Pro-Letby campaigners seek to discredit Welsh doctor whose evidence convicted her

Great article. Yes Lucy is definitely innocent.The science clearly shows this now.

You should read this: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/21/world/europe/lucy-letby-nurse-murder.html&ved=2ahUKEwj289bkweWNAxWpQEEAHfzfCPoQxfQBKAB6BAgNEAE&usg=AOvVaw17daOBvx4km8JWJZzyPBm2 When the person whose research was used, as basis for many of the convictions, says his findings weren't applied correctly, maybe its time to pause and look again.

It also throws up the leading experts on neonatology in the world who have looked at all the cases and who have used their considerable expertise to determine the cause of death and in not one case was it murder, it was all natural along with medical mistakes made by doctors not by Lucy Letby. We also have other leading doctors who have come out in support of her and we have an ex-Supreme Court Judge who is of the view that the conviction is unsafe, as well as leading lawyers. Lets not forget either that an Appeal Court Judge actually wrote to the Trial Judge during the case of Lucy Letby to draw his attention to his comments about Dr Evans in another case, comments which were damning about his abilities as an expert witness.

Dr Evans won’t be the first senior paediatrician to be discredited in a controversial court case. There is a tightrope to walk between experience and obsolescence when giving an opinion and at his stage of retirement he is increasingly looking on the wrong side of it. It is a problem with the English legal system that not enough weight is given to the proper consideration of evidence. The confrontational mechanism of the courts is theatrical and cannot cope with complex specialist evidence. It is increasingly looking as if Lucy Letby is innocent by the legal test of beyond reasonable doubt.

The prosecution did not prove the case adequately but it is the nature of the jury system that it will convict because of the severity of the charges. The analysis provided by the international panel was of a quality and superiority which far outweighs that of Dr Evans. It is very important to get this right or no one will want to work in critical care because if the risk of being accused of causing a death in a patient dying of natural causes.

The world's leading experts on neonatology convened a specialist panel to look at the scientific evidence and they found that nothing showed murder and that all deaths were natural causes. Clearly you either haven't looked at the evidence base or you are just close minded about this. I'm sure that you are also aware that leading Statisticians are of the view that the statistical evidence against her was an absolute joke and that the Police commissioned an actual expert in statistics to look at their statistical claims, she told them very quickly that their statistical methodology was wrong and that their data would be wrong, they then got her to sign an NDA and paid her off - it appears that they didn't inform the defence of this development. If you believe that the world's leading experts in the field are producing 'quasi scientific' data then that says much more about your understanding of science than it does about them. Are you, by any chance, a friend or an associate of Dr Evans and feel that you have to try to rubbish experts in order to defend his role in this prosecution?

That’s the point - cursory trawl, The evidence provided by the international panel is of a quality which far outweighs Dr Evans. The current state is that Lucy Letby has not yet been proved beyond reasonable doubt to have committed the crimes for which she was convicted.

I have been involved in Miscarriages of Justice for 26 years and Lucy is definitely innocent. as for Dewi Evans has already been discredited by a high court judge in another case he was involved in stating the he was not an honest expert and sided with the police he is a charlatan and has been further discredited by the 15 leading experts in the world who have come forward and said no murders were committed. This is new evidence that has not been before the court yet and when this evidence does it will clear Lucys Name. watch this space. This article mentions nothing about the new evidence or the fact that Dewi Evans has already in my view been discredited. Not happy with this article it smells of bias in favour of Dewi Evans.

Dewi Evans has already been discredited

Harold Shipman I "cannot comment on" as I have done no research. Other cranks yes there is good evience that vaccines have saved many lives which I am grateful for. (I guess there may be a case for caution re vaccines as there have been tradegies and money. lots of, is involved so drug companies have been known to peddle drugs not fully tested or side affects not noted. But I guess in recent days we have a lot of throwing out the baby with the bathwater situation re this anti vaxers but not followed at all. Flat earthers is a very odd case indeed as daily evidence is available for the earth globe etc. I had one friend infected with the crazy belief. Made me think about the underground Elizabeth line and I looked it up and the engineers had to allow for the earth's curvature re it changing height and depth etc. Now as to court cases and in particular Lucy Letby was easy to access the evidence. Even starting with baby A. Lucy newly on duty that night sdoing handover etc. A team of doctors and nurses all around and nothing from the proecution reenactment how anyone could possibly unseen carry out the actions put forward. A non starter as evidence.

Brilliant summary from Lucy’s wonderful lifelong friend! It is truly terrifying how genuine caring nurses can be wrongly accused. I was at the Liverpool demo in March and afterwards met up with a nurse who has become really scared in her daily practice of false accusations. This event of Nineteen Nurses was really enlightening, I am so glad I could make it

The problem was not so much Dr Evans, but rather a whole cluster of larger errors & circumstances eg his inclusion on the NCA database in the first place. A decent defence should have been able to make mincemeat out of the man, his status and his weak logic.