Tue, 21st July Cardiff 22°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

Opinion

We must help our farmers transition to a sustainable future.

By Emily Price
Curlew - Andy Hay (rspb-images.com)

Arfon Williams - Head of Land and Sea Policy, RSPB Cymru

The Sustainable Farming Scheme (SFS) will be one of the biggest changes impacting Welsh agriculture in generations. Scheme design and an adequate multi-annual budget will be fundamental to its success.

But just as important will be the advice and guidance farmers receive on transitioning from the current payment system, based on the amount of land they have, to one that pays them to manage land sustainably and the environmental benefits this provides society.

Since the mid twentieth century, following threats to food security, Welsh farming has been encouraged to intensify and produce more food, which it has done very successfully. In our lifetimes farmers have been paid for the number of sheep and cattle they kept, and generous grants were available for converting semi-natural habitats, such as traditional flower-rich meadows, to improved agricultural grasslands.

This system led to higher payment to farmers who improved their land and kept high levels of stock. The same system also served to devalue important wildlife habitats like ponds, trees, woodland and scrub as it considered them un-grazeable and therefore not worthy of payment.

The result was inevitable. Farmers are businesspeople and need to make a living from their land. The payment system supporting them provided no real option, prioritising production over nature.

Almost half our farmland birds, mammals, amphibians, insects and invertebrates have disappeared, along with more than 90% of enclosed flower-rich grasslands because of this poorly thought-out farming policy, which failed to adequately protect nature.

Yellowhammer - Ben Andrew (rspb-images.com)

[mid-content-banner]

Challenges

Wales now has a unique opportunity to develop a new approach to supporting Welsh farmers since leaving the EU and the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). RSPB Cymru welcomes the Sustainable Farming Scheme and the use of public money to help farmers tackle existential challenges of the twenty-first century.

Only farmers can produce food, restore nature, tackle climate change and provide society with a suite of environmental benefits vital to our well-being.

There are farmers across Wales, like the Nature Friendly Farming Network, who are already taking this balanced approach. Many of them have participated in past environmental schemes, like Glastir, and as such, aspects of the SFS will be familiar.

However, to the majority of Welsh farmers who have not taken part in these types of schemes, the SFS represents a significant change from the production and area-based payment system that has been in place for decades and which has shaped Welsh farming, farmers and the services that support them.

If the majority of farmers are to transition to its new scheme, then the Welsh Government must do more to promote the benefits of sustainable land management, and resource its delivery. This includes investing in an advisory service that guarantees the right advice and guidance from trusted, competent sources as and when required by scheme participants.

Farmers can’t be expected to be experts in everything, so to transition to a sustainable future, and learn from past policy mistakes, this farming advice must balance business, nature and wider environmental outcomes.

With informed advice farming will secure value for public money, be more profitable, resilient and work with nature.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

3 comments

Adrian

I'd be interested to know what the author's position is on solar farms and on & offshore wind turbines.

Reply
Adrian

Downvotes? For a genuine question? Nowt so queer as folk I suppose.

Reply
James Wilson

Couple of points - agriculture is not the only primary production sector. It is not the only way in which food is produced Fisheries and aquaculture provide the same function of food production and also can be undertaken in ways that provide environmental good and services and indeed more - with the bioremediation offered by low trophic feeding bivalves well established within the research literature base. Kind of surprising that an RSPB policy lead doesn't appreciate this. Fisheries and aquaculture are also (largely) not funded through subsidy, at least at the direct level. These sectors have also been through an extended period of change over the recent decades. As environmental values have rightly been placed at the forefront of spatial use, with related legislation and regulatory levers applied, the sectors have altered the how, where, when of their actives - with all commensurate costs associated with many of these changes being borne wholly by the businesses themselves. This has left many business lettering on the edge of bankruptcy if not over the edge. Compare this with agriculture - where subsidiary was used to encourage high production - with the subsequent environment impacts described, with their commensurate impacts to other economic activities too. Now to update practices and comply with societies needs in terms of environment as described through the current legislation and regulatory framework - agriculture is further subsidized. There's a very obvious disparity with this approach and that which other economic sectors have or are forced to undertake And it's not only this either - agricultural pollution into watershed produces a direct environmental impact but can also adversely impact throughout the watershed and out into the sea. As a Live bivalve producer, my activity is regularly impacted by slurry disposal, applied to field before heavy rainfall which then runs off into rivers and is flushed downstream across the areas of the seabed that are used to bivalve cultivation. The bacterial loading in this pollution - even after flushing - is many many times more concentrated than that which our highly trustworthy water utility companies seem to accidentally release. Some of the more recent economic performance figures for the agriculture sector in Wales suggest that the majority.of the sector is not economically viable without the support that the subsidy provides. And yet more than 80% of the Welsh landscape is utilised for agriculture in one way or another Everything about the discussion around the future of the agriculture sector appears to be hedged inside the framework of things that can never be considered. As the CAP in reality has been more akin to a social policy - designed to protect the rural economy and associated cultural values - shouldn't Wales be making the same honest statements and arguments to legitimately examine how the sector moves forward, with rapidity, towards it's necessary just transition

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Adrian Cancel

Downvotes? For a genuine question? Nowt so queer as folk I suppose.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.