Fri, 17th July Cardiff 27°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

Opinion

Tax wealth, scrap disability cuts

By Mark Mansfield
A copy of Spring Statement 2025 health and disability benefit reforms - Impacts after Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves delivered her spring statement to MPs in the House of Commons in March. Photo James Manning/PA Wire

Anthony Slaughter, leader Wales Green Party

Labour’s cuts to disability support have been widely condemned by the public and charities, yet are still set to go ahead.

Let’s be clear - balancing the books off the backs of the most vulnerable, while the richest corporations and individuals continue to grow their wealth is repugnant. No civilised society should be considering it.

If the cuts go ahead, hundreds of thousands of people in Wales will see even greater hardship, with Welsh communities hit even harder thanks to greater levels of ill health and disability. According to the Bevan Foundation, we also have twice the rate of young people receiving PIP as the south east of England.

We know people receiving these benefits already face enormous hardships. 50 per cent of people claiming Universal Credit with limited capability for work don’t have enough to heat their homes, pay their bills and put food on the table. I regularly hear from people how frightened they feel about their futures should these cuts go ahead.

[mid-content-banner]

Austerity 

Years of Conservative austerity has already devastated our social fabric, with disabled people already bearing much of the brunt. The United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has called on the UK Government to take “corrective measures” to reverse the effects of benefit cuts by Conservative Governments back in 2013.

Pushing people into deeper poverty will not fix the causes of people needing this help. Housing insecurity, poor quality jobs, huge wage inequality and a soaring mental health crisis are the root causes of our unhealthy society.

This is an attack on Welsh communities. So why is Welsh Labour failing to take a stand? Why isn’t a welfare system based on dignity and respect something worth fighting for? Their response has been nothing short of negligent, failing to acknowledge the severe impact they will have on disabled people in Wales.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

Deeply disappointing

Last month, I wrote to the First Minister asking her to take a principled stand for disabled people. The response from Jane Hutt was deeply disappointing, merely saying that there will be consultation events happening in Wales. We don’t need consultation - we need the cuts cancelled.

Labour told us that two governments either end of the M4 would improve things for us. Instead, one government is viciously targeting vulnerable people, and the other is too cowardly to call it out.

Greens will aways support the rights of disabled people to live full and fulfilling lives, never afraid to challenge the government's harmful words and actions.

The well-being of future generations depends on the decisions made today, and it is the government's duty to ensure that all citizens, regardless of their circumstances, have access to the support they need to lead fulfilling lives.

We need a compassionate and equitable approach to government. We cannot punish ill people back into health, and the government's responsibility is to support people who need it.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

22 comments

Adrian

Two things you don’t address in this overly simplistic anrticle Anthony: the enormous cost of wilful benefit fraud, and the Laffer curve.

Reply
Tucker

Blah blah, blah. PIP fraud is practically non existent but you keep peddling those right wing lies Adrian.

Reply
Tucker

https://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/news/zero-percent-fraud-rate-for-pip,-dwp-figures-show

Reply
Barry

The UK's social security spending is just over the OECD average:

Reply
Barry

The reason we don't get a wealth tax is because people insist on calling it a wealth tax which is a gift to those who don't want change. If the focus instead was on fair taxation for all it would be much harder for the Sunaks to argue their 22% effective tax rate vs the 33% paid by the Starmers is justified. Closing this gap is a de facto wealth tax that the Telegraph can't weaponise because it's based on fairness not envy.

Reply
Brian Coman

Well here in Wales we have a "Government" that can afford tens of millions on scarcely used bike lanes, millions on narrowing perfectly good roads, millions on roadsigns that blight that cities and beautiful countryside and thousands of pounds on trees for other countries. Pointless Welsh Government on line promotional adverts that change nothing while our rivers, beaches and towns and cities are polluted with sewage and litter with little recourse. To top that off, the hugely expanded costly Senedd goes ahead at our expense, so we have six MS's per constituency, which is equivalent of 2,500 MP's in London.

Reply
a a

Thing is, you need a certain number of MSs in order to do the necessary work. Even if there are fewer people, the number of policy areas is still the same.

Reply
Undecided

Correct. We need an honest conversation about what the state can afford. Not this recycled rhetoric and Jane Hutt’s circular consultations. We will, of course, not get it.

Reply
Frank

How about a substantial cut in MPs and lords wages, allowances and expenses!! These people are living in the land of milk and honey and know absolutely bugger all about surviving in the real world. Wouldn't it be nice if the general public could make up rules and cuts that only applies to politicians, lawmakers, royalty, the stinking idle rich etc instead of them ruling and robbing us all the time!! Why do we let this 5% screw us all the time?

Reply
Adrian

The MPs we have are not exactly top-flight individuals. Many are only there because they wouldn't survive in the real world. If you cut pay the standard would drop even further.

Reply
Frank

There was time when youngsters were advised to become a policeman if they were not all that bright. It seems that has changed to become a politician instead. No qualifications needed to run the country. Unbelievable.

Reply
Johnny

Believe it or not there was a time when MPs did actually live in the real world. Gone are the days when former Trade Unionists who worked on the shop floor became Labour MPs. Gone are the days when Business people and people who served in the military became Tory MPs. The Standard of current MPs can't get any lower than what it already is. There are people out there who would make much better MPs for less money than what the current crowd earn.

Reply
Dai ponty

Being a former miner i have always voted Labour until the ast general election and i voted Plaid Starmer to me was untrustworthy he seemed slimy and sly and i was proved right there is no way he and this Labour government are socialists they are right wing. Neil Kinnock was in labour leader he said of Thatchers Tory government do not be old sick disabled or unemployed under Tories you can now say that under Labour and as for Welsh Labour they are as mad as a box of Frogs especially under Drakeford and Labour has proved when it comes to Wales we do not count same as Tories typical example money for H S 2 both rejected giving it to us when we should have recieved it

Reply
Jeff

I genuinely can't believe there are many people who want to see disability benefits cut. But the rising costs projected by the OBR showed annual government spending would have risen by a further 35 billion per year by the end of the parliament. This is an incredible sum of money to find, and particularly challenging when government finances are the worst they've been for a long time. Every school, council and hospital would have faced budget cuts to fill the Black Hole created by additional spending on disability and incapacity benefits! A wealth tax might well be a solution but the current government has no mandate to implement one. As mentioned earlier this is not a tax which can be prepared and implemented in a matter of weeks - it takes detailed planning and consultation, otherwise there would be plenty of loopholes and unintended consequences

Reply
hdavies15

I wonder whether the deep rooted dependency culture suits governments in that they have created a means of controlling a part of the population while giving the rest something to moan about thus distracting them from ever thinking clearly about what should really change. I brand myself as socially conservative but find this victimization of people who genuinely need a "safety net" repugnant. Why haven't successive governments been more assertive in their pursuit of those who are fiddling the benefits system ? At the same time they could have been working out ways of reducing and ultimately erasing all those loopholes that enable seriously rich types to duck and dive and evade bearing their share of the tax burden. Instead we are steadily shifting the balance in a direction of which Trump and co would be proud.

Reply
Bethan

I don't know what dependency culture is. Is that an academic concept or more of a Tik Tok/ Twitter/ YouTube concept? Who is dependent on what? It sounds like a vague and not especially well thought out or researched notion. There are a few points that could be raised about who does or does not genuinely need a 'safety net', but a big one is that the way the British economic model has been structured since around the 1970s (arguably earlier), is that the opportunity for people who are not in tip-top, working condition has shrunk enormously. The types of jobs has changed, the amount of available jobs has shrunk, the nature of the machine has shifted from 'working to be able to comfortably support oneself and family with money left over for kids to go to university and a nice little nest egg', to a hyper-competitive market where you have to be the cream of the crop to even be considered for employment. What constitutes as 'unfit to work' has been predetermined by the very establishment that now expects disabled people to pull themselves together and get to work. In other words, they have created a world that is so cut-throat that the definition of unfit has expanded to include anyone who has a flaw or a weakness that prevents them from keeping up with an unsustainable system. Which in these highly troubling times has grown as a direct result of the poor conditions we live in and/or the mental toll this has taken on society. This isn't the 1950s. We need to stop acting like we just need to reset to that. We're in a different world. We're not going back to that. We have to deal with the challenges we now face in the 21st century. the official pitch of changing jobseekers allowance to universal credit was to update benefits to fairly meet the needs of the current times, but naturally that was altered and ammended to best suit the people holding all the power, wealth and control. An unrelated but good example of how much things have changed is to consider that only a few decades ago, a family could survive comfortably on one income. Now people are struggling to make it through the month on two, maybe three, maybe with adults working more than one job. Another obvious thing to point out is the erosion of the middle classes. The shift from the 10% to the 1%. Someone is hoarding all the money, while opportunities for everyone else evaporates, and I don't think it's the people who have been reported too sick to work by their general practioners, you know? The same disenfranchised feeling that working tax payers have is the same disenfranchised feeling that people who rely on benefits have. Both have been exploited. Both deserve to be angry about it, but some are angry at the wrong people. There are many reasons why more people are on benefits. The market has changed, the benefits system has changed, civilization has changed. People are sick because we live in a sick and festering society. Calling this a culture of dependence is condescending demonstratively false when the fact of the matter is, as citizens, we can't depend on anyone or anything anymore.

Reply
hdavies15

Had you read my first sentence before writing a "response" you would pick up on my suspicions about cause and effect. There is no doubt in my mind that there is a great deal of manipulation going on in UK society in general and that it has taken root in the benefits, ill health and unemployment arenas because those areas are just ripe for fostering division and distraction.

Reply
Bethan

Yeah it just feels like another canary down the mine. Gives me the sick feeling in the pit of the stomach that the West (if not global civilization) is about to collapse. It's beyond shocking at this point. It's expected that the people in power have no interest whatsoever in running a country and seem to be just squeezing as much out of the system for themselves as possible before breaking point occurs and the disenfranchised masses turns into the angry mob with pitch forks. Which I think is not too far away. People who support this kind of treatment of their fellow citizens are either mad or have something to gain. Stupidity isn't an arguable defense anymore. It's too obvious. Politicians aren't even bothering to lie anymore. Its just an utter lack of acknowledgement of what the public want and blatant, unapologetic disregard for rights and law and other people's money. It's sick. England is too entangled with the US to get away from them even if they wanted to. The rest of the world is backing away from that country because they have really shown their weakness recently. That country is economically ruined. It can't support it's own weight anymore, and England and extention the UK is pretty much just an annexed state within it thanks to our own foolish decisions. Yeah, its time for Wales to show some backbone. Like Canada, like Europe. It's time to stand up and say, 'eff you and eff your outdated, 1980's, yuppy, 'greed is good', proven wrong hyper-capitalist model'. It's time to actually invest into our country, not just say we're going to invest while pocketing the pennies from the donation box. Social welfare and a function go hand in hand. Fact. If that doesn't suit some people, tough! It's the truth so get over it, get over yourselves and try developing a sense of morality and some basic intelligence. You can't hoard everything and expect society to continue unaffected. It doesn't work that way. Ridiculous era we're in.

Reply
Ernie The Smallholder

If rich people do go abroad do they still own assets within this country and therefore be due to taxation in this country where the income was earned. If this is not possible, then it will involve a change in the law to state that if you earn income in a country then you must be registered in the country and pay taxes due there too.

Reply
Lord Custard

The real question is why are we paying £30 billion a year interest on money created out of thin air during quantitative easing. This serves no purpose other than enriching private banks for doing nothing. The European Central Bank doesn't do this and nor does the bank of Japan. That is more than enough money to reverse the counter productive Pips cuts.

Reply
John

Oh deary me... The UK, like most countries, pays interest on its debt because it borrows money from various sources, including bond holders, to fund daily spending. The lenders obviously charge interest.... The EU also borrows money but in a slightly different capacity. It issues bonds to finance its budget, which are then repaid by the member states. So the EU, like the UK, incurs interest on its debts, though the primary focus of the EU's borrowing is on its budget and its member states' contributions, rather than direct borrowing for domestic needs. Member states contribute to the EU budget, and the EU uses this money to service its debt (including paying interest). All your answers are here- www.ecb.europa.eu/

Reply
Baxter

The OP isn't talking about bonds.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Adrian Cancel

Two things you don’t address in this overly simplistic anrticle Anthony: the enormous cost of wilful benefit fraud, and the Laffer curve.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.