News
Reeves denies UK on path to austerity as she confirms 15% Civil Service cuts
Rachel Reeves has denied that Labour is heading towards austerity as she confirmed plans to cut Civil Service running costs by 15%.
The Chancellor pointed to money poured into capital spending and the NHS, saying the Governmentâs actions were a âfar cryâ from those of their Conservative predecessors.
At the same time, she said Labour was looking to cut back the Civil Service, which she said had swelled during the Covid-19 pandemic, by slashing its âback office functions, the administrative and bureaucracy functionsâ by the end of this parliament.
It comes after a backlash, including in the partyâs own ranks, to cuts to welfare spending and a decision to slash the aid budget to fund a boost to defence spending, and ahead of the Chancellorâs spring statement on Wednesday.
Ms Reeves was asked about some people on the left of the party who think she is âwielding the axeâ and fear that Labour austerity is on the table.
[mid-content-banner]
Capital spending
She told the BBCâs Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: âLast year, I put ÂŁ100 billion more into capital spending than the previous government had committed to, we put more than ÂŁ20 billion into the National Health Service.
âThat is a far cry from what weâve seen under Conservative governments in the last 14 years.â
She said any budgets to unprotected departments, such as the Ministry of Justice, would be set out in the spending review in June.
âWeâll set all that out when we do the spending review, but we canât just carry on like we have been spending on the same things that the previous government spent on.
âPeople want to know weâre getting value for money, when people are paying more in tax that theyâre getting more in return.â
She also said that anyone who runs a business will agree that plans to cut Civil Service costs will be âmore than possibleâ given advances in technology and AI.
[lower-mid-content-banner]
Administrative budgets
The Cabinet Office will tell departments to cut their administrative budgets by 15%, which is expected to save ÂŁ2.2 billion a year by 2029-30.
âWe are, by the end of this Parliament, making a commitment that we will cut the costs of running government by 15%,â Ms Reeves said.
Ms Reeves said the size of government âincreased massivelyâ during the pandemic.
âBut the size of the Civil Service hasnât come back during that period. So, we now need to make sure that we do realise those efficiency savings so we can invest in the priorities.â
She said the cuts would come from âthe back office functions, the administrative and bureaucracy functionsâ.
Union bosses have argued there is no simple distinction between the âback officeâ and the âfront lineâ.
Realistic assessment
Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: âThe Chancellor has talked about undertaking a zero-based review of spending, this must include a realistic assessment of what the Civil Service doesnât do in future as a result of these cuts.
âPublic servants in âback officeâ and âfrontlineâ role will both be critical to delivering on the Governmentâs missions and the Government must recognise that many civil servants are working in âfrontlineâ roles.â
Looking ahead to the spring statement, Ms Reeves said she would not pre-empt the Office for Budget Responsibilityâs forecast she will be responding to.
âBut the world has changed,â the Chancellor told Sky Newsâ Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips.
âWe can all see that before our eyes and governments are not inactive in that â weâll respond to the change and continue to meet our fiscal rules.â
The Chancellor has repeatedly said she will not budge from her fiscal rules, which rule out borrowing to fund day-to-day spending.
This has led to mounting pressure over how to balance the books â by raising taxes or cutting spending â amid disappointing growth figures and higher-than-expected borrowing.
She told The Sun she would not be raising taxes in the spring statement.
Growth forecast
The Bank of England has reduced its forecasts for growth this year and Ms Reeves was dealt a fresh blow on Friday as figures showed that Government borrowing had soared past forecasts in February at ÂŁ10.7 billion â ÂŁ4.2 billion more than had been forecast by the OBR.
An impact assessment for welfare cuts is due to be published alongside the Chancellorâs statement.
Experts estimate that around a million people in England and Wales will lose their disability benefits as part of a welfare overhaul that the Government believes will save more than ÂŁ5 billion a year by the end of the decade.
Ms Reeves told the BBC the benefits bill is âthrough the roofâ and people are âlocked out of workâ.
âI want to change that and give more people the dignity and pride that comes from work through proper support to get there,â she said.
PIP
Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said the Conservatives would have gone even further with welfare changes and undertaken a âfundamental overhaulâ of personal independence payments (Pip) to make them âmore targetedâ.
He told Trevor Philips: âWhat it means is that if you were on Pip, for example, and you had a mental health condition, a reformed Pip would quite possibly say âTrevor, rather than giving you amounts of money every year, we will actually provide you with treatment that will help you, and in particular help you, for example, if youâre not in work, to get into workâ.
In a statement, Mr Stride said Labour was âtotally out of touch âwith the reality facing families across the country.
âBusiness confidence has collapsed, growth has been killed stone dead, firms are slashing jobs and their borrowing splurge has pushed up mortgages for families.
âThis is not bringing back stability to the economy, itâs deeply damaging it, and families are paying the price for the Chancellorâs poor decisions.â
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Get more trusted Welsh news
Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.