Wednesday, 15th July 2026 Cardiff 25° · Clear sky
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Opinion

Reform surge reflects the failure of social democracy to deliver material improvements

By Mark Mansfield
A Reform poster in Caerphilly

Martin Shipton

When the main theme of an election campaign is an issue over which the parliament concerned has no power - in this case immigration - it’s clear that our democracy has become dysfunctional.

The disgraceful hijacking of the Caerphilly by-election by Reform UK’s pernicious stirring up of racial hatred is opportunistic and dangerous.

The demonisation of the Nation of Sanctuary programme has made the Ukrainian refugees who have been its main beneficiary feel unwanted in the community that gave them a kind and human welcome when they fled Putin’s brutal attack on their homeland.

[mid-content-banner]

Scapegoat

But there’s another factor we are in danger of overlooking if we simply bemoan the tendency of the far right - which is increasingly assimilating the traditional right in the form of the Conservative Party - to scapegoat minority groups on social media. We need to take on board the failure of social democracy to deliver the material improvements people want and need.

Alun Davies, the Labour MS for Blaenau Gwent, spoke to me after a tough constituency surgery in which, like many other MSs no doubt, he was confronted with the distressing problems people face when they’re condemned to poverty.

He said: “If you look at what’s happened since the financial crash of 2008, social democracy has been in retreat in much of the West. Even when social democratic parties have got elected - like in the UK, Macron in France or Scholz in Germany - they’ve won on what is essentially a conservative manifesto, with the policies they’ve delivered continuing with a different elements of austerity and not getting to grips with their countries’ real economic problems.

“In these circumstances the people who suffer most are not the rich and powerful, who are sustained partly by their own wealth and partly by policies that are geared to their needs, but the poorest, who don’t have their own resources to fall back on.

“As a consequence, the conditions are created where the poison spread by a party like Reform, where minorities are blamed for everything that’s wrong, takes root. We’re seeing it in Caerphilly at the moment.”

[lower-mid-content-banner]

Living standards

Davies is convinced that the only way for social democratic parties to recover is by offering policies that resonate with people and that are geared towards improving the material living standards of ordinary people.

He said: “In the Labour Party, people know what kind of society they want to see, where progress is made towards reducing the inequalities that exist and improving living standards for the bulk of people. I’m sure that Welsh Labour members get that and want to implement such policies.”

Davies is also convinced of the need to change the Westminster voting system, whose application is becoming increasingly erratic. He said: “The First Past The Post electoral system that we have for UK general elections has become a serious problem. It can lead to distortions where the number of seats won by a party is grossly disproportionate in comparison with the number of votes it has obtained.

“In 2024 Labour under Keir Starmer won a landslide at the general election, yet got less votes than it did under Jeremy Corbyn in 2019, when the result in terms of seats was seen as an unmitigated disaster.

“Because First Past The Post is so unpredictable and it’s possible for a party to win a big majority by polling not much more than 30%, it’s very plausible that an extremist party like Reform could win power despite a big majority voting against it. Although Labour benefitted from it in 2024, First Past The Post could end up killing Labour.

“Proportional representation at Westminster elections is long overdue and I wish UK Labour would accept that.”

Next Thursday’s by-election in Caerphilly won’t determine the result of next year’s Senedd election, but it will provide campaigning momentum to the party that comes out on top.

Degradation

The degradation of our democracy is plain to see in the pitifully inadequate, but potentially successful, messaging being posted on social media by Reform.

Top billing - yes, you’ve guessed it - goes to yet another deliberately deceitful attack on the Welsh Government’s Nation of Sanctuary programme.

The Reform post states: “Next year, back a party that will put your interests first:

* End the Nation of Sanctuary Asylum Policy. Put Wales first, not open borders.

* Support Welsh Families & Train Our Own People. No more forgotten communities.

* Bin The 20MPH Limit. Bring back common sense.

* Slash Wasteful Spending. We’ll scrap the political pet projects and fund frontline services instead.”

Goebbels-style

Nigel Farage admitted when he visited Caerphilly this week that he knew more than 80% of the money allocated to the Nation of Sanctuary project was spent on resettling refugees from Ukraine, who are not asylum seekers. Yet the lie has continued being told ad nauseam, Goebbels-style.

The nebulous promise to “support Welsh families and train our own people” comes across as a not-too-subtle attack on people like doctors and nurses from overseas who keep the NHS running. It is completely unrealistic to believe that it would be possible to deport thousands of foreign NHS workers and replace them with highly trained people from Wales. The same applies in relation to other jobs.

However unpopular the 20MPH speed limit may be among some motorists, there is statistical evidence that shows road accidents have decreased and fewer people have been killed. And the scheme has been nuanced so that on roads where the 20MPH limit is not seen as necessary, it can be replaced by the local authority after public consultation.

The promise to “slash wasteful spending” is another piece of Trump-inspired nonsense that is already unravelling in Reform-controlled local authorities in England, the biggest of which, Kent County Council, has admitted that such supposedly wasteful spending barely exists. Instead, school budgets are being eyed up for cuts and an inflation-busting council tax increase is considered unavoidable.

Deeply cynical

Reform’s approach to next May’s Senedd election is deeply cynical. Its cheap sloganising falls a million miles short of any kind of programme for government. It is insulting Wales and its people by failing to offer serious solutions for the country’s many problems, instead regurgitating the kind of rhetoric it would use in a community council election.

Where is the sense in this Reform material that Wales is a nation in its own right, with its own lawmaking parliament? It’s not there at all.

Reform offers nothing but discord, which is hardly surprising for a party funded by billionaires who want to deregulate the businesses they own, bring back a reliance on fossil fuels, strip workers of employment rights and cut tens of billions of pounds from public sector budgets while introducing tax cuts for the rich.

Of course people who are struggling to get by have been let down by successive governments, but anyone in such a position who thinks Reform will improve their lot is seriously deluded.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

41 comments

Amir

Completely agree with you Martin. Unfortunately the deluded seem to be in the majority and hatred for people of colour like myself is on the rise again.

Reply
Felicity

I really hope you're wrong, and that Reform is just a symptom of the broken social contract.

Reply
Clive hopper

Absolutely correct. No real solutions from Reform just scapegoating. Awful.

Reply
Undecided

Reform may be full of nebulous slogans; but it’s noticeable that Alun Davies couldn’t actually articulate the policies he is referring to in his equally nebulous statement. This follows more nebulousness from the candidates in Caerphilly. Therein lies the problem.

Reply
Felicity

Why have policies when you can just promote division.

Reply
Undecided

That’s not my point. If mainstream parties cannot articulate policies which resonate with people, it can’t be any surprise that voters turn to those who promote division. When you have little or nothing it’s human nature to look for something/someone to blame. If it wasn’t Farage it would be someone else.

Reply

In reply to Undecided

Felicity

I take your point. Yes, the other parties haven't put across policies that might address people's low living standards. They have though, precious little room for manoeuvre in the current climate.

Reply

In reply to Felicity

Undecided

For me it’s about political delusion. The left wants a state we can’t afford and the right wants unfunded tax cuts and the like, equally unaffordable. Neither has the courage to face reality. Starmer is the most recent example on welfare reform; but Truss and Johnson were others. The result is Reform.

Reply

In reply to Undecided

Felicity

Yes, I agree. But this is the result of decades where the majority of the public on low or average wages have paid for the mistakes of the past, and we are still paying for Brexit. And you're right, no quick fixes are in the offing. We have replaced measured political discussion with a taste for drama and destruction.

Reply

In reply to Undecided

Baxter

When did it become unfashionable to support a centrist position somewhere between the two extremes you list? I blame football which promotes two team tribalism.

Reply
Y Cymro

Caerphilly needs Reform UK like a hole in the head.

Reply
andy w

I agree with a number of points; but I note that some Welsh based organisations are not supporting the growth of the Welsh economy. Swansea Bay City region has funded a Hydrogen project and created a consortium with no Welsh suppliers https://celticseapower.co.uk/milford-haven-hydrogen-kingdom/ Cardiff University has appointed a consultant from Holland for its’ retrofit project https://www.arcadis.com/en-gb/news/europe/united-kingdom/2025/9/arcadis-appointed-to-lead-decarbonisation-of-cardiff-university-sites All the Welsh Universities should have created a long-term programme of retrofitting their old buildings, jointly funded, used previously unemployed individuals to deliver and appointed Wales Sustainability University to lead - https://cat.org.uk/ Cardiff University public sector research function advises the Senedd - they are not performing and need to focus on getting more well-paid professional services roles based in Wales and stop outsourcing key activities. Universities should be learning organisations, not spot-buying / poor at managing finances.

Reply
Peter J

In my view, there are two separate and not directly related aspects being discussed ihere. Clearly, there is a greater need for electoral reform given the rise of multi-party politics and fragmentation. I would argue that labour and tories were much more intellectually capable when they were broad churches, with differences of opinion within each party. As discussed at a meeting I had a few weeks ago; larger parties use to have internal debates away from the media, oftenwhere meaingiful political discussions took place or compromises were made. The move towards PR and smaller parties means those debates nwill happen between parties. In the social media age, that often means debates get condensed into 30 second soundbites that are simplistic and fall apart under scrutiny (see Reform). I’m not saying PR isn’t the way forward, but it does pose risks. And things change. There is the added point that we have already had one major consitituional shift in the past 10 years, the UK could do with a period of political stability for a whole host of reasons. As for the issue of social democracy, I can't get past the view that the NHS will need an extra £100bn a year by 2030 (due to demand and ageing population), and that welfare spending needs an £450bn for similar reasons. If we didn’t have to increase those budgets, governing would be much easier. Imagine if the government had an extra £150 bn to spend on infrastructure, skills training,local government, trains, roads etc

Reply
Badger

The problem with broad church parties is it's not very democratic because we end up with government by members club. If someone votes Labour are they voting for Blairism or Corbynism. Do Cons voters want hard right Toryism or so-called One Nation Conservatism. These are very different politics and voters don't get to decide which is running the show. But with smaller parties representing all shades on the political spectrum, voters will decide the type of coalition government that results. And it's likely that the extremes like Johnson and Truss would remain on the extreme.

Reply
Mab Meirion

Brexit to Reform took 5 years, what has the Senedd got to say for itself, sorry would be a start...

Reply
David Richards

Valid points made by both Martin Shipton and Alun Davies - to which must be added the corrrosive impact of so called 'social media'. Lightly regulated platforms like Facebook have been a massive boon to the extreme right - it has allowed them to pump out racist falsehoods that go unchallenged. Xenophobic propaganda that appears directly in peoples feeds and which Reform - aping the strategy of the leave campaign in the eu referendum - is currently deploying to considerable effect in Wales. But there will be no moves to hold the likes of Facebook - and Musk's X - to account and introduce measures that would compel them to act against the proliferation of misinformation on their platforms. This is because the uk labour govt is in thrall to big tech. So if anything the tsunami of right wing populist lies people are being exposed to online is set to get even worse....which is extremely ominous for our democracy indeed.

Reply
Jeff

Farage multi millionaire and grifter and Putin fluffer for the last 20 years owns numerous houses and manages to avoid tax, Tice, prefers Dubai to the UK....... Yeah, ordinary joes. https://bylinetimes.com/2025/10/17/what-nathan-did-next-a-kremlin-backed-forum-on-how-to-subvert-western-democracy/

Reply
Jeff

I did. You think Labour are out of touch politicians. Yet farageski is somehow in there in your book of politicos with real life experience when we can show he is not. Now there is this. (and his new missis is in a spot of bother, see Times) https://www.thenerve.news/p/nathan-gill-nigel-farage-bribes-oleh-voloshyn-nadia-sass-borodi-moscow-kyiv-strasbourg

Reply
Jeff

And then there is this. Bye bye rights. Farageski will know better than all of us on our rights through this group. https://www.thenewsagents.co.uk/article/is-nigel-farage-being-used-as-a-pawn-by-us-christian-extremists-5HjdFS4_2/

Reply
Amir

I can understand losing patience, but seriously deform. All their mantra is change, boats and English. That's it. And when they are elected, they are unresponsive, unavailable and useless. Like our recently elected councillor in Trowbridge and St Mellons.

Reply
Cyrano Jones

Well, yes. It doesn't require much insight to figure out that the best way for a government to become popular is to pursue policies that improve the living standards of the bulk of the population. Actually achieving that might be a bit more challenging, especially in a country that no longer makes or does anything the rest of the world needs. If social democrats can't deliver meaningful material improvements in Germany, which has tried very hard to preserve its productive economy, how on earth will they do it here? European social democrats' current big idea is to revive their economies by stoking a global arms race, which tells you how desperate they are. No wonder most of them are busy thinking about their next jobs (hopefully something that doesn't involve voters).

Reply
Badger

It would help Vladimir more.

Reply
Badger

It's not about doing what you think is best vs doing what you're told even if you know it will make everyone poorer. Just start involving people in the difficult choices with no easy answers. How about a referendum getting people to choose between rejoining the single market or abolishing retirement to pay for Brexit.

Reply
Matthew

There's a saying: Voting left doesn't guarantee you'll get good public services, but voting right does guarantee that you won't. I get that if you're not seeing results then picking someone who pretends to care feels like progress - but it really isn't. The people who will suffer most under any Reform administration will be the people who voted for it, but the cult of personality around Farage and co and the heavy bias of the likes of GB News means they may not even notice how much they've shafted them.

Reply
Roy Brychan

Reform is only there because we have a political class who live in a bubble and don't interact with their constituency. Gone are the days when politicians were people of the people for the people. They are there now to educate the people about the facts of life.

Reply
Felicity

I agree in part, the days when trade unions provided a political education and candidates for parliamentary election are long gone. Now, many are graduates of PPE instead. To misquote Tony Blair, we're all working class now.

Reply
Roy Brychan

As an example where was the constituency support for thr Nation of Sanctuary? There was support from pressure groups and from a Senedd report but I don't believe it was a manifesto promise like expanding the Senedd. And I cannot find any grass roots support in Plaid constituencies.

Reply

In reply to Roy Brychan

CapM

'As an example where was the constituency support for thr Nation of Sanctuary?' There was a lot of public support for what the very large proportion of 'Nation of Sanctuary' funding was used for. That is supporting Ukrainian refugees. Labour's usual ploy of presenting Wales as different [better] than England as a substitute of developing Cymru as a country that actually differs[is better to live in] than England, [on this occasion the grandiose Nation of Sanctuary title] is vanity. A dishonest Reform party misleading an electorate where critical thinking is far from ubiquitous is the result.

Reply
Gruffydd Wyn Evans

English journalist unhappy about English politicians telling Welsh people how to vote. You couldn't make it up.

Reply
Baxter

Isn't Nigel telling Welsh people how to vote.

Reply
Felicity

Nothing about the wealth inequality we see now was inevitable, until the Conservative Party over four decades provided the mechanisms to let wealth flow from the bottom to the top. "the rich get richer and the rest of us just get old".

Reply
Badger

For example, Liz Truss?

Reply
Jeff

Not forgetting farages Brexit.

Reply
Badger

Unlike the Trussonomic political coup, voters have yet to punish Farage for his failed Brexit ideology. But according to Adrian it will happen eventually.

Reply

In reply to Badger

Jeff

Not forgetting farage hailed Truss tanking the UK but when the press and socials have his back, the collapse will be a surprise to many that are not paying attention. I fear it will take farage in power to become a dirty name nationwide if he gets power. But dictators dont like to lose power. He will have an army of willing thugs, I fear a farage power will see people not white getting their doors licked in.

Reply
James Edwards

The people of Caerphilly will reject Lliar Powell and their leader Kermit on Thursday. The supporters of the racist, fascist English National Party won’t come out in the rain. A rainy day for them means PlayStation, bit of far right hatred on Gbeebies or YouTube back to the PlayStation for a few hours takeaway delivered smoke weed and drink beer with feet up whilst watching repeats of Love My Neighbour stagger to bed and repeat

Reply
Adam

Broken up by a trip to spoons.

Reply
Adam

How on earth did Caerphilly let itself turn into such an awful area with so many Welsh haters?

Reply
Adam

No. I think "don't hate Wales, vote plaid" works well though. Hopefully the people up for election in the area have more tact than me.

Reply
Rob

It is unacceptable for any 21st century democracy to maintain the FPTP voting system. And it it completely inexcusable for anyone to defend it, and then claim to have democratic values! What are the arguments against PR? "It will let extremists like the BNP in through the back door".Despite the fact that Donald Trump won an election via FPTP, and despite the fact the Reform could win a majority with just 30% of the vote come 2029, you still hear people making this patronising argument. I would much rather have Reform UK with 30% of the seats in Parliament than for them to have 100% of power over our lives.

Reply
Anonymous

Why the long faces? Has not Rhun ap Iorwerth shown the pathway to political success in Caerffili? The progressives must unite to keep Reform out. Rejoice!

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Felicity Cancel

Why have policies when you can just promote division.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.