Sat, 18th July Cardiff 21°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

Opinion

On Welsh independence, Labour are all words and no action

By NationCymru
Former First Minister Carwyn Jones. Picture by XIIIfromTOKYO (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Liz Saville Roberts MP, Plaid Cymru Westminster leader

‘Wales isn’t too poor to be independent’ read the headline following my debate with ex-First Minister, Carwyn Jones on Tuesday. They were quoting Mr Jones, who seems to have had the revelation since standing down from the top job.

To be fair, he was always seen as more constitutionally inquisitive than the current Labour leadership in Cardiff, which cowers behind the letter of the party line from London.

The discussion about independence took place in a room packed to bursting at the National Eisteddfod. But it is also a debate that is happening with ever-increasing urgency throughout Wales, Scotland and Westminster. How long can the seams of the Union hold?

What has happened in Scotland, in paticular, should be a lesson to Welsh Labour. The mind-bedding, logic-defying debate between the Scottish and London Labour parties on the issue of a second Scottish independence referendum has caused them much public embarrassment this week.

The row flared up when the Shadow Chancellor, John McDonell, told an Edinburgh audience that a second independence referendum was a matter for the Scottish people and that a future Labour Westminster Government would not block one. The Scottish Labour party then rebuffed this, saying Westminster should not grant one.

To summarise, Scottish Labour are saying: 'We want to be ruled by London, so ignore what our representatives from London are saying.' Beyond logic.

[mid-content-banner]

Shifting

Labour has suffered this sorry fate in Scotland thanks to their inability to offer a coherent answer to the urgent constitutional question.

A similar fate looks to befall them in Westminster and across the United Kingdom as a result of Labour dithering over Brexit.

And the dragon of independence is beginning to stir in Wales: Welsh Labour needs to decide on whose side they stand or face the prospect of again falling between two stools.

So far, the very visible and audible rise in support for independence - and the prospect of a further rise as a result of Westminster’s mishandling of Brexit - is at least forcing Labour to unplug their ears and listen.

Until now Labour thought they could ignore the problem, and even use it as a club to which to beat us: ‘But they support independence (laughs)!” was a common rebuttal of last resort for Labour politicians on the ropes in debates with Plaid Cymru on all manner of issues.

The tide is turning. Their tone is shifting. No longer are derision and indifference the order of the day. It is an issue not only firmly on the agenda, but quickly moving towards the top.

The former First Minister’s comments follow a series of statements by prominent Labour figures on the issue. The current First Minister, Mark Drakeford, made front-page news when he said his support for the Union was conditional. He later claimed that it was actually unconditional, only to be somewhat undermined a few weeks later by his Brexit Minister.

Jeremy Miles, also in the Eisteddfod, said a no-deal Brexit would lead to Labour questioning Wales’ place in the Union, noting that the UK was a “voluntary association of nations”.

The very fact that Labour are talking about Welsh independence is significant in and of itself. The fact that they are making such considered statements makes it doubly so.

But as many people pointed out after the debate, Carwyn Jones’s independence-sympathetic comments only came after he left office and thus abdicated the power to do anything about it. A very fair point – and, sadly, a classic Labour tactic.

And those present at the Eisteddfod debate will recall the ex-FM Jones’s repeated attempts to palm off his reluctant Indy-curiosity with the justification that the rampant English nationalism of the Tory party would force Wales to face the prospect of independence by default.

It's the ultimate Welsh Labour politician’s excuse: ‘The English Tories made me do it, sir. It wasn’t my idea so don’t blame me if it all goes pear-shaped.’

Power

For 20-years Labour-majority Governments in Wales have done little to demonstrate the benefits of remaining subservient to Westminster. Their lack of policy and a deficit of economic and constitutional creativity have shown up a fundamental weakness in the logic of the Union.

And despite their concerned words, as sure as night follows day, yet again, we will not see any grand gestures from the Labour party to fix this imbalance. Commentary is easy, but it is action which is needed and Labour have shown no intention of acting.

The very least they should do is establish Welsh Labour has a separate party so that their fair words might be assumed to have some weight of policy.

Come 2021, we cannot afford to retain a party in power whose only priority is to keep its privileged members in the style to which they have been too long accustomed. Our nation is facing big questions and huge challenges as inevitable constitutional changes come over the horizon.

That is why the first step – even if it is just to make Westminster sit-up and listen – is to elect a pro-independence Government in Cardiff Bay.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

10 comments

Huw Davies

Have a great deal of time for LSR's output but really did this need re stating ? It's pretty obvious that Labour in Wales is a Unionist party and any curiosity about Independence is a superficial gesture. Don't be distracted by Labour's antics in Scotland, Labour in London is Unionist and its rump in Scotland is just the same. To say..... "The very least they should do is establish Welsh Labour has a separate party so that their fair words might be assumed to have some weight of policy." gives Labour too much credit. Best leave the party the way they are and work to boot them out. Which she goes on to say … "Come 2021, we cannot afford to retain a party in power whose only priority is to keep its privileged members in the style to which they have been too long accustomed. Our nation is facing big questions and huge challenges as inevitable constitutional changes come over the horizon. ..………… That is why the first step – even if it is just to make Westminster sit-up and listen – is to elect a pro-independence Government in Cardiff Bay." That's the bit we should focus upon. We know they are pretty useless bunch and the aim over the next 2 years is to engage in a sustained barrage of criticism, analytical and constructive, so that Plaid can enter the 2021 campaign looking like real contenders.

Reply
Jonathan Edwards

Yes it does need re-stating. Because at least 2 groups of people have not absorbed the fact that Labour is about perpetuating power for itself. The Bubble people - and I'm afraid this includes a lot of Plaid AMs - have avoided the logic that Labour lets Wales down when the chips are down, so oppose Labour. The tendency has been for Plaid to ape the Labour way of doing things. The other group are the voters who vote Labour. Under Labour, for 100 years, Wales has remained at the bottom of economic league tables and who has done well? The people in the Bubble. But not people in Pembrokeshire (say) who vote Labour and need a better economy.Plaid needs to break the mould. And do something for the people. And be populist, And get Labour and Tory voters too. Perfectly doable. As McEvoy shows in Cardiff West. But...........................

Reply
Huw Davies

When confronting Labour Independence is not the key issue. Activists like McEvoy &others put other real day to day problems up front. They delve into the challenges that confront ordinary members of our communities and link the lasting solutions to the changes needed. Not a difficult link to make here - get rid of the dead hand of Unionist Labour government and the solutions can be implemented . The real challenge for politicians leading the charge for change is to ensure that the spivs and manipulators don't do a "chameleon" and turn up to blight the new regime. Plaid's current leadership group in Wales don't appear to have the backbone to secure such changes. Maybe LSR back from Westminster might be a start in the right direction.

Reply
Simon Gruffydd

So what kind of "independence" are we talking about anyway? It is almost always exclusively constitutional / political independence, great for the boys and girls in The Bay, more power for them, but less relevant to those who live outside of the bubble. We need to start talking about economic independence. It's where the real power lies. It's how we as a nation thrives, or declines. When we start talking about economic independence people will realise that constitutional independence is a mere footnote in comparison.

Reply
Rhosddu

Yes, we need economic independence, but surely, political independence has to come first in order to activate the former. A colony cannot achieve economic independence -- consider the plans for the extraction of newly-discovered gold in the Welsh gold mines, the profits from which are destined to leave the country pronto, as happened with the coal. economic independence once the political But you're right in that we should talk now about how we go about achieving political independence once the political battle has been won. I think Ein Gwlad have gone into this recently in some detail.

Reply
Simon Gruffydd

You write, "we need economic independence, but surely, political independence has to come first in order to activate the former" At first glance this seems like obvious commonsense. And if you follow the main discourse of Plaid Cymru, Yes Cymru, or Ein Gwlad you would be supported in this belief. But what if the opposite is true? (And I believe it is.) Only when Wales has a more independent and thriving economy will constitutional independence be a safe bet for the majority, including our English guests. We already have the political power and ability to transform our economy into an industrial powerhouse on both the national and local authority level - provided we are willing to jig the monetary system in our favour, rather than be at its mercy. The only thing that is holding us back is ignorance, and to a lesser degree, timidity. Too much timidity to ask impertinent questions and demand answers as to why we are wallowing in poverty and debt when from a scientific and technological perspective we should all be thriving.

Reply

In reply to Simon Gruffydd

Rhosddu

That's a good point, Simon, and I wish it would happen. I've argued the same point myself in the past, but I no longer think any devolution-era Welsh government will strap on a pair and take this on.

Reply

In reply to Simon Gruffydd

CapM

"Only when Wales has a more independent and thriving economy will constitutional independence be a safe bet for the majority,...." If Cymru was wealthier then the British nationalist argument would be - don't mess with the UK it's working to your benefit. Independence will make you poorer. The majority might well put their bet on the UK and not Cymru. There are and will be many reasons, besides the economy, why people support independence and for most of those reasons people can immediately start to act as if Cymru were already independent. We shouldn't think that independence can't and won't make big progress until after we're all wealthier.

Reply
Max Wallis

.Fine, but why challenge only Welsh Labour ? The "next step" involves negotiations on a united 'Remain' candidate if there's a snap Westminster election. Why is Liz Roberts not putting the independence issue into these negotiations, eg. by seeking commitment from the LibDems to cross-party pre-independence consultations, eg. joint study of Constitutional issues or to holding a citizens convention on key issues

Reply
Alasdair Macdonald

The reason for challenging Welsh Labour is that for very many decades, the Welsh people sent a majority of Labour MPs to London, and, since the Welsh Assembly started, Welsh Labour has always been the largest party, with a majority of seats (except now). So, Labour has claimed and continues to claim to represent the interests of the majority of the people of Wales. But, Wales, like Scotland and most of the industrial parts of England, has seen the manufacturing base destroyed, and the thrust of Westminster policies focussed increasingly on financial services and, hence on London and the South East. Despite 13 years of Blair/Brown governments, this trend continued. With the mendacious Brown wittering on about 'pooling and sharing' and the 'transfer of resources to the poorer areas'. In the latter case he is repeating the message that Wales, like Scotland, like Northern Ireland like the economically and socially deprived parts of England and London are 'too wee and not very good' - they DEPEND on the wealthy parts of England. The bulk of the Tory vote in Wales comes from incomers to Wales. The attachment of many of them to the concept of 'Wales' is not particularly strong. They do not want their family members still resident in England to become 'foreigners', who will need passports and visas to get into Wales. However, they have not suffered economically as much as the traditional Labour voting parts. So, in order to change Wales, Wales has to get rid of the Welsh Labour Party or the Labour Party must change. Labour, even more than the Tories - who, since, Thatcher have become the party of globalised wealth and not of 'this precious union' - is the BRITISH party. It deludes itself that it can use the apparatus of Whitehall to transfer wealth and power to other parts of the country. This apparatus has been created to maintain the control by the very wealthy and has always, after a few years of Labour government produced a 'run on the pound' or other crisis, which has forced Labour to revert to the maintenance of the British State and many of the senior members of Labour do pretty well out of this, with places on boards, property portfolios, seats in the House of Lords. They become seduced by the 'trappings' of power' and become detached from their 'roots' (assuming they ever had these in their constituencies. Even Aneurin Bevan, was edged into supporting nuclear weapons.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Simon Gruffydd Cancel

You write, "we need economic independence, but surely, political independence has to come first in order to activate the former" At first glance this seems like obvious commonsense. And if you follow the main discourse of Plaid Cymru, Yes...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.