Fri, 17th July Cardiff 26°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

Opinion

Plaid Cymru’s strategic dilemma

By Mark Mansfield
Plaid Cymru Leader Rhun ap Iorwerth - Image Matthew Horwood

Jonathan Edwards

Last week’s article focussed on the major strategic decision facing the Labour Party in Wales in the lead up to the Senedd election in terms of where to locate itself in relation to the wider Labour Party at UK level.

The full-frontal attack of Jeremy Miles, the Health Minister, on the UK Government’s welfare reform proposals at the weekend indicates that they will not be shy in distancing themselves from their colleagues in Westminster.

The other parties face similarly defining strategic choices, especially on the back of another poll which indicates that matters are going to be very close between Labour, Reform and Plaid Cymru next May.

This week’s Survation poll indicates the difference between the three parties is only 3% (Labour 27%, Reform 24% and Plaid Cymru 24%). While it is not easy to decipher the result in terms of actual seat numbers, we are talking about perhaps a handful of seats between the three and no one having anywhere near enough seats to govern by themselves.

[mid-content-banner]

First Minister

As this column has emphasised over the last year, the political situation gives Rhun ap Iorwerth a realistic shot of sitting in the First Minister’s chair in 13 months’ time.

The stakes are enormous for the party: they will never have a better opportunity of winning an election. The question the party will have to face in the lead up to the election is how will it configure the next government; in other words who are they going to work with?

There is nothing new in this dilemma for the party; it was the same question the party faced following the 2007 National Assembly election and every subsequent election.

Is it Plaid Cymru’s strategic aim to replace the Labour Party in Wales as the party of government or is it to act as a bulwark against the advances of the British unionist right?

If the aim is to replace Labour, then based on the likely Senedd results the party will have to work with Reform as the Tories are unlikely to get enough seats to get to a combined magic number of 49.

Plaid have form here of course: they would have been quite happy to have received the support of UKIP and the Tories following the 2016 election to elevate Leanne Wood to the fifth floor of Ty Hywel.

This would also be a strategic evolution of the tactical decision by Rhun ap Iorwerth, which has arguably worked so far, to distance his party from Labour by ending the Cooperation Agreement and the full-frontal attacks we are witnessing against the Welsh Government from the Plaid Senedd Group.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

British Nationalists

The alternative strategic path is to recognise that at this point in the political history of our nation there will soon be a very strong contingent of British nationalists who are openly hostile to Welsh political autonomy elected to the Senedd. Therefore, the overriding imperative is to protect and preserve our political institutions from what could be a very dangerous period for the devolution project.

In my time I always thought the party strategically had to keep both options open, mainly as if maximum concessions were to be gained from Labour, they had to believe Plaid would be willing to remove them from power. Once an alternative government was off the table, Labour could rest at ease.

However, a deal with the Conservatives is one thing; Reform is a completely different prospect. I would imagine that many voters of a progressive persuasion would find it impossible to vote for Plaid Cymru if there was any danger that they would allow Farragists a direct influence on Welsh Government policy.

Similarly, if Plaid aren’t serious about removing Labour from power, it risks losing a huge swathe of current supporters yearning for change in Cardiff Bay. It is for this reason that the party will try and fudge the debate over the next year, but I fear for them that this will be difficult considering continuous polls which indicate we are heading for stalemate in May 2026.

Coordination

If there is coordination between Plaid Cymru policy and political strategy we will have a good idea, while recognising that the two don’t always work in unison in modern politics. If the party offers “continuity Labour” in its policy programme, that lends itself to one strategic path. If it is offering a complete change of approach, then the alternative strategic path seems the logical one to follow.

Eluned Morgan could play a shrewd card by saying her party will not serve under a Plaid First Minister. I might be way off the mark here, but I cannot see how Labour would agree to be a junior coalition party after over a quarter of a century as top dogs, so such a statement wouldn’t be surprising. What would Rhun ap Iorwerth do in response would then be the big question.

Jonathan Edwards was the MP for Carmarthen East and Dinefwr 2010-24

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

33 comments

Gerallt Llewelyn Rhys.

Plaid's strategic plan is brilliant.

Reply
Dyfrug Caradog-Rhydderch

Plaid's strategy is to blame everyone.

Reply
Simon P. Hobson

An enjoyable and thoughtful read.

Reply
Undecided

I think a pre-election fudge is far more likely. The usual language around fighting for every vote etc. I simply cannot see Plaid doing any sort of deal with Reform - they would lose all credibility overnight. But nor can I see them “replace” Labour if the polls are broadly correct. They might win a couple more seats; but that doesn’t mean replacing. At present, it looks like a binary choice between a coalition of the Left or Right. The dangers around the likely stalemate are very real though.

Reply
SundanceKid

Plaid can aim to replace Labour at the 2030 election. It doesn't, and quite frankly won't be achieved in 2026. But Plaid can act as a bulwark against Labour and offer a strong alternative in the Senedd. Reform won't have enough seats in Wales to govern on their own next year and Labour will spout the usual, "make a deal with us to keep the other lot out". In reality, it's about keeping Labour in power for a little while longer and I sincerely hope Plaid do not fall for it.

Reply
And

Whether they can replace Labour is wholly dependent on whether they go into coalition with them. We've got a few more years of Labour rule in Westminster; and as the saying goes "Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it."

Reply
a a

So is the likely outcome an even weaker Labour minority government?

Reply
Garycymru

I genuinely don't see how they can even think about joining with reform. I know that a lot of immigrants in Wales support them, but on the whole, the genuine Welsh people seem to absolutely despise them (good to see)) Whilst I would happily support Plaid now, if they ever had any kind of relationship with the fascist liars party, I would not support them for life. Reform want Wales to continue to be plundered and stolen from as a little county of England, in much the same way as both Tory parties.

Reply
Mark

You seem to be anti-immigrant and anti-Reform, which seems a little contradictory. You might also wish to consider the fact that this article omitted another statistic from the Survation poll: Farage secured a 33% approval rating - significantly higher than ap Iorwerth, Morgan, Millar or Dodds (or the Westminster party leaders). Whatever your definition of immigrant vs 'genuine Welsh', I think you would have to concede that a lot of 'genuine Welsh' support him too. https://www.survation.com/senedd-polling-points-to-a-three-way-split/ (the leader approval ratings are hidden in the data tables linked at the bottom of the page).

Reply
Garycymru

I use the word immigrant in the non offensive manner, as in moving from one country to another. Reform use it to promote fascism, hatred and incite riots and destruction. I'm really not "anti immigrant". I am indeed anti reform as I'm afraid I believe that the allies had a very efficient way of dealing with fascists on the beaches of Normandy. Regardless of the numerous surveys, I'm afraid I will always treat reform, fascists and their supporters in the same realm as child abusers and rapists. If you support any kind of fascism, I'm afraid you're not "genuine Welsh".

Reply
Osian P

They're booming in the valleys amongst Welsh people, don't know where you get the idea that it's all English retirees pushing the country towards Reform. We have a serious problem where "the migrant crisis" is becoming the default scapegoat, even though most Welsh communities have barely any non-white British incomers in absolute terms. This is something hat has been readily encouraged by Farage and his cronies in South Wales for a decade at this point. Wales has a addiction to xenophobic excuses, and it is making it hard for people to see the real problems. That's what we need to communicate.

Reply
Ex-plaid

Plaid has not addressed its legacy member bullying problem. Good as Rhun is, but until Plaid does, the strategy does not matter.

Reply
Y Cymro

I see no dilemma. There's a simple choice to be made next May Senedd election. It's either vote Plaid Cymru or have more of the same stagnant Welsh Labour rule. See, we can either stand up and fight for our rights as a country with Rhun ap Iorwerth & Paid Cymru or choose parties like the Welsh Conservatives or Reform UK that want to use & abuse Wales, abolish our Senedd Cymru, returning us back to being vessel state of England where we are seen but not heard. Us real Welsh Nationalists want a better future for Wales not a return to the bad old days of direct rule. If 26 years Welsh Labour stagnation , 14 years of Westminster idiocracy under the English Conservatives, or the disaster what is Brexit championed by Reform UK fraudster Nigel Farage, seeing under his leadership Ukip & Brexit Party won list seats in the then Welsh Assembly and were a shambles. So it's your choice Wales. You can either choose a positive pathway forwards under Rhun ap Iorwerth & Plaid Cymru , or exit onto a roundabout of perpetual poverty favoured and weaponized by Unionists and English imperialists.

Reply
Garycymru

It's hard to believe that this still needs explaining to people, and a little worrying.

Reply
Y Cymro

It's cause & effect. The dumbing the down of Welsh society is our political Achilles heel. Social media mis & disinformation. A national broadcaster that's not representative, a paper media too. And If 26 years of Welsh Labour Senedd rule that's resulted in little change and lost opportunities , or 14 years of dictatorial Conservative & 1 year of chaotic UK Labour proxy control from London that's insulted us a people & country. With that said. If what I've said said hasn't opened our eyes to home truths, sadly we get the country & rule we deserve. Not all's lost though. There's still time. Time to send a message to Labour run Whitehall by voting in Welsh Nationalist government. If we don't will unionists we make sure we remain forever marginalised on the fringe looking on as England grows obese on the fat of our land as we starve. I reject their dystopian future.

Reply
Undecided

Yes; but the reality is that Plaid (nor anyone else) is going to win outright!

Reply
Bertie

So? Coalition governments result in better governance because it fosters collaboration and compromise, and punishes narrow ideology and self-interest.

Reply

In reply to Bertie

Undecided

Really? Confused Plaid and stagnant Labour (again) or perhaps an assortment of right wing loons? Dim Diolch. Coalitions result in lowest common denominator policies which is not what Wales needs at all.

Reply

In reply to Undecided

Gerallt Llewelyn Rhys.

Ok but what's your diolch don't tell me Plaid and Labour again. Same old.

Reply

In reply to Gerallt Llewelyn Rhys.

Undecided

No - increasingly short term deadlock may have a silver lining. The current model of devolution has failed. A little bit of paralysis might bring something better.

Reply

In reply to Undecided

Bertie

If you're pinning your hopes on an NI style deadlock that results in Westminster taking back control be aware they (Westminster) left Northern Ireland with the worst public services in the UK and on the brink of collapse despite NI having the highest per capita funding. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/apr/07/northern-ireland-public-services-at-risk-of-collapse-report

Reply

In reply to Undecided

Bertie

That's what happens everywhere else in life so why not politics. Try organising an event with friends someplace that the majority don't want to go.

Reply
SundanceKid

I don't see how Plaid can ally themselves with Reform or Labour. Maybe it's wishful thinking on Labour's part that Plaid will bail them out to keep them in power a bit longer but that isn't going to happen and Plaid would be foolhardy to even consider it. Even if Reform get most seats next year, they won't be able to form a government. I'm not even sure the Conservatives under Miller would work with them. They can shout about it but without a clear majority, they won't be able to dismantle Welsh devolution. Likelihood is that Labour will have to govern alone but Plaid will need to step and prove that they can offer a strong alternative to Labour in Wales. Even if it's Plaid's intention to replace Labour, it does not mean they can only achieve that in 2026. They can play the long game like the SNP and Sinn Feinn did. It is a risk but it's frankly the only way that Plaid has a shot of becoming the alternative to Labour on the left and centre-left. Hopefully by then, some of the "shine" might have come off Reform.

Reply
Wms

Whilst there is a case for some additional Senedd members, doing so by 40% is simply folly, this should have been done in small increments. Because of this “shock” combined with all the other societal shocks, learning about DOGE in the US, and not being able to see the doctor, but feeling potholes, not being able to vote for the individual (some like people more than parties) etc etc - Senedd 2026 is likely to attract a huge protest vote.

Reply
a a

I think 96 is too many but 86 is fine.

Reply
Jeff

I agree, terrible, and even insensitive timing going into austerity mk ii. I feel it plays into hands of reform and those on the right.

Reply
John Ellis

'Senedd 2026 is likely to attract a huge protest vote.' Since no Senedd election has yet achieved the participation of 50% of the electorate, 'huge' might be a type of progress!

Reply

In reply to John Ellis

hdavies15

Agitating the non participating c.50% into action is a double edged sword. I've preached for years that any useful political party would see that slumbering 50% as a group to be addressed with plans, policies, facts, figures. No one has thus far. So now we have the alternative " agitation" that might work for Reform as it did over the Brexit vote. Ironic that wakening the sleepers just when there's a dodgy electoral system could present Reform with the scope to influence and/or interfere.

Reply

In reply to hdavies15

John Ellis

You make a rather depressingly credible point.

Reply
Bertie

Is democracy something to be embarrassed about?

Reply
Merch o Wynedd

I agree with ex Plaid statement - Prosiect Pawb has not been addressed. This misogyny stretches to the WRU and South Wales Fire Service that we know of and can prove. I conclude that Cymru is a misogynistic country. To illustrate further the Plaid mantra - trans women are women and trans men are men is further proof. The Democrats in USA lost partly because of their stance on trans issues. We've had several court cases in Britain - and currently in Scotland- to uphold the Equality Act 2010 that includes sex as a protected characteristic not gender and confirms women's single sex spaces as exactly that. Single sex not gender. I won't vote for Plaid because of this and they ignore this issue at their peril. Women (and some men) are angry enough and we won't be ignored.

Reply
Llew Gruffudd

I am surprised that Jonathon, with all his experience of Plaid, can find any connection between Plaid Cymru and strategy. They have bumbled along throughout devolution, without any apparent sense of purpose. Sometimes a party prepared to take a minor role, but mostly a party of protest. Blame Westminster, blame the Welsh government, without giving a clue as to how they would do things differently, better. The last Senedd election was a true indication of their strategy prowess. Welsh Labour was expected to lose considerable ground. They didn't. Plaid was expected to make significant gains. They didn't. With the Welsh public still confused and reeling from Covid, they produced a 131 page manifesto that promised everything, but not how it was to be achieved. Everything that is except Independence. You had to wait until the last paragraphs for that and then the usual ' when the time is right '. What happened to the architect of that disastrous campaign. Plaid made him CEO. Not for long though, Plaid doesn't seem to have much luck with CEOs. The real dilemma for Plaid will come if they fail to dominate in 2026. There will never be a better time, with Welsh Labour and the Torys tanking, surely the Party of Wales must do better than running neck and neck with a right wing, Reform party that has no coherent policies. If not their dilemma is not who will they work with but how do they remain relevant in Welsh politics

Reply
Brychan

Have no problem with putting some Tory Mandi Maldwyn in charge of museums as long as Plaid Cymru get to run the important stuff. Any reform wreckers can then have bun fights with Labour leftovers in the corridor.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Gerallt Llewelyn Rhys. Cancel

Ok but what's your diolch don't tell me Plaid and Labour again. Same old.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.