Wed, 19th August Cardiff 20°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

Welsh indyref ‘absolutely could happen in our lifetime’, Plaid Cymru leader says

By Stephen Price
Plaid Cymru Leader Rhun ap Iorwerth

A referendum on Welsh independence could “absolutely” be held within “our lifetime”, Plaid Cymru’s leader has said.

Rhun ap Iorwerth did not shy away from suggesting his party may be the leading political force in Wales following a poll which predicts Plaid will have the largest vote share in the 2026 Senedd elections.

Plaid is projected to be the largest party in the Senedd following the outcome of the election, with around 30% of votes and 35 seats in the Siambr, according to a YouGov poll published on Tuesday.

Nigel Farage’s Reform UK would be the second largest party, with 25% of votes, according to the poll.

The Plaid leader ruled out holding a referendum on Wales leaving the UK in the first term of a Plaid-led Welsh government, when speaking to the BBC’s Walescast this week.

He has previously declined to put a timeline on a referendum, after Plaid’s last leader Adam Price promised such a vote within five years.

But Mr ap Iorwerth told the PA news agency a referendum could form part of a Plaid government’s platform for the future, once it has built trust with the Welsh electorate.

[mid-content-banner]

"Within our lifetime"

“The key thing is it’s up to the people of Wales. And I’ve many times said that I would have independence tomorrow, but it’s not what I think that matters,” Mr ap Iorwerth told PA.

“It’s what the people of Wales believe, and I absolutely think we can have that referendum and set us off on a different direction as a country within our lifetime,” he added.

The Senedd. Photo Nation.Cymru

Should Plaid pursue such a referendum in future, it would be likely to need support from other parties in Cardiff Bay and at Westminster, which is unlikely to be forthcoming.

Plaid would focus on “deep problems within the NHS in Wales”, as well as education, economic stagnation and poverty, should it be the party that leads the next Welsh government, Mr ap Iorwerth said.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

Proportional representation

The next Senedd election will see Welsh voters use a new proportional system to choose their representatives.

Some 49 seats will be required for an outright majority, with the Senedd being expanded to 96 members.

The previous system had an “in-built bias towards Labour”, the Plaid leader said.

Mr ap Iorwerth added: “That changes with the new electoral system that we have in Wales, and it’s a genuine case that wherever people are in Wales, the votes that they cast will contribute towards who can be leading that government next year, Plaid Cymru is putting itself forward as the party to lead that government.

“And if people want that, they can have it with me as first minister, the first non-Labour first minister, setting a different direction for governments in Wales.”

Parties in Wales are likely to have to co-operate following the poll, the Plaid leader admitted, but he continued to rule out a “formal relationship” with Mr Farage’s Reform UK.

Mr ap Iorwerth added: “We have two conservative parties in Wales now: the Conservative Party, and the Tories on steroids that Reform are: the pro-Thatcher, the pro-Liz Truss, the pro-Trump political party that works against the interests of workers, that works against the interests of businesses in Wales.

“I just don’t think that’s the politics that is in the interests of Wales.”

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

22 comments

TheOtherJones

We must stop with the default assumption that only Westminster can give permission for a referendum. Our constitutional situation is different to Scotland’s. Wales did not voluntarily join in union with England, it was annexed following military conquest. The Senedd should hold the legal and moral right here. I know it’s a taboo to talk about this, but it is fact and these technicalities make our situation somewhat different to Scotland. It’s worth exploring and not putting all our eggs in a basket that could be dictated by a Nigel Farage government down the line.

Reply
Peter J

I'm sorry to say, and with the greatest respect, the key bit of legislation is the 2017 Wales Act which states “the union of the nations of Wales and England” and “the UK Parliament” are reserved powers that the Senedd can't legislate on. Plus the supreme court ruling can't simply be ignored. You have to question why plaid promised a referendum at the last senedd election, when we knew they were never going to be the largest party, but now they can potentially be the larger party, they shy away from it!

Reply
TheOtherJones

However, under the United Nations charter - to which the UK is a signatory - all nations have a right to independence. International law should supersede domestic law on a situation like this, ie Wales wants a referendum but Westminster tries to block it. I think it should be explored personally, reading the UN charter the UK would have to argue that Wales is a former colony - as it distinguishes between colonies and annexed nations. It’s not a straightforward avenue but shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand, is more what I’m arguing.

Reply

In reply to TheOtherJones

Rob

Quote: International law should supersede domestic law on a situation like this, ie Wales wants a referendum but Westminster tries to block it. I'm afraid that's not true, There is no higher authority than a Sovereign state. International institutions such as the EU, UN etc do not have power over them, instead are voluntary organisations which states could leave at any time. International law is merely a set of normative principles that states normally abide by, but are not legally obligated to. If they were then Bush, Blair, Putin, and Netanyahu would be on trial for war crimes. Wales is a nation and in my view has a right to be independent. However, every state will has its own interpretation of what constitutes a nation. Spain, Belgium, China, Russia etc are among many that have their own secessionist movements and they don't want a precedence set where states can gain independence without the sovereign's authority. Take Serbia as an example, most states have no problem recognising Montenegro's sovereignty after declaring independence in 2006, but Kosovo's recognition is much more limited. This is because Serbia never authorised Kosovo's secession, but did so with Montenegro. Therefore if Wales gained its independence without London's agreement it would have very limited or no recognition. I'm not saying that independence is in impossible. There are ways to pressure London to re-evaluate its stance, just that it cannot involve international institutions as the UN Charter only applies to sovereign states.

Reply

In reply to TheOtherJones

Peter J

It's highly unlikely Wales would be considered a 'colony' or no governing self territory. As a point, 'international law' doesn't supersede domestic law

Reply
John Ellis

You have a point; I can't see any major political party in the majority unionist Westminster parliament ever 'unreserving' on this issue - least of all while there's the present degree of post-Brexit rule Britannia jingoism echoing around England in particular. But I don't think that it matters, given that we're yet to see the cause of independence seizing the hearts and minds of sufficient numbers of Welsh voters to really forge a widespread desire for independence. OK, we're at the stage when the idea's much less readily dismissed with incredulity and utter scepticism than was the case fifty years ago; these days it's more a case of residual scepticism but some curiosity than outright dismissal. Plus a larger number of Welsh folk embracing the idea - though still, I think, a minority. But pushing the issue really hard right now would just be premature, and therefore a waste of energy..

Reply
David

If you believe that Wales has been colonised there is the United Nations on Decolonisation as a route for Independence.. Since the birth of the United Nations, more than 80 former colonies comprising some 750 million people have gained independence. At present, 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories (NSGTs) across the globe remain on the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories, home to nearly 2 million people. Thus, the process of decolonization is not complete.  Completing this mandate will require a continuing dialogue among the administering Powers, the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence of Colonial Countries and Peoples (also known as the "Special Committee on Decolonization" or the "C-24") and the peoples of the Non-Self-Governing Territories, in accordance with the relevant United Nations resolutions on decolonization.

Reply
Wynn

As a Scot can I say first of all how exciting the situation in Wales has become. It is fantastic to see the rise of self determination in polls. I hope that both our nations can finally free ourselves from this UK prison and express our identity and politics on the world stage. Secondly, I'd point out that Scots didn't voluntarily join with England, there were riots at the time. To quote Burns 'we were bought and sold for English gold, such a parcel of rogues in a nation's. A message that both our movements must still heed to this day. England will not let you go easily.

Reply
Dr John Ball

There are two, connected issue here that worry me. The first is readiness. I am no fan of ap Iorwerth or Plaid Cymru but if the party really is in the majority next year and whether or not it governs alone or in some form of cooperation, it must have the detailed, costed and realistic policies ready beforehand Making up policies after the election will be too late and will damage the party from day one. Over to ap Iorwerth. The second is very worrying. Polls and people are fickle and a lot can happen in twelve months - just look at the rise of Farage and indeed, the comparative success of UKIP in a previous Assembly. If Plaid Cymru over peddles independence (if it does believe in it) and a referendum, then loses the May election - which is still very possible - then our enemies will seize upon this as evidence that there is little or no support for independence. Tread carefully Plaid Cymru!

Reply
Undecided

Agreed. Plaid’s Achilles heel is credible financial plans. We always hear demands to “invest” in this, that and the other; but hardly ever how it’s going to be paid for. I suspect we won’t either. As for the polls, one of the few certainties is a unionist majority next May and ap Iorwerth has booted independence into the long grass anyhow no matter how many marches there are up and down Barry high street or elsewhere.

Reply
Dr John Ball

You have touched on something I should have said in my original contribution. The movement for independence must NOT be synonymous with Plaid Cymru, the party's support - as you point out - is at best questionable. The wider movement has a far more important (and genuine) role - Yes Cymru, Gwlad, Neil McCavoy's party, Undod, Cymdeithas, members of the Labour Party and Trade Unions, there are even Tories, religious organisations, voluntary organisations et al. Plaid Cymru is happy to pretend just as long as it sees votes. If it succeeded in being the face of independence and is then thoroughly beaten next May - which is still more than likely - then I repeat my warning: independence will be set back decades. People of Wales beware!

Reply

In reply to Dr John Ball

Undecided

Again, in general at least, I agree. But I wonder whether Plaid being synonymous with independence is unavoidable? Is it not the lens through which the debate is seen by most people ie those who need to be convinced. I agree that trade unions and wider civic institutions have an important role to play; but in political party terms, Plaid is the only game in town? The others are firmly unionist even if some individual members are Indy curious at least. Gwlad, Propel etc are irrelevant as they have no real support as I said in other posts (much to the irritation of some on here!).

Reply
Rob

The question of whether or not Wales becomes independent depends on what happens in Scotland. While support for independence is on the increase there are many factors that would deter people from voting Yes in a referendum. The first is the issue of currency, and the second is the issue of open borders with England. Scotland on the other hand will have some bargaining power. They have natural resources, such as the North Sea oil, a huge military presence including Trident and is of strategic importance within NATO (assuming it survives Trump). They may be able to negotiate a deal with London to secure a currency arrangement and retain the Common Travel Area. This along with the fact that the UK may no longer exist post-Scotland would set the precedent for Wales to follow suit. However, if Wales had an independence referendum before Scotland does, you can be sure that London will do everything it can to give us a rubbish settlement to deter the Scots from leaving. In the meantime we should be pressuring London for parity with Scotland, and Northern Ireland in terms of powers and full economic levers to empower our economy.

Reply
Llew Gruffudd

Again the hesitancy. ' It will up to the people ' A largely uninformed people at present and that's his job, it's always been his job, to inform the people as to the benefits of Independence. In that, through hesitancy, he has so far failed. Get the majority public onside and politicians will follow.

Reply
Keith Parry

What do we want? Independence! When do we want it? NOW! Usual Plaid Cymru lack of commitment to independence! Where is Wales Alex Salmond?

Reply
Annibendod

The UK began to break up decades ago. We just aren't quite at the endpoint. That path was set in motion as soon as deindustrialisation set in and London was the peg that the economy was hung from. People really ought to read two books in order to understand the UK today. There are many of course but these two will enlighten. The first is Empireland by Sathnam Sanghera. The second in The Break-up of Britain by Tom Nairn. The UK and its territories is the rump British Empire. Shorn of territories and industry it retains a core-periphery economy, centralized beaurocracy and a stubborn constituency of anglo-supremacist, exceptionalist, British imperialists. Economic inequality is now built in as 50 years of neoliberalism compounded the damage done to communities by deindustrialisation. If you want to understand Brexit and Reform, the economic crises now engulfing our communities, you need to understand what the UK is. The Break-up of Britain is inevitable. The political path is locked in. Ask any of the main parties about meaningful reform of the State to reverse its institutional inequalities and you will be derided as villanous or thick. Precisely for that reason, the State will collapse. The UK establishment is incapable of the required reform, In the end, people will be so sick of it, they will sweep them away. Plaid and indy are benefiting in the polls, not because anyone is doing any earth shattering politics but because the tectonic motion of public opinion is fragmenting the old Empire to which we belong on account of it being a bit s***e really. The main thing we need is to keep fighting the cause, be patient, don't do anything stupid and act decisively when the moment comes. If you want to play the odds, I firmly believe a new union, a confederation of Wales, Scotland and England with EU membership will sway the electorate. Things will have to get a little bit more s**t before people are ready for it.

Reply
Bert

The breakup began when Whitehall starved a million citizens to death just to avoid "stifling private enterprise".

Reply
Annibendod

Yes, that was the "outer empire". Now the "inner empire" is going the way of the dodo.

Reply
Undecided

Fair points, whilst not necessarily agreeing with all of them. It’s interesting that none of those giving you the thumbs down have taken the time (so far) to put a contrary argument. It’s a bit of a trend around this debate. Perhaps I will now better your minus figure?!

Reply
harrisR

Thanks! I should have added that Plaid will therefore openly pitch to both sides, reassuring and playing down any significant constitutional rupture to the new "recruits" whilst holding out just such an independent future in the somewhere great beyond to the hopeful faithful. My view is that the first will electorally predominate and DETERMINE any futher program. The old line that "if you can't ride two horses at once, you shouldn't be in the circus", ignores that a politics that seeks to inspire and genuinely transform should be other. "All things to all people" usually means nothing of substance to anyone. Interesting times.

Reply
Mab Meirion

Rhun should concentrate on attacking the Labour Party for declaring war on the disabled... The bringing down of Mr and Mrs Bumble and Liz Kendal for the despicable apologies for human beings they are consumed by their unadulterated sadism must be his and our crusade... Enough is enough, the whole country should stand and fight, these are our kith and kin for God's sake...

Reply
Jeff

Deal with reform or you ain't going anywhere for a few decades after they wreck the place. Same for the other sensible parties.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to David Cancel

If you believe that Wales has been colonised there is the United Nations on Decolonisation as a route for Independence.. Since the birth of the United Nations, more than 80 former colonies comprising some 750 million people have gained i...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.