Wed, 22nd July Cardiff 21°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

Opinion

Ending Wales' evictions ban is an irresponsible move in the middle of a housing and Covid crisis

By NationCymru
Photo by Ev on Unsplash

Mabon ap Gwynfor MS, Plaid Cymru Spokesperson for Housing

Everyone should have a right to a home but the current housing crisis is deepening and stark inequalities are at play – from the proliferation of luxurious second homes on the one side to homelessness and long waiting lists on the other.

67,000 families are on housing waiting lists across Wales.

But last week, the Welsh Labour Government went ahead with lifting the ban that has been in place during Covid which has meant that tenants have not been turned out of their homes for no reason.

Lifting the no fault evictions ban is reckless and puts countless people across Wales at risk of homelessness. Eviction is one of the leading causes of homelessness, so instead of talking about homelessness and throwing millions of pounds at the problem after its occurrence, it would make more sense to extend this policy and stop homelessness before it starts.

We’re in the middle of a housing crisis in which tens thousands of families are on waiting lists. We are also at the beginning of a third covid wave with the very real possibility of more people having to isolate;  furlough is coming to an end, and the UK Government will soon stop the £20 per week increase in Universal Credit, which is a lifeline for so many vulnerable people. With all of this, it is an entirely irresponsible time in which to end the ban on no fault evictions.

Tenants need to have confidence that if they pay rent and look after their home, there isn’t a risk that they will simply be evicted.

The lifting of this ban is wrong. This practice should end permanently. Welsh Labour chose not to implement a far more progressive policy during the last Senedd.

Tenants need confidence that if they pay rent and look after the place – their home - that they can’t just be evicted. They need to know that they will have a home for as long as they need it.

[mid-content-banner]

Problematic

The Government initially said it was banning so-called ‘no fault evictions’ during Covid in order to help tenants facing financial difficulties. Now it says it was to stop the spread of Covid – and I’m concerned about this change of emphasis.

By removing the ban now there is a real danger that we will see many more people losing their homes; becoming homeless.

Instead, a new system of fair rents should be put in place for the future. An opportunity for a more progressive policy to enhance tenants rights.

Even the UK Government is preparing a tenants bill and discussing getting rid of no fault evictions, although the Tories in Wales didn’t support the Plaid amendments in recent legislation that would have brought that forward in Wales.

There should be a Fair Rents Bill to provide tenancies of indefinite duration and end no fault evictions.

All rents would need to be assessed as fair with a rent cap for increases in rental pressure zones.

It’s true that in February next year some new rules will come into force to give tenants more rights – but section 21 remains and the problematic ‘no fault evictions’ clause will remain.

To me, it makes sense to enhance tenants rights, to get rid of section 21 to prevent homelessness in the first place rather than financing schemes to deal with the homelessness that this legislation creates down the line.

Houses are not financial assets. They are homes.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

2 comments

Gareth

This is nonsense and all way too simplistic. > from the proliferation of luxurious second homes on the one side to homelessness and long waiting lists on the other If only life was as black and white as this. The reality is that there are hundreds if not thousands of private landlords out there who for various reasons own more than one property, and for whatever reason, they let it out. Perhaps a young man who owned his own place moved in with his girlfriend or vice versa, to share bills and let out one of their homes to make enjoying their time together a little easier. This doesn't mean they are magically multi-millionaires who can afford to bankroll their tenants. They might make £100/month on their property if they're lucky after the mortgage company has taken their payment and government taxes have swallowed up the rest. How are such people meant to go months or years without rental income from that property - while continuing to pay the mortgage and rates because they have to? Grow up and wake up.

Reply
hdavies15

Mabon says "Tenants need confidence that if they pay rent and look after the place – their home – that they can’t just be evicted. They need to know that they will have a home for as long as they need it." Can't disagree with that although there is much elsewhere in the article that displays a superficial familiarity with the bigger picture and exposure only to that fringe where all the trouble and conflict occurs. The key to much of the relationship between landlord and tenants is - "pay rent and look after the place.."- do that and you should have lasting relationship or one that lasts as long as its needed by the parties. However it breaks down if a) landlords start hiking up rents on a regular pattern or b) the tenants fail to honour the "look after the place " bit of the deal. Or fail to keep up with the rent payments. Often the one bit goes with the other. Rent arrears are a symptom that housekeeping is going downhill. RentSmart was supposed to improve the quality and performance of the rented sector. It has done nothing of the sort. It levies fees for various compliance clauses for landlords but displays no interest whatsoever in "tenant performance". Just another job creation scheme funded by sucking out a few hundred quid from the landlord sector. Politicians have not performed well on this piece of intervention

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Gareth Cancel

This is nonsense and all way too simplistic. > from the proliferation of luxurious second homes on the one side to homelessness and long waiting lists on the other If only life was as black and white as this. The reality is that...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.