Wednesday, 15th July 2026 Cardiff 26° · Clear sky
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Opinion

How corporate giants took over our vets - and why pets are paying the price

By Emily Price
Carolyn Thomas with her two dogs in Eryri National Park - Image: Carolyn Thomas

Carolyn Thomas - MS for North Wales

When a beloved family pet falls ill, owners need and expect compassion and care. But increasingly, what they are met with instead is confusion, eye-watering bills, and an industry which is increasingly putting profit before the welfare of animals.

And this crisis is no accident – it is the direct result of a corporate takeover of veterinary services that has gone almost entirely unchecked.

Until 1999, practices had to be owned by a qualified vet, but a change in the law allowed non-veterinary corporations to buy up vet practices.

The consequences have been staggering. Just six companies now control 60% of the entire UK veterinary sector – up from just 10% a decade ago – with many owned by private equity firms whose sole obligation is to maximise profits for investors.

Like much of our economy since the Thatcher years, veterinary care has been subject to a neoliberal monopolisation which has resulted in poorer services in return for increased prices, whilst those working in the sector have seen their pay and conditions eroded.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), now deep into an investigation prompted partly by the tireless work of Welsh campaigners such as Dr Linda Joyce-Jones, has already uncovered widespread problems: no price transparency, huge hikes in fees, overcharging for medicines and treatment, and little to no recourse when things go wrong.

The stories emerging are heartbreaking. Bills have risen over 60%, far outstripping inflation or veterinary staff salaries. Many owners have been priced out of pet insurance altogether, especially in areas dominated by corporate chains, pushing families into impossible choices.

I have come across cases of people skipping meals to pay vet bills, surrendering beloved pets to rescue centres, and in the most tragic circumstances, choosing euthanasia simply because they cannot afford treatment.

And the pressure on rescue centres tells its own story – the RSPCA has reported a 25% increase in pet abandonments this year, with 70% of owners worried about affording pet care.

Pets should be a source of joy and companionship, but too often, families now fear they simply won’t be able to care for them if the worst happens.

This crisis also extends to the workforce. Veterinary nurses, receptionists, and support staff face poverty pay, real-terms wage cuts, and shocking gender pay gaps.

Meanwhile, pressures and sales targets undermine clinical judgement. One vet told researchers he was encouraged to push the most expensive procedures and later questioned by bosses when he hadn’t delivered enough ‘upsells’.

Another described her out-of-hours call centre booking unnecessary emergency appointments costing owners £300 or more.

This is the business model of corporate chains. And when workers have tried to organise, such as during the recent dispute at Valley Vets, companies have met them with hostility, closures, and redundancies.

This is not a sector failing by accident, but by design. And it is failing because huge corporations are extracting obscene profits at the expense of everyone else.

But it doesn’t need to be this way. France has already acted against corporate ownership of vet practices, and Ireland is now considering similar measures. The UK, and Wales, must not be left behind.

We must look seriously at regulating ownership, improving transparency, and strengthening worker’s rights.

Fundamentally, we must return veterinary services to a system driven by welfare, not shareholder returns. The current system is unsustainable, and action must be taken before the damage becomes irreversible.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

19 comments

Bill

As a pet owner I agree with this call 100 percent

Reply
J Jones

This is about vile corporate greed that targets those areas where emotions are more likely to accept corrupt overcharging, they have a similar liking for the funeral business. You are right about opening times. My vets out of hours corporate partner took my dog (and £250) late one night, inadequate staff then handed him back after 15 minutes, refusing to administer any treatment. He was close to death next morning at my local vet, who just about saved his life with simple antibiotics. But hey, it was only a matter of life and death, more important for the vile corporates to make their money.

Reply
Alwyn

Yes- but one of my main points is this is an article from a politician who is in a position to influence this - and is not just doing nothing about it (apart from writing an article) but providing no solutions. It's clear until you implement policies and regs, the consolidation will continue

Reply
Padi Phillips

What you don't seem to appreciate is that the MS in question is basically doing their job in highlighting the issue to the the public, drawing attention to the issue. I'm pretty sure that the kind of legislation necessary is beyond the competence of both the Welsh Government and the Senedd, and can only be solved at the Westminster level where an MS has no more influence than you or I. In highlighting the issue we, the voting public can carry this forward and pressure our Westminster representatives to take action. Unlike many issues this one is uncontroversial unless you happen to be one of the greedy pigs with your nose in the trough. Most of us would come down on the side of owners of sick and injured pets faced with extortionate bills in a way that wouldn't be the case in other areas where there is an equal corporate rip-off happening, (anything from water to TV streaming services with gas and electricity in between).

Reply
Greg

Corporate money can also bring innovation. How about a 24hr drive-through self-service pet euthanasia facility which, from just £59.99, will pop ailing Fido into a tasteful urn of your choice in under 90 seconds.

Reply
Alwyn

To be honest, that was many vets 30 years ago. Treatment has improved massively - which is one of main reasons cost has gone up

Reply
Greg

Be careful what you wish for because once those corporate giants have squeezed this market they'll start generously lobbying for taxpayer friendly amendments to the assisted dying act. Swap Fido for granny in the above innovation.

Reply

In reply to Greg

Smae

My granny would have driven herself down had she had that option! Death comes for us all eventually and sometimes it's better to go sooner, rather than later. Instead of seeing yourself fall to bits unable to do anything for yourself, in constant pain and such. Honestly, 59.99... it's... hey if I had a terminal cancer diagnosis, I'd do it, sod the dog. The alternative is 10k in Switzerland at the moment.

Reply

In reply to Smae

Greg

That's fine until the profit motivated coercion starts, subliminal ads guilting folks into calling time early.

Reply
Wynn

Good article. Easy problem to solve if government has the will but they don't. Profit before people and, obviously, animals.

Reply
Jon

A gross over-simplification of a very complex issue

Reply
Smae

I mean, we want cheaper prices. Anyone who has taken a pet to a vet will understand this. I've fortunately found a vet with... 'reasonable' consultation fees and 'reasonable' medical fees... but seriously some of those out of hour vets can be absurd costs. Literally quadruple the cost in my case.

Reply
Michelle

The irony is that it was the CMA who called for vet practice ownership tobe opened up to non-vets.

Reply
TomP

The reason why those nice independent vets have disappeared is because they have all sold their practices to corporates so they can pay off huge debts and retire comfortably with their families. No-one can afford to buy a veterinary practice anymore- no-one has £2m sitting in their back pocket, except investors. A lot of people expect that if they invest their whole life into a business, they will be able to sell it one day and retire comfortably, and the only way they can do this often, and clear all their debt, is by selling to the highest bidder. Would you sell your house for half the price it is worth just so you can be nice to the couple who really like it? Or will you sell your beloved home for the highest profit? In the days of James Herriot, if your pet was sick, you'd be given a few herbs and an elixir, pay a nominal fee and everyone was happy. Always in the understanding that if your pet got really sick, they would be euthanised as the technology to diagnose and treat him just wasn't there. But these days people expect their unwell pet to have an MRI, CT scan, keyhole surgery, the latest diabetes medication, and they expect a highly trained professional to be there day and night, Monday to Sunday - that doesn't cost £20 a consult on a Sunday night. A lot of money has been spent in order to be able to provide that. There's also been a shift in that most veterinary staff no longer expect to live at work these days, above the practice waiting for a call day or night. In the olden days it was expected that you would be on call every week, and would spend some Christmas days at work for little or no pay. These days the younger generations expect the same quality of life as everyone, and expect to be paid for leaving their families at 2am to attend to an emergency (again that can't be provided for £20 a consult). Let's not forget that Tesco, Sainsbury's, John Lewis, Amazon, KFC arw all corporates. What would happen if we banned those, ans went back to the old butcher in the village who only opened 5 hours a day Monday to Friday? There are benefits to modernisation as well

Reply
Alwyn

Well said! A microcosm for UK problems - public wants everything, on their terms, with no downsides, but not prepared to pay for it!

Reply
Greg

Because that's how voters are patronised by the ruling elite. If people were offered real difficult choices they might make better decisions. Imagine if the 2016 European question had offered an honest choice between replacing European migration with even more non-European migration. Would they have made the same choice?

Reply
Smae

This doesn't really solve the problem unfortunately. It is expensive, to run vets in the UK. The cost of owning and maintaining (or leasing) a building, the cost of paying staff, the regulations the vets have to follow all the time, the 'insurance' scams (and by that I mean, insurance is a scam and also abused by vets because its much easier to get money out of them). Then there's all the equipment needed... expensive equipment that again has to abide by strict regulations and is expensive to lease/maintain/own. We have a similar issue with Dentists, they don't want to do the job any more because they can get better terms and conditions elsewhere.

Reply
Crwtyddol

Blair changed the law such that vets, medics and dentists could be employed by unqualified people. Now, Several,dental corporate are owned by USA equity funds and we know the result of that. One Dental corporate is owned by the same people who own KFC. US Monetary philosophy has its foot in the door of British health care. The law should be repealed as this is one aspect of the disgrace that is now British Dentistry.

Reply
Erisian

Oh the joys of unfettered capitalism. Another bumber-sized serving of crap courtesy of deregulation

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Alwyn Cancel

Yes- but one of my main points is this is an article from a politician who is in a position to influence this - and is not just doing nothing about it (apart from writing an article) but providing no solutions. It's clear until you imple...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.