Thursday, 16th July 2026 Cardiff 23° · Clear sky
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Opinion

Is the FM’s coalition answer a blooper or a cunning Plan?

By Mark Mansfield
Rhun ap Iorwerth. Picture by Plaid Cymru, Eluned Morgan. Picture by the Welsh Government.

Jonathan Edwards

Way back in the lead-up to the 2007 National Assembly election when I was embedded in the Plaid Cymru National Campaigns Unit, much of our thinking was dominated by how we could undermine the all-powerful Labour narrative of the time that Welsh elections were a straight choice between Labour and the Conservatives.

Labour’s message to the Welsh public was simple and effective. A vote for anyone else apart from them was essentially an enabling vote for the Tories. For a challenger from the left of the spectrum like Plaid Cymru, it has always been a difficult narrative to undermine.

The big question running into next year’s Senedd election, as has been the case in every single election in the devolution era, has been whether Labour would win enough National Assembly/Senedd seats to govern as a majority. One of our strategic aims going into the 2007 election therefore focused on trying to get Labour to admit in the run-up to the election, considering the polling evidence at the time, that they would have to entertain working with Plaid Cymru post-election.

Our hope was that should we get such an admission it would also legitimise the vibrant offer Plaid had put together for the election based on the ‘7 for 07’ signature policies.

A few weeks before polling day, a senior Labour source duly admitted to the BBC that should the polls prove correct, Labour would have no option but to entertain such an agreement or face the prospect of losing power to a coalition of all the opposition parties.

The response of other Labour figures was blind fury as they knew it legitimised the narrative Plaid Cymru was endeavouring to sell at the election.

[mid-content-banner]

Plaid Cymru First Minister

My reason for reminiscing is that last month in an interview with the BBC, First Minister Eluned Morgan refused to rule out not only coming to a deal with Plaid Cymru after the election but also serving under a Plaid Cymru First Minister.

Clearly the former would be a ridiculous position to take considering that since 2007 there has been a formal coalition, a formal cooperation agreement and a continuous unofficial soft understanding.

However, the second proposition - Labour refusing to rule out working under a Plaid First Minister - is an astonishing admission on several levels and indicates the rapid change at the heart of Welsh politics as we head towards the next Senedd election in a matter of months.

Furthermore, it is an indication of the fall from grace facing the Labour Party in Wales today. Whereas previously the question was whether Labour would be willing to entertain a junior partner, we are now debating whether Labour would itself be prepared to play a junior role in the next government of Wales.

If I had been advising the First Minister - and admittedly it is too late for a change of tack now, following the interview - the holding line should have been that Labour was not in the business of serving any other party.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

Labour dominance

Labour has a century and more of dominance in Wales: it could have legitimately argued that a vote for Plaid, Lib Dems, Greens or assorted Independent candidates was a gift to Reform and the Tories.

Furthermore, the First Minister must surely know that should Labour fall behind Plaid, her position would be untenable as Labour leader. In other words, she isn’t going to be able to negotiate anything unless Labour are the ones reaching out. If Labour come second to Reform with Plaid third, then there may be a window she could hang on to help secure a non-Reform administration, but the knives would be out for her in the long-term.

Perhaps the First Minister’s answer has been guided by the fear that Labour could fall behind Reform and Plaid Cymru at the election and that Labour votes would be needed to stop Reform gaining the keys to the corridors of power - an acknowledgment that Labour will be duty bound to provide some sort of stability in the next Senedd no matter how bruising the result, and that she needs to prepare the wider Labour Party for that eventuality considering the seismic shock it would entail.

If so, her aims are admirable and would gain much sympathy from those on the left of the spectrum petrified at what could potentially happen in the not-too-distant future.

Cunning tactic

However, my curious and cynical mind leads me to ask whether there could possibly be a more cunning tactic at play. By refusing to rule out working under a Plaid Frist Minister, is Eluned Morgan trying to undermine the key Plaid narrative message as we approach the election that they offer change, and hence using Labour’s current unpopularity in the country to inadvertently undermine Plaid Cymru?

It is difficult for Plaid to make the case that they are the change option if that would entail an understanding with Labour in whatever form.

It appears to me that there is an almighty battle between Reform and Plaid Cymru for ownership of the change narrative as we approach the election. If Plaid loses that battle, its currently lofty position in the polls could evaporate. The First Minister might be calculating that in what looks like being a very difficult election to say the least for Labour, the priority if she is to stay as FM is to secure more seats than Plaid Cymru. Even if Reform win, then Labour would be in pole position to lead the government. Is she the political equivalent of the angler fish, luring her prey as an easy meal before consuming the victim whole?

Jonathan Edwards was the MP for Carmarthen East and Dinefwr 2010-24

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

50 comments

Owen Williams

Lifelong Labour voters will have to hold their noses and make the jump to Plaid Cymru in order to ensure that Wales’ interests are protected. They already know that Labour’s brand is tarnished, and the Tories are a busted flush. If we want Welsh democracy to endure, Rhun ap Iorwerth will have to be given the means to form a government.

Reply
And

Think that is the intention. The possibility of Plaid working with Labour dulls the edge of Plaids "change" narrative. It also decreases the point in people shifting between Labour and Plaid if the outcome will be some jumbling of the same. Labour'll start talking about keeping Reform/Farage out as well before claiming voting Plaid will split the anti-Reform vote. So really; nothing new from Labour here. No solutions. Just managing of the situation. Plaid will have a fair bit of infighting if it comes third I imagine. So they wont be forming a government from there.

Reply
Undecided

In my opinion, the most likely outcome remains a Plaid/Labour government of some description, so they are both going to have to find a way to sort it out whoever finishes first, second or third. But it will be difficult, particularly if Reform is the largest party. They only have themselves to blame having introduced this daft closed list voting system.

Reply
Welsh_Siôn

In all this conjecture, Eluned is hamstrung by what Starmer does or doesn't do in London. She is just the latest down the line (Western) Branch Manager of the Labour Party, for whom Westminster Labour have nothing but contempt. (Witness the dismissive attitude of the current Viceroy for Western Colonies, Jo Stephens.) But more roundly, the discussion - for what it's worth - is about 'the survival of (Welsh) Labour' or 'Can Eluned keep her job?' Nothing - repeat, nothing - about any common good for the Cymry and Cymru itself. They'll have had over a century seemingly trying to 'stand up for Wales' and all that time since the election s of 1999 as Llywodraeth Cymru, to do something for country. And the news is the same: nothing done except in self-interest and the worry that they will lose power. I know where my vote is going next year.

Reply
smae

It's nonsense to react with fury in the face of political reality. Labour would clearly entertain the prospect of another coalition with Plaid Cymru their policies have a lot of overlap. It's a bit weird for Plaid to challenge to the contrary as well. Ultimately it will depend on how the votes fall, but I see a strong likelihood of a Plaid Cymru led coalition in the next Senedd, most likely with Labour but it's possible the Lib Dems might do better than some of us are thinking. At the moment, I think it's unlikely that Plaid will win government outright.

Reply
Ioan Richard

This thought provoking article by Jonathan Edwards brought me a wry smile. I well remember that when Labour lost control of Swansea Council from 2004 to 2012 I was part of an Independent / Liberal coalition that ran the Council for eight difficult years with a very slender majority. We faced an active Opposition Group who worked very closely together. That group consisted of Plaid Cymru (led by Darren Price) working closely with Conservatives (led by Rene Kinzett) and Labour (led by David Phillips). After 2012 Labour came back very strong in Swansea and Plaid Cymru lost every Swansea seat it had as Darren Price fled to a safe Council seat in Carmarthen. Rene Kinzettt left Swansea for a new 'horizon'. David Phillips lost his 'leadrship' to Rob Stewart. So it's quite possible that Eluned Morgan and Rhun ap Iorwerth could form a Rainbow Senedd Group, together with any surviving Tories, to counter the emerging surging Reform flood. We will know after the election next May. We can gaze into Crystal Balls until then. The public need to quiz all candidates as to their intentions in this matter. I for one will be quizzing them all on their fantasy global energy policies. As a Welsh European I could never vote for Reform. I just hope a decent genuine Independent stands in my constituency. At my age i'm fed up with all of the present party politicians.

Reply
Pete 90

'horizon' is an interesting way to put it...

Reply
Ioan Richard

Yes. I used 'horizon' as it's past spent history. For the curious, just put his name into a GOOGLE search.

Reply
Undecided

Problem is no independent has a realistic chance of being elected under the closed list system. It’s all designed for the benefit of political parties and party hacks.

Reply
Pete 90

DJ Eluned, Drakeford, Miles and co do not deserve another term. We've raced down the PISA education tables, the economy is horrendous, the NHS is bottom of the class etc. They should all resign and let PC go it alone. If the DJ, Miles etc are still in any sort of power by the end of next year then it would be the most shameful moment in WG history.

Reply
Undecided

I sympathise; but the reality is that no one is going to win a majority. Plaid has already ruled out working with Reform and the Tories. It is highly unlikely that there will be enough Liberals or Greens to make the arithmetic work, so by a process of elimination Ap Iorwerth is left with the clapped out rump of Welsh Labour as a coalition or at least someone to support his budget and major legislation. It will be his biggest problem.

Reply
Sian

Keep up. Drakeford isn't standing. He's an excellent politician and will be sorely missed. A breath of fresh air during the COVID crisis compared to the outrageous behaviour of the Tories filling their funders pockets with tax payers money. We're still paying the price.

Reply
Undecided

Agreed - and Plaid would be equally silly to go into coalition with Labour. I don’t think it’s unrealistic to think of a second Senedd election within 6-12 months in the circumstances you describe. I hope the proportional representation purists will then be satisfied with the ensuing chaos as nothing of importance gets done and trust in the institution eroded still further.

Reply
hdavies15

Did it have to be based on this manipulative closed list structure ? No, and that's where it falls flat on its face. These people have learned nothing. They treat the electorate with contempt and that reaches a boiling point in due course. That's when the law of unintended consequences really bites hard.

Reply
Undecided

Very much doubt it. As we have already seen, most of the candidates selected are party creatures, so if A replaced B nothing would change I suspect. The only argument against that can see is if Welsh Labour did very badly and feared a wipe out in any second election. They might then keep Plaid in office and make them look impotent.

Reply
Bram

Or Rhun as FM can say what needs to be said and their minority Labour colleagues can do the back channel negotiations with London in an attempt to stop Plaid embarrassing Number 10 on a daily basis. Could be very effective.

Reply
Cai Wogan Jones

Plaid should rule out coalitions. If they are the largest party without an overall majority, they should form a minority administration -- and then seek the votes in the Senedd to institute their programme of change without fear or favour. This is exactly what the SNP did (very successfully) before winning an overall majority.

Reply
robin campbell

I agree - if that turns out to be the situation. Would Labour really want to vote with Reform and de-stabilise the government or even vote with Tories and Reform to stop Rhun ap Iorwerth becoming FM?

Reply
Jonathan

I think the most likely outcome is Reform UK getting the most votes and most seats but Plaid forming a Government in a coalition with Labour with Rhun ap Iorwerth as First Minister.

Reply
John Ellis

Your opinion seems curiously unpopular, but as things stand right now that seems to me too a quite plausible outcome after the elections next May. But there are still eight months to go - enough time for the situation to change.

Reply
Annibendod

Nonsense. We wanted STV. Labour insisted on d'Hondt

Reply
Bram

Remember in 2011 when AV (essentially STV with one winner) wasn't good enough for anyone on the left because it wasn't PR.

Reply
Rob W

I disagree. That would merely make Labour look like Reform's little helpers in their efforts to become the governing party in the Senedd. What would that look like to their supporters?

Reply
Peter J

Every time there is a mistake or failure by an FM, they can call a vote of no confidence with reform and force a change in FM or collapse the gvmt. They won't look like that at all, it's just them 'holding plaid to account'. If they do it 2 or 3 times, plaid will look a shambles and be promptly booted out at the next election. My point is more to the recklessness of the new electoral system (I'm not seriously advocating this behaviour in opposition). It's created an unstable form of governance, when it was not needed, and I've yet to see a good reason for this change!

Reply
Bram

If you think coalitions are fundamentally unstable how do you explain that the most stable UK government in the last 20 years was the ConDem coalition? Or that in most of the rest of the democratic world coalition is normal and usually leads to more constructive and productive grownup governance.

Reply

In reply to Bram

Undecided

I don’t think it’s coalitions that are fundamentally unstable, it’s the seat numbers surrounding them that bring stability or otherwise. The ConDem coalition arithmetic added up easily as did Labour/Plaid in 2007 in Wales. The problem next year is that those numbers may not work out so well, particularly if Reform are the largest party and a defeated Welsh Labour play games. Both quite possible.

Reply

In reply to Undecided

Bram

Peter J wrote "the new electoral system [has] created an unstable form of governance".

Reply

In reply to Bram

Undecided

Yes he did; but your reply characterised the debate as him arguing that “coalitions are fundamentally unstable”. My view is that some are stable and some unstable. It depends on the electoral arithmetic as I said. Different point.

Reply

In reply to Undecided

Bram

So how does the new electoral system create an unstable form of governance if the point isn't about coalitions?

Reply
Rob W

You're wrong again. It would merely make Labour look like a bunch of bad losers giving Reform a helping hand in bringing down a progressive Plaid government. It would merely make Labour look like a bunch of opportunistic clowns. But if they want to damage their own electoral chances...

Reply

In reply to Rob W

Undecided

You have a point; but I doubt whether Labour would be that obvious. They might attack a Plaid budget for example - actually in much the same way as Plaid did themselves earlier this year before Jane Dodds and the greyhounds saved the day for Labour.

Reply
CapM

For the change to PR to be successful it needs the electorate of Cymru to develop a political maturity and sophistication that enables it to understand and accept the inevitability of 'coalition' politics and government. As the electorates of most other European countries have. What's not needed is the continuance and encouragement of support for a FPTP most suited for use in primary schools when selecting a class captain from a list of two.

Reply
Bram

What does that achieve?

Reply
CapM

It would reduce Cymru to the status of an English region. Which is the agenda of some.

Reply
Y Cymro

If voters want to punish UK Labour by making an example out of Welsh Labour next Senedd election will be harming themselves in the process of they put their trust on a Tory called Nigel Farage. Do you seriously think he and Reform cares about you or Wales. No. Wales need to vote Plaid Cymru and elect Rhun ap Iorwerth as First Minister next May. Nigel Farage should have been at PMQs today in London but he was not. This cretin was awol being in America sucking up to Donald Trump and his MAGA faithful. In reality he, Farage, should have been in the House of Commons representing his Clacton constituents interests not America's. As highlighted in the past. Reform UK, who have openly stated we are merely a stepping stone to Westminster power, have indicated that they would scrap Welsh language initiatives, reindustrialise the valleys by reopening old coal mines and opencast pits effectively tearing not only our longsuffering landscape apart but out communities too by handing our countryside on a platter to unscrupulous mining companies so they can rape and scrape us. I fear the likelihood whoever leads Wales in Reform would repatriate powers back to London from the Senedd. After all, both Ukip & Brexit Parties were hostile towards devolution and further powers spending their time in the voting chamber voting against and never for. So vote for Reform if you hate yourself and Wales. Reform like Ukip and Brexit Party before them are transient, flash in the pan, here today gone tomorrow, populist parties. But the damage done will last a generation or more. So punish UK Labour, but do it positively. If you care about Wales and have some pride. Vote Plaid.

Reply
Rob

It would just make Labour look like sore losers; undermining a government simply because they didn’t win. That sort of tactic could easily backfire, costing them seats and even gifting the Senedd to Reform. If I was Labour, I’d be focusing on building a stronger communications strategy instead.

Reply
Jenny

Which people of note are you talking about? Are they backing the leaders of other parties instead?

Reply
Pete 90

Precisely. You don't know either. PC is just Rhun and no-one else of note.

Reply
CapM

' (although I do maintain he is backed by not a single person of note).' What actual people 'of note' would you consider to be desirable for Rhun to have backing him? For Rhun/Plaid's benefit and/or your's.

Reply
Pete 90

A pulse and a brain cell would be a step up. It's an upwards trajectory from there.

Reply
CapM

So basically you can't back up your '(although I do maintain he is backed by not a single person of note).’ opinion with anything relevant.

Reply
CapM

Looking at Peoples Voice Cymru's website it appears to be just a mouthpiece of an Little Imperialist England [LIE]movement. Vote Reform get LIE

Reply
Bram

People have never chosen their leaders in the UK. That requires a presidential system. And there's nothing democratically legitimate about a government that doesn't have the support of a majority. It's not enough just to come first if the majority want someone else.

Reply
Rob

Just because a political party happens to have the largest vote share does not mean that they are endorsed by a majority of the electorate. Thats the undemocratic nature of First Past the Post. If Plaid and Labour's combined vote share is higher than the combined vote share of Reform UK and the Conservatives then they would have more of a democratic mandate to form a government. With the exception of independence Plaid and Labour voters probably share a common ground, so if even if Reform were to become the largest party but fail to win a majority they would have no right to claim its undemocratic if no other party wants to work with them.

Reply
Rob

Just because a party has the highest number of votes doesn't mean that they are endorsed by the majority. Thats the undemocratic nature of first past the post. If the combined vote share of Plaid + Labour is higher than the combined vote share of Reform + Conservatives than Plaid and Labour would have more of a democratic mandate to form a government. Reform voters do not have the right to claim its undemocratic simply because no other party will want to work with them.

Reply
Rob

sorry duplicate post

Reply
Bram

Things are as they are because central government shut down manufacturing and industry and "fixed" the resulting unemployment problem with government jobs moved out of London. Devolution hasn't been able to rebalance things because the economy isn't devolved yet.

Reply
Bram

Wales is part of the UK economy which is controlled by Whitehall and the Bank For England. Not only are all fiscal powers still reserved to London, it's actually now illegal for the Welsh Government to make Wales more attractive to investors than England under Boris Johnson's Internal Market Act. Even something as simple and harmless as controlling APD to lure some flights from Heathrow to attract global inward investment is rejected because that might harm London.

Reply
Rob

I know isn't going to sound very popular, but Plaid may have made a mistake by ruling out a deal with the Conservatives. The threat of a rainbow coalition in 2007 gave them real leverage over Labour. Without that possibility, Labour can afford to take Plaid’s support for granted.

Reply
Bram

They were right to rule out a deal with the rabble that survived Johnson's 2019 purge of the moderates. But if that lot all jump ship to Reform, as it looks like they might, and are replaced by honourable and decent centre-right small-c conservatives then that must surely change things.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Y Cymro Cancel

If voters want to punish UK Labour by making an example out of Welsh Labour next Senedd election will be harming themselves in the process of they put their trust on a Tory called Nigel Farage. Do you seriously think he and Reform cares abo...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.