Wed, 29th July Cardiff 17°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

UK position on Greenland non-negotiable, Nandy says, amid Trump threat

By Molly Stubbs

The UK needs to have an “adult debate” with the US after Donald Trump threatened to ramp up tariffs until a deal is reached for it to buy Greenland, the Culture Secretary has said.

But the Government’s position on the future of Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, is “non-negotiable”, Lisa Nandy has said.

The US president said on Saturday that the UK will be charged a 10% tariff “on any and all goods” sent to the US from February 1, increased to 25% from June 1, until a deal is reached for Washington to purchase Greenland from Denmark.

He said the same would apply to Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Finland, and that they had “journeyed to Greenland, for purposes unknown”.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has described the move as “completely wrong” and said he would be “pursuing this directly” with the US administration.

French President Emmanuel Macron said he would not bow to “intimidation” and Sweden’s Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said “we will not let ourselves be blackmailed”.

Although Washington has been ratcheting up pressure over its plans for Greenland, US reports suggest the countries were given no notice of what was coming.

Ms Nandy said Sir Keir would speak to Mr Trump at the “earliest opportunity” but could not say if that would be at Davos in the coming week.

She told the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: “Often, with this particular US administration, the president will express a very strong view. He will then encourage a dialogue.

“He welcomes difference of opinion, and we will never shy away from standing up for what we believe is right, or asserting British interests. And what often happens is a negotiation.”

But she rejected the possibility that Mr Trump would “chicken out” and back away from the threat.

“I don’t think he’ll chicken out. I think this is actually a really serious issue, and I think it deserves a far more adult debate than us threatening the United States and the United States threatening us.”

She said: “The one thing that we won’t do is compromise on our position, which is that the future of Greenland is a matter for the people of Greenland and the people of the Kingdom of Denmark.

“That is non-negotiable. That is the starting point for the conversation.”

Earlier this week, the UK confirmed it had sent a military officer to Greenlandas Denmark stepped up its military presence in the Arctic and High North.

Downing Street said they were sent at Denmark’s request to join a reconnaissance group ahead of a planned Arctic endurance exercise, but denied it amounted to a “deployment”.

Mr Trump said the countries were playing a “very dangerous game”, in his Truth Social post announcing the tariffs.

Mr Trump said the US was “immediately open to negotiation with Denmark and/or any of these Countries that have put so much at risk, despite all that we have done for them, including maximum protection, over so many decades”.

He said it was “time for Denmark to give back”, adding: “China and Russia want Greenland, and there is not a thing that Denmark can do about it.”

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa said the Danish exercise was pre-coordinated and “poses no threat to anyone”.

The EU leaders warned tariffs would risk a “dangerous downward spiral” in transatlantic relations.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

18 comments

Evan Aled Bayton

Trump has a point of course about China and Russia. But he has gone about this entirely the wrong way. He should have quietly negotiated behind the scenes and accepted unlimited ability to station military bases in the country possibly with access to resources as well.

Reply
Thepnr

“China and Russia want Greenland, and there is not a thing that Denmark can do about it.” That's the whole point of being a member of NATO as both Denmark and Greenland are. Article 5 is there for a reason. "an armed attack against one NATO member shall be considered an attack against them all".

Reply
Rob

If Trump claims that Russia as a threat then why is he so reluctant to help Ukraine?

Reply
Maesglas

Wow! I never thought I would see the day when Starmer says Trump is wrong. It is a big step forward for a man who seemed terrified to say a word out of place. Of course, he has the cover of all UK parties and Europe, which are unanimous in calling out Trump. Starmer must now stand up to this bully and call Trump's bluff.

Reply
Keith

A purchase is very different to a land grab. He should put a generous offer in writing and let the people of Greenland vote on it.

Reply
Rob

It does not work like that. Greenland is a constituent country within the Kingdom of Denmark, just like Wales is a constituent country within the United Kingdom. They cannot be bought or unilaterally decide to join another state. Sovereignty rests with Denmark, and any change in status require's their consent under international law. Re-writing boundaries through 'offers' or pressure is not self-determination it is coercion. If people want to be part of the USA then they are free to move there.

Reply
Keith

Isn't that an argument to deny anyone independence?

Reply

In reply to Keith

Rob

No, quite the opposite actually. Independence means their people deciding their own future free from external pressure. What is being suggested here is not independence, but a transfer of sovereignty to another state. Under Danish law, Greenland can lawfully pursue independence from Denmark through a recognised process, but it cannot be bought or unilaterally absorbed into another country.

Reply

In reply to Rob

Keith

If Greenland can choose to become independent it can choose on day one of being independent to become a US state. But that's not my point. Trump is free to put a trillion dollar cheque on the table and Denmark and Greenland are free to consider the offer. That's totally different to taking it by force or coercion.

Reply

In reply to Keith

Rob

Greenlanders have made it very clear they do not want to join the U.S. If the Kremlin tried to offer millions to persuade the people of Alaska into re-joining Russia, Washington would rightly call it coercion. Why should Copenhagen be any different? As a Welshman, my nationality is priceless and not for sale.

Reply

In reply to Rob

Keith

Then there won't be any concerns about holding a referendum on the deal and the matter is finished.

Reply

In reply to Keith

Rob

That still misses the point. Whether or not a referendum is held is entirely Denmark’s decision, and not Donald Trump’s. Once a powerful external state puts large sums of money on the table, the process is no longer neutral it becomes financial pressure. The UN Charter makes it clear that state sovereignty and territorial integrity cannot be overridden through external pressure or inducement. If referendums were enough to sanitise that kind of pressure, any wealthy power could buy territory and call it democratic.

Reply

In reply to Rob

Keith

Which sections of the charter are you quoting? From what I can see large financial offer is considered a legitimate inducement for a voluntary sale of territory not illegal coercion, provided there is no accompanying threat or use of force against the other state's sovereignty. While he is currently absolutely engaging in illegal coercion that is a different matter to whether it's possible in principle to make a generous offer and have it considered.

Reply

In reply to Keith

Rob

It is how the UN Charter is interpreted in modern international law. Article 2(1) establishes the sovereign equality of states, and Article 2(4) prohibits actions, including threats that undermine a state’s territorial integrity or political independence. Any financial offer involving Danish territory is therefore governed by Denmark’s sovereign law, not U.S. law or some neutral international marketplace. If both parties freely agreed, that would be one thing, but Denmark has explicitly ruled out any sale. This should make the matter closed, irrespective of how generous the offer might be. It becomes even clearer when you consider that Trump has refused to rule out taking Greenland by force and is using economic pressure, such as tariffs to get his way. This clearly violates Article 2(4). In legal terms, it would be no different than Putin offering money to Alaskans to re-join Russia, something the USA would never tolerate.

Reply
Y Cymro

This is just ridiculous. A NATO member intimidating and threatening its allies, that if they didn't comply will face a financial penalty until it get what it wants. A few months back we had Donald Trump openly say in front of the General Secretary of NATO ex-Dutch pm Mark Rutter that he was going to take Greenland by force if need be. And when he was asked for his opinion like a slug deflected the question effectively saying it was nothing to do with me. The same sycophant referred to Trump, and I quote, "Daddy". At the moment we have Trump's masked ICE agents like Gestapo murdering unarmed American citizens in the street. Threatening & terrorising those deemed illegal aliens solely because they have brown or black skin. Deporting foreign students because they had criticised either Trump or JD Vance on social media. This is right out of the Nazi handbook. Am I surprised? Yes and no. Being a supporter of Welsh independence , freedom for the people of Palestine from tyranny and other social causes, was aware this administration in American was fast becoming a fascist regime, and knew what happens in America the world usually follows suit. Just look at how past & present English Conservative and Labour governments regard Wales. With utter contempt. Both have bypassed devolution. Sole billions in consequential from Wales. Repatriated without consultation Welsh Government admin powers in their power grab. Dissolved Welsh law they didn't agree with. Flatly refused further devolution, especially power over the Crown Estate citing the most lamest of excuses even though a majority wanted control. Labour's English Health Minister Wes Streeting was openly hostile to those striking calling junior doctors in England referring to to them as, "part of a cartel." The Labour government banned pro-Palestine protesters and those Republicans opposed to the Monarchy using anti-terror legislation. This from a party founded in 1900 to fight for workers rights, to represent the interest of working class , poor, and to fight for those oppressed. So It's high time we stood on our own two feet, and this starts in May when we break free from Welsh Labour rule. Looking north, it's highly likely Scotland will vote in a majority SNP government in May after the disastrous UK Labour government. And if we don't do the same in Wales will pay dearly when a Reform/Conservative government is elected by English voters.

Reply
Jeff

Bend the knee to Trump and he keeps coming at you for more. The EU is where the UK needs to be. Because Putins placeman in the Whitehouse is going to take us for a ride.

Reply
Rob

If the US refuses to play by the rules then maybe Europe should consider strategic engagement with China. Not an ideal situation, but would hit Trump where it really hurts. Any potential US invasion of Greenland would potentially be a bigger catalyst for WW3 than the war in Ukraine. At least in that conflict, NATO and Russia both understand the nuclear red lines, so neither side is prepared to risk a direct war. Greenland is different. It’s Danish territory. If Donald Trump ordered a U.S. seizure, it would mean a NATO power attacking another NATO member. Not only would that risk a US–Europe war, it would collapse NATO itself. Once NATO’s credibility and its nuclear deterrence is undermined, Russia would see an opportunity to take the Baltic states. European forces would potentially be fighting on 2 fronts: against the US in Greenland, and against Russia in the East. Yet in the run-up to the last U.S. election, some voices (including a few on the left) would misleadingly claim that Trump “never started any wars.”

Reply
Clive hopper

Who knows what goes on in Trumps head? All politicians, leaders and diplomats know that he is a dangerous crazy egotist, but can't say it out loud as he was actually elected! Anything can happen next.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Keith Cancel

A purchase is very different to a land grab. He should put a generous offer in writing and let the people of Greenland vote on it.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.