Mon, 10th August Cardiff 18°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

Senior Reform Wales figure deletes Charlie Kirk social media post amid online backlash

By Emily Price
Reform Councillor David Thomas - Image: David Thomas Facebook

Emily Price

Reform’s Regional Director for Wales has deleted a social media post about US conservative activist Charlie Kirk after receiving a backlash online.

On Tuesday (September 16), Torfaen Councillor David Thomas published a post to X saying he had walked out of a town council meeting in "disbelief" because there was no mention of the fatal shooting of Kirk.

The right-wing political activist and trusted Trump ally found fame as an avid public speaker touring liberal leaning US college campuses to promote conservative views.

The American podcaster made several controversial statements on issues such as gender, race, women's rights and gun control and often drew fierce criticism.

Kirk was gunned down on September 10 while addressing an audience at Utah Valley University - the first stop on his "American Comeback Tour" of college campuses.

[mid-content-banner]

'Shameful'

Following Torfaen Borough Council's September meeting, which Cllr Thomas attended virtually, he published a post to X criticising councillors.

He wrote: "I’ve just walked out of Torfaen Councils full council meeting in absolutely disbelief.

"Not a single mention… not even a moments acknowledgement… of the horrific event involving Charlie Kirk.

"For a council that claims to stand for community, compassion and respect - their silence today was nothing short of shameful.

"Absolutely disgusting."

Labour Council Leader, Anthony Hunt, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service his thought’s were with Kirk’s family but said he "wasn’t sure there was a relevant place" to raise his death in the meeting.

Cllr Thomas' post went viral on social media, with X users questioning why a county borough council in Wales would discuss the murder of a US figure.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

'Faux outrage'

Some online commentators accused the 31-year-old of "faux outrage" and several Reform UK supporters called him out over the post.

One commentator said: "You walked out in disbelief? Completely out of your depth. You want flags taken down from council buildings, but when it suits you, wants councils to spend time discussing a US murder? Time to start the grown up work David."

Another said: "Bugger all to do with the council. Your job is to get the bins emptied."

Cllr Thomas' post was later replaced with an X notification which stated: "This post was deleted by the post author."

We asked Reform's campaign manager why he had removed his comments about Kirk from X.

Cllr Thomas did not respond to our question but later published a statement online claiming he had been hit with a "torrent of abuse and vile messages".

'Abuse'

In the statement, posted in the early hours of Friday morning - the Torfaen Councillor re-published the original post he had deleted hours before along with a screen grab of an offensive message sent to him by an anti-Trump X account with 21 followers.

Cllr Thomas wrote: "Since Tuesday, when I posted my tweet about the shocking lack of compassion in the council over the horrific assassination of Charlie Kirk, I’ve been hit with a torrent of abuse and vile messages from what I can only describe as the most despicable elements of the left.

"As expected, Welsh news media outlets and the usual social media suspects jumped straight on it, fanning the flames.

"The abuse didn’t bother me—I’m used to it. But the moment they dragged my parents into it and started hurling insults at them, I decided to take the tweet down from X.

"While I deleted it from X, it was never deleted from Facebook. Facebook is not quite as vile as this place so the words remain, and I stand by them.

"I was disappointed in myself for taking it down on X. I allowed these mindless, disgusting people to get the better of me.

"I regret nothing I said. I stand by every word. And I want everyone to see just how low and vile these people are. See screenshot of the abuse on one tweet!"

'Disgusting'

He added: "My tweet and what I said was about compassion and nothing more. So here it is again. Knock yourselves out! I will not be intimidated by any of you again.

"I’ve just walked out of @torfaencouncil full council meeting in absolute disbelief.

"Not a single mention… not even a moment’s acknowledgment… of the horrific event involving Charlie Kirk.

"For a council that claims to stand for community, compassion and respect — their silence today was nothing short of shameful. Absolutely disgusting."

The post received a further backlash, with one commentator saying: "I’m far from a lefty but it was far more disgusting that you tried to use the death of a prominent young man for your own engagement farming and publicity than it was that a council didn’t feel the need to demonstrably commemorate the death of a US civilian. You should be ashamed."

Another said: "That account has 21 followers and you arguably have just republished the allegations."

Another wrote: "Why do you think a welsh council should acknowledge the death of an American podcaster?

"If councils stopped to acknowledge the shooting of every American, nothing else would ever get done.

"Performative nonsense from a ltd company masquerading as a political party."

Cllr David Thomas was invited to comment but did not respond.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

18 comments

FrankC

Difficult to believe David Thomas was selected for this role. The guy's an absolute headcase. I've got a pet rock that would do better. Bad news for Reform but excellent news for Wales😂

Reply
End the UK

He really is a bell end isn't he

Reply
TheOtherJones

This guy is their head honcho in Wales, let that sink in. Imagine how much of a loon their 96th placed candidate is going to be for the 96 Senedd seats available next year. Not sure how, in a million years, Kirk’s murder is relevant to street lighting and grass cutting in Torfaen.

Reply
Rob W

He'll be suggesting having a statue of Charlie Kirk erected outside the council offices next!!

Reply
Amir

The one thing he should have mentioned regarding this horrible shooting incident is why the US hasn't banned gun ownership? That is one nasty bad habit that we do not want to import to the UK please.

Reply
Jeff

Curious if this person demanded the same when the Democrat politicians were murdered or the many school children gunned down. Kirk was all for guns. Turns out a pretty nasty bit of work as well. But the gop have weaponised his death, no secret to where this councillor has allegiance then. US not the UK.

Reply
Fanny Hill

What a plonker.

Reply
TheWoodForTheTrees

What else did he want on the agenda? The genocide in Palestine? Putin's invasion of Ukraine? Robert Redford dying? Get a grip. I bet there was a lot of disbelief that he walked out in disbelief. Muppet.

Reply
Fi yn unig

The next question for no response is about alignment of views with those of the named deceased. Does the councillor believe that anyone other than a white, hetero sexual male is an inferior human being? If so, he is not fit to serve in any public service role.

Reply
John Ellis

No one, surely, could defend the assassination of Kirk. However distasteful or even abhorrent you might think his opinions to be, no one deserves to be murdered as a response to them; bad ideas, if anyone judges them so to be, are effectively countered by better ideas, and never by murder. And in any event, Kirk seems to have relied purely on argument to drive home his points, utilizing his well-honed skills in debate and argument - he was after all a full decade older than the students whom he targeted - to convey his views and persuade his hearers. From what I saw on TV, the gazebo-style contraption in which he sat and debated with students carried a logo printed on it which said 'Prove to me that I'm wrong'. In principle, surely no one can fault that approach. But for all that, it's nonetheless patently absurd to expect that the murder of a polemicist in a foreign country thousands of miles away, of whom hardly anyone here had ever previously heard, should be a significant agenda item at a meeting of a Welsh local council. These 'Reform' characters aren't serious practical political players on our national and local scene; like Kirk himself, they're primarily controversialists and 'influencers'.

Reply
Bryce

Reform desperate to become the 51st state. Sad.

Reply
FrankC

Give your head a wobble you Reform fool. Kirk is of no relevance to Wales, the UK or the rest of the world except for magaland. The performative grief of David Thomas was pathetic, with even Reform voters telling him to take the post down. The sooner Wales gets rid of him and his ilk the better.

Reply
Bryce

But this is America where they have the second amendment as well as the first. Violence is built into their constitution.

Reply
Alan Jones

Utter utter drivel.

Reply
Jeff

Mr Thomas is a fool. His handlers in the States are shutting down free speech. Kirk was a far right nasty bit of work but should never have been killed. Most people have called it out (there are unfortunately a few idiots). The far right now try to use the situation to shut down free speech. That is Trump. That is GOP. Did Mr Thomas call for the recognition of Melissa Hortman? Did he call for the recognition of John Hoffman? Did he call for the recognition of the kids murdered the same day in a school shooting? NO. He did his masters bidding in calling for one person to be recognised, he exposes his handler control. How is Jimmy Kimmel doing with free speech? The people that lost their jobs for repeating Kirks own words, not making anything up, showing him for what he was.

Reply
Pete Cuthbert

If it is appropriate to discuss killings in foreign countries then all our Councils should be discussing the fact that the IDF killed 77 Palestinians yesterday. I do feel that is a much larger and more important (for the world) issue than the murder on one American. Happily, the majority of our councils discuss issues of importance to their residents like car parking charges, and rubbish collection and let the rest of the world continue without comment. Hurling abuse at a Councillor who thinks differently is a waste of time and lowers the quality of our politics. Abuse never changes anybody's mind.

Reply
Dana Fenton

People used to get cancelled for what they said. Now theyre being cancelled for what they are not saying, bizarre

Reply
Tony Trimble

So he walked out of a council meeting in ‘disbelief’ because there was no mention of the murder of some American bloke who nobody in the UK had ever heard of! Well he’s a bit sensitive!

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Alan Jones Cancel

Utter utter drivel.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.