Friday, 17th July 2026 Cardiff 22° · Clear sky
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Opinion

This is how the UK is supporting Israel’s Genocide in Gaza

By Mark Mansfield
Smoke and flames billow after Israeli forces struck a high-rise tower in Gaza City, October 7, 2023. Photo credit: Ali Hamad of APAimages, for WAFA is marked Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license .

Harry Carter

Evidence from several investigations shows how the UK government supports Israel as they continue to slaughter Palestinian civilians.

Reporting from journalists has revealed that the UK is aiding the Israeli government militarily to carry out their attacks on Palestine in several ways:

  • The UK continues to supply arms and military contracts to Israel.
  • British airspace and RAF airbases have been used in the re-supply of weapons and munitions to Israel.
  • Over the period of a year, British taxpayers have paid for just under half of all the surveillance flights over the Gaza strip.
  • Israeli soldiers are reported to have received training on UK soil since October 7th 2023 and UK spy teams have been deployed to Israel to assist militarily.

[mid-content-banner]

Genocide in Gaza

The equivalent to Welsh, Scottish, Irish and English towns and cities have been flattened in Gaza.

The Palestinian people which make up these youthful communities have been killed in their tens of thousands by Israel and are buried alongside the rubble.

The statistics hide the horrors behind every name. At this point, the number of people dead is so large that there is a growing sea of untold stories – loved ones and entire families wiped out.

If all their stories were to be reported on TV, there would be no time for other programmes to be aired.

The latest number of Palestinians killed can be found here, at the time of writing it is 62,614. Unfortunately, as noted in a piece penned for the prestigious British Medical Journal, The Lancet, the true number dead is likely to be multiple times higher than currently reported.

Definition taken from the 2025 Encyclopædia Britannica. The full definition of genocide was ratified under the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

Accomplices to the crime

The genocide taking place in Gaza is a transnational project, requiring the participation of western countries who provide the economic, military and political support for Israel to prosecute its attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure.

The state of Israel is actively under investigation for a ‘plausible genocide’ against the Palestinian people by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and arrest warrants have been issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the previous minister of defence Yoav Gallan for war crimes.

Despite this, the UK continues to support the Israeli state extensively.

An aerial view showing destruction in Rafah after Israeli forces withdrew and as a temporary ceasefire took hold. Photo UNRWA is marked under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

1. Spy Planes

The UK government was responsible for nearly half of all the reconnaissance flights over Gaza from October 2023 to October 2024. The UK used its Shadow R1 spy planes to collect at least 645 flights worth of intelligence, which were shared with Israel and financed by the British taxpayer.

Meanwhile, according to the same report using open source flight data by Al-Jazeera, Israel conducted just 20% of the reconnaissance flights over Gaza in the same period. The result: British taxpayers footing the bill for Israel’s military intelligence, while there is a cost of living crisis and Rachel Reeves is busy making cuts to vital social spending programmes at home.

2. Israel’s use of UK airbases and airspace

Reporting by Declassified’s investigative journalists has revealed that UK airbases have been used by the Israeli airforce. The UK Ministry of Defence (MOD) has previously refused to deny that Israeli F-35 fighter jets (known to have been used to bomb Gaza during the course of the war) have used Britain’s military airbase in Cyprus.

A map showing military flights between the UK and Israel.

The RAF airbase Akrotiri, located in Cyprus, plays a crucial role in the re-arming of Israel. International flights containing munitions and military equipment from Israel’s allies stop off at the RAF airbase prior to arrival in Israel.

Many international military flights arrive in Israel via either Tel Aviv or the Nevatim military airbase. The Nevatim Airbase is frequently used to launch attacks on Gaza and Tel Aviv provides it with military supplies. British R1 spy planes fly from RAF Akrotiri to Gaza to collect intelligence on behalf of Israel and are also known to have used the Israeli Nevatim airbase.

Further reporting by Sanad, Al-jazzera’s verification agency, shows that UK mainland RAF airbases and the same UK military base in Cyprus have been used to facilitate the transport of arms and weapons to Israel.

The support by the UK in the creation of these ‘weapons air bridges’ for bombs and munitions to be re-supplied to the Israeli military, at the same time that the state of Israel is actively under investigation for a ‘plausible genocide’ by the ICJ, has almost certainly allowed the ferocity of Israel’s massacre to continue in Gaza and across the region.

3. F-35 Fighter Jets

As reported by Campaign Against the Arms Trade, the British Labour government allows vital parts needed for Israeli F-35 fighter jets to be sent to Israel as part of the UK’s role in providing parts to the F-35 global supply-chain programme.

These specialist parts are required by Israeli F-35 fighter jets in order to stay operational and to continue dropping up to 2,000 pound bombs onto Palestinians and their homes in Gaza.

The decision by the UK to allow the provision of specialist parts for Israeli F-35s alongside other military exports is currently being challenged by the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) and Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq in the UK courts.

In an embarrassing result for the UK Labour government, they had to admit during a High Court hearing in 2024 that “Israel is not committed to complying with international humanitarian law” by the UK’s own legal assessment.

The High Court has now ruled that the UK government must attend court in May 2025, due to GLAN and Al-Haq’s legal challenge, to face a full hearing over the UK’s export of F-35 and military components to Israel

4. British Companies

While Palestinians continue to die, British-based arms manufacturing companies like Elbit Systems with locations in Wales and England, and BAE Systems with locations in England and Scotland, continue to profit by providing critical parts and weapons to an Israeli government under investigation for numerous war crimes.

5. Israeli Troops on UK soil

It has also been reported by Declassified that Israeli Soldiers have received training in the UK since October 7th 2023, with the UK government confirming these claims. Little information about the content of the training is publicly known.

6. UK Spy teams in Israel

Israeli officials have revealed to The New York Times that the UK has had a spy team deployed inside Israel for the duration of the conflict to assist in providing ‘intelligence’ for Israel’s attacks on Gaza.

19 Months of Horror

Over a year into the attacks, the UK Labour government has halted less than 10% of military exports to Israel.  Meanwhile, senior Israeli political figures continue to express their intentions. This includes the minister of Defence for the majority of the conflict, Yoav Gallan – who as early as the 9th of October 2023 said:

 “I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed,” and "We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly."

As legal experts have noted, it is a war crime to collectively punish the Palestinian population as a whole for the Hamas and Islamic Jihad October 7th attacks, which massacred 863 civilians including at a music festival, killed 319 personnel from the Israeli security services and led to the kidnapping of 251 hostages (including 41 dead bodies counted among the civilian deaths noted above).

For over two months, Israel has once again cut off all aid, including food, from entering Gaza. On the 9th of March 2025, Israel cut Gaza’s last remaining electricity supply. This means that water desalination plants and water pumps will cease to operate without the necessary fuel and electricity needed to keep them running.

In total, 18 British nationals were killed and 2 were taken hostage on October the 7th. One of the British hostages was released alive in 2025 and the other British national, 51-year-old Nadav Popplewell, did not survive.

To date, it is still unknown how many people were killed on October the 7th due to Israeli friendly fire and the use of the hannibal directive, which instructs the Israeli military to prevent "at all costs" the abduction of Israeli civilians or soldiers.

Attacks on Aid Agencies

Over a year on from when Yoav Gallan’s incriminating statement was made, the Israeli equivalent to the UK parliament, known as the Knesset, voted overwhelmingly to ban The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) from operating in Israel and all Israeli occupied territories.

The vote to ban UNRWA follows a pattern of continued attacks on aid agencies by Israel in the Gaza strip. This includes the killing of 7 World Kitchen workers, including 3 Britons (John Chapman, aged 57, James Henderson, aged 33, and James Kirby, aged 47) in a targeted strike on their NGO marked vehicles after they had just unloaded 100 tonnes of food aid.

At the time of writing, over 280 UN staff have been killed by Israel in Gaza. There has been a systemic destruction of public facilities by the Israeli military, including hospitals, schools and bakeries, and the blocking of food and vital medical supplies into Palestinian territory.

UNRWA is considered by many professionals to be the most important aid agency for Palestinians. This is because they are the only aid agency that can provide, at scale, the lifesaving infrastructure and food needed to sustain the aprox. 6 million Palestinian refugees forcibly displaced by Israel across the middle east, including over 2 million Palestinians trapped and besieged by the Israeli army in the Gaza strip.

The withholding and weaponization of aid against the Palestinian population by Netanyahu’s  government and the use of starvation against a civilian population, of which nearly half of whom are children, are clear red lines for governments around the world and British aid organisations. So, why does Keir Starmer and his government see fit to maintain normal relations with a state that does not abide by international humanitarian law?

British Foreign Secretary David Lammy shaking hands with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while visiting Israel in 2024. This was at the same time that the International Criminal Court were seeking to issue international arrest warrants for Israeli Leaders. Photo via Mr Lammy's X account

Political accomplices or failures?

By any metrics, the UK Conservative and Labour governments' approach to dealing with Benjamin Netanyahu has failed.

Sunak and Starmer’s governments have provided the political cover for Netanyahu to operate with impunity and continually subvert attempts to end the conflict. Instead of shaking hands and posing for photos, David Lammy should have been applying tangible pressure on the Israeli government to capitulate to international calls for a ceasefire, bring the hostages home, begin the recognition of a Palestinian state, and take steps towards a lasting peace.

The political choices being made by Keir Starmer and his cabinet over the genocide in Gaza are all the more egregious as 15 UK NGOs, including Oxfam, Amnesty International & Medical Aid for Palestinians, wrote to the government in October 2024 and reported that:

“Gaza is being erased before our eyes, violence against Palestinians in the West Bank is worsening, and Israeli military attacks on Lebanon continue to escalate, causing untold civilian suffering and threatening to replicate the conditions in Gaza.”

US and UK doctors working in Gaza have reported seeing children with gunshot wounds to their heads and chests, and a UN Commission has reported that Israel is committing war crimes and the crime against humanity of extermination in Gaza.

Until now, Prime minister Kier Starmer has not used his position of power to place sanctions, or put in place a trade and full arms embargo, on the Israeli government despite the mounting war crimes they continue to commit.

The value of life and for whom

At this stage, with hundreds of thousands of Palestinians either dead, maimed, starving or displaced, there are no excuses. What more do Keir Starmer and his front bench need to see to act? Nineteen-year-old Sha’ban al-Dalou being burnt to death in a hospital tent while connected to an IV drip is not enough? Or hearing 6-year-old Hind Rajab’s desperate cry for help that was recorded in her last moments:

“I’m so scared, please come. Come take me. Please, will you come?”

Her words were heard just moments before she was killed by the Israeli Army’s 162nd Division surrounded by dead family members in a car.

The 162nd is the same Israeli Army division that then went on to kill two paramedics, who were in their ambulance, en-route to try and save the child.

A Palestinian refugee carries his injured grandchildren from the Israeli bombing of Nuseirat Camp, Gaza Strip. Photo via UNRWA is marked Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license

Will the British government keep enabling Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians? How many of these countless crimes need to play out for it to be enough for Labour ministers?

What is crystal clear is that there is a lack of value placed on Palestinian lives by the UK government. This is exemplified through the absence of meaningful action on part of the government even when confronted with evidence of a genocide and war crimes.

The reality is this UK government’s foreign policy position on Israel would not be tolerated if these atrocities were being committed to European or American citizens. It is jarringly obvious that the Labour front bench is out of touch with their party members, constituents and the majority of the world at the United Nations.

Enough is enough

In 1982, when Israel invaded Lebanon, then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher ordered a full arms embargo on Israel. Meanwhile, 2025’s Keir Starmer, David Lammy and Anneliese Dodds choose to stand up in the house of commons and refuse to take meaningful action, even as a genocide perpetrated by Israel is live streamed to the world.

British politicians allow for UK airbases and airspace to be used in the re-supply of the Israeli military machine and UK ministers permit the use of British taxpayers' money to finance half of the reconnaissance flights over Gaza, and all the while more bombs and bullets continue to rain down on Palestinian men, women and children.

To many, these UK government ministers and their top civil servants look to be complicit in the genocide taking place in Gaza. They are comfortable in their London flats and largely unaffected, all while they allow for critical weapons and parts to be supplied to Israel to the delight of the bank balances of British arms manufacturers.

In contrast, the reality for Palestinians in Gaza is stark.

As journalist Paraic O’Brien put it: “If every soul is a world of its own, in Gaza, whole galaxies are dying.”

A ray of hope

Despite such dark times, the good news is that there is a blueprint for applying pressure on a rogue state and affecting change when governments themselves fail to do so.

The global anti-apartheid movement to stop the practice of racist segregation in South Africa also had roots in the UK.

Citizens and organised labour carried out boycotts of South African goods, cultural and sporting events, blocked important military shipments, filed legal challenges and changed the political landscape inflicting a mounting economic and political cost on the South African government and their supporters.

These co-ordinated international efforts helped to see Nelson Mandela become the president of South Africa, while supporters of the apartheid regime now claim that they were always against racial segregation.

In a similar tradition, Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund, the worlds largest, recently announced it had divested from Israel's Paz Retail and Energy company which owns and operates infrastructure supplying energy to illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

In the same week, Norway's most powerful trade union federation, LO, has voted in favour of a full economic boycott of Israel.

Despite Israel’s efforts, there does exist the possibility of a prosperous future for Palestine.

It starts with holding those in power to account and taking action collectively. Currently, Starmer and his front bench continue to politically and militarily support and supply Netanyahu’s government as Israel brushes aside international law, starves the population and commits genocide in Gaza.

It’s time that changed.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

56 comments

Evan Aled Bayton

The British Medical Journal is the house journal of the UK doctors trade journal union the BMA. The Lancet was once a British journal but is now international and published by a Dutch publisher. It has produced figures for wars like Iraq which tend to be overestimates. Undoubtedly a large number of people have been killed in Gaza and a lot of the infrastructure destroyed. The nature of this is such that the exact number may never be known and not for many years.

Reply
Mac

Hamas is still holding hostages. Why?

Reply
Johnny

11,000 Palestinians including Women and Children have been detained without trial since before October 2023

Reply
Brad

Starting a war isn't the solution to that.

Reply
Mab Meirion

Middah k'neged middah...

Reply
lufccymru

Disgusting behaviour by the UK government and those members of the public who support this genocide.

Reply
Jon W

Great article hits on the key points. The issue that seems to be totally ignored now is the many thousands of Palestinians held by the Israeli in their torture camps. We have ample evidence now of the brutality of these places from before and after October 7th and this is the reason for hostages being taken for exchange which isn't justification merely context. What should also be remembered is the brutal reality of life in Gaza in the years leading up to this. The many well documented Israeli massacres, the siege and the use of Palestinians as guinea pigs to test out weapons and then market these to the world as battle tested Anthony Lowenstein's great book the Palestine Laboratory documents this well

Reply
Brad

Lots of words about how bad one side is but no interest in finding a permanent solution. That's why this will continue for another 80 years.

Reply
Brad

How many of those solutions guaranteed Israels security?

Reply
Jon W

The problem is Israel has constantly chosen expansion over security. All significant Palestinian resistance and political factions have agreed to one big democratic state and also many iterations of two state based around the internationally recognised pre 1967 borders, which means Palestinians agreeing to give up around 78% of their historic lands to those who stole them. These negotiations have been sabotaged a long time ago by Israel and wouldn't even be entertained for the last few decades. The problem is until America and its vassals stop providing Israel with means and protections they need for constant expansion it's difficult to see a route forward. We have to end our governments complicity in this horror

Reply
Brad

Various Palestinian factions may have agreed to a one or two state solution based around the 67 lines but they didn't have full support of the population. There remained a resistance that was armed and dangerous. This resistance and the violence they caused was the reason expansion happened, partly to make the borders easier to secure in response to attacks, and partly as punishment for the attacks. We'll never know what might have happened if everyone on the ground had just got along. Without the justification for expansion coming from the violence there may have been no expansion at all. The one state solution may have worked. The extremists that wanted all the land may have been kept in a box by the moderate majority. The reason that didn't happen was external forces funding and arming the resistance. That's what has kept this going all these years. The Israelis and Palestinians were never given a chance to live together.

Reply

In reply to Brad

Jon W

That's a gross misrepresentation. The most prominent armed groups had agreed to these things. The problem is the Israelis having an unconditional military guarantee by the global hegemonic power and a national ideology based on enthno religious supremacism and constant expansion

Reply

In reply to Jon W

Brad

So why did Saudi keep funding violence?

Reply

In reply to Brad

Tucker

Where's your proof of this? Why aren't the UK or Americans sanctioning Saudi instead of arming them? If that was true.

Reply

In reply to Tucker

Brad

Because the Americans needed Saudi oil. That all changed after 9/11 after which Saudi funding dried up. Iran then stepped in to plug the gap.

Reply

In reply to Brad

Tucker

So they sell them arms to help Hamas? Ok if you say so.

Reply

In reply to Tucker

Brad

The whole of the Middle East is in an arms race. Saudi's biggest foe in the region is Iran who is also not friends with the US so it's useful to have Saudi keep Iran in check.

Reply

In reply to Brad

Tucker

So why are isreal bombing the West Bank?

Reply

In reply to Brad

Tucker

How about the billions given to isreal by America to murder civilians Palestinians? Or doesn't that count?

Reply
David Inman

The UK Government claims that it has deployed military assets to promote de-escalation and also claims that drone surveillance of Gaza has been conducted for the purpose of hostage rescue. It has also stated that it would be willing to share this evidence with the ICC if requested. What evidence do you have to the contrary? And, which arms and munitions are nation.cymru claiming that the UK government is currently supplying to Israel that are being used in Gaza?  While it is true that the UK has stopped short of a full arms embargo when it has not been shy to impose one in the past, it has not provided “lethal or military equipment” to Israel since 7 October 2023. The situation is somewhat complicated by the joint development of the F-35. The currently contentious arm sales appear to be limited only to the F-35 parts which, as a part of the licences the UK has revoked, are not supplied directly to Israel - as the article erroneously claims - but released into the global (NATO based) supply chain. The UK government has rightly concluded that withholding these parts from NATO would be the only feasible way of ensuring they will not end up in Israel and that this action would disrupt production in other theatres where they are desperately required, such as the Ukrainian war.

Reply
Lan y Môr

The UK is providing 1,000's of hours of surveillance footage to a state committing war crimes which are well documented, you perhaps are ok with that, taxpayers however may not be. Interestingly the government has not provided footage when requested to date, likely because it would mean that they were aware of crimes being committed and would be forced to halt military exports to Israel. The UK has actually sent F-35 parts directly to Israel. A quick google also shows that it's not true that the UK has halted sending leathal military supplies to Israel. Since September 2024 the UK has sent munitions marked as bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines and missiles despite claiming otherwise. Additionally, since September, items exported were listed under “tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, motorised, whether or not fitted with weapons, and parts of such vehicles.”

Reply
David Inman

The UK government unsurprisingly declined to share it's drone surveillance footage when it was requested via FOI citing obvious security concerns however as previously mentioned they have said they would be willing to share this evidence with the ICC if requested. There is currently no reason to believe otherwise. I do not have an issue with the UKs involvement for the expressed purpose of finding hostages and if the information it is collecting can be provided as evidence in court then all the better. Regarding the F-35s, as per your own source... There have been no further “exports of F-35 parts direct to Israel via RAF Marham since the licensing suspension” announced by the Labour government in September 2024. The withdrawn licences implicitly forbid the transfer of F-35 parts directly to Israel. If under the previous conservative Government parts were directly shipped to Israel then they should be held accountable for misleading parliament and doing so. The MSN article you linked states.. since September 2024, 8,630 items were reportedly exported under the category “bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines, missiles and similar munitions of war and parts thereof – other." The UK Government has repeatedly claimed that it will not provide military equipment it believes will find application in Gaza but will continue to provide equipment so that Israel can defend against the attacks from other actors such as Iran and the Houthis - to that end the UK government have been forthright about resupplying Israel's Navy. This would fall under the category “bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines, missiles and similar munitions of war and parts thereof and does not necessarily suggest that the UK is providing bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines, missiles and similar munitions of war and parts thereof to be utilized in Gaza. Theses licences are under constant review and as such they should be withdrawn if there is direct evidence that they are in use in Gaza. I do share the same concerns as those which McDonnell raised in the MSN article you linked namely that there is a worrying lack of transparency - and despite your assertion that this information is readily available via a quick google search - the few articles that are available aren't particularly informative, and it is the government that should be explicit about what is has determined can be sent and why, particularly if it is currently unwilling to impose a full arms embargo.

Reply

In reply to David Inman

Lan y Môr

Thank you for conceeding that Israel has been sent F-35 fighter jet parts directly by the UK. In just one example Israel F-35 planes bombed a safe zone in Gaza, killing 90 people. Thank you also for conceeding that Israel is taking leathal munitions from the UK, even though you then went on to wrap it up in a nice little story about how possibly, potentially, maybe they are all going to their Navy. The Israeli Navy has been used to attack Gaza, so there goes that story. As you mentioned there is a major lack of transparency taking place in how the UK is supporting Israel's genoicde in Gaza. With all respect, you have a lot of blind faith in the UK government who has had to conceed in court that 'Israel is not committed to complying with international humanitarian law' and the same UK government which has a history of misleading the public. Then you go on and are putting even more faith in the Israeli government that is being investigated for 'plausible genocide' and has an international arrest warrant issued for their Prime minister, who is also being tried for corruption in his own country. With that in mind, do you really think Israel can be trusted not to use military intelligence, parts, and leathal munitions on the major conflict that they are waging on Palestinian men, women and children while breaking international law and starving the same population?

Reply

In reply to Lan y Môr

David Inman

To be absolutely clear: I have not expressed “faith in the Israeli government,” nor have I said anything that remotely suggests it. Likewise, I did not “acknowledge a major lack of transparency in how the UK is supporting Israel’s genocide in Gaza.” That is a gross distortion and a disingenuous misrepresentation of what was a carefully qualified argument. I have consistently focused on the UK government's stated policy, its arms export licensing regime, and the need for transparency and accountability in those decisions. I would have liked you to engage with what I actually said not what you'd prefer to argue against. While you may well believe the previous Conservative government and the current Labour government are functionally the same on this issue, that doesn’t align with the facts. The Conservative government claimed to be “satisfied that there was good evidence to support a judgment that Israel is committed to comply[ing] with IHL” and appears to have mislead parliament by shipping F-35 parts directly to Israel. Conversely, Labour, on taking office, conducted its own review and concluded that “there exists a clear risk” that UK exports might be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law and suspended around 30 licences that could potentially be used to breach IHL accordingly. While there is certainly room for criticism, the current government's actions including its stated willingness to share intelligence with the ICC, the cessation of F-35 shipments directly to Israel - or any munitions it deems will have use in Gaza - should be acknowledged and commended, not dismissed out of hand. If arms or surveillance data are ever shown to have contributed to breaches of international law, there must be consequences. But we need evidence and due process, not assertions grounded in assumption, cynicism, conspiracy or distrust.

Reply

In reply to David Inman

Tucker

Then why are UK lawyers acting on behalf of the government claiming there is no genocide in Gaza, so arms sales can continue https://www.thenational.scot/news/25162823.evidence-not-show-genocide-gaza--labour-lawyers-argue/ Or https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/uk-government-lawyers-no-evidence-israel-targeting-civilians-gaza-jc2mmu9d

Reply

In reply to David Inman

Lan y Môr

Like a politician you didn't answer the question - do you really think Israel can be trusted not to use military intelligence, parts, and leathal munitions on the major conflict that they are waging on Palestinian men, women and children while breaking international law and starving the same population? You seem happy to parrot the government line while also expressing concerns about a quote "worring lack of transparency". Which implies you do have an element of blind faith as you are happy, so far it seems, to hand over lethal weapons, military intel and military parts to a state committing genocide. That also implies a larger amount of blind faith in the Israeli government to use those weapons according to international law when they have been documented extensively to have committed war crimes, their prime minister has an international arrest warrant issued for his arrest and is currently undergoing trail in Israel for corruption. The evidence is there for all to see. So far you have had to have someone show you that the UK has sent F-35 parts to Israel approved by the Tories and carried out under the tenure of Labour, the UK labour goverment continues to provide lethal munitions to Israel and Labour has approved more arms to Israel in three months than the Tories did in four years. The Labour goverment is in court as we speak arguing that it should be able to continue sending F-35 parts to Israel, that you yourself are opposed to the Tories having done. For someone who in their own words can write "carefully qualified arguments", why are you incapable of looking up the evidence? That evidence includes hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with a population of 50% children either starving, displaced, maimed, or killed by Israel in Gaza. Perhaps you should be thinking about those people's human rights and humanitarian needs.

Reply

In reply to Lan y Môr

David Inman

I didn’t answer the question because it’s redundant, and frankly, a tacit admission that you don’t understand how UK export controls work.  Neither I, nor the UK government, need to “trust” Israel to use UK supplied military parts, intelligence, or munitions in compliance with international law. The UK’s arms export licensing system operates on the opposite premise: licenses are granted or revoked based on risk assessments, not trust. Under Criterion 2C of the Strategic Export Licensing Criteria, the UK will not issue export licenses if there is a clear risk that the items might be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law (IHL). In September 2024, following a review of Israel’s compliance with IHL, the UK government suspended around 30 arms export licenses to Israel. This decision was based on the assessment that there was a clear risk that certain UK exports might be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of IHL. Again, that’s not blind faith - it’s precisely the conditional accountability you claim to want?  The one remaining point of contention is the UK's contribution of F-35 components to the global supply chain. The UK produces approximately 15% of each F-35 aircraft, including critical components such as rear fuselages, batteries, ejector seats, and actuators. While these components are no longer sent directly to Israel, they are supplied into the  global F-35 program, which is run by the United States and includes Israel as a participant. I share the deep concerns about the conduct of the Israeli government - the ICC's application for arrest warrants and widespread documentation of violations of IHL are serious and should absolutely be pursued through legal channels. That includes scrutiny of the UK’s role, which is exactly what is happening right now in the High Court. Human rights organizations, including the Palestinian NGO Al-Haq and UK based Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), argue that the UK's continued export of F-35 components indirectly supports Israel's military operations in Gaza, potentially violating both domestic and international law. The UK government defends its position by citing national security interests, international peace and security, and the importance of maintaining confidence among NATO allies, particularly the United States. They argue that halting the UK's contribution to the F-35 program could disrupt critical supply chains and strain international relationships and would risk locking the UK out of future joint development programs. They have also disputed the claims that Israel is deliberately targeting civilians or that there is evidence of genocide. In addition to Al-Haq and (GLAN) several other prominent human rights organizations have been granted permission to intervene and present evidence in the case. These include Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch, and Oxfam.   You’re asking why I’m not “looking up the evidence” - but this issue is in court precisely because the evidence is being weighed. That’s the forum where legal standards of proof are applied and where arguments can be tested fairly, transparently, and in full. You also claim the evidence is “there for all to see” - but I’m interested in whether it stands up to legal scrutiny, not just public outrage. If there is credible evidence of genocide, or of deliberate airstrikes on civilians, I am confident that these legal challenges will bring it to light and that consequences will follow. That’s how accountability works - not by assertion or assumption, but through evidence and due process.

Reply

In reply to David Inman

Lan y Môr

Before I start, it's to be commended that you've shown you've done your own research here. Easy enough to not be open to the facts online, when it's not convenient. It's quite right that this is going through the courts with the likes of Amnesty international and others challenging the UK governments position that they deem it ok to keep militarily supporting Israel despite the mountaing evidence of war crimes and genocide, including an international arrest warrant being issued for the Israeli prime minister and Israel being under a provisional court order issued by the ICJ that there is a risk of genocide being committed in Gaza. Part of the risk assessment requires demonstrating that Israel is not at risk a.k.a can be trusted, to use the weapons, arms and military parts not to commit war crimes. Why? Because once you hand over leathal weapons and military parts, you loose control of them and have to trust that the other country will use them according to international law. The UK government has got itself in a bit of a bind here as they are defending their military support of Israel in the courts while also condeming Israel for it's military actions including being quote "horrified" by the latest offensive. The world will judge the Labour and Tory ministers for their actions of politically, militarily and economically supporting a genocide over the last 19 months by continuing to provide arms to Israel while it indiscriminately bombs civilians and their homes in Gaza.

Reply
Brad

All of them? Name one that could keep Israel secure.

Reply
Stevie B

Shame on the UK government. The economic sanctions against Russia why not against Israel? Answer money.

Reply
David Inman

I think it's slightly more complicated than that in that it would put the UK at odds with the US who fulfil ~90% of the F-35 program which is maybe why it is unwilling to entertain a full arms embargo on this occasion when it has imposed them multiple times in the past. I also believe the UK government is of the persuasion that it can influence Israel with diplomacy more effectively than it can with economic sanctions and a belligerent stance that likely wouldn't achieve much of anything and only risks deteriorating the situation even further,

Reply
Christopher Donald Wood

Here's a tip: don't slaughter over 1,200 civilians and take over 200 hostages vis-à-vis Oct. 7.

Reply
Tucker

So that justifies murdering 50000 plus civilians?

Reply
SemperFi

How many palestinian combatants have been killed chief?

Reply
Thomas

Israel has accepted the two-state solution on several occasions. Conversely, Palestine has declined every diplomatic push towards a two-state solution. Why? Because Iran and Hamas prefer to prolong victim status than build a country. They consider the lives of the Palestinian people to be disposable - what other explanation can there be for October 7th? Did they think / do you think raping, murdering and kidnapping huge numbers of people was the opening gambit of a peace plan? Or a deliberate provocation?

Reply
Paul

Does that still give a country the excuse to treat the civilians in this way ?

Reply
Jon W

They certainly have not accepted it on any occasion. Indeed the group you mentioned has though. I'm not sure how you have been so poorly informed but all major Palestinian factions have agreed to both two states and one democratic state but neither are ever on offer from an American backed Israel determined to expell them all

Reply
Thomas

Israel accepted the two-state solution in the Oslo Accords (1993/95) and withdrew from the agreed lands. Hamas used it as an opportunity to start a terrorist campaign against Israeli civilians. Israel accepted the two-state solution in 2000. Arafat rejected it and the second interfada followed. Israel accepted the two-state solution in 2008 (including giving sovereignty over Temple Mount to an Arab-majority committee). Abbas walked away.

Reply
Thomas

Regarding your accusation of apartheid: Israel accepts muslims as citizens, about 20% of the population is muslim and has 11 muslim members of parliament. Palestine, like most of the Arab world, do not accept Jews. Life is undoubtedly difficult for a muslim in Israel, but their life is far more comfortable that that of a Jew in any Arab country would be.

Reply
Jon W

It is specifically written into law that Palestinian citizens of Israel do not enjoy equal rights and in practice their lives are made impossible by the state. The point is they are in their country they've just become enveloped by the expanding settler state. Please don't take my world for it read some of the extensive reports into why it is apartheid by the United Nations, Amnesty International, Save the Children, Human Rights Watch or Israel's biggest human rights NGO B’Tselem it's really proven beyond doubt

Reply
Thomas

Like I said, life for a muslim in Israel is difficult. But life for a Jew in Palestine (or Iran, Saudia Arabia, Qatar, Yemen...) would be very short. Regarding Israel being the 'their country', by which I assume you mean inherently Muslim land which has been 'settled' by Jews: I think you are taking a selective view of history. This land was occupied by Jews a thousand years before the birth of Islam, and occupied by Christians for hundreds of years before the birth of Islam.

Reply

In reply to Thomas

Tucker

No it wasn't. It was settled by many faiths. It's only zionists who claim these lies.

Reply

In reply to Tucker

Brad

The land belongs to the Canaanites.

Reply

In reply to Brad

Tucker

That includes Palestinians

Reply

In reply to Tucker

Brad

Never said it didn't. The problem if you remember is those insisting that the Israelites have no connection to the land.

Reply

In reply to Thomas

Jon W

I wonder why you say Muslim and not Palestinian. These Palestinians who live within Israel are subject to a brutal form of apartheid as is well documented in the reports I mentioned in my previous comment. The reason I say 'their' country is because it is where they and generations before them live. These Palestinians did not choose to become occupied, ethnically cleansed and now exterminated. For the Palestinians this is no religious conflict. It makes no difference the religion of those stealing your land and oppressing you, and that is what it's all really about taking the land of the people who were there and replacing them with another people who've come from elsewhere. Trying to say who was where thousands of years ago is beyond ridiculous and clearly couldn't be applied to anywhere else or even proven so I won't bother with it

Reply

In reply to Jon W

Barry

It's worth pointing out that there has never been a Palestinian state. The Palestinian people have always been occupied by someone, a region in someone else's empire. That's not to say there shouldn't be Palestinian state in the future, I fully support that but anyone trying to recreate the past isn't supporting a Palestinian state.

Reply
Tucker

The UN disagree https://www.un.org/unispal/document/israels-55-year-occupation-of-palestinian-territory-is-apartheid-special-rapporteur-for-the-situation-of-human-rights-in-the-palestinian-territory-occupied-since-1967-statement/

Reply
Tucker

Tell that to the Jewish people accepted by Palestinians in yhe 1930s and 1940s when yhe rest of world turned their backs. Or the Christian Palestinians bombed by isreal in the past year

Reply
Christopher Wood

... do you condemn what Hamas did on Oct. 7? 

Reply
SemperFi

Unlikely, he called the six day war an act of kindness. Push too hard against him and the mods will just delete your comments (if he isn't one of the mods himself)

Reply
Tucker

More lies from someone who celebrates war

Reply
Tucker

I condemn the killing of any civillians

Reply
Tim Edwards

According to UK Government lawyers there is ‘no evidence’ of Israel targeting civilians in Gaza. Additionally the evidence 'does not support' conclusions that a genocide has happened or is happening in Gaza. 'Evidence does not show genocide in Gaza,' Labour lawyers argue | The National

Reply
Emma

Excellent read, a sad reality that what is happening in Gaza is being supported by the UK government. Time it stopped now.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Tucker Cancel

Where's your proof of this? Why aren't the UK or Americans sanctioning Saudi instead of arming them? If that was true.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.