Tue, 21st July Cardiff 20°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

Opinion

If Starmer doesn't change his tune on Europe, he'll facilitate the rise to power of the far right

By Mark Mansfield
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaks during a press conference after his first Cabinet meeting at 10 Downing Street. Photo Claudia Greco/PA Wire

Martin Shipton

The seeds of complacency about the general election result are already being sown within Welsh Labour.

It’s a highly dangerous path to take.

Cardiff council leader Huw Thomas posted a message on social media that encapsulated the problem. Addressing Stewart Owadally, Welsh Labour’s general election campaign manager, he wrote: “Congratulations Stewart, and the whole @WelshLabour staff team for all your incredible hard work behind the scenes, helping to secure the most dominant Labour victory in Wales for a generation.”

Cllr Thomas’ triumphalism was typical of what’s been on display from Welsh Labour activists on the right of the party.

Yet while Labour won 27 of the 32 seats in Wales, their vote here was actually down to 37.0%, 3.9 percentage points lower than at the last election in 2019, when Jeremy Corbyn was the party leader.

Disastrous

Paradoxically, that election performance has often been described as Labour’s most disastrous since 1935.

To make a more local point, the number of votes cast for Labour last Thursday in Cllr Thomas’ home city of Cardiff was down from 107,016 in 2019 to 70,602 in 2024.

Former Bridgend Labour council leader Jeff Jones, who did the calculations, said: “And what about Caerfyrddin [a Labour target seat that was won comfortably by Plaid Cymru]? Labour held an eve-of-poll rally attended by Starmer. A seat the party clearly wanted and expected to win. In 2019 Labour got 13,380 votes and in 2024, 10,985.

“There is a clear pattern in Wales of thousands who voted Labour in 2019, when the party was led by the devil incarnate Jeremy Corbyn, not voting Labour in 2024 when it was led by ‘Mr Sensible’ Keir Starmer.

“How about Newport, where Labour wards were added to the city’s constituencies so it could keep two seats? 2019: 42,324 votes; 2024: 33,779 votes.”

Worrying

One part of the explanation relates to the worrying fall in turnout across Wales. At the general elections in 2017 and 2019, the voter turnout was roughly equivalent in Wales to that of the UK as a whole (69% in 2017 and 67% in 2019).

But last Thursday turnout slumped to 56% in Wales, four percentage points behind the UK as a whole.

That only three of Labour’s 27 successful candidates in Wales got more than 20,000 votes - Tonia Antoniazzi in Gower, Catherine Fookes in Monmouthshire and Anna McMorrin in Cardiff North - should also be taken as a warning, especially when compared to the mammoth vote totals achieved by Labour in Valleys seats in years gone by.

Even the voting figures in Keir Starmer’s own London seat of Holborn and St Pancras tell a story.

In 2015, when he was first elected and Ed Miliband was the Labour leader, 29,062 people voted for him. In 2017, when Jeremy Corbyn was leader, his vote rocketed to 41,343.

In 2019, Sir Keir’s vote dropped back to 36,641. But last Thursday, when Starmer won his landslide victory, his vote collapsed to 18,884.

Another factor that should worry Cllr Thomas is that across Wales, Reform UK was second in 13 seats, coming closest in Llanelli, where Labour’s Dame Nia Griffith was just 1,504 ahead of the Reform candidate.

Far right

To understand why Reform came so close in Llanelli, I spoke to local Labour councillor Shaun Greaney, who told me: “It’s worrying to see the creeping rise of the far right in working class areas, where diatribes about refugees and small boats have gained traction. They have latched onto local issues like the now abandoned plan to turn the four-star Stradey Park Hotel into a hostel for asylum seekers.

Protesters' banners outside Stradey Park Hotel in Furnace, Llanelli to oppose the housing of asylum seekers in the venue. Photo Bronwen Weatherby/PA Wire

Despite the best efforts of the Labour Party locally, misinformation has been spread that Nia Griffith was supportive of the Home Office’s plan to turn the hotel into a dumping ground for refugees. The truth is that Nia, who has been the MP for Llanelli since 2005, went to the Home Office to oppose the plan and urge a rethink, which was exactly what happened.”

In a place like Llanelli, which has seen a reduction in well-paid job opportunities, a significant decline in the vibrancy of the town centre thanks to foolish planning decisions that have allowed the construction of out-of-town shopping centres, and a noticeable rise in visible drug taking, fresh initiatives are needed to chart a new course. In that respect Llanelli is a microcosm of many similar communities across Wales and the UK as a whole.

We have a right to expect that after years of dysfunctional Tory government, Starmer’s administration will take decisions that will improve people’s lives. Like every newly elected Prime Minister in recent decades, Starmer made a speech in Downing Street in which he sought to start his premiership on a high-minded note. Margaret Thatcher quoted St Francis of Assisi saying, “Where there is despair, may we bring hope”. Many, not least in Wales, would argue that she did exactly the opposite.

Starmer struck the right note by stating that his government would rebuild hope and opportunity in the UK "brick-by-brick" and show people that "politics can be a force for good”.

Nigel Farage

We must hope that he fulfils his promise without delay. The alternative would, without doubt, see Britain vulnerable to a takeover at the next election in 2029 by the populist far right. Nigel Farage has made it clear that the important general election from his point of view is not the one we’ve just had, but the one due in five years’ time.

He’s succeeded in the first part of his plan by maximising the Tories’ seat losses through standing candidates in virtually every British constituency and splitting the right-wing vote.

For the next five years he will behave as if he is the official Leader of the Opposition, constantly harrying Starmer and his ministers about everything that goes wrong and hoping to sweep to an unlikely victory in 2029.

Several reports from respected think tanks including Cardiff University’s Wales Governance Centre have been written analysing the new Labour government’s spending plans. All of them reached the conclusion that, despite assertions to the contrary from new Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the kind of austerity policies we have depressingly got used to under the Tories are likely to continue.

A day or two before the election Starmer himself gave an interview in which he made it clear that he didn’t expect the UK to return to membership of the EU in his lifetime. Nor does he expect us to rejoin the European single market or the customs union.

It’s a shame he didn’t make that clear earlier in the election campaign or we could have had a debate about Brexit, which both Labour and the Tories were desperate to avoid. Instead, Starmer has doubled down on the foolish decision to support a Brexit which he and every other sensible politician knows is disastrous for Britain and makes it immensely more difficult to achieve the growth we need to raise prosperity levels for ordinary people.

That’s despite consistent polling evidence that a clear majority of voters now accept that leaving the EU was a mistake and is doing economic harm.

There’s a huge irony in Starmer’s position. By kowtowing to Farage and refusing to contemplate the reversal of Brexit, he’s making it more likely that the populist far right will come to power.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

31 comments

John Powers

There's an interesting dilemma brewing with Reform, aka the Brexit party, demanding a fairer voting system, which was unfortunately rejected in a 2011 referendum. To change the voting system Reform would have to accept that the 2011 result can be revisited which opens the door to revisiting the 2016 result.

Reply
John Ellis

Worth remembering that the choice back in 2011 wasn't between 'first past the post' and PR, because Cameron's Conservatives refused to agree to that. It was between FPTP and the 'alternative vote', which very few advocates of a change to our voting system supported. And, foolishly, Clegg's Lib Dems in coalition accepted that Tory demand. They should have rejected it outright.

Reply
John Powers

PR isn't a voting system: https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/voting-systems/types-of-voting-system/

Reply

In reply to John Powers

John Ellis

True, in that it comes in various shapes and forms. But nonetheless they share a 'family likeness' which is recognizable.

Reply

In reply to John Ellis

John Powers

The only system offering proper PR is the party list system which people hate because it feels like like an anti-Democratic stitchup. Look at the response to Welsh Labour choosing this system for 2026. So when people demand PR as a cure all they need to be clear what they're asking for. The most proportional system that still feels democratic is STV. And back to the point. Was 2011 a rejection of change or a rejection of AV. We simply don't know because the question didn't ask. Just as 2016 didn't ask if we should cut all ties with the continent or just stop sending MEPs to Brussels.

Reply

In reply to John Powers

John Ellis

Personally I prefer STV. It normally involves larger constituencies than those to which we've been accustomed; but the effect of that is ameliorated if there are two elected members per constituency, who of course might not, if voters so choose, be from the same political party. That maintains the personal link between elected members and constituents which sadly looks set to be lost under the closed list system under which the next Senedd election will be contested. As to the referendum in 2011, there's no real way of knowing whether it failed to achieve change because most participants wanted to retain the status quo or because too many of those who favoured change thought AV was undesirable. The choice on offer was simply and starkly between retaining FPTP or opting for AV. I recall joining in an on-line debate at the time in which participants discussed whether to support AV or to vote against change because opting for AV would simply replace one unrepresentative system with another. In that debate, almost all the contributors eager to move away from FPTP seemed set on voting against the change because they believed that AV would offer insufficient improvement on the existing voting system. So I wasn't too surprised when the vote went against the change that was being offered. Acceptance of that very narrow choice of alternatives was the first - at least that I noticed - of what seemed to me to be a number of inexplicably eccentric and imprudent choices which the Lib Dems made during the course of their coalition agreement with the Conservatives.

Reply
Ernie The Smallholder

Clegg should have demanded 'The Single Transferable Vote'. If the Tories refused - Then the Lib Dems should .have left the coalition as a breach of trust and tabled a No Confidence Vote' and forced the Tories out of office.

Reply

In reply to Ernie The Smallholder

John Ellis

I certainly think that the Lib Dems should never have acquiesced to a referendum choice wholly confined to choosing between FPTP and AV. But the hard fact back then was that the Conservatives, as the leading partner in the coalition, were in a position to dictate terms, and they would simply have refused to accept putting PR using STV to a popular vote. I'd been living in England for quite a long time by 2011, and the effectiveness and responsiveness of local Lib Dem 'pavement politics' had led me to join the party and, increasingly over time, to become an activist. My view back then was that the Lib Dems should have bluntly told the Tories that they'd only entered coalition in order to ensure, as far as possible, that in the aftermath of the banking crash international investors would be reassured that the UK had a stable government; that AV was absolutely not an option that they were prepared to offer, and that in the context of that time voting reform, especially on those terms, wasn't a priority for them. Had they done that, at least they'd have maintained some political integrity. But they didn't do that. The party's decision to go with the Tory agenda on electoral reform was the first of several decisions which gradually disillusioned me, and when my membership came up for renewal early in 2013 I abandoned the Lib Dems.

Reply
SundanceKid

The writing is on the wall. If the current trajectory continues, Labour will start haemorraghing votes from the right of their party to Reform. In one respect, they are the authors of their own demise, in refusing to see what is staring back at them and in taking the electorate for granted, as they most certainly have done in Wales. It could be due to fatigue too. They have presided over a failing, economy, health and education service in Wales after 25 years in government. And when one of their own faces a vote of no confidence, they rally behind him, shamelessly putting party before country. Is there truly any wonder that people feel dissillusioned? And is Labour really the answer seeing as they have been judged to have "failed" Wales? Just as we are experiencing a revolution on the right, we urgently need one on the left. I hope the election results have also given Plaid pause for thought as the future is grim if not. They need to find a way to stand up to the plate and do so quickly.

Reply
Jones

Plaid need to appeal to those who voted reform. Ignore them at your peril. They are the people who need courting as they are Lab voters. With an ever increasing younger cohort supporting them. they are the real danger. 'We want our country back ' turned on its head but with a positive spin not the nastiness of the nazty party

Reply
John Powers

Reform is a protest party. You can't govern as a protest party. But you're right not to ignore the protest, which boils down to a lack of hope in the future and a fear it's getting worse. The root cause is economic. Improve everyone's wealth and opportunity and they don't look for people to blame for a lack of wealth and opportunity.

Reply
Alan Jones

Absolutely agree Sundancekid, if Starmer & his party do turn round & surprise us all by turning things around by making lives better/easier for all those who have suffered the most over the last 14 years, then the natives who are restless for change might, just might settle back into getting on with their lives without the constant nagging worries that plague them & turn back from the likes of farage & his myopic lying grab at the power he craves & give Labour a second term to hopefully improve things further. I live more in hope rather than expectation that this will be the case for all our sakes. Failing all this then yes, it's absolutely about time that Plaid upped their game & provided that "alternative" to the Westminster status quo which so many people have alluded to. While Plaid need to push their policies at every & any opportunity they also need to call out the failings of not only Labour & Tory ideologies but specifically hammer away & persuade the more disaffected among the general public of the limited, vile, poisonous ideologues of reform. Constantly inform people of farage's aims of completely doing away with the concept of an NHS that's free at the point of use & making it an insurance based scheme as in the US of A, the land of milk & honey in the twisted mind of farage & his acolytes. Remind people again day in & day out that their idea of lower taxes or a tax threshold of £20,000pa means no welfare safety net for those most in need or, indeed, service provision that makes daily living more bearable. Make changing Reforms narrative from just immigration & boat people to highlight their other regressive policies a top priority from today, right now, to really get the message through that if a political alternative is needed then it's here, right here on your doorstep. You don't need to vote for anymore already rich people in the East of England who align themselves with another simple minded rich person & far right ideologues in america. It's time to stop hiding in the shadows for Plaid & really put themselves out their with regard to Reform who have already put themselves out there as a ready made punch bag, well, for Christ sakes, punch it & keep punching it until it breaks then step in and show EVERYONE you have what it takes & not just people such as myself who vote for you even here in little & often forgotten about (especially by the London labour party) Torfaen.

Reply
Annibendod

Interesting that Martin Shipton brings up Llanelli. I compared the 2019 and latest results. The combined Tory and Brexit Party result then is pretty much the same as the combined Reform/Tory vote of a few days ago. Labour's vote in Llanelli for the most part was lost to Plaid, the Lib Dems and Greens, all of whom posted increased tallies. Indeed, Plaid were a very close third. Llanelli is now very much a marginal seat and very winnable for Plaid Cymru.

Reply
j91968

Winnable when? In five years minus three days? I admire your comfortable assumption that Plaid is certain to grow and also learns how to capture the imaginations of the young, possibly adding two more seats every five years, and that you will still be alive to see it. The future that far ahead is unknowable, but if you insist on living in it, you'll miss your one an only terrestrial existence now. I do hope you have a few other outlets, interests and hobbies apart from typing on here to sustain you while you wait.

Reply
Johnny Gamble

Do you have any outlets, interests and hobbies besides typing on here?

Reply
Jeff

farages handlers smell blood, it wont be Labour's problem only and Europe wont assuage that professional muck spreader, Farage. Don't vote for them but don't vote for them either seemed to work but not in the way the far right think tanks thought. Seeing as we drew a lot of votes for brexit in Wales (not overly fond of that thinking) but it seems the underlying trope can be worked by this grifter friend of Trump. Seems people will peg their noses to the overt nature of reform and be like the people reading "gentlemen's" publications in the 70's, "I read them for the articles" At least farage will now have to declare interests and will be in hansard, I don't think he will get the ride he expects in parliament.

Reply
S Duggan

Plaid has to spread it's appeal from its heartlands otherwise Reform will take disgruntled Labour voters in 2026. We can fear the decline in Labour's vote percentage but really it's an opportunity for Plaid and possibly the first stage towards an independent Cymru.

Reply
Adrian Bamford

Classic misuse of the term ‘far right’. Presumably not everyone’s heard of Hitler.

Reply
Jeff

H provides a handy if disgusting measuring stick. The shoe fits.

Reply
j91968

At last, a witticism.

Reply
Adrian

No - only the left think that.

Reply
Neilyn

A 'points-based system' for Welsh residency (never mind citizenship at this stage) based upon the actual NEEDS of our country and her communities seems to me to be a sensible, pragmatic way for the future. That includes movement from within the existing UK state as well as without, so can apply across the board in all four nations. A hard sell I know, but what other way is there to chop the hard right off at the neck? The arrival of more and more retirees or unskilled migrants (not all are, of course) to Wales is of no use to us whatsoever. It just weakens us. Plaid must strengthen it's narrative of independence to dovetail with the 'taking back control' narrative of the Faragists.

Reply
j91968

Perhaps you could just invite back all your Welsh-born graduates who have had to move away somewhere else in the UK to have a decent career.

Reply
Neilyn

Excellent idea!

Reply

In reply to Neilyn

j91968

They might have got used to other ways, made lots of friends, fallen in love, had children. You know, settled elsewhere. Your would need to offer two jobs/careers for the adults, education for the kids, maybe they'll bring a dreaded "retiree" or two with them who help mind the grandchildren while the parents work. Healthcare and housing for three generations, and a warm welcome to them all. You think your narrow-minded xenophobic little immigration scheme is up to that?

Reply
j91968

Precisely. I think Neilyn's immigration policy for a fully independent Wales needs a bit more work. Can't tell people born here or with parents born here they can't come back even if they are yet more "retirees or unskilled migrants" and therefore unwanted.

Reply
Johnny Gamble

At last someone has chosen to mention inward migration from the other side of Clawdd Offa.You only have to look and see what the social, economical and cultural impact has been on over tourism for rural Cymru. Whenever anyone wants to debate this they are as good as silenced. Far smaller places than Cymru can impose immigration controls e.g The Channel Islands and The Falkland Islands. As you quite rightly said inward migration should be based on locality and community needs and certainty not the relocation of anti social individuals from other parts of the UK.

Reply
Neilyn

Let's not be silent, or be silenced. If the Great Nation of England / GB / UK can debate and voice it's concerns regarding unrestricted migration, legal and illegal, then the Great Nation of Wales can do likewise. We'd be foolish in the extreme not to do so.

Reply

In reply to Neilyn

j91968

Take more water with it, or a little more tobacco maybe...nobody ever silences anybody these days in the UK. How ever much we wish we could. The amount of blether is growing exponentially. And the quality of public discourse dwindles away to dribble as a result.

Reply
Richard Thomas

The Channel Islands don't impose immigration controls, they merely restrict who can buy housing (except for Alderney and Sark which have open markets). Anyone can move to Jersey or Guernsey and rent a home, only people meeting the criteria can buy one. The astronomically high rents then limit who wants to live there.

Reply
Richard

What's all this far right nonsense?

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Jeff Cancel

farages handlers smell blood, it wont be Labour's problem only and Europe wont assuage that professional muck spreader, Farage. Don't vote for them but don't vote for them either seemed to work but not in the way the far right think tank...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.