Thu, 3rd September Cardiff 18°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

Petition calling for referendum on Senedd reforms reaches almost 10k signatures

By Emily Price
Senedd Members in the Chamber - Image: Senedd Cymru

Emily Price

A Senedd petition calling for a referendum on plans to increase the Welsh Parliament by a third has reached almost 10,000 signatures.

Started by Nanette Davies, the petition titled 'We feel there should be a Referendum before the Senedd has a further 36 members' will continue gathering signatures until April 2025.

The petition states: " The Senedd costs a lot of money. Local Authorities are struggling with funding. We don’t feel that more money should be wasted on Members of the Senedd when we need improvements to NHS , Education and Social Care.

"Local Authorities are so cash strapped that they cannot deliver services. Waiting lists are endless. Elderly are bed blocking hospitals because of the lack of care homes and carers."

It was shared on X, formerly Twitter, by Welsh Conservative MS Tom Giffard who pointed out it is only a few signatures short 10,000.

If it surpasses this target the Petitions Committee will consider asking for a debate in the Chamber – although this is not guaranteed.

[mid-content-banner]

Power

Controversial plans agreed by the Welsh Government and Plaid Cymru to increase the number of MSs from 60 to 96 and change how they are elected got final approval earlier this year.

The landmark legislation will see the maximum number of Welsh Government ministers increase to 17 – not including the first minister and counsel general – with powers to further increase to 19.

Supporters of the plan say the Senedd's expansion will strengthen opposition members’ ability to hold Welsh ministers accountable for their decisions.

The Welsh Government’s former chief legal adviser, Mick Antoniw said Welsh democracy has grown, developed and matured over the past 25 years.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

'Short changed'

The Senedd currently only has around 42 backbenchers available to both scrutinise the government and legislate.

It’s argued that this number of MSs cannot fill all the committee seats needed to deliver a properly functioning parliament.

Plaid Cymru Leader Rhun ap Iorwerth says the reforms will ensure "that the people of Wales are no longer democratically short-changed".

The Welsh Government says increasing the number of MSs could cost up to £17.5m in a typical year - around 0.07% of the £24bn total annual Welsh budget.

The Senedd Commission has also requested an extra £12m to fund the infrastructure changes needed to make room for more MSs.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

Extra cash

The money will be used to pay for more office space and more seats in the Chamber as well as for things like security, lighting, heating and ICT infrastructure.

The Welsh Conservatives oppose the reforms saying any extra cash should be spent on more doctors, dentists, nurses and teachers.

Shadow Education Minister Tom Giffard said: "If Labour and Plaid think their £120m plans for more politicians in Cardiff Bay are so popular, they should prove it in a referendum.

"Speaking with so many people across Wales, it’s clear the money would be better spent on more doctors, teachers and dentists - not more politicians!

"The Welsh Conservatives have been the only party in Cardiff Bay to stand up against these plans, and if the Senedd petition reaches 10,000 signatures I look forward to re-stating our case once again."

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

33 comments

Annibendod

Did they call for a referendum to decide on Wales losing 8 MP's? No? Where were they then? There's no constitutional change here. Same old anti-Wales tub thumpers thumping away.

Reply
Billy James

And replacing 8 MP's on a £100,000+ and expenses and office staff costs and replacing with 36 MS's on £100,000+ and office costs/staff is fair then?

Reply
Ernie The Smallholder

The full plan is for the Cymru Senedd to be more accountable when it takes on more powers from the UK that affect Cymru. For example: The accountability for the generated from tidal and wind power systems from our coastlines to which is at present taken by the centralised UK regime. The UK is a centralised monopolist regime with no local input from the nations nor the English regions: This must be change, the 2nd house must contain only elected representations from the nations and regions. Otherwise abolish the UK as it is not fit for purpose. A better idea is for Cymru to have 2 chambers of the Senedd with the 2nd chamber made up of representatives of the local councils or regional governments (say no more than 30 members) which can veto aspects of legislations they are passed from the 1st chamber. There is no case for the change of voting system to a closed list system which will remove the relationship of the electorate and individual candidates. WE MUST HAVE THE SINGLE TRANSFERABLE VOTE.

Reply
Annibendod

Check your figures. Also Wales has fewer MS's than NI has MLA's. Is that "fair"? Just a bunch of anti Wales tubthumpers thumping away. Blame the Tories 14 years of austerity if you wonder why our services are cash strapped.

Reply
Steve Thomas

Pretty much all tories

Reply
Tomi Benn

Where are the Welsh petitioners for getting rid of the House of Lords? We need more scrutiny of the Senedd and the increase in numbers of members is vitally important.

Reply
Jeff

We are getting a referendum in 2026.

Reply
Ernie The Smallholder

Don't waste your vote on parties that will keep Cymru within the centralised UK structure with heavy top-down control. Vote for an independent Cymru with full potential from its natural assets. Centralisation has failed. Cymru is a nation of potential; We must get it right.

Reply
John Ellis

'We don’t feel that more money should be wasted on Members of the Senedd when we need improvements to NHS , Education and Social Care.' I don't accept that it is a 'waste'. A functioning democracy comes at a cost, and it's a simple fact that the Senedd currently has, proportionate to Wales's population, a smaller number of elected members than is the case in respect of its counterparts in Scotland and Northern Ireland. One defect in the present situation which I haven't seen mentioned is the relatively small number of Labour 'back-benchers which are left once the first minister has formed her government. The late Frank Field - so independently minded a Labour MP at Westminster that he lasted less than a year when Blair briefly appointed him into government - is surely significant. In terms of a healthy democracy, a government is well served if it has critical friends on its own side alongside its political opponents in the Siambre. However, having made that defence I'm a deal less enthusiastic about electing the Senedd on a 'closed list' system.

Reply
Sean Thompson

I agree. Increasing the number of MSs would assist the democratic functioning of the Sennedd - but the closed list system being introduced is indefensible and as far as I can see supported only by Labour's party managers.

Reply
Dai Ponty

Again look at Scotland bigger population but with more members of Scotish Parliament to show for it Northern Ireland a Million and a half less population than Wales but with more members than Wales in their Parliament and now anti Welsh banging the table no more members of Welsh Parliament get lost better still get out of the DISUNITED KINGDOM they always put us down hold us back and rob us short change us

Reply
Cyrano Jones

Clearly there won't be a referendum because it's obvious what the result would be. Winning a referendum on any proposal to create more politicians would be an uphill task even if the plans were well thought out; let alone the complete dog's breakfast the current administration has come up with, which even many supporters of expansion are deeply dissatisfied with.

Reply
Padi Phillips

Let's get the expansion and then demand reform so that the system becomes STV. That's a similar logic that those of us who campaigned for devolution made, and is, I think, what was behind the very narrow victory of the Yes campaign. In 1997 we were offered nothing that was any different to that which was on offer in 1979, basically an all-Cymru talking shop, but the crucial difference was that it was sold as a starting point, as it's architect, Ron Davies was at pains to point out, 'Devolution is a process, not an event'. It's very sad in a way that he didn't stick around, as I'm pretty sure that devolution would have progressed far beyond what we have now had he done so.

Reply
Sean Thompson

Replacing a bunch of unelected party placemen, bishops and a selection of the Great and the Good whose faces fit (and who all get 300 plus pounds a day 'attendance allowance') with elected representatives who we can get rid of seem to me to be a democratic necessity.

Reply
hdavies15

plus all those subsidised lunches and all sorts of expenses they dream up while snoozing on those comfy benches.

Reply
Ernie The Smallholder

Stop our wealth going into UK coffers. ....and spent on London vanity projects.

Reply
Rob Pountney

So, according to the economic illiterate who wrote this petition the price of 36 MS's is equivalent to the thousands of millions required to adequately fund local authorities, fix the NHS, fix schools, and fix social care... Basically it is the same old story, people on the right and people who dispute Wales' right to exist, always seem to come up with the same irrational argument, it goes something like this... "why are you giving me this apple I didn't want, for that price you could have given me a Ferrari"... Also, just for the record, there has never been a case in the Senedd where the largest opposition party has enough members to shadow all the ministers in the government, never mind insufficient members in total to ensure proper scrutiny, if people are genuinely concerned about how money is spent in Wales (and is capable of counting accurately) then they should be welcoming this move (despite the badly designed process)...

Reply
Padi Phillips

I think the economic illiteracy is among the least of their issues. They seem to be somewhat intellectually challenged too.

Reply
Old Curmudgeon

You can call the electorate whatever you want but to get change you need the them on your side. Surely one of the first things is to get the majority of voters to feel that their vote matters and change is possible. Economic illiteracy can be improved by education assuming that someone is intellectually challenged because they don’t think as you do is not doing your cause any favours.

Reply
Bilbo

The map is revealing. Seems most support is from wealthy migrant retirees who swapped their semi in Surrey for a detached VoG mansion, and the economic migrant workers priced out of North West England.

Reply
Y Cymro

Again the Welsh Tories with the aid of their English masters machine in London are trying to demote the Senedd by interfering with Welsh democracy using social media as a vehicle as done with the 20 mph default speed limit blanket ban falsehood to whip up hostility. Just look at recent remarks by Andrew RT Davies who suggested a referendum on abolishing the Senedd. This from a man who said to Remainers how we should respect the Brexit vote, the very same hypocrite & Tory party who have been fighting lost devolution battles since 1997. It's do as we say not as we do. It seems the Welsh Tories love demanding referendums for Wales but fail to call for one when it comes to matters concerning England and its Monarch King Charles, who I might add recently had a £49m Sovereign Grant increase from £83m to £132m, this during the height of austerity too. Who can recall when Conservative PM Margret Thatcher sold thousands of council houses in the 1980s. The money accrued was sent not to local authorities to invest in new stock but returned to the English Treasury. No referendum was called. What about the selloff of Royal Mail. There was no public referendum when the then Conservative government undersold it losing tens of millions? The Welsh Conservatives argue cost and how there's no need for any expansion of the Senedd, but fail to mention the voting public were aware of Welsh Labour's policy of increasing the Senedd from 60 to 96 as it was part of their manifesto in 2021. In fact, it went out for public consultation in 2018, not forgetting Welsh Labour won the Senedd election which in a way was a defacto referendum because if the voting public was hostile to the idea would have elected a Conservative Welsh Government. They didn't.

Reply
Padi Phillips

£17.5 million is not a huge increase. As stated in the article the increased expenditure amount to 0.07% of the annual budget. This is peanuts. If people are going hungry, that's the result of Westminster's mismanagement, not the Welsh Government's or the Senedd's responsibility. The Senedd needs to have an increased number of members because of the increased responsibilities placed upon it to scrutinise legislation, which involves far more than it did at the inception of devolved government under the Welsh Assembly. Someone may well have started a petition, but that in and of itself does not guarantee that there will be a referendum, and in any case even should a referendum be held the result wouldn't be legally binding. In any case a referendum wouldn't be a good choice in a situation that is binary in nature. In any case, as someone else pointed out in a comment on this thread, there will be a referendum in 2026 anyway: The Senedd Elections. Rather than rallying to the Tories anti-devolution trumpet calls, those genuinely concerned about the state of public services should maybe shift focus and throw their weight behind campaigns to get the Westminster government to start taxing the real culprits in all of this, the obscenely rich. Those who are aware of current affairs will know that an open letter has been sent to the Labour leader demanding that the rich are made to pay their share. The letter was signed by every Plaid Cymru MP, Jeremy Corbyn MP and many others. Maybe starting a petition to demand that the Welsh Government grow a backbone and demand a needs based financial settlement in place of the current Barnett Formula that leaves us short changed would have been a more positive action rather than the current petition which appears to be little more than a thinly disguised attack on the whole idea of devolution.

Reply
Dr John Ball

If Nanette (who?) is so deeply concerned about public sector spending, perhaps she might question the need for 22 Local Authorities? No, cheap anti-Welsh politics.

Reply
hdavies15

22 local authorities and most of them led by brown nosed Unionist sycophants, people who can always find funds for pet projects but confronting real challenges is beyond them.

Reply
Bilbo

How many do you propose? Local government is supposed to be local so if you merge too many you may as well run everything from Cardiff Bay.

Reply
Rob Pountney

8... Actually the 1973-1997 setup wasn't bad, 8 regions and around 120 local councils, now we have 22 and around 730 community councils (that no one knows for sure exactly how many just shows what a mess it is)... Should also be elected on full open list PR...

Reply
Rob

Was expansion of the Senedd put into the Labour and Plaid Cymru manifestos in 2021? Don't we get another vote in 2026, where we can vote them out if we don't like them. Scottish Parliament - 129 MSPs Northern Ireland - 90 MLAs Yet again why is Wales the outlier?

Reply
Paul ap Gareth

Don't forget that the Senedd is only expanding because the 2011 referendum expanded its powers. More powers means more politicians. The Assembly had so few members by comparison to NI or Scotland, because it had far fewer powers.

Reply
Paul ap Gareth

Everyone is forgetting that these reforms are happening as a result of the 2011 referendum. Voters approved the Assembly getting full law making powers, creating the Senedd with more powers and now we need to staff it appropriately. Additionally, reforming the Senedd was a manifesto commitment at the last election. In just the same way that Westminster cancelled a reduction in the number of MPs because of Brexit workload, Wales needs more politicians to cope with the workload of full law making powers. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52036168

Reply
Welsh Patriot

Won't do any good, 1/2 Million voted against the blanket 20mph zones, and the WG could not care less.

Reply
Rob

Well vote them out next time

Reply
FrankC

You do know the difference between voting and a petition don't you?🙄

Reply
Bilbo

How many times did you sign?

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Bilbo Cancel

How many do you propose? Local government is supposed to be local so if you merge too many you may as well run everything from Cardiff Bay.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.