Tuesday, 14th July 2026 Cardiff 25° · Clear sky
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Opinion

Why the Welsh national movement needs Brexit voters

By NationCymru
Picture by ketrin1407 (CC BY 2.0)

 

Ifan Morgan Jones

I, like many others within the Welsh national movement, voted to ‘Remain’ in the Referendum on EU membership on 23 June last year.

Subsequent events have, I believe, validated that choice. I believe that Wales will suffer economically, and culturally, because of Brexit.

However, as contradictory as it may seem, the Welsh Brexit voter may have gotten us into this mess, but they’re also key to getting us out of it.

There’s no point shunning them. They are our friends, family members, and fellow countrymen. If we truly believe that we’re running a national movement, we need to include them too.

And it’s clear that they share many of the aims of the Welsh national movement.

Wales voted ‘Leave’ because of a deep dissatisfaction with the political status quo.

To use slightly more colourful language, they wanted to give an out of touch elite that they perceive as not giving a damn about them, a good kicking.

And however terrible Brexit would be to the economy, they wouldn’t have risked that if they didn’t recognise that Wales’ economy was in a pretty bad state anyway.

OK, yes, the same elite they voted to kick is now using Brexit as an excuse to make themselves more politically powerful.

And yes, what little crumbs off the table they had given Wales in recent years are going to be swept back up off the floor. That surely wasn’t part of the plan.

But you can’t blame Leave voters for that. Some of us here in Wales had warned that this would happen, but:

  1. We lacked a strong Welsh media to get our message across
  2. We were complacent. We didn’t see it coming and didn’t do enough to stop it

Disillusioned

If the national movement in Wales is going to make any ground, it needs to offer these small ‘c’ conservative voters a home. Here are four reasons:

  • These are the people most likely to understand that we live in a rigged system, because they see that same system holding them back every day however hard they try to overcome it.
  • These are also the people most willing to change that rigged system, because they have less to lose in doing so.
  • They are looking for change. If the Welsh national movement doesn’t offer it to them, they will turn to the imperial nationalism of the Farages and Trumps of this world instead.
  • The Welsh national movement won’t get very far without them.

The contradiction at the heart of the Welsh national movement is that it’s a middle-class, mainly Welsh-speaking, socialist movement in a mostly working class, English-speaking, socially conservative country.

It’s a front-row nationalism in a back-row country.

In other words, it’s not much of a national movement at all because it effectively leaves out a good 75% of the population.

Independence and dependence

The second of the four reasons outlined above warrants further discussion.

These socially conservative voters are also actually more likely to ultimately vote for independence than the group that currently makes up the independence movement.

Although cultural factors do play a part, the success or failure of national movements ultimately comes down to economic and political self-interest.

Ironically, the people who currently make up the Welsh national movement are also the group that’s probably one of the least likely to vote for Welsh independence.

That may seem mind-boggling, but it’s true.

This is because their own economic and political self-interest is dependent on the public-sector institutions most likely to be damaged by the economic changes that would follow independence.

In fact, it could be argued that the Welsh national movement isn’t in its current form an independence movement at all. Its aim is to achieve two things:

  • Maintain the current political status quo (with a few tweaks) in perpetuity
  • Maintain Welsh institutions for the employment of the Welsh middle class

That is, we have ended up with half a nation state (devolution) not because the Welsh are ‘weak’ or because we’ve been ‘brainwashed’.

It’s because half a nation state is ultimately the arrangement that meets the political and financial needs those that make up the Welsh middle class than run the country.

While they are ultimately financially dependent on the UK government, the kind of activity that would make independence a possibility will never happen. There’s simply no incentive.

Only a financially independent middle class will ever fight for independence.

The conservative argument

Therefore, if Wales is to become independent (and it’s a big if) it’s more likely to do so via a small ‘c’ conservative movement than a left-wing, socialist one.

Such a movement would be free to argue for the following:

  • Spending less on the public sector and more on projects that would strengthen the private economy in the long term, such as better infrastructure
  • Lower taxes on small businesses to make Wales a country of financially independent business people.
  • Fight to devolve broadcasting in Wales - the BBC and S4C. While the media in Wales depends on the UK Government's funding it’s unlikely they would give an independence movement an equal platform.
  • Argue that while immigration of skilled workers is a positive, free movement in and of itself can damage the cultural fabric of communities (English as well as Welsh speaking) if not controlled
  • Combine local authorities but also devolve significant powers over housing, education, language, transport and agriculture
  • Strive in every way to cut Wales’ financial deficit and set independence as the goal once it is done

These are arguments that are already out there, and are occasionally expressed by members of Plaid Cymru, Labour, the Conservatives and the Lib Dems.

However, there is no party or movement that has brought them together into one over-arching, consistent political manifesto.

Small ‘n’ nationalist in Plaid Cymru, Labour and the Liberal Democrats are mostly content with the current arrangements (with a few tweaks).

There is some overlap with the Conservative Party but their British nationalism means that such a program would be anathema to them.

Want Welsh independence? You’ll need Brexit voters.

But you may need to create a new movement from the ground up, as none of the political parties in Wales, at the moment at least, offer an easy fit.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

67 comments

Gareth Tuen

flag needs scotch input, then would be fantastic

Reply
chiefofwales

Very well written article which articulates many valid points My question would be, is Yes Cymru open to the arguments presented above? (The small 'c' issues which many in Wales support) My assumptions of Plaid and the independence movement have been that they are too far left for mine (and the the majority of the public's)

Reply
Jonesy

Hit the nail on the head there, bang on without the S E of Wales and Valleys there is no hope for Independence. Leanne and PC banging on about socialism is completely the wrong tack. Preach communitarianism rather than out of date socialism which puts off people as they think that the state is planning to take their hard earned money off them in higher taxes. People want to look after their communities and care for their fellow man/woman , so work on that not trendy lefty issues suited to Corbyn's Labour . Anyway how can PC be to the left of Corbyn? that's a nuts stance to take.

Reply
Martin

Not convinced Leanne or PC bang on about socialism. She actually won in the Rhondda, and more recently that area saw the most council seat gains for PC (seats taken off Labour). It appeared to be due to localism, authenticity and community work. It seemed to be exactly the things you call for, looking after communities. Plaid's output is dominated by banging on about "communities", place names, Welsh language and other localist type things. But Brexit does seem to be a cloud hanging over both sides of the debate, and will be until it is resolved.

Reply
Gwylon Phillips

What is too far left exactly? Please explain chiefofwales.

Reply
chiefofwales

In general terms higher taxation, more regulation, an overall bigger state

Reply
DDOwen

That's a fairly reductive take on what it means to be 'left-wing', though, in that it's defining it as being no more than post-war social democracy. Post-war social democracy tends to favour a compromise between socialism and capitalism by using 'big' states as a way of reining in capitalism's more destructive tendencies. But there are left-wing schools of thought that are sceptical of that way of forging a compromise, and it strikes me as very plausible that you could have a left-wing alternative to Corbyn that draws on them rather than on nostalgia for how things were in 1945 (a good example of how you could do this is given in Colin Ward's 'Social Policy' from the early 1980s).

Reply
DDOwen

Should also add: it's also mistaken to think of 'big' states as characteristic of the left; they're also characteristic of the right -- for instance the current form of Westminster Toryism favours strong, 'big', centralised government [1] while leaving local governance hollowed out and subject to the whims of the market. That's a problem regardless of where you are on the political spectrum. [1] Some on the right (and a few on the left) aren't going to regard the constant monitoring and intrusion required by the 'hostile environment to migration' as a problem, but if intrusive, omnipresent monitoring in a way that can put people who aren't even migrants in difficulty isn't characteristic of a 'big' state piling more and more regulation and surveillance on to businesses and landlords, I don't know what could be. It can't only be 'big statism' if you happen to disagree with it.

Reply

In reply to DDOwen

Trailorboy

Marx and Lenin were proponents of people having the right to self determination and national sovereignty and I don't under how the big state solution became a socialist ideal. I understand the attractions of state solutions to control the means of production and ensure labour is fairly valued and rewarded, but what has anything in socialist ideals got to do with imposing big state solutions over indigenous minority ethnic groups. There is no philosophical basis for it and I fail to recognise anything about socialism in it.

Reply

In reply to Trailorboy

sibrydionmawr

Big state solutions are favoured because, simply put, states equal bureaucracies, and bureaucracies tend to perpetuate themselves and grow. There is no real correlation that state 'solutions' actually deliver in terms of controlling the means of production, or indeed that labour is fairly valued and rewarded - the only solution to those problems is the wholesale expropriation of the means of production by the workers, who will then run it in their own interests, and abolish the wages system in the process. It shouldn't be about a fair day's pay for a fair day's work, hut about workers enjoying the full fruits of their labours. Capitalism of any form is predicated upon theft. Admittedly the anarchist period where the economy of Catalonia, specifically Barcelona, was reorganised along anarchist principles was very short, but it did manage to radically reorganise whole industries and make them far more efficient. Anarchism is a system that hasn't really been allowed to establish itself, and has even, as was the case in Republican Spain during the civil war period, seen communists defending the capitalist class from the anarchists! It could even be argued that it was the communist suppression of the anarchists that lost the republic the war. Anarchism is presented as chaotic, but in reality, it's something quite different, and could offer a lot of solutions. Marx and Lenin, though saying that they were in favour of people's rights to self-determination, were state socialist. State socialism is an oxymoron as it's imposed, and that isn't democratic. Without true democracy, socialism is impossible. Marx himself was probably the least damaging proponent of his form of communism, (perhaps because he died before he could do any damage) but Lenin's form was excessively blood stained, and maintained by terror. Not as bad as Stalinism, but nonetheless bad. The old arguments against nationalisation are usually couched in terms of being bad because they are 'socialist' or even 'communist' but as neither has ever existed, the only forms of nationalism we have seen is that of state capitalism, which Engels saw as the last stage of capitalism. In reality nationalisation isn't the peculiarity of any ideology or dogma. I agree, big state solutions, indeed any kind of state solution is not going to do indigenous minority ethnic groups any good whatsoever. Big state solutions may initially be beneficial to minority ethnic groups, as was the case in the Soviet Union, where some cultures gained a written form for the first time under 'communist' rule, but the longer term effects of what was essentially an imperialistic system was that the minorities would disappear - one only has to look at the situation in the former Baltic soviet republics to see that. All soviet polices achieved was perhaps killing off indigenous cultures a little less quickly than avowedly capitalist systems.

Reply
Tal Mac

You forgot what could be the radical stimulus for all this. Restoration of Welsh Law. The economic and social benefits it would bring, as excellently argued in the document below. http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/wgc/files/2015/11/Publisher-version-of-Pamphletfinal.pdf

Reply
Trailorboy

I agree, but it's full of conundrums that need to be solved - not least in terms of some of the Brexit issues that have been raised - trading relationships with the EU, currency (tieing to the Euro is the simplest option, but perhaps unpalatable for many), customs arrangements etc etc. Also, I personally could never compromise or cave in to the darker side of Brexit - hostility to ethic minorities and others etc. If we are going to throw sacred things out of the window, then this is a controversial, Devil's advocate sort of idea - Why don't we become more British than the English and strive for independence under Welsh and British banners?? I don't care much for the Union Jack, but only because of how I picture it historically, but maybe we should keep it???!!!. If I can be really controversial, then perhaps we should appropriate it and if that's too much to bear then maybe modify it to some degree?. (I do dislike the flag immensely and hard to write that one) This may sound a bit crazy, but I think it is possible to make it patriotically British to strive for Welsh independence - we can get back a Britain in the form of a part of Britain that Welsh people have always imagined and wanted? That flag is a problem, yes, but maybe part of the solution as well - it has been a well marketed symbol that has created an emotional bond with many in wales for generations. Also, many in Wales have very strong links to the armed forces etc and they have fought and died for Queen and Country under the banner of the Union Jack. We cannot disrespect that and have to address this issue and not simply reject it as un-Welsh, because I also suspect that we will never go anywhere until we do - it's not just the soldiers etc, it's their families, friends, teachers etc etc. I should point out, that I'm not someone who has links or emotional attachments to the British armed forces, but trying to be inclusive and pragmatic here and include others who I know and like and are just as much Welsh as I will ever be. We need to redefine what British means on our terms, for us here in Wales. The English will always remain British in an English way, but Welsh can be a very different sort of British (we are after all more entitled to the name than the English). At the end of the day, we can be independent, Welsh and British (our sense of British could be based on history obviously, but also with more modern elements for those that have no emotional attachments to the more distant history of these lands). I'm sure much of the above is flawed and trying to wonder if I could ever really get over a phobia of the Union Jack - maybe that's a step too far?

Reply
Trailorboy

wish i had a delete button for the above post

Reply
Capitalist and Welshnash

Nation.Cymru, Fyddwch chi'n cyfyngu ar hyd sylwedau please? Will you put a limit on the length of comments os gwelwch yn dda?

Reply
leigh richards

trailorboy i cant think of anything more 'disrespectful' than a flag (the union flag) on which wales isnt even represented. Wales has its own flag - y ddraig goch - and i look forward to the day when it's flown outside the united nations building alongside the flags of other small independent nations like ireland, iceland, malta and estonia.

Reply
Trailorboy

I do agree with you. Just throwing the idea out there, but do find it hard to stomach myself. I also have friends and relatives though who don't think like I do and will never change.

Reply
Heather

Trailorboy, you might just have something here. It depends what we want from independence... If you only want cultural independence, then this is entirely possible if 'being British' means that the Welsh speak Welsh, and that is how it is. If that was universally accepted, then funding for promoting the language would not be questioned. If you want independence for it's own sake, then this will obviously not do.

Reply
A Gog

That flag is disgusting. Long Live the Republic!

Reply
Capitalist and Welshnash

When we achieve independence we will still have the monarchy. Grow up, this is not 1917.

Reply
leigh richards

Um think you might be taking rather a lot for granted there capitalist and welshnash. It would ultimately be up to the people of wales to decide if they wanted to keep the queen (or king) of england as their head of state. It is entirely possible we may decide to follow most other nations in the world and dispense with the hangover from medieval times that is a hereditary monarch. After all this isn't 1717.

Reply

In reply to leigh richards

Dafis

best leave kings and queens where they belong - in the history books !

Reply

In reply to Dafis

CambroUiDunlainge

Some would say the same about our language and culture. Easy comment to make. I wonder if the Senators of the Roman Empire said much the same about the Republic? Easy to pick and choose elements of our culture and history we like and ignore some that do not conform to our personal opinion... which is kind of why Welsh nationalism falters in the first place. Constitutional monarchy keeps the Union together above the politics... we should seek to imitate it in that regard considering the fractious nature of our nation. Best part about that? It fits with our culture anyway. Every other movement has been led by a Tywysog. What better example for independence has there been than Owain? Or one of the Llewellyn's? What better way to legitimise ourselves as a sovereign nation? Unless you'd prefer the inevitable conflict of legitimisation that Republics go through...

Reply
glasiad

The referendum gave us two choices: 1. no change, keep the status quo; 2. ignore the elites and their FUD and vote to shake up of the Establishment. The idea that those who voted in favour of the Establishment are more 'Welsh nationalist' in character is an illusion. Voting for no change is the very definition of a small 'c' conservative - yet you claim that "people most willing to change that rigged system" are the small 'c' conservatives. Are you deliberately trying to muddy the waters here or was that a typo? You write, "If the Welsh national movement doesn’t offer it to them [Leave voters], they will turn to the imperial nationalism of the Farages and Trumps of this world instead." In other words, people who voted Leave are 'low information' (stupid) people who will follow anyone. This is the exact line that anti-democratic elitists like Tony Blair espouses. Your characterisation of the Welsh national movement as "middle-class, mainly Welsh-speaking, socialist movement" is more of a characterisation of Plaid Cymru members and supporters. Republican Welsh nationalism and the desire for deep systemic change has always come from the south Wales valleys, whether Welsh speaking or not. You trot out the idea that Wales will be economically damaged after the UK leaves the EU in 2 to 5 years time as if it is an established fact. If it were fact, how is it that that Isle of Mann, (that has never been in the EU) is doing so much better than us economically than us?. Membership of the EU is not a recipe for a prosperous economy. If you look at what is happening on the continent, the opposite appears to be more likely. I have talked to a lot of people since the referendum, Leave and Remain voters. By and large, the less one knows about how the EU actually functions and its effects, the more likely one was to vote Remain. The same would probably hold true in a referendum for Leaving the UK. It would be the small 'c' Remainers that would have to be informed and convinced. Sorry Ifan, I know you want to explain and justify you and your friends' choice to vote for no change on June 23, but your argument makes no sense when examined carefully - apart for your last statement - suggesting a new Welsh political party. A new political movement in Wales is indeed needed if we are to direct the Welsh anti-establishment sensibilities towards and independent Wales. Leaving the EU was step 1. Leaving the UK is step 2.

Reply
iantoddu

"Your characterisation of the Welsh national movement as “middle-class, mainly Welsh-speaking, socialist movement” is more of a characterisation of Plaid Cymru members and supporters." Yeah. I'm middle class from the top of my head to the soles of my feet, but I grew up in an area which was not. And that area was straightforwardly Welsh nationalist. People there voted for Plaid, which didn't make them "supporters", and I didn't know many members. People were Welsh because they were Welsh, wanted the best for Wales and considered Wales their country above others. Welsh speaking they were. Socialism they tended to lean towards. But middle class they certainly were not. If any Welsh nationalist movement is *only* "middle class, Welsh speaking and socialist", the movement should look at itself and see why that is so, rather than blaming it on the Welsh, as it were.

Reply
CambroUiDunlainge

"In other words, people who voted Leave are ‘low information’ (stupid) people who will follow anyone. This is the exact line that anti-democratic elitists like Tony Blair espouses." I think what he meant is... if they are alienated by the values of the Welsh nationalist movement then they will naturally oppose that movement regardless of whether they consider themselves Welsh or not. Welsh identity is pretty unique to every individual and the more ideologies that movement has the more exclusive it becomes. Thats why many in the south see Plaid as the "Welsh language party" because even though Welsh language is part of our identity not all speak it... and not all can directly relate it to their every day lives. So really... they'd not be opposing a Welsh nationalist movement at all as they see it - just a movement that says its something they are but simply cannot relate too. If that makes any sense? Westminster would seek to exploit that (I think it already does) in order to curb anti-establishment nationalism. If we were to gain independence... we'd struggle for a while and we'd have already given pro-Unionism a beach head of voters and supporters because the movement alienated so many at such an early stage.

Reply
Capitalist and Welshnash

Nation.Cymru, Will you put a length limit on comments os sgwelwch yn dda. Some people want to write books.

Reply
sibrydionmawr

Why? Do you want to stifle debate? Some of us are literate and need space to expand our ideas.

Reply
Arfor Cymru

Fair play Trailor Boy, whilst what you say does make me feel uncomfortable, it is this sort of thinking (outside the box) which will help to achieve our aims. Personally, I am fed up of seeing the same old ideas year after year never going anywhere

Reply
Trailorboy

and i before i read your comment I was asking for it to be deleted. I was uncomfortable writing it.

Reply
Tal Mac

Carwyn Jones nonchalantly making the claim for independence in the 'Justice for Wales' document. Yes Carwyn, divergence should be seen as an opportunity. In 2009, the First Minister Carwyn Jones AM (then Counsel General), spoke of a ‘Devolution Dividend’ for the legal profession in Wales. Public and administrative law linked to devolution should be a ‘growth area of work’. Divergence should be seen as an opportunity: ‘The law of Wales will be different and firms can advise English clients in this.’ Welsh law and a legal system might mean that: ‘Economic and social advantages…flow from developing the legal profession in Wales and in the development of law that is suited to the particular situation in Wales.’ We agree.

Reply
leigh richards

Some sweeping assertions there Ifan - most notably the statement that "if Wales is to become independent (and it’s a big if) it’s more likely to do so via a small ‘c’ conservative movement than a left-wing, socialist one". It would have been nice to have seen some psephological evidence to back this claim up, as all existing evidence of political attitudes would seem to show the complete opposite of this. Conservative voters - big c or small c - tend to vote for conservative parties, and in wales this now means the tories and ukip - parties based on maintaining the 'union'. Hardly fertile territory for the welsh independence movement. Also not sure why you assert that wales is a 'socially conservative' country. Yes this may have been true of the wales which existed 50 or 60 years ago but looking at contemporary wales i see no evidence to support such a view. Where it's impossible to disagree with you however is when you say the welsh national movement needs brexit voters - with 52 percent in wales voting to leave the eu last year no serious political movement can ignore so many people in its own country if it wants to realise its objectives. As someone who was active in the referendum (like you i supported the remain side) my experience was people voted to leave the eu for a number of reasons. Many working class voters in particular wanted to give david cameron and george osborne a kick in after years of tory imposed austerity. Some people voted to leave as a result of concerns over what they saw as the undue influence of unelected commissioners in making decisions in the eu. Certainly it seemed a great many voted to leave because they felt immigration from the eu should be controlled and it seemed a significant number of those in wales who voted voted leave did so because they wanted to assert 'british sovereignty'. And therein lies a big problem for our campaign. How are we going to persuade those for whom british sovereignty is paramount to support welsh indy? Because if we get our way there will be no 'great britain' - the cherished 'union' will cease to exist , it's a conundrum those in the indy movement who supported brexit (yes there were a few) have never been able to satisfactorily answer when i have presented it to them.

Reply
glasiad

I agree with much of you comment, but, I fail to see how voting to leave the EU makes you a British nationalist. People who voted to remain in the EU simply because of this erroneous association reminds me of the phrase "biting your nose to spite your face".

Reply
sibrydionmawr

No, it doesn't necessarily follow that voting for Brexit makes someone a British nationalist, but most people probably did vote Brexit full in the knowledge that much of the campaign cloaked itself in British nationalism. It's also true that subsequent to the Brexit vote that British nationalism has come to the fore and seemingly isn't being challenged by those who voted Brexit but who don't see themselves as British natonalists. That may just be down to a biased media who are ignoring those dissonant voices, but also may just be because they are relatively few in number. But that doesn't change the fact that Brexit is still a child of the more repugnant elements of Brit nationalism. One could equally accuse Brexiters of voting to cut off their noses, especially in Wales, which was a net beneficiary of EU investment. I very much doubt that the Westminster government will step up to the plate if/when Brexit actually happens, and plug the gap in the financial deficit thus left.

Reply
leigh richards

"I fail to see how voting to leave the EU makes you a British nationalist" no it doesnt glasiad. The point i was trying to get across - and to be fair i think sibrydionmawr has done a better job of it than i did - is that a fair chunk of the people who voted leave in wales did so because their primary motive was to 'restore britain's sovereignty' and to 'make britain great again'. Well given our intention is to break up Britain as a political state, and to establish an independent wales and scotland and reunify ireland, persuading the sizable 'rule brittannia' element of leave voters in wales of the case for indy will be a helluva challenge to say the least.

Reply
Capitalist and Welshnash

Your point was noteworthy, but did it need its own article length explanation?

Reply
Radek

The problem in your analysis is that Leavers were not the revolutionaries smashing the status quo you are painting them as. They voted for the emotional status quo. After decades of talk of the EU as something alien, many felt the referendum was a joining one. They voted for isolation because that's how they had always felt and were told to feel. So yes, conservatives voted Leave, and in order to uphold the status quo.

Reply
Royston Jones

You have excelled yourself. This sentence alone encapsulates what is wrong with the self-elected left-green 'leadership of a non-national movement. (Movement!) "The contradiction at the heart of the Welsh national movement is that it’s a middle-class, mainly Welsh-speaking, socialist movement in a mostly working class, English-speaking, socially conservative country." But then, I would agree, seeing as I've been saying the same thing for decades. Here's a link to my post explaining why I voted for Brexit. http://jacothenorth.net/blog/eu-referendum-i-want/

Reply
glasiad

Your post confirms my observation that the less people know about the EU the more likely they were to vote Remain. The irony is that the Remain voters tend to think of the Leave voters as "low information votes" bolstered by the BBC and the British Establishment.

Reply
Dafis

Hello Jac Revisiting that post of yours which appeared in June last year was an interesting experience. I don't get around to reviewing archived materials often enough but that post made an interesting read because there was an awful lot of good stuff in there. Too many people in Wales, and some on here, had made the simple mistake of equating a pro Leave stance with support for the AngloBrit "Brexit" stance. Many of us went to great pains even prior to June 2016 to spell out the key difference - we wanted to Leave the U.K as well as Leave the EU !. On other forums we were abused and scorned for holding such views, scolded for daring to tread a path away from the Plaid orthodoxy that anything with EU written on it was good. Well now a year and a bit later we can see quite clearly that the lumbering London monster and its lackeys in the "regions" are struggling to produce a coherent exit plan and the equally immobile bunch of EU bureaucrats have an agenda which boils down to "stay or pay". The EU is a bloody mess, the Tory clique in London is self serving caring not a jot for this little lump on its Western boundary, and the Labour Corbynite alternative at its heart is much the same. That post of June 2016 forecast much of this with accuracy. I wonder how many have read it and learned from it, or did they turn away with a wishful think and reach again for that begging bowl shelf with pots labelled London and Brussels ? .

Reply
CambroUiDunlainge

Completely agree with everything you've said. The realisation we need Welsh "c"'s is a major stepping stone to making any kind of progress towards Independence. I do genuinely believe that the Welsh Leave vote was true to Welsh identity (I voted Remain, should say) - when the results were confirmed in those early hours and I just couldn't understand how so many people were sold on it. But then I thought "David Cameron was a Tory Prime Minister asking the people of Britain to remain" - and that is why I suspect many people voted leave. The most basic instinct in the valleys is "What the Tories want cannot be good for us". Its just one more case of Wales going against the establishment as we have always done - regardless of the consequences. It needs to be inclusive not exclusive. Saunders Lewis was a staunch "c" - and in the early days the Welsh movement was formed to conserve our identity - that was the founding principle of Welsh nationalism. But its not just needing the small conservatives now - its about us needing them in a post-Independence situation as well - because nations who are not nor have been ruled by Britain are still under threat from cultural Imperialism that the UK and USA exude. Everyone needs to stop trying to add all these labels to being Welsh. The only thing in this country the majority conform too (because we're all naturally non-conformists) is the label of being Welsh. Nothing more, nothing less. Thats where it needs to start... or be restarted too.

Reply
Dafydd Thomas

With output per head in the Welsh economy at only 72% of the U.K. average we are placed as the poorest part of the U.K. The GVA per head in Wales is rock bottom, owing to a lower participation rate in the workforce. This is the result of a massive elderly immigration. Also sick and disabled are being offloaded here to social housing from over the border. What do we need? Education and Taxation are Key. We need to spend at least as much on the education of our school children as they do in England, not much less as has been the case for some time. This is because the Welsh budget is having to share its resources between Health and Education. Health predominates because of the elderly immigrants etc. While we have a comparatively large number of school leavers with no qualification whatsoever. We need home grown, well educated, entrepreneurs and they need tax incentives. Control of Corporation Tax is a must. Ireland is so much wealthier than us in Wales, over twice as much. Ireland has a highly competitive Corporation Tax of 12.5% and one of the most highly educated work forces on Europe. Oh and it's independent.

Reply
chiefofwales

I completely agree - a low rate of corporation tax in Wales alongside a reduction in other forms of taxation is the route to prosperity. I also find being an ardent supporter of independence yet a passionate advocate for the EU a big contradiction. However, can't we debate these issues as part of a wider Yes campaign? We all have different visions of what Wales could and should be but the fundamental point is that we're not in a position to decide which vision should come to pass.

Reply
Tame Frontiersman

Brexit was billed by Mr Farage as the UK’s independence day- an event, which would be a starting point for a new direction of travel. However, what we have is a process and a process which colours and will continue to colour (or cast its shadow if you prefer) over political debate for the foreseeable future;-devolution and the independence debate included. Dissatisfaction with the status quo may well have a reason why some people voted for the UK to leave the EU. It is certainly true that very many people in Wales and other parts of the UK have very good reasons to be dissatisfied with their lot. There have been many examples of movements being able to channel the discontents of the populace and the creation of the internet and our relationship with the virtual world has made it much easier to whip up support. The problem is, when you stir the depths, what comes to surface is often unpredictable. We release the flame bearers and the Id monsters of the internet into the real world at our peril. The independence debate must stress positive visions : a Wales with people and communities who are the economic or political dependency of no one, a country that doesn’t have to poach its healthcare staff from impoverished countries and regions; a country that supports the personal development of its people; a country that embraces and masters technological change; an internationalist Wales; a country punching above its weight in the solution of the problems that face the future of humanity; a country with pride, not in waving a flag, but listing the achievements of its people.

Reply
Martin

The idea that Brexit voters suddenly go to Welsh nationalists because of "infrastructure spending" or low taxes for small business is not sound. Also, I keep seeing (online mostly) wishful thinking from some Welsh nationalists who want to convert the Brexit vote into a Welsh nationalist one. It absolutely was not a vote to create a Welsh state. And in fact, the limited evidence I have seen online from Yes Cymru suggests that nominal support for Welsh independence is linked to somehow staying in the EU, or trying to stop having a Conservative majority UK Government.

Reply
glasiad

You write: "evidence I have seen online from Yes Cymru suggests that nominal support for Welsh independence is linked to somehow staying in the EU". An astute observation. From what I can gather the top dogs in Yes Cymru are very much in favour of ignoring the referendum result and promote an 'independent Wales in the EU' (as if it's possible to be independent and in the EU at the same time). I believe this is the main barrier to Yes Cymru becoming a larger movement than it is. Time will tell ...

Reply
Martin

I am not involved, but would not be surprised. The reason is, if you are the kind of person inspired by Catalonia and Scotland, and you are also a strong Welsh identifier, being pro-EU is a natural development. I can even see it in these comments. People pointing out Ireland's low corporation tax rate. Ireland's position in the Single Market (and EU) is critical to how their economy grew so rapidly. My main argument is that these are fundamental questions about identity as much as they are economic. Brexit was not a randomised anti-establishment vote, it was a specific anti-EU vote and Brexit voters have tended not to select other anti-establishment options but are moving towards the Conservative party.

Reply
iantoddu

Not round here we aren't. Definitely aren't pushing remaining in Europe as a part of being independence. And each YesCymru group runs its own area, so we aren't getting any pressure to push being a member of the EU from anybody. Who are the "top dogs" to whom you refer?

Reply

In reply to iantoddu

glasiad

Sion Jobbins comes to mind, who recently tweeted (August 19) "Dwi'n teimlo dylai'r mudiad dros #annibyniaeth @YesCymru gynnal rali dros Annibyniaeth yn UE. 'Sdim Cymru Rydd tu allan UE." In English - I think that the movement for #independence @YesCymru should hold a rally for Independence in the EU. There in no free Wales outside the EU. That's classic Orwellian doublespeak to me. I glad to hear that not everyone associated to Yes Cymru feels the same, but I don't think he is alone in the Yes Cymru inner circle. I hope they don't lead you back to increased dependence on an unaccountable and unelected body (European Commission) that calls the shots in favour of big business and big finance, inevitably leading to the destruction of nations through debt-slavery and mass-migration.

Reply

In reply to glasiad

iantoddu

Sion Jobbins is a "top dog" in Yes Cymru? Really? Firstly, he may be a member of Yes Cymru but I can't see why you regard him as being in an "inner circle". He doesn't seem to be making an effort to steer it in any direction to me, or particularly involved in the running of it, or particularly noticeable at any meetings.. Some people might be trying to do that, he doesn't seem to be. I have my suspicions about people trying to steer any organisation (that's why I join them on a next to never basis voluntarily), but Sion Jobbins doesn't seem to be one. So unless you want no one who believes that Wales would be better off as part of the EU as a member then I can't see the relevance. I was wondering if you had seen some sort of "promotion of Wales as part of the EU" as part of Yes Cymru's message. As I said, Yes Cymru is thankfully run along rather anarchic lines - there is no an "inner circle" telling us what to do, and I wouldn't be interested in letting them do so.

Reply

In reply to glasiad

iantoddu

Just had a look at that tweet. As I said, he doesn't seem to be particularly active around Yes Cymru meetings etc, so it was a personal opinion and he made a suggestion asking for people's opinions. And everyone disagreed with him. Not to my mind demonstrative of the attitude which you describe. There are ambitious people who I would worry about for all sorts of reasons. Sion Jobbins isn't, in this case, one. And the separate groups seem to be doing just that - leading to a movement run by the grassroots rather than the "top dogs". So far, any way.

Reply
Capitalist and Welshnash

From what Ive seen YesCymru leans towards the Left, which is a problem. I wish them the best of luck, honestly, no sarcasm, deapite some being hippies.

Reply
Cymru Rydd

Some great points made in this article. I also concur with Glasiad's succinct summary: Step 1 Leave the EU. Step 2 Leave the UK. Step 2 could not happen without Step 1. In fact, Step 1 is the historical trigger point which the Welsh national movement has been waiting for. The genie is now truly out of the bottle. We are starting from scratch. Step 2 is the logical end game. I think we will look back in a few years time and marvel at how England's Independence Campaign( which is what leaving the EU is to all intents and purposes) proved to be one of the clearest examples of the Law of Unintended Consequences- as it inadvertently led to our own Independence. There's an old Welsh saying :" Os na fydd gryf, bydd gyfrwys"( if you can't be strong,be canny). Wales can now sit back and watch England's Independence Campaign unfolding in front of us. Our hands will be clean. In the meantime, we wait, we plan and we dream our own Independence into existence. England, being England, with its delusional sense of Exceptionalism will probably foul it up big-time and alienate the rest of Europe in the process. It will be a crash TV event: of that there can be no doubt at all. This can allow the new Welsh national movement to persuade Brexit voters and Remain voters alike that their economic, social and cultural interests will be best served by an Independent Wales. For the life of me, I cannot understand why so many nationalists in Wales cannot see this, and have bought into this Liberal/Metropolitan disaster narrative, underpinned by this belief that Brexit was down to racism, a lack of education and prejudice. It just reeks of condescension and arrogance. Don't disrespect our own people! These were not just right-wing media fodder: their leave vote was an expression of their own lived experiences in their own comnunities for many, many years.. I agree with Ifan that an independent Wales would need to avoid any big state socialist model and encourage the growth of the private sector, enterprise and personal initiative based on a strong sense of Welsh identity. Let's remember that the success of other small nations such as Iceland, Norway, Denmark, Estonia etc are not predicated on Socialism. Their success is down to a strong sense of national identity which has in turned led to a thriving society and economy, where all citizens feel they have a stake in their country. Small is Beautiful! Daw dydd y bydd mawr y rhai bychain!

Reply
sibrydionmawr

So, rather than European or English capitalists exploiting Welsh workers, you'd want small minded Welsh capitalists exploiting Welsh workers? Doesn't sound like much of a change to me, apart, from my experience of Welsh capitalists being even meaner and nastier than most of their English equivalents! It makes no difference whatsoever whether you're being exploited by a Welsh capitalist, or any other kind of capitalist, you're still being exploited by capitalist scum!

Reply
Capitalist and Welshnash

Some of us could not care less about the workers struggle. Some of us want independence for cultural reasons.

Reply
Nick Hubble

Yes, independence needs the support of Brexit supporters. But where does the jump to current indy supporters are less likely to vote indy come from? Economic determinism is an overused explanation. Experience suggests people vote what they believe as much as they vote for their economic interests (brexit being a classic example). If I believe indy, I'm going to vote indy regardless of the damage it does to my public sector university job. Aside from brexit voters, indy also requires a new economics. I for one am prepared to lose my professional salary and work towards new models of further and higher education and other parts of the public sector. The only thing holding us back from recreating those models along communitarian and peer-to-peer lines are a lack of imagination. It is not a question of whether we need left-wing supporters or small c conservative supporters: we need both. But the only way to bring them together will be through imaginative solutions.

Reply
Dafydd Thomas

The command economy experiment (Russia etc) has failed. Would we want someone or government controlling all aspects of our economy. Our first minister said, recently, through the 'Office of the First minister' (Prime minister in Welsh) that "there are almost 800,000 people aged 60 and over in Wales, over a quarter of the population, and,in the next twenty years, this is expected to exceed one million people. The fact that Wales is a nation of older people should be seen as something positive". We are older because elderly English retirees, which add a minimum of 50% to our own elderly population, make us the oldest country. This deprives our young people and diminishes our economic prospects. For some reason Aneurin Bevan comes to mind when he said "if the Prime minister is sincere in what he is saying, and he may be, he may be, then if he is sincere in what he is saying he is too stupid to be prime minister". So beware if you want those above us to control the economy in all its aspects. Home grown entrepreneurs sounds better.

Reply
Al

It's great to see a consensus forming that a new Welsh national movement is now essential in what is an existential crisis for Wales. I have high hopes for Yes Cymru in this respect but i very much hope that they don't turn out to be another lefty/socialist echo chamber. Please put the Welsh national interest first! What Wales needs is a strong culture, society and economy based on a strong sense of national identity. A new national movement needs the old socialist shibboleths like a hole in the head.

Reply
Owain W

"Argue that while immigration of skilled workers is a positive, free movement in and of itself can damage the cultural fabric of communities (English as well as Welsh speaking) if not controlled." If this is the kind of Wales you want, you can count me out. The ‘threat’ of immigration has been built up over decades out of pretty much nothing. It is a colossal lie that distracts people from the things that are really important in life, particularly in Wales which has such incredibly low levels of non-UK inward migration. Follow this narrative and it only leads one way – to hatred, discord and scapegoating. More to the point, evidence suggests that fear of immigration is largely concentrated among baby-boomers and the over-65s. If the cause of Wales becomes associated with parochial xenophobia, legions of young Welsh people will want nothing more than to leave it all behind. As a second point, I really don’t buy the idea that the Welsh political middle class has too much to lose from independence. If anything, our civil service would need to be much larger to make an independent Wales viable. Independence offers a world of opportunity for those people. Wales’ problem – which has been a problem for centuries – is that our middle class is nowhere near big enough. A middle class is made up of many things, including intellectuals, businesspeople and civil servants. To try and build up one aspect by undermining another will not create the engine for political change, it will just lead to the concentration of economic power in the hands of a rentier class who care nothing for politics or culture or the nation. Finally, the idea of 'spending less on the public sector' as a means to achieving independence is hugely problematic. It won't hurt civil servants anywhere near as much as it will hurt the working class people who rely on public services the most - particularly the elderly and people living in the valleys. By all means, the low-tax Celtic Tiger model might provide a blueprint for post-independence economic development, but independence will be a hard sell if it is associated with a decrease in living standards and the closing of schools and doctors surgeries.

Reply
sibrydionmawr

Firstly, I don't think that it's non-UK immigration that most of us are concerned about. It's the immigration from other parts of the UK, predominantly England. I wouldn't go so far as to tar every migrant from England with the same brush, but there are more than significant numbers of these immigrants who harbour some very nasty attitudes towards Welsh people, especially Welsh speakers, and other people, often those who have a different coloured skin. I personally don't wish to live in a Wales where our political leaders are spineless appeasers. Nor do I want to live in a Wales that is a pale reflection of England, which is what it would be if we follow the route of expanding the middle class, who will then impose a conventional government on the people, who will then be expected to cough up the cash to pay for such entitled entities. You may express disgust at the 'concentration of economic power in the hands of a rentier class', but any expanded Welsh middle class would only be providing bureaucratic enablement for that class anyway. So what difference? We simply don't need an expensive class of 'hangers on' which is what a middle-class is. Ordinary people should be controlling everything in their own lives, with no need of a clerical class to enable it. I would aspire towards a Wales that celebrates it's smallness, and aims towards, not only living within it's means, but by being as self-sufficient as is practically possible. It would mean assessing our own real needs, and then foging polices that enables us to supplying those needs without engaging in the rat race, or by trying to keep up with the international Jones'. I don't mean a retraction into a past that never existed, for if Wales is to achieve the kind of society I would like to see, it would need to invest heavily in education, on social entrepeneurship and in high tech solutions to our own problems. More oriented towards developing countries who have as much to offer us, as we have to them, than towards the so called developed countries for whom we would just be a market to be exploited. We need truly sustainable I don't want more of the same that we have already, we have too much of that, and I don't think an illusory element of Welsh control will change anything. We need to be raddevelopment that is directly related to our immediate needs, and not to the desires of some parasitic middle class. There would be absolutely no need to close schools or doctor's surgeries if we got rid of some of the dead weight of the middle class, who cost us far too much.

Reply
Owain W

I think this is where the indy debate gets stuck. There is an inherent conflict between the aims of nationalism and the aims of socialism/redistribution. Personally, I can’t see an independent Wales without an active bourgeoisie to lead it, campaign for it and administer it. This is not because I love the idea of a parasitic middle class, nor because of international ‘keeping up with the Jones’’ but because the middle class has the resources to do it, has the interest in making it happen and because historically it has been the bourgeoisie that has led nationalist movements – look at the Italian Risorgiomento, or Simon Bolivar, or the Young Turks movement. It's not about trying to copy anyone, but the idea of 'ordinary people controlling their own lives, with no need of a clerical class to enable it' simply does not exist, and never has existed. “There would be absolutely no need to close schools or doctor’s surgeries if we got rid of some of the dead weight of the middle class, who cost us far too much.” This sounds pretty contradictory. Teachers and doctors are not working class. If you ‘get rid’ of the middle class (how exactly?) you might be able to keep schools and surgeries open, but there would be no staff to work in them!

Reply

In reply to Owain W

sibrydionmawr

We need a bourgeoisie like we need a hole in the head! We don't need leaders in the conventional sense. It may be that 'historically it has been the bourgeoisie that has led nationalist/political movements', usually because that class didn't feel they were being adequately accommodated by an imperialist regime. However, once they've achieved their aims, that bourgeoisie wastes little time in suppressing the ordinary working people who did all the grunt work, paid for it, and often shed their blood for it too. And as for your claim that the idea that ordinary people controlling their own lives, with no need of a clerical class to enable it having never existed, I point you to the Makhnovist Movement in revolutionary Ukraine in the early 1920s, or the CNT- FAI taking control of society in Catalonia in the Spanish Civil War period. True, they were not successful, because bourgeois power suppressed them. I'd also like to point out the recent tragedy at Grenfell Tower that demonstrated very well what ordinary people can achieve, spontaneously, organising as they did, food supplies, clothing, emotional support networks and shelter whilst the bourgeois officials were still wondering whether to pull their finger out , or not. So, that ability exists, in latent form, all over the world, and is suppressed, all over the world, by the bourgeoise. There is nothing to say that teacher and doctors are by definition or necessity 'middle class' they are just defined that way to give them status in our society. And anyway, I think that many doctors themselves, especially junior doctors, regard themselves as workers, since last year's industrial action last year. Teachers are more problematic, given that they are tasked with ensuring that ordinary people are conditioned towards accepting bourgeois values - much cheaper and more efficient that crushing them with the police/military, (but they are kept in the wings, just in case). But teachers probably need liberating from themselves. Even so, teachers aren't of necessity members of the bourgeoisie. We don't need bourgeois leaders, or to campaign or administer it. Ordinary people can do all that themselves, more efficiently, and a hell of a lot more cheaply, as the bourgeoisie has always parisitisied ordinary working people. All ordinary people need to do is to convince themselves of their own true worth, and take it from there.

Reply

In reply to sibrydionmawr

sibrydionmawr

Oh, there are various ways of getting rid of the middle class, the methods depend a lot on how much time there is. The anarchists in Catalonia just shot people dressed in bourgeois clothing out of hand, which even I think is a little drastic, after all, the way someone dresses is no indication of their political or social leanings, and besides, there are quite a few anarchist dandies out there too. Other methods would be a gradual moving of society away from the bullshit of social class, best achieved through education, which, contrary to the beliefs of many, isn't gained in our state schools. (the fact that they are state should give a strong clue as to why not) but through radical education in line with the ideas of A S Neill, Paulo Freire, and Ivan Illich, amongst other radical educators.

Reply

In reply to sibrydionmawr

Red Dragon Jim

Or you could look at the real, existing Catalonia of today, run by a coalition of bourgeois liberal nationalists and left-nationalists. A relatively successful pre-independence state with prosperity, identity and a strong social welfare system. National liberation absolutely requires the participation of patriotic elements of the middle-class.

Reply
sibrydionmawr

(THIS ISN'T A DOUBLE POSTING - I saw some errors and omissions in the version above!) Firstly, I don’t think that it’s non-UK immigration that most of us are concerned about. It’s the immigration from other parts of the UK, predominantly England. I wouldn’t go so far as to tar every migrant from England with the same brush, but there are more than significant numbers of these immigrants who harbour some very nasty attitudes towards Welsh people, especially Welsh speakers, and other people, often those who have a different coloured skin. I personally don’t wish to live in a Wales where our political leaders are spineless appeasers. Nor do I want to live in a Wales that is a pale reflection of England, which is what it would be if we follow the route of expanding the middle class, who will then impose a conventional government on the people, who will then be expected to cough up the cash to pay for such entitled entities. You may express disgust at the ‘concentration of economic power in the hands of a rentier class’, but any expanded Welsh middle class would only be providing bureaucratic enablement for that class anyway. So what difference? We simply don’t need an expensive class of ‘hangers on’ which is what a middle-class is. Ordinary people should be controlling everything in their own lives, with no need of a clerical class to enable it. I would aspire towards a Wales that celebrates it’s smallness, and aims towards, not only living within it’s means, but by being as self-sufficient as is practically possible. It would mean assessing our own real needs, and then foging polices that enables us to supplying those needs without engaging in the rat race, or by trying to keep up with the international Jones’. I don’t mean a retraction into a past that never existed, for if Wales is to achieve the kind of society I would like to see, it would need to invest heavily in education, on social entrepeneurship and in high tech solutions to our own problems. More oriented towards developing countries who have as much to offer us, as we have to them, than towards the so called developed countries for whom we would just be a market to be exploited. We need a truly sustainable economy, based on open principles that allow ease of access. I don’t want more of the same that we have already, we have too much of that, and I don’t think an illusory element of Welsh control will change anything. We need to be radically different, promoting development that is directly related to our immediate needs, and not to the desires of some parasitic middle class. There would be absolutely no need to close schools or doctor’s surgeries if we got rid of some of the dead weight of the middle class, who cost us far too much. *This is an edit, as I posted and then saw some errors and ommissions – editor, could we please have an edit button, and maybe also a delete button too?*

Reply
Eos Pengwern

One of the most cogent and sensible articles on the subject I've read in a long time. I was a Plaid Cymru member during the Dafydd Wigley era, and would describe myself as a right-of-centre Welsh Nationalist. Not a single one of the Welsh 'mainstream' parties represent me, so I vote UKIP: enthusiastically in 2015, reluctantly this year, and of course in between the two general elections I voted Leave. I cannot think of a single argument for Brexit which is not also just as good an argument for Welsh independence, and vice versa; I want the one for the same reasons as I want the other, namely to get Wales out from under a massive bureaucracy run by people who don't care a jot about us, and to be able to trade with the world on our own terms. Naturally I think we have the best chance of doing so successfully, and so increase the country's prosperity across the board, if a future independent Welsh government followed right-of-centre policies with low taxes, low regulation, minimal government interference in the economy and a small state. Therefore I've been in despair at the direction that Plaid Cymru in particular, and the Nationalist movement in general, has been taking since Dafydd Wigley stepped down. This article has given me a glimmer of hope.

Reply
Wrexhamian

The issues that motivate Brexit supporters and those that motivate Welsh nationalists are not mutually contradictory. Some overlap, e.g. the desire to protect Welsh culture and the Welsh language from the threat of massive demographic change emanating from both England and the EU and promoted by their respective rulers. Brexit supporters were, as far as I can see, voting for Britain but equally for Wales. They will be far less of a problem to hopes of Welsh sovereignty than those like the liberal elite who work to promote a globalist agenda.

Reply
JezzaC

I was a Plaid member and voted Brexit. No longer. My MP revealed himself as a virtue-signalling anti-democrat when he voted in Parliament for a second referendum. Wales has been sucking off the tit of Europe for too long and it has got us nowhere. When we have no-one else to blame, and begin to restore pride based on our abilities, rather than our "grudge" identity as "not English", then we will make progress. Until then, let's talk about about anything other than the real issues and go to the Eisteddfod for a bit of nostalgia.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to sibrydionmawr Cancel

(THIS ISN'T A DOUBLE POSTING - I saw some errors and omissions in the version above!) Firstly, I don’t think that it’s non-UK immigration that most of us are concerned about. It’s the immigration from other parts of the UK, predominantly...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.