Tuesday, 14th July 2026 Cardiff 25° · Clear sky
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Opinion

Plaid Cymru needs to fight back rather than conform

By NationCymru
Caernarfon in Gwynedd. Picture by Reading Tom (CC BY 2.0)

 

Aled Gwyn Job

Wales became a modern nation because of the growth of nonconformism.

The Methodist revivals of the 18th Century led directly to a range of far-reaching educational, social and political changes in turn.

These developments were born of the foundational idea that Wales had a mind of its own, and would not blindly follow what the UK Government told it to do.

We won't be told what's best for our own nation by distant authorities, thank you very much.

But, I wonder whether the harsh truth today is that Wales is by now a deeply conformist nation in so many ways.

A kind of stoic acceptance that we must accept the status quo seems to have permeated all aspects of our politics – even, sadly, Plaid Cymru, who claim to want to upturn the political order.

It was seen clearly on Friday, as county councillors gathered in Caernarfon to vote on Gwynedd Council's Local Development Plan.

This plan will see a total of almost 8,000 new homes built in Gwynedd and Ynys Môn - the last real heartlands of the Welsh language - between 2011 and 2026.

The vote was split down the middle at 30-30, with most Plaid Cymru councillors supporting the Local Development Plan. The Council Chair gave her casting vote in favour.

What was really depressing were the arguments set out by those in favour.

Despite the protestations of deep concern and love for the Welsh language that preceded almost every speech in favour of the plan, not a single councillor in favour argued that the development plan would boost the language in the two counties.

One had anticipated that at least one of the cabinet members would try to convince their fellow councillors that all the new houses could, for example, attract Welsh speakers back to Gwynedd to start new businesses and the like.

They could have argued that this, in turn, could help meet one of the council's key strategic priorities, i.e. raising the number of Welsh speakers in the county from 65% to 70% by 2021.

But no. No attempt was made to present such a narrative.

Their core message was that they had no choice but to obey the requirements of the Planning Inspector and implement this development plan (which is essentially a plan foisted on local authorities by the Planning Inspectorate in London).

They raised a whole host of doomsday scenarios which could come into play if councillors had the temerity to vote no:

  • the Labour Government could implement the Development Plan from Cardiff
  • the Government could send in Commissioners to run the Council directly
  • developers could rub their hands in glee at the prospect of no development plan in place

Great store was also placed on the fact that the Planning Inspectorate had praised the robustness of the plan.

It was hard to reconcile this "robustness" with the fact that the plan will mean a 20% increase in new houses in Pwllheli and a 30% increase in Llangefni by 2026.

These are two of the only three towns in Wales where 80% of local people speak Welsh (Caernarfon being the other).

It seems almost criminally negligent that a Plaid Cymru administration can contemplate threatening such a cultural heritage by accepting these housing projections in such an abject way

Are we to believe that the inspector knows more about how best to preserve the culture and history of Gwynedd than the councillors elected by the people to represent their best interests?

The motto of Gwynedd County Council is ‘Cadernid Gwynedd’ (The Fastness of Gwynedd), but it’s hard to believe that they were living up to their name in this instance.

Always right

The cabinet members who spoke in the debate seemed to forget that they were politicians, and spoke like administrators.

That is, that they now see their role almost as civil servants to all intents and purposes, there to implement whatever is imposed upon them.

They forgot that a politician’s job is to create a political reality, not accept orders handed down from above.

There is a strong case to be made that the Cabinet system now used in Welsh Local Government has facilitated a process by which cabinet members spending more of their council time with Officers rather than in the company of their fellow councillors.

And it is a common complaint from ordinary councillors from all political stripes that they are now mere bystanders in county council politics.

And, of course, the administrators are always right. There seemed to be no shred of doubt in Dafydd Meurig (Planning Portfolio) and Dyfrig Siencyn (Council Leader)’s minds about the essential virtues and benefits of the development plan.

One almost felt at times that they were arguing about their own integrity and sincerity as individuals, rather than arguing objectively about the merits of the development plan.

"Trust us, folks, we know what we’re doing," was their plea, which reminded me of the arch-persuader himself, the former Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Lobby

It was very ironic that one of the best speeches made in the chamber came from a Labour councillor, Sion Jones from Bethel. He was a breath of fresh air after the spin presented by the administrators.

He acknowledged that opposing the development plan was going against his own party's wishes, but he said that protecting the Welsh language in Môn and Gwynedd was more important than his own political welfare.

He said that choosing to allow so many new houses would only attract more migrants into the two counties, putting the Welsh language under even further pressure.

He argued that Gwynedd County Council should have lobbied hard for Gwynedd and Mon to be granted special linguistic status as part of the planning process in Wales.

It should be taken into account, he said, that these two counties are the only areas where Welsh remains a living, community language on a large scale in the whole of modern-day Wales.

But, no, it seems that using their political capital to fight for such an outcome occurred to the ‘administrators’.

Disappointment

The truth is that administering and conforming rather than politicking and challenging is a blight on the whole of Wales by now.

Perhaps this can even be traced back to the onset of devolution itself when Plaid Cymru took a conscious decision that their main task was to solidify and secure the future of the fledgling Assembly by extending every help possible to the Labour Party.

This support for Labour and helping Labour to "administer" Wales has been an ever-constant feature of Welsh politics since 1999.

This passive, administrative approach has been one of the reasons why devolution has proved to be such a disappointment to so many people.

But even worse than that, this technocratic process has turned into a defining feature of our national life on every level.

This overwhelming emphasis on administration more often than not leads to conformity: that is the very nature of the beast. And conformity in our present circumstances is deadly in so many ways.

It is painfully clear in so many facets of our national life that we sorely need a new non-conformist spirit in Wales.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

44 comments

BATTLEFORFTTP

Good read. Given me much to ponder on. thanks.

Reply
Owen Llywelyn

"Their core message was that they had no choice but to obey the requirements of the Planning Inspector and implement this development plan (which is essentially a plan foisted on local authorities by the Planning Inspectorate in London)." Mae hwn yn swnio mor drist o gyfarwydd. Yr un dadleuon wedi cael eu defnyddio dros gynlluniau datblygu lleol yng Ngheredigion gan gynghorwyr Plaid Cymru a phleidiau eraill yn y gorffennol. Onid yw'n bryd i gynghorau sy'n cael eu arwain gan PC yn y gorllewin ddod ynghyd a dweud na, mae'r hyn sy'n cael eu gorfodi arnyn nhw drwy'r cynlluniau datblygu yn gwbwl niweidiol? Yr hyn maen nhw'n gwneud ar hyn o bryd yw gweithredu fel biwrocrats sy'n gweinyddu polisiau oddi fry sy'n lladd yr iaith.

Reply
glasiad

As a former county councillor (Bridgend) I can testify that this article hits the nail on the head. Although most councillors of all parties are well meaning people, they are ground down and cowed by the bureaucratic chiefs. These top bureaucrats have perfected the arts of persuasive arguments and veiled threats to ensure their directives are approved. Most councillors start with the intent to represent the interests of their community in the council. After a spell of indoctrination they soon start representing the council in their community. Mind you, it never worked on me. I don't know how many times bad measures passed 53 in favour, 1 opposed. Me being the 1. By and large our representatives in councils are sheep. Maybe politics just attracts the wrong type of people. Not bad people, but weak people. After all, when you join a political party the first thing you learn is that you have to stop thinking for yourself and just toe the party line. Political party structure is part of the problem. The Isle of Man, an independent prosperous island nation in the middle of the British Isles (which has never been part of the EU) is most often run by independents. Think about that. Political parties of any stripe don't run the show there, and the place thrives. (How do I know? I visit there at least once a year.) Wales needs a root and branch democratic revival. We've got the people. 52% of us defied the experts and the threats and voted Leave last year. That's quite non-conformist! We just need to get involved in the democratic process and kick out the old dinosaur parties. A new Charterist uprising perhaps?

Reply
Sibrydionmawr

Unfortunatelyfro your argument, Brexit is now the new conformity from which no-one is allowed to sway without the wrath of the Brexit totalitarians. You also seem to need reminding that democracy is a process, and not an event. The Brexit vote was an event, which triggered a process that currently doesn't seem to be going too well. Brexiteers are people who insist that that a turd can be shined, despite all the evidence to the contrary. The EU may have some serious shortcomings, but none of what Brexiteers accuse it of, or indeed what most of them seem to believe, is true.

Reply
glasiad

You can like the EU, you can feel our membership in the EU is essential, you can be a passionate Remainer - but you still have to admit that the Leave vote winning was the biggest voter revolt in living memory. Even UKIP boss Nigel Farage confessed that he thought Remain would win on counting night. The result was a severe punch in the gut to the UK political elites and Establishment. BBC is still staggering from the shock. There is nothing 'totalitarian' about a referendum, whatever the result. There is something quite sinister however in try to block of water down the result.

Reply

In reply to glasiad

Sibrydionmawr

Nothing sinister whatsoever - there may have been a majority vote for Brexit, that is beyond dispute, (however much many of those who voted for it who are now having second thoughts) but it was a very close vote, and 48% of those who voted, voted to remain, and if we live in a democracy, that 48% also deserve to be heard. Referenda are very much instruments of totalitarianism - it's exactly how the Nazis attained their power in 1930s Germany, and as we have seen with the Brexit vote, the extreme right played on peoples fears. Brexit is a reckless idea, and as the result was not binding, (precisely because referenda can be dodgy in the extreme) the UK government should have walked away from it. What makes the Brexit vote even more invalid is the fact that a significant number of those voting Leave didn't and probably still don't have a clue about what the EU is, as well as others who were voting Leave for reasons that had absolutely nothing to do with the EU. There is nothing 'sinister' about attempting to moderate the hugely negative effects of implementing something that is probably going to completely wreck the Welsh economy. And if it is indeed sinister, then you are suggesting that the democratic process itself is such. Democracy is being able to change bad decisions in the light of new information, and Brexit is one such decision!

Reply

In reply to Sibrydionmawr

glasiad

Wow! What a reply. I had to read it over a few times. It pretty much sums up in a nutshell everything that is wrong with the argument to ignore the Brexit referendum result. I'm going to save your comment. I think it will have historical interest in the future. - Gweiddibach :)

Reply

In reply to Sibrydionmawr

kim erswell

Find myself, again, agreeing with Glasiad. Yet, laughing that, Sibrydionmawr, has introduced "Godwin's Law" - something that seems to occur more and more in online debate. During the 2016 referendum it was common of Remainers to call Brexiters, Nazis...especially when they - Leavers - made good points in the debate and they had no real response.

Reply

In reply to Sibrydionmawr

Sibrydionmawr

It may be 'Godwin's Law' but none the less, appropriate. If there were other ways of pointing out the pitfalls of referenda, then I would use them. And has it escaped you that perhaps analogies towards nazism and totaltiarianism may indeed be appropriate, as many who support Brexit tend towards the political extreme-right? Glasiad - there is nothing whatsoever wrong with suggesting that the vote for Brexit should be ignored, again, you make the mistake of denying people the right to express an opinion. Do you feel there is anything wrong with your apparent assertion that those of us, nearly half the population, should be ignored? By all means, keep my comment for posterity, but I seriously think that I'll have the last laugh, as the wheels are falling off the whole Brexit project, as those on the UK side doing the negotiating quite clearly don't have the first clue. Even if the UK does actually leave the EU, I'm pretty sure it will soon after be clamouring for re-entry. One final point, you are now showing how petty you are with your 'clever' (not) playing about with my pseudonym. That is the kind of insult meted out by those who've lost the argument.

Reply
CambroUiDunlainge

Was Brexit conformity? The Prime Minister at the time, a Tory I might add wanted to Remain within the EU. So Wales voted Leave. Polls showed Tories would gain in Wales, Theresa May went to Bridgend... she thought she had enough support to gain an even bigger majority. All those people who voted Leave in Wales pretty much rejected her trying to harness their vote.

Reply
Cofi dre

Plaid Cymru in Arfon, most of them, and certainly the AM and MP, have been negligent and cowardly, and have almost certainly doomed Arfon to becoming a Labour seat next time around. The anger around here is palpable, and everyone knows that if the AM and MP had shown leadership then Plaid would have resisted and if the worst came to the worst it would have been implemented by force from outside - thus showing up the Labour party and showing Plaid fighting its corner. But no - they caved in when they didn't have to, and a couple of their councillors were active in actually forcing it through. The political benefits of being seen to resist and stand their ground would have been considerable. Instead they caved in and allowed a voluble Labour councillor - who opposed a medical school for North Wales and who will play politics with anything - to look like he was standing up for Gwynedd, Wales and Welsh. Plaid are amateurs, and they're also frightened, weak and hypocritical, and they'll lose a lot of votes over this. It's their unprofessionalism that baffles us up here. Here they are the etsblishment. Luckily my Plaid councillor opposed the plan and I will keep voting for them. Others up here will not.

Reply
Sibrydionmawr

I guess the only thing that can be said about Plaid Cymru in this is 'Brad!' But what of people on the ground, Welsh speaking people who are going to see their community destroyed by the LDP? There is no way in the world that 8,000 new houses are needed in Gwynedd and Môn, as I'm pretty sure there is already more than sufficient housing that is unused the vast majority of the year. There is no nice way to put it, this kind of craven decision on the part of Plaid Cymru councillors makes them complicit in the financial ethnic cleansing process taking place in North West Wales. If the housing were to be for local people only, at truly affordable prices, then at least the LDP would have been partially acceptable, though still far too big in terms of sheer numbers, but I suspect most of the housing will be speculative in nature, aimed at wealthy immigrants. I hope there is a groundswell of local, grass roots opposition to this disgusting and traitorous decision. Who needs the Tories when we've Got Plaid Brad Cymru?

Reply
CambroUiDunlainge

I'd have to disagree about being governed by distant authorities... I don't think thats the issues here. Some one on Ynys Mon could easily say the same thing about Cardiff (and the culture drift adds to that!). It's about an authority that cares not for Wales - that shields itself with our apathy and as you say the conformism which has surface in recently decades. I don't think we should use the death of non-conformist religion in Wales as metre for whether Wales is becoming more conformist... I think its death was in part due to growing number of atheists - which for all intents and purposes is the new non-conformism. There was also the Brexit vote... David Cameron a Tory Prime Minister wanted to say in the EU so Wales voted to leave. I voted Remain but even i see it was probably an anti-establishment vote. I think that is probably one of Plaid's issues. They expect their voters to be supporters of Socialism and Republicanism - asking voters to conform to what they believe being Welsh is and expecting people will one day wake up and see they were right all along. Thats not going to happen. I think more of their leading figures should be invited to write here in the holiday season. Not the usual drawl... if we're reading nation.cymru we're already some breed of nationalist - we're not some random crowd on Question Time. It's about sharing thoughts and feelings with nationalists they are not winning over and in some cases losing... taking the scrutiny on issues like this and telling us why we should support Plaid's future.

Reply
H

Words that come to mind for describing Plaid Cymru: feeble, spineless.

Reply
Brynhp

If we're serious about not just maintaining the number of Welsh speakers but increasing them what about making it mandatory for every local and regional development plan to consider the effect of the proposal on the Welsh language and for there to be a presumption against any development unless it has a positive impact on Welsh? Whilst my heart tells me to vote for Plaid I simply cannot bring myself to do so whilst it remains so totally wet. Having moved back to Wales when I retired because that is where my roots belong, I have to confess I am frustrated at how subservient we have become and how there is no spirit to make us great again. I'm afraid we are badly led and that devolution has proved to be a failure.

Reply
Al

This article is a real eye- opener for many. I think one of your respondents has also nailed it when he said that many of our plaid cymru councillors are not bad people- they are just weak people who have not really got a wide-lens awareness of what being a nationalist actually is. They are just too many in their midst who feel that they are there to represent their area- without an implicit understanding that they are also there to represent the Welsh National Interest. But then, when Plaid Cymru have virtually given up on any real nationalist mission work in our communities since 1999: is it any surprise that so many of their elected councillors are now so easily swayed by bureaucratic councilspeak?

Reply
Royston Jones

I have argued for 30 years or more that Plaid Cymru is part of the problem not part of the solution. It is of more use to England now than to Wales. Not only because it refuses to rock the boat and challenge, as in the case of this LDP, but because it sits there, pretending to be a national party, and all the while blocking the emergence of a genuine national party. The tragedy is that we've had 90 years of Plaid Cymru masquerading as the 'national party', 90 years that can never be made up; 90 years that have seen the de-industrialisation of our urban areas and the loss of so many Welsh-speaking communities. To the point where our rural and coastal areas have no future except as England's recreation and retirement areas, while our former coalfields and other areas face managed decline or, if they're lucky, commuter belt status for Cardiff, Bristol or north west England. Thankfully, more and more people realise what Wales needs, and also realise that Plaid Cymru has nothing to offer. Wales cannot afford to put its hopes in Plaid Cymru any longer. It's becoming clear that unless Plaid Cymru can change itself in a very fundamental way then an alternative will have to be formed. But we can never make up those 90 wasted years.

Reply
Cofi dre

There's a time and place to discuss Brexit, and this isn't either of them. The issue here is a basic one: not only is Plaid not able to be principled, it's not even able to be pragmatic without cocking it up. There were votes to be regained by outflanking Labour on the LDP, and if they really wanted to implement it they could at least have fought it and then allowed themselves to be overruled. No. Instead they let a Labour councillor appear to stand up to his party while Plaid visibly didn't stand up for itself. He'll get votes, they'll lose votes, Labour get their policy through while having a local councillor visibly looking like a maverick and thus getting votes; Plaid vote through a policy they oppose, appearing to own that policy when it's in fact been forced upon them. This is how things like People's Voice, Llais Gwynedd and Sian Caiach started: ruling parties thinking they could do anything they wanted, then realising they lost whole seats because they were neither properly principled nor properly cynical. Blinkered amateurs.

Reply
Gwyn Williams

You've completely misunderstood the LDP.

Reply
Dafydd Thomas

Perhaps Leanne should tell the Plad councillors in Gwynedd to grow a backbone. It seems as if the vast majority of the 8000 houses, if not all will go to retirees from over the border. Theses retirees, almost 90% of whom will have pre existing medical conditions, will be a burden on Wales NHS, depriving funds for the education budget for our children all over Wales. It all comes from the Welsh budget. This number of houses is equivalent to some 150,000 houses (300,000 people) built in England for retirees from Europe, and burdening England NHS with an annual expenditure of £1,500,000,000. Does anyone think there would be rubber stamping without a huge outcry? It is almost criminal what the Planning Inspectorate gets away with in Wales. They need to be challenged root and branch. Did the councillors at least press for a local occupancy clause, or are they content that local young families are outbid by the English retirees. The planning inspectorate directed from London reminds me of the faceless bureaucrats from Brussels and the unwanted immigration much like that evident in the brexit debate. Welsh independence referendum anyone?

Reply
Alwyn ap Huw

What the councillors who voted in favour of the LDP said is correct; the Labour Government could implement a Development Plan from Cardiff; the Government could send in Commissioners to run the Council directly and developers would rub their hands in glee at the prospect of no development plan being in place to restrict even more developments than were in the plan. Before nonconformity became the accepted religion of Wales in the 1850s earlier pioneers of the cause had been martyred, imprisoned, exiled and assaulted. If we want Plaid councillors in Gwynedd (Labour councillors in Cardiff, Tory councillors in Monmouth, or Indy councillors in Conwy etc) to be the forerunners of County Council nonconformity we must be willing to accept that our communities will suffer as a result. As much as I oppose these housing developments I am not willing to see even more houses imposed on Gwynedd or other counties because of councillors’ acts of symbolic defiance. That, of course, is not to say that nothing should be done. We need to protest about the way that these plans are forced on local authorities, but the target of our protest shouldn’t be the councils. We should focus our attack on the Welsh Government and the English Planning Inspectorate that they use to impose the plans. We should take our placards our ire and our civil disobedience down to Cardiff Bay & Temple Quay, Bristol; where they belong, not to County Hall.

Reply
Dafydd ap Gwilym

Into the last heartland, just like the Romans wiping out the Druids the British government is doing the same. Voting Tory or LIb Dem got you where you are just like in the south voting Labour! Believing in the British was our first mistake not saying enough is enough years ago the second. Rise or die, it is up to all Welsh people the last ball is in your court!

Reply
Max Wallis

Caerphilly Council last year rejected their LDP, standing up to the bullying to conform to the WG's Planning Inspectorate. http://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/14630612.Caerphilly_council_scraps_land_plan_for_12_400_proposed_new_homes/ No disastrous consequences, no 'direct rule' from Cardiff. Just recently, the Vale of Glamorgan supinely accepted their LDP, with a lot more house-building than even the WG projections. Plaid cllrs did vote against, but tokenist only. They failed to replicate the fight in Caerphilly and win over the independents and many of the Tories who said they were opposed - to the Labour-driven expansionist LDP.

Reply
Martin

But this is Plaid Cymru Gwynedd's own LDP that they have put together for several years.

Reply
Bryn Daf

What is going on with Plaid Cymru over there. WEAK WEAK WEAK

Reply
Martin

They should explain their side of the story, with an article for balance.

Reply
Leia

I oncur - would love to see some more interview-style articles challenging directly on this sort of thing.

Reply

In reply to Leia

Martin

Not happy with it. Seimon Glyn and my parents councillor being called "bradwyr"? Not buying it. Think it's bad form and destructive. Want to see the other side of the story.

Reply
Cofi dre

Hywel Williams won by less than 100 votes last election. He's a good MP and I admire him. But on this the MP and AM stood on the sidelines, and that will cost them in any upcoming election. If Caerphilly can stand up to the LDP then surely Gwynedd can. It scraped through by one vote - one! several abstained, several didn't turn up, and some were on holiday. One faction of Plaid was pushing for the LDP and one was pushing against it. To have it win by 1 vote should make a lot of us wonder what we pay councillors for. Labour will get the credit for opposing their own policy (plus the bonus of getting it passed), while Plaid will pay at the ballot box for something they opposed and forced through out of cowardice. There are votes to be had in standing up to LDPs, Cardiff Bay, etc. but Plaid in Gwynedd has rolled over for the establishment, and it's not even *their* establishment.

Reply
desdelguinardo

I admire Nation.cymru and the amount of work that seemingly goes into the project, but since the General Election, it has seemed to turn into 1) a platform for those who are not involved in Plaid Cymru to say how they would change Plaid Cymru if they were and 2) a blog driven by opinion articles and not offering a news service, as the intention was to begin with. Many of us gave funds at the beginning to contribute to a news service, not an opinion platform. The constant flow of articles by people who are not involved in Plaid Cymru noting how Plaid Cymru had to radically change was particularly tiring - as if those of us involved in Plaid Cymru were not aware of those challenges. There is space for a forum like this, and I think that it would be a great idea to have one - however, I didn't think that was the whole point of nation.cymru. The amount of traction received with the Iron Ring series for an issue in Wales was good however, despite it probably not getting past the usual nationalist bubble. Will there be an effort to move away from the constant opinion articles, preaching to the choir, and working towards a news service instead? All the best with your work!

Reply
Sibrydionmawr

You are correct, there are many people here who are not involved with Plaid Cymru expressing opinions about what they think Plaid Cymru should be, including myself. But, I think that most of us who comment on Plaid Cymru have in the past been members of Plaid Cymru, who have eventually become frustrated by the party's cowardice, lack of backbone and it's constant pandering to a pacifist elite still cowed into obsequious Blue Book engendered forelock tugging, or moves of appeasement in the hope of appealing to the monster's (Brit Imperialism) better side. I was once an enthusiastic member of Plaid Cymru, but gradually became disillusioned with the party as time wore on. I remember being at the inaugural meeting of the Coleg Harlech branch of Plaid Cymru in the Queen's Hotel (1985-86?) when Dafydd Elis Thomas came and spoke to us. I can distinctly remember thinking to myself at that time that what we had here was a politician: i.e. someone not to be trusted. Later on in that decade, I remember becoming even more disillusioned with the party when Elis Thomas came out and publicly condemned those behind the Meibion Glyndŵr holiday home arson campaign. I found that shocking, for it informed me that the Plaid elite were more concerned with pandering to what the English (mostly those in Wales) thought about Plaid and Welsh nationalists in general, no doubt in the hope that it would make the party more attractive to them. (Vain hope in the vast majority of cases, most White Settlers are either completely disinterested on politics, or resolutely pro-imperialist, though it has to be said that there are important exceptions who have made sterling contributions to the national cause). For me, I would have been happier if the then leader of Plaid Cymru had not condemned or condoned the holiday home arson campaign, but had simply explained that it was perhaps a natural concomitant in a situation where a people and a community felt under threat, where moderate means had visibly failed, (Plaid itself the most obvious example!) and that there was a feeling that there was only one way in which that discontent could be demonstrated. In this Plaid singularly misinterpreted an important movement that had widespread passive support. I don't for a minute suggest that I think a majority of those giving that passive support condoned the kind of action being undertaken by Meibion Glyndŵr, but that, in the failure Plaid Cymru to robustly take up the cause of the real issues behind the protest, housing for locals, decent jobs, (that don't involve skivvying for tourists) and the erosion of the language and culture through mass immigration, in itself the partial cause of the crisis. Finally, in 1989 I left Plaid Cymru when I heard that Elis Thomas had accepted a peerage in the English House of Lords, and Plaid hadn't ejected him from the party. Now, I fully accept both his right to accept an English peerage, and also Plaid's decision to allow him to remain a member, but I was also free to leave a party that I realised was rapidly becoming part of the British establishment; that had abandoned any pretence of genuinely standing for Wales. Much of the appeasing behaviour of Plaid is to avoid the vocal condemnation of the English Left, (and their Welsh lackeys, Welsh Labour) much of which displays a rank hypocrisy that is easily deflected: why are they so condemnatory of a freedom movement of the kind that they would, nominally at least, be supportive of if it were one of the world's submerged nations? Why do most of the English Left support the Palestinian cause and not the Welsh? Partially this is Plaid's own doing, in my opinion, as Plaid is constantly in search of a backbone; if Plaid asserted itself, it would probably gain more respect from the English Left, and though this appears counter-intuitive to many in the nationalist camp in Wales, it seems elementary to me, but then I've never really understood what appears to me the naïve and hopelessly optimistic belief amongst a significant number of Plaid supporters that all is required is to be reasonable and persuasive and that then the English sense of fair play will kick in, and all will be well. Unfortunately, fair play and chwarae teg aren't the same thing! To the English establishment, and to many English people themselves, Plaid's constant attempts at appeasement, and lack of backbone appear as 'arse licking' which, as subordinate behaviour, isn't exactly going to engender respect. I'm not for one moment advocating that Plaid should adopt an anti-English stance, but rather a standpoint that asserts a Welsh identity, that stands up for Welsh people and never condemns any assertion of identity or defence of that identity in any way that is non-violent, in the sense that this is understood in Wales. Thus, the Meibion Glyndŵr campaign should be seen as perhaps analogous to the Toxteth Riots, as a protest against intolerable conditions. Then, sadly we come to the post 1999 period, where we have a National Assembly for Wales, and a Welsh Assembly Government where Plaid has, as pointed out by another commentator in these threads, been Welsh Labour's supine lapdog when it should have been a Rottweiler going for Labour's jugular. And sadly the cancer seems to have spread. Since 1999 there has been no co-ordinated, or sucessful Cymdeithas yr Iaith campaign to support the language. That organisation too seems to have decided that the best way is to remain only mildly critical of Welsh Labour's tardy and lukewarm proposals towards the Welsh language, perhaps, along with Plaid itself, content that now there is a career structure for the Welsh speaking petty bourgeouisie who have been bought off with the prospect of nice, well paid cushy jobs. I know that sounds very cynical, and indeed I can be accused of being very cynical, but I am not lacking in optimism. It's easy to criticise detractors of the nationalist movement, especially when they are so often so obviously in the nationalist camp themselves for not being members of the nationalist organisations they criticise - but maybe that is because they have realised the utter futility of trying to change those organisations from within. Maybe if those organisations took onboard some of the criticisms and changed accordingly they may attract those detractors back into the fold? But no, the pinnacle of achievement in the period since Devolution was the crushing of Cymuned in the pincer movement between Plaid and Cymdeithas, Wales' leading conformist organisations hell bent on not corddi'r dyfroedd and in cadw'r ddesgil yn wastad. Oh, and back to the topic in hand, yes, I'm sure that nation.cymru was set up to be an alternative news service for Wales, and yes that is needed, but as you say, there is also a need for a platform of debate. In the bad old days of the Welsh Office and no internet, we had the letters pages of the Western Mail, which, however bad did remain true to John Jenkins' description of it being the newspaper that nobody wanted, but had to have. Since devolution, the internet has taken over, and the the Llais y Sais has gone rapidly down hill, (always a mistake to go from broadsheet to tabloid, though to be fair, the WM had gone tabloid long before the format changed to tabloid!). Whether it's something to do with the nature of the internet, or just that we haven't yet adapted to this new medium, but there just doesn't appear to be the kind of focus that was offered by the older forms of of media. In the case of nation.cymru, perhaps the very name has been the cause of a little confusion, and both contributors and commentators have taken it to mean that it is a platform for the discussion of things Welsh in general?

Reply
Huw

1) it doesn't seem that there are an abundance of articles here on the direction of Plaid, and it seems natural that during an election period, and after a momentous decision such as this, that there is attention given to these questions - it would be more worrying for the party if people weren't interested 2) all this sort of discussion seems very healthy anyway because it is critical engagement with the nationalist movement - the English language public discourse is badly lacking this sort of discussion that begins from the perspective that Welsh nationalism is a positive thing; in general more discussion about Plaid, their policies and their approach all helps to validate nationalist politics and make it important and newsworthy in ways it isn't at the moment 3) on the point about a 'news' service it seems to me that what we need a lot more of, in terms of 'news', is not content (there are any number of stories on other Welsh outlets) but stuff that gets beyond headlines and actually scrutinizes and discusses. It would be great to have news items that aren't covered on other outlets, but surely that will come with time as the site becomes established, more well known and gets some more income - this should encourage a wider pool of contributors with different views and stories and may allow more commissioned stuff.

Reply
kim erswell

Very interesting,Sibrydionmawr, and informative. I agree also that their is no point in catering to the English/British establishment. Yet, when most people talk about the English their - I feel - talking about a very small minority that do look down on the Welsh. In fact, look down on everyone: including most of the English themselves. Having lived in Wales I think a major problem is your not vocal enough - unlike the Scots or Irish who seem to register more in the pyche through greater media attention by making vociferous demands. Passiveness and playing by the Marquis of Queensbury rules won't really be noticed. Just as the English left won't work to help you.

Reply

In reply to kim erswell

Sibrydionmawr

I think you're right. There are indeed probably only a minority of English people in Wales who are vocal in their condescension, but I know from personal experience that there are a great many who have consciously refused to acknowledge that they are living in someone else's country, even to the point of deliberately mis-pronouncing place names after having lived in the area for many years. I have found quite shocking the attitudes of many English expats in Wales. Much of it is of a casual nature, so I'm not talking of the kind of people such as Protic or those behind the Llangennech scandal, or even the likes of Education First, though the latter did give voice to much of the casual prejudice against Welsh language education, which I've never understood the logic of. Yes, it's kind of ironic when it's considered that our culture is one where words play a disproportionate role that we aren't really vocal enough. Perhaps though, despite the reality, the Welsh are widely seen as being voluble, and therefore there is a reluctance to actually be vocal in case we're found guilty of what we're often accused of being! The passiveness and playing by the rules is part of the whole Parchusrwydd thing that still affects far too many in Wales, especially in influential positions. I think it is something that misinforms Plaid Cymru often, as they naively still seem to believe that the way into English hearts is to be reasonable and appeasing. They couldn't be more wrong! I'm not arguing for rudeness, or forgetting common decency towards others, but rather that common decencies towards English people in Wales ought to be offered in Welsh first, and then repeated often to those who choose to live here, to underline that really, they ought to learn Welsh if they really want to live here and truly be part of the community. I've had many run ins with the English Left over the years, much of it within Wales itself, indeed, mainly within Wales itself. It's still a huge problem, but it often seems to me that it is also a peculiarly Welsh issue, in that those on the English Left who are attracted to Wales are, fundamentally, anti Welsh. Most seem to be in favour of any and all freedom movements around the world, but specifically want to oppress any Welsh aspirations to self-determination. It's quite flattering in a way that they like Wales so much that they don't want us to have it back! However, I have had some really odd (to me anyway) experiences with the English Left in England of recent years. I have lived in England, in several places in my life, and been subjected to anti Welsh sentiments on occasions. Sometimes quite mild, (being called Taffy - yawn, so predictable) and sometimes I've more or less been regarded as being guilty by association of burning down holiday homes because I'm Welsh speaking. But in recent years I've been very pleasantly surprised by attitudes amongst a growing number on the Left in England, particularly amongst those with anarchist leanings., who are sympathetic, and cautiously supportive. But in terms of the mainstream English Left, I agree with you.

Reply
desdelguinardo

You seem to enjoy leaving comments on sites. Why not establish another party or organisation if changing Plaid is so futile? I just don't get why all of you don't just do it.

Reply
NationCymru

Thank you for your comments desdelguinardo. The intention with Nation.Cymru has always been to provide a news service alongside a platform for analysing the news. The analysis is just as important as it is something there is little of on other Welsh media platforms (partly due to the dominance of the BBC which can't be seen to be offering a view on issues). There are a few reasons why there isn't a lot of news on Nation.Cymru yet. The biggest one is that we launched much earlier than intended in order to take advantage of the General Election. We had planned to spend the summer setting up a business model for the website. As it stands, that work is being done right now by our newly appointed CEO Mark Mansfield. News is more expensive than opinion because you have to pay journalists to put the hours in to find it. The intention remains to be in a position to pay freelance journalists very soon. All the money kindly contributed by people like yourself is still there waiting to be spent on this aspect of the website - we've only spent £180 of it so far, on the website itself! Hopefully by the time the new political year begins we can begin to spend it. I'm not sure I agree with your claim that we're preaching to the nationalist choir. The website has been very successful, particularly on Facebook, in reaching beyond that bubble. We've had just under 200,000 visitors so far. If that's a nationalist choir then it's a very big one! At the end of the day there's little point for Nation.Cymru to provide the same kind of coverage that other news platforms do. We need to find our own niche and look to provide the kinds of stories and outlets for discussion that aren't available on other platforms. It's telling that when we've strayed into providing the kind of coverage already catered for by other sites, visitor numbers have been down. Nation.Cymru was never going to be a stand alone news platform where you could get all of your news - we just don't have the resources. It's better to consider it as a site that fills the gap in the coverage of much larger organisations such as the BBC and the Western Mail. One day, if we keep plugging away, that will hopefully change.

Reply
leigh richards

Well said desdelguinardo! After promising beginnings based on the laudable premise of providing 'a news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales' i worry this website is in danger of degenerating into a bubble for a narrow and remote group of right wing critics of plaid cymru. Such people are of course perfectly entitled to their opinions, but trust me ordinary people the length and breadth of wales are not currently bemoaning the fact plaid is a left of center party. I also feel bound to say to these right wing detractors that there is an obvious course of action open to you - get off your keyboards and your bony old a**** and form this right wing party you seem to think the welsh are gagging to vote for.

Reply
Sibrydionmawr

Not this critic of Plaid Cymru. A right wing critic. moi?!! I have no problem with Plaid being left of centre, it's just not left of centre enough! I swing towards anarchism, community communism etc. Hardly right wing.

Reply
Bet

Surel this hás to be the last straw When is a centre right nationalist party going to be set up? A party like this would put heritage and tradition above this constant deference to Labour in Cardiff Bay. It could be a properly nationalist party not afraid to stand up for Wales. It could stand for independence and a sound economy based on entrepreneurship and fully releasing all the talents of the people of Wales. When are the next Assemly elections?

Reply
Martin

And it would stand in Gwynedd against Plaid Cymru at the council? Would any of the Plaid councillors who voted against the LDP join it do you think?

Reply
desdelguinardo

One of the greatest problems with Wales, especially post-devolution Wales, is lack of action. In Catalonia, if a load of people think that there's a space for a Christian Democratic Federalist party, for example, guess what they do? Oh yeah that's right, they come together, get off the comments columns of websites, and establish one. I suggest you do the same and see how you get on.

Reply
Andrew M.

I'm not sure there's much difference between a News service and an opinion platform. Articles like this encourage activity and readers... as well as opinions. Pretty much the lifeblood of any media outlet. You are correct about attention on Plaid since the election... but there's a lot of discontent and disenfranchised nationalists out there and Plaid Cymru's performance in both elections was pretty dire. Thing is... Plaid's rhetoric about being the only party of the Welsh people, the voice of Wales and the only party which puts the Welsh people first means that they are accountable when it all goes wrong. But there's not really been much out Plaid but "Keep calm and carry on" which has people understandably concerned. So ultimately... if a Welsh media outlet is not going to hold the party to account... who is?

Reply
glynadda

Gweler Blog Glyn Adda: https://glynadda.wordpress.com/2017/07/30/at-wraidd-y-broblem/

Reply
Wrexhamian

This whole story is really depressing. The English authorities tried this on in North East Wales a few years ago, and lost - in an area where Plaid Cymru has weaker representation! Wales really needs to get its act together with regard to these local development plans; they are nothing less than colonialism. I thought planning issues were devolved to this country after the Senedd was established. Planning should be based on housing need, and Gwynedd does not need 8,000 new houses. If Plaid are complicit in this, they need roasting on an open fire.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to glasiad Cancel

Wow! What a reply. I had to read it over a few times. It pretty much sums up in a nutshell everything that is wrong with the argument to ignore the Brexit referendum result. I'm going to save your comment. I think it will have historical in...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.