Tuesday, 14th July 2026 Cardiff 27° · Clear sky
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Opinion

Wales – A Nation of Sanctuary?

By Mark Mansfield
A Tory leaflet attacking the Nation of Sanctuary in Wales.

Joe Newman

Wales has long taken pride in its deep cultural belief in fairness, community and strength of solidarity. But across the UK, and increasingly here at home in Cymru, our values are being tested.

It has been sixty years since the Race Relations Act became law, yet we still see racist riots, the largest far-right rally in British history, and a growing political movement fuelled by fear, misinformation and division. Refugees – people seeking safety – have become their preferred target.

We live in a political climate in which refugees are rarely discussed as people. Instead, they are framed as numbers, threats or burdens. It is easier to dehumanise than to understand. But behind every headline about “migrants” or “asylum seekers” is a human being's story, a family, and a life interrupted and upended.

Perspective is everything.

The Human Refugee

When Farrokh fled Zanzibar in 1964, as violence targeted Arab and South Asian communities, he arrived in Britain a teenage refugee with little more than hope for a chance at a better life. He would later change his name to Freddie Mercury.

When eight-year-old Hussein was trafficked into the UK from Somalia, unable to speak English and separated from his real family, he rebuilt himself through sport. He became Sir Mo Farah.

When one-year-old Rita fled Kosovo during the persecution of ethnic Albanians, she grew up in London and became Rita Ora.

You get the picture. These are not anomalies. They are reminders of who refugees become when given safety, dignity and opportunity. They enrich our culture, strengthen our communities, and contribute in ways that go far beyond economics.

The only difference between them and those born here is circumstance.

The Myths That Dehumanise

For years, myths have replaced facts in the national conversation.

“Refugees are illegal.”

Seeking asylum is a legal right. International law exists precisely because people escaping war or persecution rarely have the luxury of safe, orderly routes.

“They are a burden.”

Refugees work, build businesses, fill labour shortages and contribute more in taxes than they receive in support once they are allowed to work.

“The UK takes in too many.”

The UK hosts less than 1% of the world’s refugees. Most are sheltered by low‑ and middle‑income countries.

“They get housing first.”

Only a tiny fraction of social housing is allocated to refugees. Many spend months - even years - in temporary accommodation.

“They increase crime.”

There is no evidence linking asylum seekers to higher crime rates. None.

These myths persist because they are politically useful. They generate fear, and fear is a powerful electoral tool.

What Kind of Nation Will Cymru Choose to Be?

As Cymru prepares for the 2026 Senedd election, the wider political winds cannot be ignored. Support for Reform UK - a party whose rise has been built partly on hard‑line rhetoric about immigration - has grown sharply in Welsh polling ahead of May. That shift reflects a national climate where fear and misinformation have become potent political currencies.

But Cymru must now decide whether those currents define us.

In 2019, Cymru declared itself the world’s first Nation of Sanctuary. That title was never meant to be symbolic. It reflected something deeply Welsh: the belief that communities are strongest when they open their doors, not when they build walls.

A Nation of Sanctuary cannot exist only in name. It must exist in how we speak, how we vote, and how we challenge misinformation. It must exist in how we respond when politicians attempt to pit communities against each other, turning vulnerable families into political talking points.

Cymru cannot control UK immigration law. But it can control the political culture it chooses to nurture.

Does Cymru want to follow a UK‑wide trend towards punitive, hostile politics?

Or does it want to assert something different - something rooted in compassion and truth?

Rehumanising the Refugee Narrative

To rehumanise refugees, we must give them back their stories. We must challenge the myths that devalue their lives. We must remember that every displaced person is someone who once had a normal life - a school, a job, a community - before it was stolen by war, persecution or disaster.

We must also recognise the role each of us plays.

Every time we share unverified claims, repeat dehumanising language, or stay silent when prejudice spreads, we make refugees less safe.

But every time we speak up, every time we correct misinformation, every time we insist on empathy, we push back.

The Choice Ahead

Wales stands at a crossroads, politically, morally and culturally. The rise of a party capitalising on anti‑migrant sentiment shows how easily fear can take hold when left unchallenged. But it also shows why Cymru must hold fast to its principles.

If Cymru still believes in being a Nation of Sanctuary, then this is the moment to prove it.

And above all - remember our shared humanity.

A nation’s character is measured by how it treats the vulnerable. And my Cymru has always known on which side of that history it wants to be.

Joe Newman is a Welsh writer and charity‑sector professional specialising in racial justice and equalities work. As a member of both the BAME and LGBTQIA+ communities, his writing is rooted in lived experience and the everyday navigation of life as a double minority.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

25 comments

Richard Jenkins

Remarkable piece that condenses the stark choice we face! Retain our nation & its culture or sell out to selfish stupidity?

Reply
Askevans

You make good points but to ignore British people's concerns and label them racists is abhorrent. One can't blame the refugees but we can blame big business and government who for the last few decades have encouraged immigrants rather than pay to train locals. Why do you think Brexit happened everybody except those taking advantage of cheap labour were being ignored and disadvantaged.

Reply
Chris Hale

Brexit happened because of a well financed campaign based on lies, financed by foreign based billionaires, with Russian state support. Who remembers the Brexit bus NHS slogan - promising a £350 million a week saving, which could be used to fund the NHS. That went well. Look at the loss of regional assistance, which Wales had benefitted from. London promised to match fund it - it didn’t, and what money is given does not come to the Welsh government. Are the Welsh people going to be fooled again by the same liars in new suits?

Reply
James

Very very good point. Big business wants mass immigration as you don't have to pay to train the locals, hence why the UK has more unemployed young people than anywhere else in the 'Western' world. Also agree that it is horrendous to keep labeling people as racist simply for questioning whether our immigration policy is fit for purpose as there have been some horrible things happening (the dog walker, Brighton etc etc). Immigration is not all bad but you can't say it's all good either. Nuance has been kicked into the long grass.

Reply
Dom

But those wanting to take advantage of cheap labour bankrolled Brexit. The whole point of Brexit was to replace expensive European migration with much cheaper non-European migration.

Reply
Y Cymro

With due respect, yes—there are those with genuine concerns, agreed—but a sizable majority voted for Brexit, which caused many of the very issues now being faced. And let’s not forget: the Welsh Conservatives blindly supported Blair’s illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, as well as the 2016 Brexit referendum—a perfect storm that later contributed to the rise in small boat crossings. And now these anglophile hypocrites criticise the “Nation of Sanctuary” policy, which seeks to support those sent by Westminster, often without the knowledge of the Welsh Government or Senedd. A good example was when the Home Office bypassed the Senedd by housing over 250 asylum seekers in terrible conditions in ex-army barracks in Penally, Pembrokeshire, during the height of the Covid pandemic, without proper PPE supplies in 2020/2021. And to rub our noses in further into the dirt. They were only later moved, and the local council was never reimbursed for the approximately £500,000 spent on policing and other related costs—only the accommodation providers were compensated by Whitehall.

Reply
Askevans

Seem to have raised a discusión point. Mind I didn't mention Brexit but I do believe the point I made re lack of training for the indigenous Brits was a big reason for the Brexit vote

Reply

In reply to Askevans

Johnny

So who exactly are Indigenous Brits! If you are referring to People of Angles, Saxon,Jute and Norse descent then that's No.

Reply

In reply to Johnny

Askevans

I'm including anybody born here regardless of race . I have to I'm an Englishman of English, Irish and Welsh descent living in Wales

Reply

In reply to Askevans

Dom

Does that exclude American-born Boris Johnson?

Reply
Y Cymro

More dog whistling from the Welsh Conservative party trying to stave off the threat of fellow extremists Reform UK.

Reply
algebra museums

There was a time when we in Cymru were called foreigners in the UK; it's the same message that's still being pushed by Reform today. Somewhat ironic for the Reform company that is primarily funded from outside of the UK and has its policies written by the Heritage Foundation USA. It's certainly not the only foreign money, but the £5,000,000 that was donated to Reform by Chakrit Sakunkrit, the ex-English cryptocurrency billionaire tax dodger who is now Reform's largest donor. He's also been the largest donor to every party that Farage has been involved in. The slight difference with Reform England is that, instead of it being a political party, it's a company that is owned by Farage, so those tax-free donations are the personal property of the owner of that company. It's essentially a copy of what Trump is doing to the USA, and as it is in the USA, the people who vote for him will end up being the people who suffer the most if he were ever to gain power. If it were up to the Farage/Trump alliance, the UK would currently be at war in a country that Trump won't even send his own troops into. I've never understood why people choose to misunderstand the difference between immigration and people seeking refuge. Let's remember how many people from the Celtic nations have had to seek refuge in other countries because of persecution and subjection instilled in us by people just like Farage and his ilk. The USA wouldn't even exist today if it weren't for people being forced to leave their own homes here. We even had protection from uncontrolled immigration until Farage and Johnson lied to the exact same people who are still believing Farage's lies today that we would be better without those protections. Even this very week, the treasury has had to pay France £500,000,000 to partially cover a fraction of the protections that we used to get for free before Farage's lies, and that's only with France; there are more than 30 other countries, both inside and outside the EU, that we gave up agreements with thanks to Farage and his lies. Let's not forget that after Brexit, Farage boasted about the fact that he managed to claim expenses of over £2,000,000 from UK taxpayers simply in the time it took to sell the lie.

Reply
Dom

Odd the Cons don't know the difference between a refugee and an asylum seeker.

Reply
David Jones

There is a "HUGE "difference in the thousands of young men who travel on the boats across the channel these people are Illegal "invaders" as stated in UK law. Than people seeking genuine asylum.

Reply
Dom

The system requires people who want to claim asylum to get here first.

Reply
Mab Meirion

Why isn't H.M.S Dragon defending those mariners against the Pirates of the Levant ?

Reply
Walter Hunt

It's absolutely true that we in Wales: those in government, communities and we as individuals, have a moral and legal duty towards those fleeing persecution. What is politically naive is to virtue signal that with a policy called "Nation of Sanctuary". This has facilitated those who see political advantage in creating division. Importing American style culture wars into Wales threatens to divide communities and undermine the very values of solidarity, croeso and inclusivity we hold so dear.

Reply
Rhidian

You are absolutely right Walter. It is a virtue signal. We know that because as they keep telling us Wales has no control over immigration anyway. It is also an undemocratic virtue signal - because the majority of Wales voted for Brexit.

Reply
Dom

Brexit only asked about membership of a political union so you have no idea what it said about immigration. In fact central government took it as sn instruction to replace European migration with non-European migration.

Reply
Will

Pertinent to watch what is unfolding in Spain with their amnesty for 500000 illegal migrants. Might, just possibly, put a wee bit of pressure on the NHS etc were we to keep going down the same road.

Reply
Dom

Presumably that's half a million new taxpayer to help pay for public services.

Reply
Lionel

Nah, vast majority will be unskilled workers so will be a net tax loss over their lifetimes. That's the bit people miss. If they were all doctors, engineers, financiers etc then fine, but that really is a long shot...

Reply

In reply to Lionel

Dom

You're not considering the black market businesses they may have been working for which have to become legitimate to keep employing these folks and start paying business and employment taxes.

Reply

In reply to Lionel

Dom

By some estimates upto half are overqualified for their black market jobs. Regularisation will allow them to move into higher skilled roles paying more in than they'll take out as well as filling skills shortages.

Reply
Johnny

Hahaha even when Enoch Powell was Health Minister he authorized British passports for people from the Commonwealth Nations to come and work in the NHS

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Chris Hale Cancel

Brexit happened because of a well financed campaign based on lies, financed by foreign based billionaires, with Russian state support. Who remembers the Brexit bus NHS slogan - promising a £350 million a week saving, which could be used...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.