Thu, 23rd July Cardiff 21°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

Opinion

YesCymru needs reform - but members should vote against the new proposals at the EGM

By NationCymru
Picture by Ifan Morgan Jones / Llinos Dafydd. (CC BY 2.0)

Dyfrig Jones

Back in October 2018, Iwan Rhys published an article here, on Nation.Cymru, urging the members of YesCymru (YC) to attend that year’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) to vote down proposed amendments to the organisation’s constitution. Then, Iwan argued that YC had experienced a successful year, but needed to make sure that it didn’t take a wrong turn.

Little over three years later, YesCymru has grown to be a mass movement, its membership rivalling that of the Labour Party in Wales. Yet while it has grown almost beyond recognition, few would argue that 2021 has been a successful year for YesCymru. It has been riven by infighting, bullying and bitter division – and it is now on the verge of taking another very serious wrong turn that could have long-term implications for the cause of Welsh independence.

On Saturday the 11th, an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of YesCymru will be held online to decide on the future shape of the movement. All members have been invited to attend, and to vote on a proposal that has been drawn up by a small group of members – the Gweithgor – who have been working on reforming the YC constitution since August. If you are a member of YesCymru, I urge you to read on, to register as a delegate for this EGM, and to vote against the Gweithgor’s proposal.

Until early October I was a member of the Gweithgor, appointed as a delegate by my local group, YesBethesda. Mid-way through the process of drafting the new constitution I resigned in protest at what I considered to be an opaque and unaccountable decision-making process.

Having been, at least partially, involved in drawing up the Gweithgor’s proposal, I have some insight into what is being put to the members at the EGM. Parts of the Gweithgor’s proposal is valuable and has the potential to change YesCymru for the better. But as they stand these reforms are still at an early, half-formed stage, and not ready to be put into practice. More worryingly, they also involve unpicking important aspects of the existing constitution that are progressive and left-leaning in nature.

[mid-content-banner]

Democratic

To give the Gweithgor its dues, the proposal contains two important recommendations about how to improve the organisation. First, it asks the members to approve a change in YesCymru’s structure, moving from being an unincorporated association to becoming a (non-profit) Company Limited by Guarantee (CLG). This would provide YC with a legal and regulatory framework that will help guard its members interests, while also limiting the liability of those elected to its executive – which I welcome and support.

More importantly, perhaps, the proposal would – if enacted – eventually eliminate the National Committee from YC’s structures. Much of the blame for the crisis of the past few months can be laid at the door of the National Committee, an unelected and wholly unrepresentative assembly of delegates from YesCymru’s “Groups” (or local branches).

Despite the fact that the National Committee has little in the way of democratic legitimacy, it wields exactly the same powers as the Central Committee, YesCymru’s elected executive. This past Summer the National Committee decided to use those powers to overturn the results of a perfectly fair election, by means of an entirely unconstitutional vote of no confidence. YesCymru will take a major step towards becoming a properly functioning democratic organisation by the removal of the National Committee.

Diversity

Yet, despite these positive reforms, I vehemently oppose the Gweithgor’s proposal because of a number of other provisions that it includes. Most problematically, it undoes a vitally important recent reform to the YesCymru constitution. Currently 50% of the members of the Central Committee – YesCymru’s Executive – must be female or non-binary, and at least one member must be from a Black or Minority Ethnic (BAME) background.

The Gweithgor’s proposal would replace the Central Committee with an elected board of executive directors, but there is no mechanism in their proposal to ensure equal gender representation, or any BAME representation. The Gweithgor may well argue that this is an accidental oversight, and this may well be true – but it is the kind of accident that only seems to occur when decision-making bodies are overwhelmingly male and white, as the Gweithgor happens to be. Accidental or not, it is a very significant step backwards for YesCymru, and one that will serve only to undermine the diversity of the movement.

This is not the only aspect of the Gweithgor’s proposals that should cause concern to progressive members of the organisation. YesCymru has always taken great pains not to align itself with any one political party. It is, and must always be, a broad church if it wants to build sufficient support for the cause. Yet while it has always been non-partisan in a very narrow sense of the word YC has never been unideological.

The YesCymru's constitution clearly lays out the aims of the organisation: to build a new Wales that is internationalist and European, that embraces diversity and is inclusive of minorities. This is hardly a revolutionary position to take, and locates the organisation slightly left-of-centre. It is also – contrary to what some may think – not a new position; this is a vision that has been consistently articulated by YesCymru since it was established in 2015.

What the Gweithgor proposes, however, is to eliminate even this very mild centre-leftism from YC’s constitution in favour of a vague pursuit of independence for independence’s sake, nothing more. On the face of it, this may seem innocuous; a simple attempt to broaden the appeal of the movement to a greater range of political supporters.

But consider for a moment what is being removed from the current constitution – any reference to internationalism, to Europe, to inclusivity, to race, religion, ethnicity and gender. What is it about these things, specifically, that mean that they should no longer be part of our collective vision for the movement? Who exactly would we be appealing to by eliminating any reference to these things, and who are we turning away?

New nation

There are plenty of other lesser reasons to object to the Gweithgor’s proposal, too numerous and arcane to explore in detail here. The new structure of the organisation is Byzantine, far too convoluted and with poor lines of accountability – take a look at the proposed new organisational chart, and ask yourself how it could be expected to function?

There is also a total lack of clarity as to how the new proposed structures will be put into practice, both in the short- and medium-term. Yet members are being asked, at the EGM, to immediately suspend the powers of the Central Committee and transfer responsibility for the day-to-day running of YesCymru into the hands of an interim administration. How that is to happen – indeed who is to make up this interim administration – will only be revealed to the members once they have voted to adopt the Gweithgor’s proposal.

It is therefore, in my opinion, absolutely imperative that the Gweithgor’s proposal is voted down. If their recommendations are rejected by the members, then this will allow YesCymru to move forward to elect a new Central Committee under the current constitution, and set the organisation back on its feet. A newly-elected Central Committee could then engage in an open and transparent discussion of how to reform the organisation, involving the entire membership instead of a small, secretive group of unelected members.

This would allow us to finally close the door on this unedifying episode in YesCymru’s story, and move forward to build a new organisation, and a new nation, that represents the best of Wales.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

55 comments

Dai Rob

FFS here we go........Utter nonsense and I would urge everyone to ignore him!

Reply
j humphrys

YES , and let's get on with building CYMRU..................Tempus Fugit!

Reply
Prys Lewis

As one of many who were disenfranchised by the chosen mechanism of the last election which saw the Central Committee elected by a tiny proportion of the membership, the portrayal of said election as a "perfectly fair election" is perplexing and concerning.

Reply
Philip Jones

The barefaced hypocrisy of the writer is breathtaking. I served on the YesCymru Gweithgor and endured his irrelevant nitpicking feeling relief when he threw his toys out of the pram. His idea of the golden age of the old Central Committee who combined to drive out members who disagreed with them on anything is pure nostalgic fantasy. The proposed reform will enable YesCymru to develop. It will be a new start and will change and improve as circumstances change. I would ask YesCymru members to reject this bitterness and go forward with a new constitution into 2022 and beyond.

Reply
Richard Jenkins

As the father of 6 daughters & anxious that the rights of non binary people are respected, I ask all YC members to consider, why should the ‘inclusivity rule’ be brought in at the expense of women? Why is it 50% of CC members must be FEMALE or NON BINARY? Why doesn’t it say ‘MALE or NON BINARY. Why are females losing out on their hard won equality? I think this is very revealing of the controlling chauvinist mindset of the old CC. This & many other examples of the arrogant & misguided ethos of the former CC is a good example of why we are where we are? We desperately need to move forward with this new constitution & I beg all YC members to support the motion. Let’s get on with working for Indy!

Reply
Quornby

Gender equality is another issue entirely...... Yes Cymru exists to seek Indy for all of us, not for the pursuit of personal gender identity hang ups or anything else that damages our cause.

Reply
Dr John Ball

I entirely concur with the other comments - ignore this rant for the good old days. Read this article very carefully and his ideas are aimed at making YC a dumbed down left wing pseudo political party. He is concerned that the past ."progressive and left leaning" former organisation will cease to exist. It was this one sided view that caused the problems in the first place. He also bemoans the removal of gender equality and BAME commitments. Such inclusiveness is of course to be welcomed but written in stone commitments to 50% of the C C presents all kinds of problems . His concern for the removal of ethnicity et al and "vague" pursuit of independence shows his true colours. YC is abroad church with all and many different views of our nation's future and we must NOT -as this writer suggests - tie ourselves down to any left/right political dogma. By all means keep the exiting Central Committee, its dogma and in fighting - and destroy Yes Cymru. Is that the plan?

Reply
Richard

On the mark as usual John 👍🏼

Reply
Gaynor

ALL MEMBERS can watch these meetings online by request from Yes Cymru HQ They will show you people from opposite sides of the political tracks putting their differences and egos aside and cooperating for the good of the organisation. All bar some. You can then judge for yourselves. Thanks Nation Cymru for stirring up a hornets nest, just as people representing groups from all over Wales have finished working together despite their differences on a solution to safeguard the organisation and refocus on Independence ONLY. What did you do? Let us all thank the Gweithgor who represented the members for their hard work, un paid, unrecognised in their spare time. Unfortunately the Gweithgor cannot make statements, respond or write opinion pieces in Nation Cymru, as it is not in it's remit to do so. So it cannot respond. Timing is everything. If you want the truth watch the recordings.

Reply
Leigh Richards

It's been a disastrous year for yes cymru - with internal rows, resignations and suspensions bringing the organisation to the brink of collapse. As i understand it the new constitution will enable YC to get back on its feet and resume doing what it was created for and which it used to do so well - campaigning for independence for Wales! Incidentally like dyfrig im firmly on the left of the political spectrum - but i dont expect everyone else in YC to share my socialist beliefs. Ive always believed that YC needs to be a broad church if its to maximise support for welsh independence - indeed it was that 'big tent' approach to independence that enabled Yes Cymru to enjoy its phenomenal growth in recent times. The only beneficiaries of the recent paralysis which has gripped Yes Cymru are the unionists and the british state so vote yes on December 11th to the new constitution so that YC can move on and get back to doing what it was created for - campaigning for an independent Wales!

Reply
Dr John Ball

Well said Leigh! You and I have in many ways fundamentally different political views yet we worked hard together to deliver a "yes" in 1997 - and will do so again! That's the message; work together!

Reply
Leigh Richards

Was pleasure to work with people like yourself in '97 John to deliver that referendum result which was so crucial to Wales' survival as a nation. And yes while we may differ ideologically what unites people like us - and clearly many others commenting here - is that we can set aside those ideological differences to do what's best for Wales. Indeed history shows us that the most successful independence movements have done exactly that....and Yes Cymru must do the same.

Reply
Dewi Davies

What gives these people the right to demand 50% representation on the committee?I have no issue or problem with anything they represent but Yes Cymru only goal is independence and nothing else matters so only the best people who are fully committed should sit on committee irrespective of of they're sexual preferences etc.Could be a Martian as far as I'm concerned. One of the first things the old CC did straight after they were elected was form a transformation sub committee?To transform who?I'll leave it you to guess the make up of that committee. I didn't have the opportunity to vote last time and I dont know anyone who did but I will be voting this and it will be a vote for.

Reply
arthur owen

When someone says 'could be a Martian for all I care'you know that the are advocates of the status quo.

Reply
Keith Evans

Not really,but hey ho it's an opinion.

Reply
John

So you weren't against a small secretive group when you were involved, but now you aren't you think its not fair. One rule for you another for me, Dyfrig!

Reply
Pob lwc

The clowns are assembling, the circus has returned!

Reply
Arwyn

I can't go along with this. There are some fair points but much of what Dyfrig says is a matter of opinion. Yes, this year has been a sorry episode in YesCymru's short history. I've been disgusted by the behaviour of many members. I've been blocked by some members, heavens knows why. I deplore the public villification of individuals, this trial by social media that has occurred. I've seen evidence of those claiming to be bullied being bullies themselves. I've seen evidence of the most immature behaviour amongst those we entrusted the leadership of the movement. It's time for that to stop. Dyfrig is not helping in that regard. If YesCymru cannot be freed of public infighting then it cannot be a force for good in the cause of independence. In those circumstances it should cease to be. I'm glad that the emphasis in the new constitution is on independence. This is what YesCymru should be. A campaign group for Welsh Statehood. Having read the new constitution, it is at pains to declare itself inclusive of all moderate political hues, of those with protected characteristics, and of the need to act respectfully online and in public as a member. The emphasis on conflict avoidance is strong. Good. There were many that sought it this year - let it be on their own consciences. I don't agree that it is YesCymru's role to be the progressive voice for independence. I never did. I just wanted it to be a straightforward campaign group that could be a shop window for moderates to present the case for a Welsh Nation State. I'm a member of Plaid Cymru because I am both liberal and progressive in my political views and support independence. I suggest that those who are like minded do the same. It's time people stopped trying to make different things vehicles for the intricacies of their personal politics. There are other avenues where one can campaign. Keep YesCymru simple. Keep it free from infighting. Or else wind it up lest it become a hinderance to our movement.

Reply
Geoff Evans

Geiriau call Arwyn!

Reply
Cai Wogan Jones

I am reminded of a wonderful book written by the distinguished Irish historian, Diarmaid Ferriter, charting the progress of Ireland's national movement during the years from 1913. The title of the book is "A Nation Not a Rabble". I fear this is a stage from which our national movement has yet to emerge.

Reply
Greg Walton

I am left-of-centre and Internationalist myself but I think YesCymru should focus on independence and leave the questions of how an independent Wales should position itself to the people of that independent Wales. The new Cymru should be a democracy for all its inhabitants. It should not be predetermined by anyone who does not represent us all

Reply
Cai Wogan Jones

"Independence for independence's sake" ??? Surely, the purpose of independence is to enable the big issues (be they social, ethical, or whatever) to be debated in a tolerant and democratic context, so that that policy positions can be determined by our OWN electorate and elected representatives. Not by Boris Johnson and his successors. We will, however, never achieve independence until we can accept that we are a nation of diverse opinions. Conditioning independence on preordained policy positions is therefore utterly self-defeating.

Reply
Hannergylch

This article makes YesCymru look like a forum for student politics.

Reply
Dai

And here was me thinking it was the sound of rain on the window instead of all the toys being thrown out of his pram. A last attempt at relevance, which from what I'm seeing so far is having the opposite affect of what the author intended.

Reply
Y Cymro

United we stand, divided we fall. We need to stop this bickering now and focus on three fronts. Defending Wales from our Welsh Tory quislings who want to undermine our Senedd Cymru democracy in Cardiff bay. Fight Boris Johnson's idiocracy in London attacks on devolution. Plus continue the goal of Welsh independence our priority. At the moment we are playing into their grubby hands. #YesCymru 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿. #Ymlaen 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

Reply
j humphrys

No one bickering here, just the muffled sound of Dyfrig being trampled underfoot.........

Reply
JonathanEdwards

Why do I, a lifelong nationalist, still feel YC would cancel me if I joined? YC has the "..aim of gaining independence for Wales in order to improve the way the country is governed." Yep, that's it. But "YesCymru believes...in an inclusive citizenship, which embraces the fact that all who choose to make Wales their home – regardless of age,..belief, sex.. are full citizens of the new Wales." Prove it, YC. I am white, male, past 50 and my beliefs include being non-woke, and being critical of us Welsh for not putting our economy/revenue deficit higher than most priorities, and for not working out the legal/statecraft route to Indy, which has to be via Dominion Status, like the rest of the UK/Commonwealth. Will someone from YC tell me I personally can indeed be a citizen of the new Wales ie a member of YC? On past form (member of Plaid Cymru 1981-2020) I will get cancelled as soon as I open my mouth.

Reply
Philip Jones

Jonathan what you mean "cancelled"? When you join you become a member of your local geographic group. It's up to you what you do after that. You can be silent as most are, or you can participate in group meetings, flags on bridges and, hopefully in the near future, rallies. Come on join us, you know it makes sense.

Reply
JonathanEdwards

OK

Reply
Keith Parry

This appears to be the same old stuff. Why is this meeting being held on the same day as Cilmeri? Real patriots will be at the Great Stone in Cilmeri to remember those who have given their lives for Wales.Not debating the agenda of Corbynista Crackpots.who took control of Yes Cymru and did nothing. No marches nor demos nothing.

Reply
Adam Phillips

Now there’s a trouble maker. “Nout but fascists” you wouldn’t know a fascist if they were putting you against the firing wall. Cilmeri is attended by historians, politicians, genuinely interested people in the story of the nation and you just threw an unfounded slur. Bravo

Reply
Keith Evans

You don't even know if the meaning of the word fascist,you and your ilk are nothing but precious fundamentalists I different than religious zelots.Tbe big difference between you and say myself is that I am willing to sit with you and still achieve independence.The usual bs argument of ,what's the point in independence if it doesn't from day one change anything, is ridiculous from day one all change would be Cymru centric ,and as a left leaning( on the whole) country most of your aims would be more achievable than under a Tory controlled Westminster.I'm to you a fash,Flag shagger,I think this purile name calling says more of you than anything I could say.

Reply
Rob

And there lies the problem. Anyone who doesn't support the agenda of the hard left must be a fascist or a racist. You would think that in a post Brexit, post Trump world they would have learnt their lesson. If we are going to make our goal of Welsh independence a reality then we have to stop polarising ourselves.

Reply
hdavies15

I would have gone to Cilmeri if I could. As for the other event I remain convinced that the freak show carries on so will give it a wide berth. And I think that in this context you are being a touch harsh on Corbyn !

Reply
Annest John

I wondered same too, whether EGM was called on Cilmeri day on purpose.... or whether date was not meaningful to powers that be. I propose we show unity in the face of discord by meeting outside Senedd at 3pm on December 11th. Dewch Gymru Hen ac Ifanc!

Reply
Mochyn 69

Gyfeillion, Mae'r CCA ddydd Sadwrn, diwrnod Cilmeri, ARLEIN a phleidleisio'n yn agor o 8 o'r gloch fore Gwener,10 Rhagfyr! Felly ma mod i chi bleidleisio a mynychu'r cyfarfod A mynd i Gilmeri. Gobeithio nad yw hyn tu hwnt i'ch dealltwriaeth. .

Reply
Keith Evans

Pleidleisio ,ie,I gymryd than?Na.Ydi hynnu o fewn eich dealltwriaeth?

Reply
Padi Phillips

The Central Committee was for me basically the problem. Elected in a way that would make advocates of the Westminster system green with envy, the CC was unrepresentative and out of control. There is no way in the world that twelve people can represent a movement the size of YC. The National Committee may well have been formed in a manner not involving a national vote, but surely members were delegates from the branches, and thus subject to instant recall should they dare to engage in the kind of antics we witnessed from the CC over the past year. It seems to me that the NC is a far more democratic approach to governance as it ensures that the grass roots remain in complete control of the organisation. Hopefully said delegates are time restricted in how long they can hold such positions, all in the interests of ensuring a ruling clique does not emerge. This is the system used by the IWW, which is an international industrial union that is obsessed with transparency, grass-roots control and democracy - no decision is made by its steering committees until such time as all members have had the chance to peruse, discuss and vote on literally everything. That sounds a bit clunky, but in practice it works, and has worked for over a century and internationally. I'm personally opposed to the movement becoming a limited company, on any grounds, as for me this would represent too much of a risk of losing democratic control to a chief executive and company board. This is in every way just as risky as investing power and control in a central committee. It would also introduce paid professionalism, which is not only costly, but involves ceding control. It's certain that YC does need to have paid employees as there is no way that volunteers can be expected to deal with, for example, the daily administration generated by an organisation the size of YC. But all supervision of that paid workforce should be by elected officials of the movement. The organisational chart linked to in the article is indeed labyrinthine, and it's difficult to see how it would work. It's immediately a fail as it isn't obvious how and where the power flows. Obviously those designing the structure are not in favour of the KISS principle (Keep It Simple Stupid). Either that or their keen to present a structure deliberately designed to confuse. If not, it might just have well been. Though I feel that the CC went way too far in it's handling of identity politics - making exactly the same mistakes as gay activists in Haringey did way back in the dark days of the 80s. Pushing this kind of stuff to the exclusion of all else when a softer, more gradual approach is needed is going to put noses out of joint, and the infantile behaviour of some over the whole issue quite simply beggared belief. However, any organisation that in the present day that doesn't commit to intersectionality needs to be scrutinised. I know that for some intersectionality is some kind of trigger, and unfortunately it's exactly the kind of antics we saw from some members of the CC that's responsible for intersectionality being widely derided. However, when one considers that the Welsh Local Government Association is an organisation that has embraced intersectionality, which, for those unfamiliar with the concept, means that no one issue can be allowed to be seen as more important as any other - issues may be more pressing, in terms of the urgency in which they are dealt with, but not more important. Thus, issues of gender identity, race, ethnicity, language etc are all equally important and deserve to be taken into consideration all at the same time. It should be clear where the former CC failed in this approach. We all need a broadly based approach to intersectionality as it almost definitely includes all of us under multiple headings. I'm minded to vote against the proposal, for one because I don't know what it is, and I'm not going to opt for a pig in a poke, and for another, I am unhappy with the notion of a limited company taking over control in any sense. The crucial issue for me is that the National Committee is the coordinating body of the movement, taking it's cues from the grass-roots local branches inside a movement that is as horizontal in organisation as is possible.

Reply
Cymreigiwr

I agree with your concerns about a corporate rather than a democratic structure, but your notion that “the NC is a far more democratic approach to governance” is nonsense. “surely members were delegates from the branches, and thus subject to instant recall” - Not at all. There is no robust mechanism of delegates or recall, or democracy! In many if not most cases, group leaders are pretty much self-appointed, have no democratic mandate, and no mechanism whatsoever is in place for voting to be driven by the views of members local to a group - there’s nothing to require/ensure group leaders consult at all, and frequently, timescales imposed would have precluded it. Voting & decisions seem to have been driven very much by the personal views/prejudices of the few individuals attending NC meetings. In my experience Dyfrig is pretty much on the money on that aspect. Potentially mechanisms such as you describe could work well, but really the existing NC structure & arrangements would need significant reform before it could be described as transparent and democratic in any legitimate sense.. There’s nothing undemocratic about a meeting, open to any member, and attended by thousands, electing a committee - although I agree a correspondence ballot of all members is much better. Countless organisations operate that way, with a far smaller electorate, and it’s completely accepted & acceptable as representative democracy. The claims it was not are very clearly about people disagreeing with the views of the people that were elected, and seeking any way to attack & delegitimise them, no matter how illegitimate.

Reply
Padi Phillips

Thanks for the information. At that it seems things within YC are far more shambolic than I thought they were. No wonder the sometimes toxic environment. I'm actually somewhat shocked that a supposedly grassroots movement should have been allowed to function at such a fundamental level basically as personal fiefdoms accountable to no-one. It does make me wonder why so much show is being made about 'democratising' the Central Committee when it appears to be lacking in the local groups, which rather makes democracy within the movement a sham. I shall have to think carefully whether or not I wish to continue my membership, given the apparent organisational mess it seems to be. The most recent issues with the CC seem to be just this year's car crash, there having been something of a crisis a couple of years ago. The lack of any semblance of democracy at local branch level is deeply worrying, and it's even more worrying that this aspect isn't being addressed as a matter of urgency.

Reply
David Harking

Dyfrig Jones, trying to be the voice of reason, so self righteous. You cannot and should not try and police the identities of YC members. It is their hearts and minds that are important.

Reply
Quornby

Just where do these self important blow hard gangs come from? Why on earth were they not put back in their box as soon as their "group this" and "group that" self indulgence raised its head? YesCymru's success is in no small way dependent on our philosophy of ALL UNDER ONE BANNER. So drop the schism and get UNDER THE BANNER!!!!!!

Reply
Jason Bates

I'm surprised nation.cymru published this rubbish. A constitution no matter what organisation will not please everyone, it should not be at the forefront of everything that the organisation does as it needs to be pragmatic to survive. People like Dyfrig have an hidden agenda and should be ignored, all this it's my way or the highway nonsense should be left behind for the larger cause of gaining independence. And remember when we gain independence YesCymru will disband and the political parties will take over the day to day running of Wales. So let's stop the arguing move forward and unite for the one cause. Cooperation is key.

Reply
Keith Evans

OMG, political fundamentalists are just as bad as their religious brethren.

Reply
hdavies15

Keith, much much worse ! You can ignore religion, well in the West you can, but these political fundamentalists are an intrusive bunch with their typical insistence on a narrow orthodoxy.

Reply
Rob

I have a mental health disability. But I don't expect Yes Cymru to go out of their way to fight for my rights or give me special privileges simply because of what I am. That's what mental health groups are for. Don't get me wrong if someone within the organisation made derogatory remarks against my disability or people like me, or if I felt I was being discriminated against then I would be making a complaint against that individual/YC. The primary function of Yes Cymru is too campaign for an independent Wales, or at the very least Wales having the same powers as the other nations of the UK. This should not be a left wing or right wing issue at all. If Scotland becomes independent and Ireland reunites then there is no longer a UK to be part of, we in Wales could end up by default becoming nothing more than a region of England, and you might be shocked as to how many voters in Wales feel resigned to this possibility. By all means distance ourselves and condemn of forms of racism, homophobia, misogynism and bigotry. But at the same time, distance ourselves from political correctness and wokism, because all they do is fan the flames of hatred & bigotry. Our main goal is independence, and if this means working with people who shares my political views on other matters then so be it.

Reply
Rob

Correction....'working with people who do not share my political views'

Reply
hdavies15

Bang on there Rob, 100% correct.

Reply
Padi Phillips

Totally agree with you there. I was once a member of the IWW and was very impressed by the way that organisation dealt with such issues. Since its inception in1905 as 'the union for all workers' the IWW has been just that, regardless of whatever else those workers might be. The IWW has long had a rule that both religion and politics are personal matters and are thus to be left at the door. From time to time the union was asked to ratify statements of solidarity with workers of different identities, whatever that identity might be, and also that union meetings were 'safe spaces', not just for marginalised groups or individuals, but for everyone. Personally I think YC should emulate the IWW and be the organisation for all who want an independent Wales, which is what the vast majority of us want. If YC had had the kind of robust policies and procedures the IWW has in place to deal with the kind of issues that have come to the fore in YC on a couple of occasions now, I doubt that YC would be in the situation it now finds itself in, the issues contributing to it having been nipped in the bud.

Reply
Johnny Gamble

Well done YesCymru an excellent choice of dates for an EGM.December 11th along with St Davids Day is the most important date in The Cymru Calender as The annual Cilmeri Rally is on this date.This was the Date when Cymru lost its status as a Sovereign Nation yet YesCymru don't seem to be concerned by this historical event. As one person who has already commented on this has said at least The People who have interests of Cymru at Heart will be at Cilmeri.

Reply
defaid

From YC's website, the EGM page: "Online voting will be open from 8am on December 10th and will close during the EGM on December 11th so don’t worry if you can’t make it to the event you can still vote on the proposals." You can vote from Friday morning so can also attend at Cilmeri.

Reply
Mathew Rees

A perfect example of the rabid, paranoid, left-wing political autism here. Welsh people by and large are socially conservative, whether Welsh speaking or from the valleys. No one is listening to you Dyfrig bach. I'm a gay man and I'm telling you that there is no such thing as non-binary, and until you can tell me where gender is stored in the body, transgenderism is a total nonsense. And why are you complaining about the lack of black or brown people on the committee when you sacked the only person of another race on there previously? Did she have wrong thoughts?

Reply
Barry Taylor

"Left-wing political autism"? I'm actually autistic, as are many other people - including other Yes Cymru members. Please don't use our neurotype as an insult or to score cheap political points. It's deeply offensive and insulting to those of us who actually are autistic.

Reply
Dafydd Iwan

Wales divided will never be free. It's as simple as that. We all have our preferences, but in the cause of independence, we must work together, and revel in our magnificent Welsh diversity.

Reply
hdavies15

Tair brawddeg syml sy'n gwneud llwyth o synwyr. Efalle yn rhy syml i'r sawl sy'n mwynhau codi crachen ar bob cyfle yn hytrach na canolbwyntio ar y prif bwrpas.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to David Harking Cancel

Dyfrig Jones, trying to be the voice of reason, so self righteous. You cannot and should not try and police the identities of YC members. It is their hearts and minds that are important.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.