Sun, 16th August Cardiff 16°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

Reeves battles tears as Starmer declines to back her staying in post

By Mark Mansfield
Chancellor Rachel Reeves crying in the House of Commons-4 - Image: Parliament TV

Chancellor Rachel Reeves appeared to cry in the Commons as Sir Keir Starmer declined to guarantee she would remain in place until the election.

The Prime Minister faced MPs after being forced to scrap key planks of his welfare reforms, leaving an almost £5 billion black hole in Ms Reeves’ spending plans and fuelling speculation she could be forced to hike taxes.

[video width="1920" height="1080" mp4="http://nation.cymru/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Rachel-Reeves-crying.mp4"][/video]

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Ms Reeves looked “absolutely miserable” and challenged the Prime Minister to say whether the Chancellor would keep her job until the next election.

Sir Keir dodged the question about whether Ms Reeves would be in place for the remainder of the Parliament, saying Mrs Badenoch “certainly won’t”.

[mid-content-banner]

'Awful'

The Tory leader said: “How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn’t confirm that she would stay in place.”

Changes to restrict eligibility to the personal independence payment (Pip) were abandoned on Tuesday night to limit a Labour revolt, wiping out the savings that Ms Reeves had counted on to help meet her goal of funding day-to-day spending through tax receipts rather than borrowing.

Mrs Badenoch said the welfare reforms were designed “to plug a black hole created by the Chancellor” but “instead they’re creating new ones”.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

Toast

She told Sir Keir: “Labour MPs are going on the record saying that the Chancellor is toast, and the reality is that she is a human shield for his incompetence.

“In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?”

Sir Keir responded with a defence of Labour’s record but no mention of the Chancellor’s position.

As the Chancellor left the Commons following the Prime Minister’s Questions session her sister Ellie Reeves took her hand in an apparent show of support.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

18 comments

Amir

She is just a patsy. I don't think she actually looks like she made any decisions.

Reply
hdavies15

Crying when she sees the prospects of a long career at the top of the pile turning distinctly off colour. She was grinning at the prospect of culling benefits ( and recipients) to balance her miserable budget only weeks ago.

Reply
Mab Meirion

Guilty as charged, Get rid of Uncle McSweeney, now let's see who rules that bucket of crabs...While Rome burns...

Reply
Fi yn unig

Badenoch, leader of the crash economy party, asking questions of anyone regarding government fiscal decisions is beyond insult. Her motoring mouth is talking her out of a job.

Reply
Erisian

As ever..."Deputy heads will roll!"

Reply
TheOtherJones

Well, the Tory fiscal rules her and Starmer have insisted upon has put them voluntarily into a fiscal straight jacket. Reeves has wedded herself to the Tory fiscal ideology that the public are fatigued from over the last 16 years, popularity has nosedived as a result and he’s notoriously ruthless. What does she expect? Political careers nearly always end in tears.

Reply
Peter J

I'm curious to know what fiscal rules should they work with? Servicing debt is now almost 10% of all government spending. It'll be closer to 15% by the end of the parliament

Reply
Lord Custard

They could start by refusing to pay Interest on QE money. The ECB doesn't do this. £30 billion a year interest saved.

Reply

In reply to Lord Custard

Peter J

You do read some nonsense on here! The ECB still pays interest on the vast majority of reserves. I think it's maybe 1 or 2%. And you do know that high interest rates mean the ECB is now making net losses due to paying more on reserves than it earns on the bonds. And guess who pays those losses?! I think that plan has been suspended for over a year. In any case, this would not be changing the fiscal rules.

Reply

In reply to Peter J

Drew Anderson

What Lord Custard is referring to are Central Bank Reserve Accounts; these hold virtual money, created by the government, to provide liquidity in the banking sector, in the wake of the Great Financial Crisis. Your post suggests you are aware of this, but I include it for the benefit of those who aren't. Liquidity was the first casualty of the crash; the banks simply stopped trading with each other, while they figured out their levels of exposure. So, the government created £1tn (to emphasise, a trillion) of funds to kick start interbank trade. Technically it is debt, but the government borrowed it from itself, so there's no need to pay base rate on it; but our government does, presumably because its a jolly wheeze for transferring public money into private hands. Japan, for instance, pays 0.1% on their reserve funds; more than enough to pay for the management of them. £30bn is an overstatement, because the interest payments generate taxable revenues; that need to be factored, but savings of £20bn are not unrealistic. This is not a new idea from Reform, Richard Tice merely brought it into focus recently. I have been aware of the call to emulate Japan's approach for several years. Even if we followed the ECB, "1 or 2%" is a lot lower than base rate.

Reply
Peter J

I can't help but think the real winners in all this are Reform. Many will be thinking, it was chaotic under the tories, it's chaotic now under labour, so how bad can reform be? In my view, the situation is far from ideal, and few people could do a significantly better job when there's a 120 bn black hole in public finances, which is not far off what it was when Osbourne became chancellor. Really, labour should have implemented big tax rises last year when they came to power. The trouble is, if they had said they'll do this prior to the election, they almost certainty wouldn't have got into power.

Reply
Alwyn

Believe me - it WOULD be even worse under Reform. Remember they’re led by the fool who started the rot in UK’s position by lying in his teeth about Brexit

Reply
Peter J

I'm not disagreeing with you! The problem is - the more the sensibles look chaotic or out of control, or in this case - unable to do things, the more people will think 'why not reform?'

Reply
Mab Meirion

Never get in a lifeboat with that man...

Reply
Alwyn

on the contrary, the lifeboat he’s in will e the safest place to be

Reply
Mab Meirion

Um, you have share resources to survive no matter how well found is the hull, this concept may be alien to Clark of the Cinque Ports...

Reply
Len Shelby

Like a song by Smokey Robinson.

Reply
Frank

Rachel Reeves crying!!!! Are we suppose to feel sorry for her? I am sure thousands of people cried when she robbed them of their winter heating allowance and the threat of losing their disability allowances.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to TheOtherJones Cancel

Well, the Tory fiscal rules her and Starmer have insisted upon has put them voluntarily into a fiscal straight jacket. Reeves has wedded herself to the Tory fiscal ideology that the public are fatigued from over the last 16 years, popula...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.