Sat, 18th July Cardiff 24°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

Opinion

The art of culture war

By Mark Mansfield
The Henry Richard Richard statue in Tregaron. Photo via Google

Gwern Gwynfil

Sun Tzu was a 6th century BCE Chinese general, military strategist and philosopher, and author of the ‘Art of War’. As curious as it sounds, his teachings still hold many lessons for campaigners, culture warriors and leaders today.

Underlying much of Sun Tzu’s strategic thinking is an ethos of allowing your opponents to find their own way to defeat. ‘He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight’. Unfortunately, it seems that most of those who would align themselves against the wailings of the populist right have not yet read Sun Tzu.

[mid-content-banner]

Choosing the Field of Battle

Controlling and choosing the ground upon which to fight certainly confers huge advantages.

Unassailable higher ground, fortified and defensive locations, a natural redoubt, will all add to the chance of victory. This is also true of cultural battles.

But the populists seem to be being given free rein to make these choices.

Why on earth have trans rights issues become synonymous with toilets? Women’s toilets too.

You would never know from this particular culture war battlefield that women transitioning to men consistently outnumber men becoming women by over two to one. Of course, women becoming men don’t suit the populist narrative so they are ignored to make way for ‘hot button’ selective issues which can be amplified to fit a certain narrative.

Those who would oppose such misinformation and misleading portrayals are often sucked in by this, engaging directly on narrow terms set by those who stand to benefit from them. Thus the battlefield is set to favour the populist.

[taboola-banner]

‘Balk the enemy’s power, force him to reveal himself’

Nothing enrages a populist more than being ignored. They thrive upon the engagement and proliferation of debate and fierce argument around the issues they identify as having the right mix of emotional triggers, with enough basis in reality, so that they can construct a vaguely ‘factual’ argument to underscore the emotive response they seek.

Rarely, if ever, will this withstand real scrutiny, facts and data but it can be enough to convince on a shallow reading.

Ignoring such forays forces them to escalate. Inevitably, the more they escalate the weaker their argument becomes, they become desperate in their pursuit of triggers, using ever more lurid and isolated examples to trigger a response.

Make no mistake, it is those arrayed in opposition that they seek to trigger, not their supporters. For populists, it is vocal opposition that validates them and gives them credence and relevance. They have understood Sun Tzu in ways that those who would stand in opposition have not.

‘If your opponent is of choleric temper, irritate them’

The way to ‘win’ the culture wars is to disengage from them directly in every sense. Allow the opposition to scream and shout into a void until they are hoarse and tired. It is only engagement that gives them fuel and power.

Let me take a recent example of allowing the populists and culture warriors to win without even bringing them to the field of battle. An illustration of how they have understood Sun Tzu’s Art of War whilst those arrayed against them have yet to learn these lessons.

‘Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war and then seek to win’

 In early November, groups campaigning on behalf of Palestine and pressing for peace in Gaza, staged a statue based protest in Cardiff. Their target was the statue of David Lloyd George. They had been drawn into framing legitimate aspirations for peace in the Middle East around a campaign to remove a statue of Wales’ only UK Prime Minister.

This gesture campaigning playing entirely into the hands of the populist culture warriors – it is easy to portray those who attack statues as narrow and blinkered.

Nation’s own Martin Shipton responded to the event with a balanced piece on Lloyd George, his mixed record and fallibility but also his position within his time and drawing attention to some of his more valuable contributions as well as his failures.

The organiser of the protest subsequently responded with a long, rambling polemic, taking a clearly one-sided view of David Lloyd George.

There are valid criticisms of Lloyd George and of Empire in that essay but they are a little lost in what becomes a diatribe, dare I say, a rant, against a dead man from a very different and now relatively distant era. There is no living memory of Lloyd George as PM.

From the very beginning, by choosing to fight a statue, the peace campaign message on behalf of Palestine was destined to be utterly lost in engagement with irrelevant arguments. The people suffering in Gaza don’t care about David Lloyd George or his statue (very few people do), this battlefield will never further any discussion or debate about the need for a ceasefire, for peace and for rebuilding.

The populist warriors did not even need to enter the fray as the battle was lost before it had begun.

‘The Supreme Art of War is to Subdue the Enemy Without Fighting’

Let us imagine a different approach to enlisting a statue in the cause of peace. Wales has an immensely long and rich history of campaigning for peace at a global level.

There is a statue of Henry Richard, the ‘apostle for peace’, on the square in my home town of Tregaron.

The Temple of Peace is in Cardiff.

Shortly after David Lloyd George’s time as Prime Minister of the UK and Empire came to an end, hundreds of thousands of Welsh women were signing the incredible Women’s Peace Petition.

A direct line can be drawn from Henry Richard, with his lifetime of shuttle diplomacy across the length and breadth of Europe, to the creation of the League of Nations and, subsequently, the United Nations. The Temple of Peace, peace petitions and a persistent Welsh voice advocating for peace has played its part in this process for more than a century and a half.

With such a deep and lasting national tradition of campaigning for peace available in Wales, being sucked into a battle about a long dead politician demonstrates an immense lack of tactical awareness. Why allow the internecine culture wars of our age to dictate the battlefield when there is no need to do so?

Positive Contemporary Campaigning

Imagine 350 people gathered as a flash mob at the feet of Henry Richard in Tregaron, drone footage of a packed market town square, stirring speeches highlighting the horror and injustice of war, all embedded in a cultural memory of campaigning for peace - these are the unassailable heights campaigners should seek.

This time the battle is won before it has begun, with affirmation and actions that drive attention and amplify the message. There is no room for culture war as you already possess all of the higher ground.

Patience, Young Grasshopper

Whenever the temptation arises to engage with populists on a field of their choosing remember, ‘if you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float by’.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

24 comments

Another Richard

According to the US National Institutes of Health, there is a consistently greater prevalence of trans women (male to female) than trans men (female to male), which is the opposite of what is asserted here. Gwern Gwynfil should cite a source for his assertion. In any case, women do not become men and men do not become women. Some women feel uncomfortable when trans women (natal males) enter their single sex spaces, such as toilets. Men, on the other hand, are not particularly bothered if trans men (natal females) use their spaces. The Women's Peace Petition was indeed a fantastic political achievement. However, WWII wasn't far behind, and if we hadn't fought it the world would be in an even worse place than it is today.

Reply
Gwern Gwynfil

Shwmae Richard, you are correct about that study (2020). what you’ve missed is that even in that study incidence of FTM has increased to parity with MTF by the end of the study period. UK census data shows overall parity MTF and FTM too but it also shows that the balance primarily comes from the youngest age bracket. Demographically in the 18-24 bracket FTM outweighs MTF. Perhaps it is simply that women becoming men are more willing to say so now? Perhaps there are other reasons. It is also telling that chest transition surgery outweighs genital surgeries by a factor of two to one (That’s a supposition however as the data is insufficiently granular to show who is having what surgery or why). Regardless, the point stands - why have we allowed toilets to become the culture war bete noire of the trans rights debate? It’s just one example of the absurdities that denigrate discussion and reduce it to a point of absurdity (to the benefit of populists obviously - giving them oxygen whilst allowing them to avoid any actual proper engagement or realistic debate, standard propaganda playbook to attack minorities after all). For the record, I have no interest in getting involved in a gender and sex debate (or a toilet one). Let people be who they want to be as long as everyone respects each other’s basic rights, morally and legally. Who cares if they want to be Richard or Rosie?

Reply
Bethan

You're engaging on the culture war though by taking a stance on that stupid trans debate while telling the reader that they shouldn't engage in culture wars. If you were speaking as a critical thinker shining a light on the absurdity of culture wars then I shouldn't know what your viewpoint is on trans women using public toilets, but I do, because not only do you have a clear side, but you chose to tell us. Engaged. Engaged in an all but retired debate too aside from a handful of pigheaded zealots on both sides. Like most if not all culture wars the people don't start it. The media does. At convenient times when the masses need distracting from serious and urgent global issues that warrant collective attention and that is more likely to actually concern them. The media sets the stage, the parameters, how goofy the arguments are going to be and creates uncompromising arenas for unwinnable debates, when in their right minds the masses would shrug and say, 'I don't know. I'm not an expert in this issue'. If you're going to call out culture wars then do it objectively. Disengage from the subject matter and observe the madness going on around you as a whole. Does the debate warrant that many angry people? If no, then ignore it. The issues will magically go away on its own without anyone winning, changing or resolving anything. Funny how that works.

Reply
Gwern Gwynfil

I don’t think a few lines highlighting an issue as an exemplar is engagement. And don’t think for a minute that I don’t believe that women have the right to safe spaces. But the safe space debate, the women’s rights debate, neither have anything to do with trans issues. It’s an artificial conflation created by populists for their own ends. An excellent example of letting them set the battlefield and one I highlight to illustrate that point. Please read the article again.

Reply
hdavies15

MSM does a damn good job for all sorts of regimes wanting to get away with the serious erosion of our rights while the masses are distracted by junk issues. Whoever dreamt up the plot to make boys in frocks a big issue was/is a dangerous manipulative type.

Reply
Fi yn unig

I’m reaching for a Mike Smash phrase but in a genuine, not facetious, way. ‘Wise words, mate!’.

Reply
Steffan ap Huw

Quoting from the article: You would never know from this particular culture war battlefield that women transitioning to men consistently outnumber men becoming women by over two to one. Of course, women becoming men don’t suit the populist narrative so they are ignored to make way for ‘hot button’ selective issues which can be amplified to fit a certain narrative. A bit disingenuous here. The reason the issue of men transitioning to women receives more attention is because it's about permitting biological males into biological female spaces. Due to the obvious natural differences between these two, we are right to be concerned about allowing such to happen, and that is what the argument is only ever about. FtM trans pose little to no risk to anyone in male spaces. Or would the author decry the fact that rape in society is almost always discussed in the context of the rape of females, while male-victim rape is virtually ignored?

Reply
Gwern Gwynfil

Diolch Steffan, you have beautifully demonstrated how easy it is to fall into the trap laid for you by populist spin. You have here bundled a woman’s right to safety, trans rights, biological sex vs gender, and violent sexual criminality into a mish mash which has no logic or reason. All of these are important but they need not, and should not, be conflated in an emotive mess specifically and exclusively designed to cause fear and consternation. You’re fighting the battle in an arena chosen to favour the populist.

Reply
Another Richard

It is fascinating to see "populist" evolving into a pejorative term in real time. The OED defines "populist' as "[i]ntended to appeal to or represent the interests of ordinary people". That seems to me very positive, and on that basis YesCymru is surely a populist movement. (If it isn't, what is it?)

Reply

In reply to Another Richard

Gwern Gwynfil

Agreed. The evolution of terms generally is fascinating! And the way in which they are debased over time, especially in politics. Liberalism, socialism, populism, pretty much any -ism, eventually becomes a pejorative term with only the most tenuous relationship to its original meaning. Not sure you’d use it to describe any cross party campaign group though 🤔 surely ‘popular’ would suffice?

Reply
hdavies15

Best advice here is - stop digging that hole. The "battle" is what it is, although I would call it a "skirmish" because it's messy but doesn't amount to much. Nobody really gives a sh*t until a line is crossed. That the line has been, will be, or is crossed is what bugs those who display hostility. Away from matters like the safety of women's spaces, Senedd candidate lists where "gender" gets some sort of priority, physical contact sport, and not much else, who gives a damn about a man in a frock ? And the woman who kits herself out as a bloke en route to a transition hardly raises an eyebrow. But that doesn't suit the needs of a segment of our political class who need to be offended and aroused on a regular basis.

Reply
Jamie Lee

Its actually been shown to be an argument designed by MRAs/misogynists to reintroduce single sex spaces like gentlemen's clubs. Its about dominance over women. Women's safe spaces should not also be where they pee. Everywhere should be safe. But if you get duped into just arguing about toilets you can ignore all other (actually existing) VAWG like what happens in their homes and schools and workplaces. And until this nonsense started rape crisis centres often accepted men and boys... you've fallen for it and proved the point perfectly!

Reply
Gwern Gwynfil

Dude, I was pretty clear that I have no interest in getting involved in this debate (because it’s exactly what I talk about in the article). Last paragraph of my previous response ‘I have no interest in getting involved in a gender and sex debate’ 🙄

Reply
Barry Pandy

Why are you so obsessed with trans-gender issues?

Reply
Richard Davies

You refuse to accept evidence contrary to your opinion, even when provided with links to the evidence that is published in respected peer-reviewed academic journals!

Reply
Jon W

In fact Adam's article added deep and much needed historical context that was missing from Martin's short rant. Talking about Lloyd George, whatever we think of the statue it is important that this formative period for much of the world, in a particularly brutal time of empire is properly understood. Try not to take it so personally Gwern

Reply
Gwern Gwynfil

Shwmae Jon, I don’t disagree with the need to talk about history at all. Fairly sure I credit Adam with some valid points in his essay too. But this does not change the fact that it is a polemical criticism of DLlG. Neither does it change the reality that Adam’s energy, time and effort as a peace campaigner on behalf of the people of Gaza was totally sidetracked into a fight about a dead person. The protesters idea of hanging an event campaigning for peace on the destruction of a statue was a tactically poor decision - gulled into playing on the terms and to the narrative of those who would exploit such battlefields for their own culturally divisive ends

Reply
Jon W

I don't see any substance to your criticism or the article that is all. Lloyd George has been portrayed as a sort of Welsh folk hero so we mostly hear about the no doubt important internal reforms his government achieved, although, this can also be put down in part to growing internal pressures from an emerging labour movement. What Adam did was add the historical record that much of the rest of the world, especially people in the former colonies are keenly aware. I, like you am not entirely sold on the tactics of targeting statues but at the same time it's important people are aware of our unique historical involvement in the creating the settler colony in question and creating the ideology that has sustained our support for it ever since. Adam like many in Cardiff have spent years campaigning on this issue. The last year especially with several events every week including pickets at arms manufacturers supplying Israel, boycott campaigns led by the bds principals, weekly protests and charity fundraisers so to give the impression that a lot of energy is being devoted to statues when this was one part of one day in years of campaigning seems an overstatement to fit your narrative. The real historical record of empire needs to be told but it will be uncomfortable confronting generations of propaganda

Reply
Jamie Lee

Mate, trans people definitely exist. I've met some - quite a few actually. Thats seems pretty empirical to me... they were walking, talking, flesh and blood.

Reply
Adrian

I don't doubt what you've seen - but those are not 'trans' people.

Reply
TJ Palmer

Please do not drop tampons in the urinal. Thank you. As someone pointed out above, the chances of any of us encountering one of the 1in10 at a convenience are slim and when we do we don't care so using that as a dog whistle was a mistake Gwern. I would like to add my own warning as a corollary to Sun Tzu: While waiting at the river for that one enemy, an awful lot of your friends will drift away.

Reply
Gwern Gwynfil

‘ Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent's fate.’

Reply
Alun

Xx or xy, there isn't a third category.

Reply
CDE

It's a lot more complicated than that Alun.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Gwern Gwynfil Cancel

I don’t think a few lines highlighting an issue as an exemplar is engagement. And don’t think for a minute that I don’t believe that women have the right to safe spaces. But the safe space debate, the women’s rights debate, neither have a...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.