Fri, 28th August Cardiff 18°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

Starmer cannot duck and dive on question of Irish reunification, Sinn Fein says

By Stephen Price
Ireland from European Space Agency. Image: ESA CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer cannot duck and dive on the question of Irish reunification and must instead commit to holding a referendum on constitutional change by 2030, the leader of Sinn Fein has insisted.

Mary Lou McDonald said the incoming government in Dublin must also take “urgent” steps to start planning for unity, including by creating the role of minister for unification.

The Sinn Fein president was commenting in Belfast as she published a report outlining the work of her own party’s Commission on the Future of Ireland.

[mid-content-banner]

Referenda

Ms McDonald said her previously stated goal of having referenda on both sides of the Irish border by the end of the decade remained realistic, despite Sinn Fein failing to emerge victorious from the recent general election in Ireland and with the party appearing to have little realistic prospect of being part of the new coalition administration in Dublin.

She said Fianna Fail and Fine Gael – which are set to lead the new government – needed to publish a green paper on unification; appoint a minister for unity in the Department of the Taoiseach; set up a parliamentary committee to examine issues around constitutional change; and also form a citizens’ assembly to consider the same sort of questions.

Under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement, a border poll should be called in Northern Ireland by the incumbent Northern Ireland Secretary when he/she believes there is evidence that public opinion in the region has shifted in favour of constitutional change. In that event, a simultaneous poll would also be held in the Republic of Ireland.

Successive UK governments have consistently declined to specify publicly what criteria will be applied when measuring public sentiment on the issue. Sir Keir has insisted the question of calling a referendum is “not even on the horizon”.

Ms McDonald said it was no longer tenable for the UK government to hold such a position.

[taboola-banner]

"Binding agreement"

“The referendums are provided for in the Good Friday Agreement,” she told the event in west Belfast.

“That is a binding agreement, both governments, both states, have signed this agreement. So the referendums are a reality of life. It’s not a question of will they happen. It is a question of timing. And I think the British Prime Minister, the incoming Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, now needs to be true to the obligations contained within that agreement. And that means you cannot simply duck and dive or pretend that you did not commit to referendums.

“It is there, frankly, in black and white in that agreement. So I hope and anticipate that with a new administration and new government coming into place in Dublin, with a new Labour-led government – remember the original champions of the Good Friday Agreement – we will see a positive advance and a new sense of realism around what needs to happen next.

“And, by the way, it is still my belief, it is still our belief that referendums must happen by the end of this decade. The process has moved on. It has evolved. But the process of reconciliation and building anew across the island always has to have impetus. It always has to have forward momentum.”

[lower-mid-content-banner]

Challenge

Ms McDonald said any citizens’ assembly that is established must fully reflect all shades of opinion within unionism.

She insisted there was a “significant section” of the unionist/Protestant population in Northern Ireland that was up for having the conversation around unity.

“We’re very clear that those of us who champion, who advance the cause of Irish reunification, and all of the collective opportunity that brings, have a job to convince, to engage, to reassure, to challenge and to be challenged,” she said.

“All of that work is still to be done. What we are marking today through the work of our own commission is the considerable work that has been done so far. But that’s not, by no means, the totality, much less the end of the story. And that’s where the role of the Irish government in particular is really, really important. We believe it to be a reasonable and responsible position that the Dublin government now needs to lead by example.”

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

9 comments

Jack

SF overstatement. Note that SF are not part of the Eire Government and their results in the 'South' are good, but not outstanding. So, this is a SF grandstanding comment not a serious politcial judgement.

Reply
Evan Aled Bayton

Bearing in mind the ludicrous outcome of the Brexit First Past the Post referendum it would be a good idea to set up a commission to examine how to run such a referendum looking at other countries voting for constitutional change. Usually there is a requirement for an absolute majority of all the eligible electorate sometimes with a higher bar such as 60% or 2/3. Once a structure for the referendum whenever it is held can be agreed then dates can be considered.

Reply
Mark

Do you also consider it ludicrous that Wales secured devolution based on the yes vote of 25% of the population? Rightly or wrongly, we have little precedent for constitutional change to require the consent of the majority of the electorate. The UK joined the Common Market without a referendum at all. We also didn't have a referendum on any of the treaties that took powers from the UK and gave them to Brussels. Blair didn't trouble himself with a referendum for replacing hereditary peers with appointed cronies, and I doubt it will even cross Starmer's mind to call a referendum to finish the job. Setting up the Supreme Court didn't need a referendum, nor did making the 'Supreme' court subservient to the ECJ (i.e. not Supreme at all). Where we have had referenda, I can't think of a single example where a threshold of 50% of the electorate has been achieved. The 1979 devolution referenda did require 40% of the electorate to vote in favour, and both failed. The 1997 devolution referenda fell a long way short with only 25% voting in favour in Wales and 45% in Scotland; London got its mayor based on 25% of the electorate, but Blair had been careful not to scupper his plans by setting a requirement for a majority of the electorate to vote in favour. In 2012, 10 English cities held referenda on establishing an elected mayor. Nine voted against and the tenth (Bristol) passed on a majority of votes but not a majority of the electorate. The Tories moved the goal-posts a bit and imposed elected mayors without referenda in 2015. I agree with you, constitutional change should require consent of the majority, and perhaps this should be combined with a legal requirement to vote (as in Australia). The British political system would certainly look very different if that had been a requirement for the last 50 years.

Reply
Mark

Since the Good Friday Agreement, polls have shown support for unification varying between 17% & 46% in Northern Ireland. The Northern Ireland Secretary is absolutely right to conclude there isn't public support for unification. As an aside, using the word 'reunification' is not historically accurate. Before British rule, Ireland was a collection of kingdoms not a united country.

Reply
Drew Anderson

Before British rule it had been completely conquered by Tudor England; so was technically united, albeit under the English crown.

Reply
Mark

But my point is, the island of Ireland has never been united as an independent nation, hence talk of reunification is disingenuous.

Reply
Charles Coombes

He can a d he will delay. No PM will want to allow reunification.

Reply
Mark

...because the people of Northern Ireland do not want to allow unification.

Reply
Garycymru

He'll delay because reunification is the right and just thing to do. He does have to at least show that he's trying to stop the end of an empire, that's already long past its sell by date, no matter how pointless.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Mark Cancel

But my point is, the island of Ireland has never been united as an independent nation, hence talk of reunification is disingenuous.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.