Sat, 25th July Cardiff 23°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

Major retailer confirms closure of flagship city centre store

By Amelia Jones
Marks and Spencer, Oxford Street | Image: Google Maps

Amelia Jones

A major high street retailer has confirmed it will close one of its flagship city centre stores later this year.

Marks and Spencer (M&S) said the proposed closure forms part of a wider strategy to reshape its store estate, with staff informed of the plans this week.

Its Oxford Street store in Swansea, which has been open since 1957 and operates as a full-line branch with a café, is expected to shut in late 2026, subject to consultation.

Writing to council leader Rob Steward, M&S Head of External Affairs Adam Hawksbee said age decision forms part of a UK-wide programme aimed at ensuring stores are in the “right space to deliver an excellent shopping experience”.

The retailer said the move follows a sustained decline in sales over the past 10 years, leaving the store no longer viable in its current format.

In a statement, the company said the programme is designed to ensure it has "the right stores, in the right place, with right space."

The retailer acknowledged the impact on staff and shoppers, saying the proposal will be disappointing for some. The business added that it will prioritise supporting employees, including "exploring alternative roles at nearby stores wherever possible."

'Cannot support this decision'

Responding to the letter on social media, council leader Rob Stewart said: "Hugely disappointing decision by Mark & Spencer to begin consulting on the closure of the store in Swansea Oxford Street.

"Our thoughts are with the staff.

"We had successfully worked behind the scenes engaging with M&S senior decision makers to avoid this store being included in the previous rounds of M&S closures and have been encouraging M&S to invest.

"...While we don’t agree and cannot support this decision, we will to do all we can to retain the M&S brand in the city and therefore do what we can to help M&S find an alternative store location in Swansea.

"M&S have been clear this is not a Swansea decision but a strategic one. It is about the new business model that company are adopting.

"M&S are clear they recognise the significant regeneration that is underway, and they are keen to find an alternative location in Swansea."

Extremely disappointing 

A Swansea Council spokesperson added: "The news from M&S is extremely disappointing for staff and shoppers.

“M&S confirmed late yesterday afternoon that the current building and location is no longer suitable for their business model which has already seen 90 historic locations close and investment in new store locations

“We’ve spent several years actively working to prevent M&S closing at this location. We will continue working in the coming weeks and months to seek a new site that meets their needs and keeps M&S in the city.

“M&S recognises the significant Swansea regeneration which is under way and they stated they remain committed to exploring options for an alternative store location in the city.

“M&S has been very clear that this decision is not a reflection on Swansea as a retail destination, but forms part of its wider national strategy. We remain determined to ensure the city centre continues to grow and attract major brands.

“Our immediate thoughts are with the M&S staff, and we are committed to supporting them through this period of uncertainty.”

Despite the closure, efforts are ongoing to secure a new site and ensure the retailer remains part of the city’s future.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

8 comments

Agnes Nutter

M&S is wildly overrated. Sorry for those who will lose their jobs, but honestly, otherwise? Meh!

Reply
Fanny Hill

Could have moved to the old Debenhams store.

Reply
brendan

there's meant to ne 3 units moving in there but the shopping centre is being cagey about who

Reply
Quinn

Presumably cost-cutting needed to steady the ship after the great M&S hack. The c-suite thought they could save money by outsourcing their IT to the cheapest offshore provider and it nearly bankrupted them.

Reply
iona4

As the same thing happened to the one in Neath the food and Swansea's cafe was good if they look at the other stores the money input is lower. Drama.

Reply
Jeff

How is Shein doing? Lots of people using that? Amazon? Yeah. Consequences.

Reply
Brian

Can someone please do a correlation analysis comparing on line sales via, Shein, Amazon, etc with the decline of our high streets. I'd think the correlation is very strong but it would be good to see the data. We export our hard earned cash to Geoff Besoz etc is that what we really want to be doing?

Reply
Zarah Daniel

Nobody wants to make Jeff Bezos any richer than he already is...... However, we don't want to make ourselves any poorer either. Decades of "Pro-business" government means that executive wages are up, up, up, and workers wages are so low that people who work full-time and take all the overtime possible are still eligible for tax-credits. This is the tax payer making up the gap where business owners aren't paying decent wages. They all claim it's impossible. They say businesses will close down if they have to pay workers fairly - they said the exact same lies for decades before the first minimum wage came in. When Labour called their bluff, studies were done after a year to find all the jobs lost and businesses closed because of the minimum wage......and (because they wanted to prove it was terrible) by god they looked hard!!!!......but didn't find ANY. There is a way of managing the system. You pick a number (say...40 for example ) and then make it Law that the annual wage of the highest earner in the company cannot be more than 40 X more than the lowest earner employed by the company - even if they are employed via a third party contractor (like a cleaning company) Thus, if the cleaners earn £20,000 a year the CEO cannot earn more than £800,000 (a king's ransom for you and me but peanuts to people like them). In addition, bonuses cannot be more than 5% of annual income and must be tied to the achievement of specific, measurable targets that are relevant to the improvement of the business and can be judged by a government ombudsman if required. Of course, if that CEO wants to earn more money he is welcome to - he's just got to make sure that everyone else is earning well too!! Obviously, such a number is suitable for a huge business like M&S but wouldn't be applicable to smaller businesses. The number would have to be scaled to relative business size and what the CEO of a smaller group of businesses might reasonably earn and pay their staff. It's supposed to be that "A rising tide lifts all boats" but the way our economy has always supported the wealthy and put business OWNERS first , because they promise that they will provide for their workers...............and then make the taxpayers subsidise the poor wages they pay...... It's more like: "A rising tide lifts some boats, many are stuck on mudbanks, and those too poor to even have a boat are left to drown until the government finally throws them a raft (which it might take away at any moment), as long as they've had the energy to keep their heads above water long enough or just didn't give up because the swim was too exhausting."

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Brian Cancel

Can someone please do a correlation analysis comparing on line sales via, Shein, Amazon, etc with the decline of our high streets. I'd think the correlation is very strong but it would be good to see the data. We export our hard earned cash...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.