Fri, 28th August Cardiff 18°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

‘Extreme anxiety, anger and distress over fuel poverty’ - older people’s commissioner for Wales

By Mark Mansfield
Rhian Bowen-Davies, older people’s commissioner for Wales

Chris Haines, ICNN Senedd reporter

The older people’s commissioner for Wales called for funding to alleviate the impact of winter fuel payment cuts amid “extreme anxiety, anger and distress” over fuel poverty.

Rhian Bowen-Davies urged the Welsh Government to set up a distinct fund for older people to mitigate against Westminster’s decision to introduce means-testing.

Ms Bowen-Davies, who was appointed for a seven-year term in July, warned the withdrawal of universal winter fuel payments will have a significant impact.

She told the Senedd’s equality committee: “I felt that this decision was the wrong decision… it should have been reversed, I think that opportunity has been missed with the budget.”

She added: “I felt the approach was wrong in terms of it being rushed through and I also felt the timeline was unrealistic for people to apply.”

[mid-content-banner]

‘Inappropriate’

The new older people’s commissioner, who is a former police officer, welcomed the Unite union taking legal action to try to overturn the cuts.

Giving evidence to an inquiry on fuel poverty, she told the committee an estimated 50,000 households in Wales are eligible for pension credit but do not claim the extra income.

Warning the eligibility criteria for the Welsh Government’s discretionary assistance fund is too narrow, she urged ministers to follow the example of Northern Ireland and Scotland.

Ms Bowen-Davies pointed to a £100 payment for all older people in Northern Ireland this winter, with no application needed and a similar scheme set to follow in Scotland.

She raised concerns about the Welsh Government’s refreshed Warm Homes programme, with a lack of boiler repairs leaving some households without heating and hot water.

[taboola-banner]

‘Huge increase’

She told the committee the boiler replacement scheme has since opened but only until March as she called for a better balance between warm homes and decarbonisation.

Age Cymru highlighted a “huge” 1,144% increase in calls to its advice line about winter fuel payments and a 99% rise for pension credit enquiries from 2023 to 2024.

Ceri Cryer, Age Cymru’s policy adviser, raised similar concerns about the equality impact of an emphasis on heat pumps that are inappropriate for some homes.

She warned the upfront and ongoing costs of heat pumps are beyond many people’s means.

Rebecca Hill, a senior public health specialist at Public Health Wales, expressed concerns about a trend towards older people skipping meals and cutting back on heating.

[lower-mid-content-banner]

‘Extreme anxiety’

Dr Hill said: “We know that colder homes are linked to heart and lung conditions, infectious respiratory illnesses such as flu. We also see higher rates of deaths in cold months … and we know a majority of those deaths accrue amongst our oldest population.”

She also pointed to evidence that older people in colder homes have higher blood pressure and cholesterol, problems with sleep and reduced physical performance, leading to falls.

Ms Bowen-Davies warned older people are experiencing “extreme anxiety, anger and distress" as she called for interim targets in the Welsh Government’s fuel poverty plan.

Raising concerns about the disproportionate impact of the cost-of-living crisis, she pointed out that many older people have to budget for soaring bills from a fixed income.

She told the meeting on December 9: “What older people are saying to me is they are having to make really difficult decisions in terms of how much they are eating on a daily basis and the individual rooms that they are heating.”

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

9 comments

Llyn

Politically perhaps it might be wise for the Labour Welsh Gov to provide extra help for pensioners, but for the devolved services such as the NHS, education, social care and the arts to have tens of millions of taken away from them so that all pensioners including millionaires and the 50,000 households in Wales eligible for pension credit from the UK Gov who don't bother to claim it to be given a winter uplift by the Welsh Gov. That would be financial insanity.

Reply
Barry Pandy

Let's not forget that winter fuel payments were introduced in 1997 by Blair/Brown to alleviate pensioner poverty after 18 years of Thatcher/Major cutting the state pension (in real terms). Let's also not forget that the pension triple lock was introduced in 2010 (and is still in place) by the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition to increase the state pension (in real terms) - arguably the only thing the Tories got right. The result of 14 years of the triple lock is that most pensioners have been lifted out of poverty and no longer need the winter fuel payment. Those who still need it will still get it. I suspect that the 'extreme anxiety, anger and distress' is more to do with greedy grasping pensioners no longer getting a state freebie than with any genuine concern over being able to pay for heating. Personally, I would love a triple lock on my pay, but hey-ho.

Reply
hdavies15

You were doing well there until your emotive traits got the better of you and you had to get "greedy and grasping" into your piece. Pause and consider that the State Pension is still well below the earnings of a person on adult minimum wage doing say 35 hours a week. Or are you really one of those people who thinks everyone should be made to rely on a highly speculative private pension provision built on insurance company fund contributions ? Fuel poverty is a pain shared by people of all age groups where there are income deficiencies. The real "wrong" is caused by passive governments who are perfectly relaxed about letting the big utility companies gouge inflated prices from customers to pay inflated dividends, executive salaries, or transfer surpluses overseas to parent groups. They could impose price controls on the racketeers who run energy markets and pensioners and others who have a hard time would be quite content to dump WFA and a host of other benefits that don't plug gaps in weekly budgets.

Reply
Barry Pandy

'greedy and grasping' is actually spot on in a lot of cases. A friend of mine works as a benefits advisor. He deals with queries from very wealthy pensionsers who don't qualify for means tested benefits precisely becuase they are too wealthy. You wouldn't believe the number of times he's heard a pensioner say something along the lines of 'can't you pretend that you didn't hear about my £150,000 in savings, my rental properties bringing in £4,000 per month and my three fat private pensions (which were of course final salary pensions before us baby boomers pulled up the ladder behind us) just so that I can qualify for a free TV licence and winter fuel payments' or 'how much of my £180,000 in savings will I have to spend to qualify for pension credits so that I can get a free TV licence (which I can easily afford anyway but I'm too greedy and grasping to want to pay for one)'. Like I said, those who still need winter fuel payments will still get them, the rest don't need them. Oh and where was all of the confected rage and anger at the introduction of the two-child benefit cap which has done so much to exacerbate child poverty? Where was the 'extreme anxiety, anger and distress’ when Labour refused to withdraw it? Where were all the pensioners then? Pensioners - particularly the baby boomer generation - are greedy, grasping and selfish and don't give a damn about anyone except themselves - so long as their property prices continue upward (pricing working age people out of the market in the process) and so long as they keep getting their triple lock payments and winter (or should that be whinger) fuel payments they couldn't care less about the rest of us. They are some of the biggest beneficiaries of Attlee's welfare state but seem pretty determined to destroy it by consistently voting Conservative (and more lately Reform) - so long, of course, as the destruction of the welfare state doesn't apply to them. The withdrawal of the winter fuel payments is really a non-issue that has been blown out of all proportion so that the right-wing press and Reform UK (neither of whom could really give a damn about pensioner poverty) have a big stick with which to beat the Labour government. Just be careful what you wish for. I'm not big fan of Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves but they do ask a very pertinent question: how else are we supposed to fund the NHS? Tax increases? The average (thicko) British voter wouldn't accept it as they are too stupid to work out that you can't have Scandinavian levels of public spending with Malaysian levels of taxation. Sometimes I think: to hell with it, give the average thicko British voter what they want and dismantle and privatise the NHS and make us all rely on health insurance instead. They might (although I doubt it) then realise just how stupid they were. But hey! We've got to cut taxes haven't we?

Reply
HarrisR

"Pensioners lifted out of poverty and will no longer need the Winter Fuel payment" sic. Meanwhile... "She (Liz Kendall) admitted that the restrictions to the Winter Fuel Payment are forecast to push 50,000 more pensioners into relative poverty this winter and between 50,000 and 100,000 in subsequent years" Government letter to DWP Select Committee. And that's from one of the lowest public pension base in Europe. The UK is the fifth or sixth largest economy in the world. This obscene piece of political posturing by the Starmer/Reeves axis of inadequacy is supposed to save £1.6bn. it won't and that is on its very own logic. Meanwhile "we" have cheerfully gifted £12.7bn to Ukraine and promised a further £3bn a year "for as long as it takes". I expect the much trumpeted"run on the pound" is coming soon. After all, It's only fair.

Reply
Barry Pandy

OK, so how would you fund whinger fuel payments? Would you make them a universal benefit thus giving a freebie to pensioners who don't need them? How would you fund the NHS? Would you end the two child benefit cap and, if so, how would you pay for it? If you answered 'higher taxes' to any of those questions you'd be wiped out at the next election. Why? Because the average British voter is stupid.

Reply

In reply to Barry Pandy

HarrisR

"Lord Sikka, (a former accountancy professor now in the Lords) also suggested that the Treasury could have taken in £4bn from just four of the largest law firms, “enough to cancel (the) two-child benefit cap (and the ) winter fuel payment cut”. Lord Sikka told The Independent there seemed to be “no political will” to change the situation." Understatement of the year. Everyone expected Labour (Rachel from Accounts) to do this as long overdue. But that is to forget who Rachel from Accounts and Keir from Group Packaging ACTUALLY WORK for. Others most certainly haven't. A one term government.

Reply

In reply to HarrisR

Barry Pandy

"Rachel from Accounts". So tell me, do you enjoy belittling women? Holding a woman to a far higher standard than you would ever do for a man, your comment is misogynistic to say the least

Reply

In reply to Barry Pandy

HarrisR

Her reputation (and ballooned CV) goes before her, including the raised eyebrow opinions of her previous colleagues. Her own custody of her Commons expenses card led to a forced repayment and rebuke. Her regulation "Big" book on women economists was largely written by her assistants and openly ridiculed by the FT for its widespread plagiarism - some 40 examples as I recall and most lifted from Wiki of all places, not even the primary or secondary texts. You wouldn't get away with that in a first year essay. Still, it was so "profound" that its now completely unread. Result. She's a total nonentity in a government rank with them and now visibly scheduled to be the SOON fall guy for Starmer. As Bevan said, you don't need to struggle to predict the future when you can just read the book. Her past goes before her as she's on her way out and no, that's not "misogyny" which against a Labour government rife with the stuff would be a laughable proposition. "Keir has a woman problem", and that's from his own side. Not long now then Rachel.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to hdavies15 Cancel

You were doing well there until your emotive traits got the better of you and you had to get "greedy and grasping" into your piece. Pause and consider that the State Pension is still well below the earnings of a person on adult minimum wag...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.