Wednesday, 15th July 2026 Cardiff 26° · Clear sky
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Opinion

At last Welsh Labour tells Starmer’s Labour some home truths

By David Owens
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer with First Minister Eluned Morgan. Photo Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire

Dr Keith Darlington

On 3rd December, eleven Welsh Labour politicians signed a letter addressed to Sir Keir Starmer.

They accused the Labour UK government of rolling back devolution by bypassing ministers in Cardiff Bay to make decisions in Wales.

Differences between Welsh Senedd Members and Westminster MPs who hold Welsh seats have been well documented over the years. Those in the former group generally believe that greater control over our affairs in Wales is the way forward, whilst those in the latter group are likely to resist changes to the devolution project.

The former group believe that extending devolutionary powers is not inconsistent with Britishness, whilst some in the latter group still view it as a threat to Britishness.

In this article, I show that these differences are partly rooted in the way that some in Labour struggle to separate Welsh identity and nationalism, whilst others have no difficulty reconciling being both Welsh and British.

The Letter

The letter, which included signatures by many senior Labour MSs and former Welsh government ministers, but not any sitting ministers, said there is increasing concern that the UK government is failing to deliver further devolution.

It also accused Starmer's government of a constitutional outrage by announcing a scheme that will give councils cash for town centre improvements. This funding bypasses the Welsh government, which generally governs and funds local government in Wales. The scheme runs counter to the spirit of devolution.

The signatories of this letter and all highly experienced MSs who understand Welsh politics far better than their Westminster-based MP counterparts holding Welsh seats. Furthermore, these MSs cannot be accused of doing this to try to save their seats, as most of them are not even standing in the Senedd elections in May 2026. To understand what is happening, it's essential to keep in mind that Westminster Labour has always had an ambivalent and muddled attitude towards Welsh devolution.

UK Labour’s Attitude to Devolution

In the 1979 referendum on Scottish and Welsh devolution, many Welsh Labour MPs were deeply hostile to any devolution. They included influential MPs like Neil Kinnock and George Thomas (later became Lord Tonypandy).

Some of them claimed that devolution was incompatible with socialism and that it would lead to a fascist brand of nationalism. This thinking persists to this day with Labour’s Secretary of State for Wales, Jo Stevens, who has repeatedly described Plaid Cymru and Nigel Farage's Reform UK as "two sides of the same coin" or "different poison, same bottle," arguing that both are divisive nationalist parties.

This is complete nonsense but demonstrates their muddled thinking about nationalism.

Welsh devolution was voted down in the 1979 referendum. A majority voted for Scottish devolution in that same referendum, but it wasn't passed into law because it didn't reach the required threshold at that time. However, for the next 18 years, the Scottish electorate had a hard-line Tory government imposed on them, causing deep unease and outrage in Scotland.

It was imposed on them because Scotland had never voted for a Tory government during this period. John Smith became Labour leader in 1992 and described the establishment of a Scottish Parliament as "the settled will of the Scottish people," which became the cornerstone of his party's plan for democratic renewal in the UK.

New Labour and Devolution

The tragic death of John Smith in 1994 and his strong belief in devolution left his successor, Tony Blair, no choice but to commit to another referendum in both Scotland and Wales in late 1997 after becoming PM in May of that year.

As in 1979, several Welsh Labour MPs implacably opposed devolution, but the vote succeeded, albeit with a small majority, and the National Assembly for Wales formally began in May 1999. New Labour deserves credit for establishing the Welsh Assembly, but differences quickly emerged over the nature of devolution. Some wanted the powers of the Welsh Assembly to be limited to little more than that of a glorified county council.

This diminished view of the Assembly's role held by some in Labour led the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, to try to impose Alun Michael as First Minister after Ron Davies's resignation. He feared that Rhodri Morgan was more independent-minded and would do what he thought was right for Wales rather than be slavishly told what to do by UK New Labour. But it backfired, and Rhodri became First Minister. He was the people's choice and recorded stellar ratings in opinion polls during his period as First Minister.

Changes to Devolution since 1999

UK Labour’s ambivalence didn't end in 1999. They deserve credit for establishing the Welsh Assembly, but beyond that, UK Labour has made few changes since. Devolving further powers since are due to non-Labour UK governments. For example, it was the Lib Con Coalition government that consolidated the Assembly's limited powers through another referendum in 2011, granting the Assembly full primary legislative powers in its devolved areas. This was approved emphatically, with 64% supporting the Assembly having greater law-making powers. The Wales Act 2014 introduced tax and borrowing powers, and further devolved powers, including partial control over income tax, stamp duty, and landfill tax, were devolved in 2018-2019.

Since Starmer’s UK Labour came to power in 2024, they have not shown any inclination whatsoever to extend powers to Wales. They refuse to devolve the Crown estates to Wales - contrary to the wishes of Welsh Labour and all councils in Wales. Neither will they implement judicial reforms, as many experts believe would benefit Wales. Nor do they want to consider changes to the Barnett formula - despite claiming otherwise during the election campaign.

Welsh Labour’s Choice - Country or Party?

Welsh Labour Senedd members, even though part of a greater UK Labour party, are elected as representatives of Wales. Their first duty, therefore, should be to Wales.

Leaders like Rhodri Morgan and Carwyn Jones understood this and balanced these roles accordingly. They were popular figures who realised that, to do things like encourage inward investment, they needed to represent Wales as a nation in its own right.

At the heart of this matter is the inescapable conclusion that UK Labour is at best indifferent to devolving powers to Wales and at worst hostile. Therefore, the eleven signatories of the letter were right to call out Starmer’s Labour.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

22 comments

John Glyn

Always remember that many Labour British nationalists are just as determined and disagreeble in their opposition to Scotland and Wales taking their rightful place among the family of nations as are the Tories. In my experience they can sometimes be even more invidious and insidious. Least you know where you are with Blue Tories.

Reply
Egon

We saw it today when Stamer chose Wales to launch his child poverty campaign. Why choose Wales when child poverty is far worse in London, north east England and West Midlands? Because it fits a narrative of Wales as a basketcase dependent on Westminster. Of Wales with a purpose in the union of making England feel better about itself.

Reply
Amir

It will fall on deaf ears as our weak Welsh government has not built up any courage to write this letter themselves.

Reply
Barry Taylor

I doubt Starmer would have listened even then.

Reply
Gwyn Hopkins

In the House of Commons 84% of MPs represent constituencies in England and the percentage is even higher in the Parliamentary Labour group - massive controlling majorities. The vast majority of these MPs – including Starmer - have essentially the same colonialist mentality as their ancestors regarding Wales (and Scotland). They believe that England’s conquest of Wales (1282AD) and the subsequent imposed annexation of Wales gives England the divine right to rule and control Wales in perpetuity. This is the real reason why Starmer & Co try to undermine devolution in Wales.       

Reply
Rob

Quote: "Some of them claimed that devolution was incompatible with socialism and that it would lead to a fascist brand of nationalism. This thinking persists to this day with Labour’s Secretary of State for Wales, Jo Stevens, who has repeatedly described Plaid Cymru and Nigel Farage's Reform UK as "two sides of the same coin" or "different poison, same bottle," arguing that both are divisive nationalist parties." There is a clear and fundamental difference between the civic nationalism advocated by Plaid Cymru and the ethno-nationalism of the far right. Plaid are not calling for withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights, nor do they scapegoat minorities or undermine democratic institutions. To equate them with Reform UK a party that openly flirts with authoritarian and exclusionary rhetoric is not just inaccurate, it is dangerous. It trivialises the very real threat posed by the radical right and misleads the electorate about where the risks to our freedoms actually lie. But there is a wider lesson here too. Nationalism of any kind can become unhealthy when a nation is denied respect, recognition or the tools to govern itself. If Welsh interests are repeatedly sidelined or dismissed, frustration will fill that vacuum, and that’s when resentment grows. Labour should be working to empower Wales, not smearing those who want a fairer, more confident country as extremists. Calling all national movements the same only helps the worst ones.

Reply
Egon

The other flaw in the "devolution incompatible with socialism" argument is that many of the same folks were ambivalent about union with Europe so what was good for the gander wasn't so good for the goose.

Reply
Mike T

There is no difference between nationalism here, there or anywhere and stop pretending there is. Just different flags. Reform has anti foreign immigrant rhetoric. Plaid anti English.

Reply
Egon

Plaid is pro Wales. That can only be spun as anti English in the face of anti Wales rhetoric or policies. There are genuinely some that want finish the Germanic invasion.

Reply

In reply to Egon

Mike T

Ah yes, the word 'invasion'. Very Farage.

Reply

In reply to Mike T

Egon

Not a fan of history then. If it was a friendly piecemeal arrival they would've integrated and this island wouldn't be fluent in a Germanic language nor would the largest nation be named after a Germanic tribe.

Reply
Mike T

They wrote a letter? Oh that'll show 'em. Starmer's government is desperately weak but Welsh Labour is utterly craven. Disgraceful.

Reply
Egon

If you look at the chart, Northern Ireland and Scotland have the lowest child poverty in the UK by quite a margin. They also have control of their social security. This proves that not enough devolution has been the problem for Wales. So the real question is why Welsh Labour didn't push for the same during the last quarter of a century.

Reply
Barry Taylor

It is the successive Labour governments that are to blame, not the concept of devolution in itself. Don't confuse the Senedd with the Welsh Government; they are not the same thing, any more than the UK Government in Westminster and the Westminster parliament are the same. The answer is to vote in a better government, not to abolish Welsh democracy by getting rid of the Senedd.

Reply
Mike T

I couldn't agree more. But after 25 years of it, you do wonder whether we will ever have a WG that can improve the NHS, education, the economy etc, rather than see us continue to slide downhill. Funding is a factor but after 25 years we may have to accept that we just don't have the political talent to do it. I just can't think of a single thing that has improved for the people of Wales in that period. I cannot point to a single notable achievement.

Reply
Undecided

You are a lot more right than wrong. The Senedd and the Welsh Government are different; but they share a risk averse managerial culture, too many low quality individuals and operate within a very constrained devolution settlement.

Reply

In reply to Undecided

Egon

The opposite of a risk averse managerial culture is the reckless incompetence that Johnson normalised. Be careful what you wish for.

Reply
Rob

And what did Wales achieve under direct rule in the 20th century? As Barry Taylor pointed out the issue is not devolution the issue is the Welsh Labour Government. I agree they have achieved nothing: so we should vote them out in May.

Reply
Mike T

Completely agree. Devolution could have worked but I just don't think it will. The last 25 years has shown that we don't have the political visionaries for it work. I just cannot think of a single notable achievement in 25 years and nothing I've seen makes me think that that will change in the next 25.

Reply
Rob

So what do you suggest?

Reply

In reply to Rob

Mike T

All out of ideas I'm afraid. Would have been great if they'd developed a powerful renewables industry, the M4 relief road, raised standards in education to world class levels as we had in the 50s, improved the NHS, attracted entrepreneurs and businesses etc though creative use of income and corporation tax etc to afford people well paid jobs etc etc etc but none of these things happened and I'm not sure they ever will...

Reply
Agnes Nutter

2Little2Late Vote Plaid

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Mike T Cancel

There is no difference between nationalism here, there or anywhere and stop pretending there is. Just different flags. Reform has anti foreign immigrant rhetoric. Plaid anti English.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.