Thu, 23rd July Cardiff 18°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

Opinion

Misogyny - not so niche now

By Mark Mansfield
Carrie Harper

Carrie Harper

This last week has been the most difficult I've experienced as a member and elected representative for Plaid Cymru. The Prosiect Pawb report commissioned by the party to look into reports of a toxic culture delivered its damning conclusion. Plaid Cymru has a culture of harassment, bullying and misogyny that needs rooting out.

It's not just Plaid Cymru wrestling with these problems of course. We've seen it in the WRU, the Met Police and in other political parties too. Too often society generally turns a blind eye, too often 'banter' is the excuse and too often those in power brush bad behaviour under the carpet.

We had all hoped that the 'me too' movement would spark a fundamental change but it sadly wasn't the silver bullet for such an endemic problem. In a climate of political polarisation, culture wars and anti-wokeness, it's all too easy to dismiss genuine problems as 'niche issues'. Within Plaid similar concerns have also been raised previously but we have to accept that not enough has been done to turn the page.

It's been an eyeopener to say the least. With no hint of irony I've even seen some point the finger at former party leader Leanne Wood for the party's current woes. I recall she was accused of focussing overly on niche issues when she challenged misogyny. Misogyny doesn’t seem so niche now does it? It's an indication of how much work there is to do.

[mid-content-banner]

Respectful

My own County Council group in Wrecsam is made up of a majority of women councillors, sadly we are the exception not the rule. We've worked hard locally to encourage more women to stand for the party and many stepped up to the plate during the last council election.

They've also been supported by men in the party who have been instrumental in ensuring a supportive, positive and respectful environment. It's difficult to now bring this report to them and we've had to have an honest and open conversation locally about what needs to change. We're agreed it starts with accountability.

At the heart of the problem is sexual harassment and misogyny but it's also important to note the report points to bullying too. Abuse of power is also an issue and one political parties have to be particularly mindful of. Nerys Evans is clear in stating in her report that the perpetrators are men and although the majority of victims are women, men have been victims too.

Moving forward we have to separate these issues out in order to understand them fully. We also can't just point the finger at the top of the party, these issues reflect our society more generally and will therefore manifest at all levels.

A green shoot in this saga is the fact that Plaid Cymru commissioned this report itself and shared the conclusions publicly. It's undoubtedly tough to hear damning home truths set out so starkly and to put them up for public scrutiny but it's also the starting point for raising the bar.

Determined

As a member of the party's National Executive I know how determined people are to effect genuine change. There is absolute unity around the priority to implement all 82 of the recommendations set out in Nerys' Evans report as a matter of urgency.

Fundamentally, Plaid Cymru is a party of decent, dedicated people who are committed to building a better Wales. We know that to do that, we have to embody what that Wales looks like.

Clearly not everyone has lived up to the standard. We now owe it to our members, to our staff and to all those within the Independence movement to embed a new culture of respect from the grassroots through to the very top.

The party is currently in the very capable hands of Llyr Gruffydd MS as interim leader and we have started the process to elect the next leader of our party. That person undoubtedly has a huge task ahead but they will have the backing of us all to get the job done. That job is about making Plaid Cymru structures a best practice example in Wales but it's also about setting out the vision for the Wales we want to build and the road map to getting there.

That vision has to include a zero tolerance approach to bad behaviour.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

14 comments

Gill

Why so much misogyny Carrie when the party is fulĺ of powerful women? Can we not call it toxic rather than mysoginy . After all men and women have been hounded out Of PC.

Reply
hdavies15

It's a toxic mix that includes misogyny. The missing word is "misandry" like it can't happen. Some of the "powerful women" losing their focus and lashing out ? Not possible ? Since when has "scheming" been a male only activity?

Reply
Leigh Richards

Carrie is right - its been frankly laughable to observe some people (ie. men) attempting to blame our former female leader Leanne Wood for serious problems like misogyny in the party. A woman blamed for misogyny - you couldnt make it up! But appalled as i was by the investigations findings i was nevertheless very pleased to see the recommendations contained in Nerys Evans' report accepted in their entirety by the party. I fear however its going to take us a long time to recover from this shameful episode. But if we are serious about dealing with the very serious issues highlighted in the report (and i think we are) part of our response must involve the expulsion of those responsible for such intolerable behaviour. There would be no clearer way of demonstrating that misogyny, sexual harassment and bullying wont be tolerated in Plaid Cymru.

Reply
Sorgina

I just hope remedial action is also taken at branch level, since the problem extends outside Ty Gwynfor as well.

Reply
CJPh

"A woman blamed for misogyny – you couldnt make it up". It seems that you've found a way, Leigh. What an incredibly flimsy straw man statement. I've read plenty of commentary about Leanne Woods tenure, some totally justified, criticism, some hyperbolic and plenty of ad hominems too, but who has ever said that she is a misogynist? If that's how you see things, no wonder you're willing to accept the findings of a report based on... What exactly? Say so?

Reply
Leigh Richards

"No wonder you're willing to accept the findings of a report based on....What exactly?" Only someone with zero knowledge of the report's shocking contents could post a comment as tone deaf as that - either that or its appalling revelations of sexual harassment, bullying and misogyny dont matter to you. Plaid Cymru im pleased to say takes such matters extremely seriously and has not only accepted the report in its entirety but will also impliment its 82 recommendations to ensure nothing like this ever happens again in the party. PS. It's very revealing that those commenting here disputing the findings of Nerys Evans' report (like yourself) do so under pseudonyms....nuff said.

Reply

In reply to Leigh Richards

CJPh

Or, and hear me out, the findings and the general thrust of the report (which is all that has been publicly released) doesn't matter vs the data, the methodology and other levels of due diligence and scrutiny that would normally be employed in such an endeavor. Look, there may very well be serious concerns here, there may be many actual, verifiable instances of terrible (and perhaps even unlawful) actions taken by the membership and staff, but there's nothing save the suggestions and a general overview drawn from a survey-based report for the public to go on. Can you imagine a scientific paper that gave you the abstract, the findings but no methodology or data, or a criminal trial conducted with only character witnesses? What has been made public so far seems to amount to "trust us, it's true". If things are that bad, surely we should be given the full picture? I'm not someone who is going to claim there is a conspiracy afoot based on animus or some deductive reasoning alone, but also not someone who is going to accept anything based on what amounts to a series of statements either. evidence is not proof - issues deemed so serious as to suggest a root and branch restructuring and the loss of someone like Adam Price from our cause needs proof of the issue at hand, for it to be made public and proper scrutiny from an independent third party. So, to get back to the question I asked you - who said Leanne Wood was responsible for misogyny, or have you made an error in claiming that? Secondly, if you are privy to more details than the general public are regarding the detail found in the report (as you suggest that "Only someone with zero knowledge of the report’s shocking contents could post a comment as tone deaf as that"), maybe some proof surrounding claims rather than reportage or subsequent inference drawn from a posteri public statements, or if you can also provide us with some compelling reason why the employment of Nerys Evans doesn't present a serious conflict of interest issue, and why bullying and harassment take narrative precedence over the claims of sexual assault in this report, I'd genuinely like to know. I'd also like to know, if so, how you were granted the ability to scrutinise the data when the general public haven't? I'm more than willing to concede that the sky is falling, Leigh. I do need proof first though.

Reply
CJPh

"A green shoot in this saga is the fact that Plaid Cymru commissioned this report itself and shared the conclusions publicly" - it's like releasing the title of a novel without any content. This piecemeal 'transparency' is more suspicious than out-and-out opacity, clearly designed to obfuscate something real and manufacture outcome. There has also been commentary, as well as allusions from the report's conclusion, that there are credible accusations of sexual crimes. How is that not the SOLE focus, with outmoded language and nastiness a distant 2nd and 3rd concern? It's like someone saying "Quick, there's a house on fire with 3 people inside" only to be answered with "let's talk about payday loans". What's going on here? Seriously now, Plaid Cymru needs a series of credible whistleblowers or something. Also, I like most of what I've seen and heard from Harper before this (and there's plenty within the article that's sensible), but that title! Yeesh. If you wanted the public to stop thinking of this whole affair as a vindictive act of revenge, perhaps Plaid politicians like Ms Harper should think twice before publishing things like that. Not confidence building.

Reply
Ivor Schilling

"How is that not the SOLE focus, with outmoded language and nastiness a distant 2nd and 3rd concern?" We all know the answer - its because this is vengefulness dressed up as moral principles. It is weaponised ethical language, blatant willpower masquerading as ethical outrage / anti-sexism. Any serious concerns over sexual crimes should have been taken directly to the police, as was surely the case with Simon Thomas AM (Surely!?) The report in question should have been an internal document, aimed at improving Plaid's working environment, among its staff and politicians, whose numbers are limited as we know. Instead, this has been dished out publicly, to the great detriment to the party and, at another level, to the reputations of all those engaged in fostering and supporting its very obvious agenda. We can all work out what is going on here. Don't those involved in this cynical nonsense realise that their actions here today will be attached to their names and reputations from now until the end of time? Unwise moves!

Reply
CJPh

It could very well be the case, Ivor. Then again, it may not. Who can tell? From what I understand (which is very limited - which may be the point), the only approach used in the report was survey. if this is the case, all the supposed bad behaviour here is based on unquestioned accepting of self-reportage. I hope (and would dearly like to know) that a more rigorous methodology was employed. Based on the 'reporting', both subsequent and, worryingly, prior to Price's exit, there's been remarkably little questioning, a certain amount of vitriol, and an odd sense of 'we must rebuild', as though this report contained the witness testimony from a war crime tribuneral. Nobody has asked how the head of a lobbying organisation that is a previous party member and a complainant in the issue at the heart of the report could possibly be viewed as impartial either. I'd love to chalk all this up to incompetence. Based on all that we do know, I can't do so just yet. Ych a fi.

Reply
Ivor Schilling

"...but that does not give due weight to the abuse of Plaid’s complaints process for bullying and harassment of dissenters, from Neil McEvoy downwards" C'est vrai! Carry Harper and Marc Jones have done the devil's work here. The complaints facility, which should have dealt with true cases of bullying and harassment, has been weaponised in the most cynical mis-use of gender politics, to hound out dissenters. The McEvoy case was bad enough, but to use it to avenge the ego of Leanne Wood, and push back against Price's 'outrageous' ousting of her way back in 2018, is a new low for Plaid. Who is the author of Carry's precious 'Prosiect Pawb' report, eh? Now, please check this information and rejog your memory on the context of all this: https://derynconsulting.wordpress.com/

Reply
Joni Boyd

Misogyny was not the only thing the report’s content referred to; bullying, harassment, basic failures of whistle-blowing procedures were all identified. As were failings within *gasp* the NEC.

Reply
Alun

"Suspicion alights on the current CEO" I think you're a little bit out of date (with respect). The current CEO only started work less than a month ago.

Reply
Leigh Richards

If youre going to troll this article then at least have the courage to do so under your real name. Why are these misogynist homophobic bigots who sometimes besmirch this website always such cowards? 🤔

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Ivor Schilling Cancel

"How is that not the SOLE focus, with outmoded language and nastiness a distant 2nd and 3rd concern?" We all know the answer - its because this is vengefulness dressed up as moral principles. It is weaponised ethical language, blatant wi...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.