Sun, 2nd August Cardiff 20°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

Reform would cut more than 68,000 civil service jobs

By Molly Stubbs
Danny Kruger speaking during a Reform UK press conference. Photo credit: Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire

Reform UK would cut the number of civil servants by 68,500 if the party won the next election, Danny Kruger has said.

The East Wiltshire MP, who is leading efforts to get ready for government, said the plan would cut the salary bill by 17% and save the taxpayer £5.2 billion a year.

He told a press conference in Westminster: “That’s £4 billion in averted salary costs, which will be realised within two years, and £1 billion in averted pension contributions that will be realised in the years ahead.”

He said the first phase of plans to reform the government would also see the party invest an additional £400 million – for a total of £500 million – into a bonus pot to reward “high-performing” civil servants rather than giving them “over-generous” pension contributions.

Mr Kruger insisted the party’s plans would improve working in central government, and would be “radical” and “thorough”.

He said: “Someone once said that a hard rain is going to fall on Whitehall, and I do see the need for serious weather, but after the rain, after the storm, there will be sunshine – it’s going to be a better place to work.”

Asked how he expected to attract talent to the Civil Service by reducing pension contributions that form a key draw for many to apply, he said: “We value people who have a long career in the Civil Service. Obviously, their pension should reflect their service.

“Nevertheless, we don’t want an organisation in which the main reason to work there is that you can look forward to a good pension once you retire.

“We want people to work for the public interest, and we want the type of people who will be incentivised by the opportunity of performance-related pay, rather than a distant and over-generous pension.”

He said he expected the cost of Civil Service redundancies to pay for itself within two years under Reform UK plans, based on it costing around £60,000 to let someone go.

Mr Kruger told reporters his party would not be “judgmental”, after an endorsement from OnlyFans personality and adult content creator Bonnie Blue, real name Tia Billinger.

He told a press conference: “On Bonnie Blue I mean, listen, we’ll take votes wherever we can get them.

“We know we want all the support we can get, quite like Bonnie Blue.

“But we, you know, we’re not going to be fussy about that.

“But listen, I mean, you know I’m not going to be be judgmental about people who want to vote Reform.”

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

29 comments

Jeff

yeah, all the MP's and ex Tory defecting to reform are responsible for one of the worst hits on the UK in its history. Austerity and service cut backs and then brexit, along with farage. No provenance in running a country, only ruining a country. Every council they run, the costs are rocketing. reform will destroy the UK. They will strip mine wales. Remeber farage and his gassing jokes? They will bring back race hate on a scale you have never seen in the UK. His hit squads will be kicking doors in on people the wrong colour. Remember Krugers hateful comments on LGBTQ. Farage on gassing people, Gill fronting for the russians along with farage and 30p attacking disabled people and pochin racist rants.

Reply
Amir

These clowns are definitely not ready to govern anything except their shoe cabinets and even that sounds doubtful.

Reply
Greg

Why 68,000? Why not fire them all?

Reply
David J.

Because you will have to wait forever for a renewed driving licence, a Lasting power of Attorney, a passport, a marriage certificate, or any one of a thousand documents and services the civil service provides. I used to think there was no such thing as a stupid question, but reading yours has made me rethink.

Reply
Smae

Oh no, AI will do all of that don't you know ;D. Pretty sure Greg was being sarcastic.

Reply

In reply to Smae

Amir

Greg is DEFINITELY being sarcastic.

Reply
Fred

Worse than that. No government is anarchy. And that's what these folks that just want to cut cut cut without asking "how much government do we need for the public services we want" are trying to achieve.

Reply

In reply to Fred

Thomas

Nobody is talking about 'no government'! They are proposing a mere 2% cut in headcount.

Reply
John Brooks

Perhaps Reform could tell everyone what services will no longer be provided. And before anyone says 'efficiencies', just remember every government since 1979 has claimed they will make efficiency savings and then gone on to pass legislation that requires Civil Servants to put into practice.

Reply
Jeff

Anything with decency in it. NHS will be private so departments cut there. No help with disabilities, on your own there. No job, tough luck. No rent or rates controls, cutting back on oversight for snatching people off the street, cant have them held to account when they transport you despite being born in the UK. Regulation will be cut so dumping chemicals, health and safety gone, unions will be banned, all green projects shuttered and basically we move to the USSR of the United States as they strip the UK. I wonder how long it will take for mass demo's. I don't expect farage to remain on the UK after he guts the places. Where is "gas them all" Nigel anyway?

Reply
Greg

People forget that the Cons took us into Europe to outsource huge swathes of the public sector. Taking back control meant unavoidable civil service bloat.

Reply
Smae

Uh... no, no it really didn't. The Civil Service did not expand where you seem to think it did. Largely the Civil Service absorbed ALL of the work without an increase, from the Home Office to Defra, DWP, HMRC... they saw minimal rises. No the main bulk of the civil servants were hired into specially created departments, which were not disbanded once their usefulness had run out, but rebadged. It is somewhat hard to fire a Civil Servant (rightly so) once hired, I mean you can do the usual firing for misconduct etc, but you cant just fire them because you don't want them anymore. You have to think long term about how to manage the Civil Service... by long term I mean 10-20 years ahead. Some departments, like the HMRC, Home Office, MOD, MOJ are crying out for more Civil Servants (if only they could get the budget to pay for them).

Reply
Greg

I recall HMRC saying they needed an extra 50,000 customs agents to handle the new border red tape. Surely that wasn't the only Brexit related public service bloat.

Reply
Fi yn unig

All doubt removed now everyone? Tax free allowance on pay up to £20k (you’ll never see a penny of the £7.5k ‘gift’) and now a massive cull of civil servants. This is the FULL privatisation of EVERYTHING. Want your bins emptied? Get your credit card out. You’ll still be paying council tax - for nothing in return whatsoever.

Reply
Fi yn unig

All savings to be routed out to their billionaire paymasters and away from the people. Reform UK are a danger to life and do not plan to form a government for us.

Reply
Fanny Hill

Who runs the country when a general election is called and parliament is dissolved?

Reply
Jeff

Nige wont want another General Election. Not a fair one anyway. Fascists don't like losing power. At least until the end is certain then they scarper or get cornered or take the easy way out.

Reply
Fi yn unig

The Torygraph, The Fail, The Scum, The Excess, The Slimes and The Dictator. I know what you mean though. It’s the civil servants but could be Farij next time around.

Reply
Fanny Hill

He’s already got more jobs than anybody else, another 68,000 should be a problem.

Reply
Ian

Whilst there is certainly an argument for reducing the Civil Service after the additional posts created after Covid, making such an ignorant and glib statement just shows how vacant the Reform policy book is. They do an enormous amount of work that without, democratic govt could just not operate. If they think the Trump model is a good one, then take a look at the consequences. A Reform UK Govt would just end up using consultants at far greater cost.

Reply
Fanny Hill

The increase in civil servants was a result of Brexit. A direct consequence of listening to Farage and his cronies. Somebody has to deal with all the red tape that resulted in the barriers created in trading with the EU.

Reply
Thomas

Strange how the civil service head count had risen from 2.3 million in 1991 to 3.1 million in 2016. How were those 800,000 extra people drawing from the public purse the result of Brexit?

Reply
Y Cymro

It's a bull in a china shop approach from Reform UK. Remember, this is a party of hypocrites that saw fit to spend thousands on an armour car for their multimillionaire cult leader Nigel Farage, including a Reform themed bar in Clacton-Upon-Sea, Essex, one of the most deprived constituencies in England. And what about Reform's youngest councillors , 19-year-old George Finch, who as interim leader of Warwickshire County Council, promised to end waste in his campaign , won , then suggested employing at the cost £190k annually to ratepayers political assistants to help him going against Reform's anti-waste platform. I would'nt trust Reform UK with my spit let alone allow them to run a council or country. They are like a predators, who use grooming technics to entice the apathetic. They seed and gestate hatred of minorities. Promise those from poor deprived areas that asylum seekers are the problem and they are the solution. It's a form of abuse in a way. The only ones who will benefit is Reform UK, where their voters lives and communities will not change but get worse.

Reply
Smae

Armour car is a good idea for high profile people, not gonna begrudge him that. It's a matter of safety and yes... it's necessary even in the UK.

Reply
Thomas

Let's put this into perspective. Central government public sector headcount has increased from 2.3 million in 1991 to 4.0 million in 2025. A 74% increase in headcount and 1.7 million extra people being paid from the public purse. Getting rid of 68,000 jobs is 4% of the increase over that period, or less than 2% of the total headcount. It seems to me that those claiming this really rather modest ambition will lead to the collapse of our public services are getting a little carried away, particularly when the fact that the service delivered to the public by all these people is far worse in just about every area than it was in 1991.

Reply
Smae

The UK needs more civil servants not less, admittedly it needs them in the right places. This was a tory mistake as it created a temporary department and hired a heap load of Civil Servants into it that couldn't be easily returned back to their former departments because their places had been filled already. The wage packet does take a lot of money from the civil service, but this is not where most of the money is lost. Most of the money is lost through procurement and contracts. For a 5.00 mouse, it costs the Civil Service 20.00, for a change to someone's computer profile or reactivation it doesn't cost 10.00... or 30.00... or 50.00 it costs over 200.00 a pop, per change half the time and the more that is outsourced to private contractors, the less bang for buck we, the public, get. Sadly, the work is very much there and we very much need Civil Servants and Public sector workers to do it, because the private sector are too profit driven to do a job properly, just look at Royal Mail, Evri, Capita, G4S...

Reply
Mike T

But we go full circle as SOME of the issues mentioned could only be solved by the private sector. Capita has saved us millions by taking on TV licencing, the call centres etc. Then there's centralised procurement for the NHS etc. Should have happened decades ago and it's only the private sector that could take it on as you'd need real commercial skills and strategy to do the deals. Property rationalisation is another - could save billions (for the NHS in particular) - but you need private sector property experts to do it (incidentally, there are a lot of ex NHS property people out there in the private sector). It's obvious we need more civil servants here, less there, but outsourcing to the private sector has worked. Like any organisation, sometimes you need to go out for the skills you don't have in-house. And when it comes to the commercial stuff, it's understandable that it'd be a public sector weak point.

Reply
Greg

If you don't have the skills in-house those that you hire in can run rings around you costing far more in the end. The answer is both. Have core teams and skills in-house and augment them with the private sector. The damage to public services comes when a profit motivation rather than a relentless drive on efficiency and effectiveness sets strategy.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Fanny Hill Cancel

He’s already got more jobs than anybody else, another 68,000 should be a problem.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.