Fri, 28th August Cardiff 17°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

Extra cash for Wales’ railways ‘top priority’ for Welsh Secretary after HS2 row

By Mark Mansfield
Welsh Secretary Jo Stevens in the House of Commons

Wales’ rail settlement is “not good enough”, Jo Stevens has said, as she insisted she would fight for as much cash to fix the situation as possible.

The Welsh Secretary could not reveal how much Wales will get to invest in its trains, but said she was making representations to the Treasury for “sustainable funding”.

Ms Stevens’s appearance at the Commons’ Welsh Affairs Committee came after Eluned Morgan, the First Minister of Wales, told the BBC the UK Government had recognised Wales has been “hard done by” when it comes to rail.

Welsh politicians have complained that the country has lost out over the HS2 project, for which Wales received no additional money.[mid-content-banner]

[mid-content-banner]

Consequential funding

The high speed rail project is classified as an England and Wales project, meaning the latter country loses out on consequential funding, which Plaid Cymru has estimated would be worth around £4 billion.

By contrast, Scotland and Northern Ireland are receiving extra funding as a result of HS2.

Speaking at the Welsh Affairs Committee for the first time since taking up her role as Secretary of State, Ms Stevens said she wanted to be “perfectly frank” about Wales’ rail settlement.

“It’s not good enough, and that is a direct consequence I’m afraid of the last 14 years of underfunding by prior governments, and that is why I am determined to change that. I can’t change the past. I hope that that I can change the future,” she told MPs.

Ms Stevens said she had been working with the Welsh Government’s transport minister Ken Skates, and the Department for Transport in Westminster, and had “agreed a direction of travel” which she hoped would “deliver new rail investment for Wales”.

[taboola-banner]

Blueprint

Three key points had underpinned these discussions, she said – recognition that Wales had not received a fair share of funding in the past, that there is already a “really good blueprint” for which investments to prioritise, and that the UK and Welsh governments needed to work together.

A letter from Ms Stevens and Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander to the Welsh Government admitted “railways in Wales have seen low levels of enhancement spending in recent years, particularly in the context of major investments such as HS2”.

The UK Government will prioritise projects proposed by the Wales Rail Board, the letter said, including upgrading the railway in south-east Wales and building new stations between Cardiff and the Severn tunnel, as well as upgrades to the North Wales mainline and to connections between Wrexham and Liverpool in the north.

Speaking at the committee Ms Stevens stressed the Government “cannot fix this overnight”, adding: “It has gone on for a long time, and the legacy of under investment is going to take time to resolve, but I am clear, both governments are clear, that we have got to break this cycle of underinvestment that had been a political strategy.”

Rail infrastructure funding

When asked by Plaid Cymru’s Ben Lake (Ceredigion Preseli) if HS2 should be reclassified as an England-only infrastructure project, Ms Stevens signalled this was not an approach the Government would take.

“I want us to have a sustainable pot of rail infrastructure funding for Wales, and I think we need to stop deriving the future of railing Wales from HS2 alone,” she replied.

The Welsh Secretary could not give a timeline for when the funding would be set out, or how much it might be, as this will be subject to negotiation as part of the Government’s spending review later this year.

Ms Stevens insisted she was on the “side” of the Welsh travelling public, and added: “I just want the committee to be reassured that this is top on my shopping list for the spending review.”

Welsh First minister Baroness Morgan had earlier said she hopes the amount on offer will be “significant”.

“For the first time they’re recognising ‘you’ve been hard done by’,” she said of the UK Government.

Plaid’s Llyr Gruffydd MS argued the First Minister had misrepresented the letter she had received from UK ministers.

“If Labour were serious about giving Wales fair play, then they would give us the full £4 billion we are owed, just as they said they would,” the Senedd member added.

But a Labour source said: “We recognise that Wales has suffered chronic underinvestment under successive Conservative governments, including through HS2. We cannot fix that inherited injustice.

“But we can and will fight for a funded pipeline of future rail projects across Wales for the first time in decades.”

Scraps

Welsh Conservative Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Transport and Infrastructure, Peter Fox said:“Before the election, the Welsh Labour Government was vocal in calling for fair HS2 consequentials to come to Wales. Yet now, with a Labour Government in Westminster, the First Minister seems all too willing to accept whatever scraps her counterparts in London throw our way.

“Jo Stevens, when she was Shadow Secretary of State for Wales, had called for billions of pounds to come to Wales. Now she is in Government, she remains tight lipped.

“We were promised two governments working in partnership to deliver what is best for Wales. Instead, we’ve had broken promise after broken promise. The Welsh Conservatives have consistently called for fair HS2 funding to develop a modern, sustainable rail network that drives economic growth for all of Wales.”

Welsh Liberal Democrat Westminster Spokesperson David Chadwick MP said:“More than warm words are needed to fix Welsh railways.

“This statement doesn’t commit to any specific extra funding and doesn’t commit to the full devolution of our railways, which is what is needed to stop scandals like that around HS2 consequential funding from happening again.

“The letter also doesn’t mention Mid or West Wales at all. Rural areas are too often neglected by Labour. While billions of pounds are being spent on the South Wales Metro, rail services in rural parts of Wales like the Heart of Wales Line and Cambrian Line are being cut.

“The Welsh Liberal Democrats will continue to fight for Wales to receive the funding it deserves for rail, including HS2 consequentials in full.”

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

10 comments

Arthur

I dream of a North-South connection, so that it is not necessary (as it is now), to travel across the border to England and back again. I'm not an engineer but imagine a line connecting Swansea, with Aberystwyth and Bangor.

Reply
Bob

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-68003542 A third less than upgrading the Piccadilly Line.

Reply
John

From an outside point of view (as I live abroad) I've noticed how polar the debate on HS2 consequentials are. Obviously the project won't cost 100 billion, as plaid claim. In addition HS2 is a 20 year project so those consequentials are divided by 20 in terms of annual loss to the Welsh settlement budget. Plus devolved railway infrastructure isn't just free HS2 money, you also have to pay to maintain the infrastructure, which we don't at the moment. Having visited Scotland recently (which has HS2 consequentials due to devolution), the trains aren't amazingly all on time, or new, or they're building new lines. Interestingly, if just Wales got a funding uplift, Scotland will get 8% if that in increased funding as well?! I'm guessing Westminster doesn't care, but it'll be it would be interesting to see an accurate and non partisan figure on how much Wales has actually lost out due to HS2.

Reply
Drew Anderson

£100 million isn't too fanciful given recent updates on the projected costs: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/17/cost-of-hs2-estimate-euston&ved=2ahUKEwi8oYOLs_iKAxV1YEEAHWIDGOkQFnoECDYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1Uqe1hMD780_jGDPcCG283 As far as trains in Scotland are concerned, they're not all under the control of Scotrail, abd by extension the Scottish Government. The crossborder mainline services are run by other companies. Whilst not technically new lines they have been reinstating old ones, where the tracks had been lifted. The Waverley line from Edinburgh to the Borders. A 3rd connection to Glasgow from Edinburgh, by extending the Edinburgh to Bathgate line, through Airdrie and on to Glasgow. A short spur off the Fife circular route to Levenmouth has just reopened. There are several new stations across the country and there's an ongoing programme of electrification of routes. There are plenty of proposals in the pipeline too. How long were you in Scotland for?

Reply
John

Thanks, nice to see some sensible opinion on the matter. I see so much onesided and almost partisan nature to the debate, which never gives me confidence.i think I'm right in saying government has budgeted 50 billion. Of course it might go higher, but government is clearly cutting costs as much as possible eg recent platform cuts.

Reply
Ap Kenneth

Have a look at the blog by Mark Barry (the original instigator of the S Wales Metro https://swalesmetroprof.blog/2022/07/21/200-to-1/ "So, the ratio between UK Government rail enhancement commitments in England V Wales is approximately 200:1. I’ll repeat that,  200 to 1 !  (Compare that with the population ratio of approximately 20:1…and the route length just 10:1!!!) As I have stated before, the Wales network (which also include the Marches line, Severn Tunnel, Chester, etc) has received approx. 1-2% of total UK rail enhancement investment over the last 20 years "

Reply
Lyn Thomas

And of course the rail network in rail is greater than 5% of the UK network so how ever you look at it we have been massively underfunded.

Reply

In reply to Lyn Thomas

Badger

I would resist underfunding arguments based on miles of track because these numbers could be "improved" by ripping up track - closing the HoW line for example. It could also count against laying new track, such as reopening Carmarthen to Aberystwyth. A spending per person shortfall is on more solid ground and just as outrageous, particularly when totted up over several decades.

Reply
Arfon Jones

Sounds like a fudge whereby all we get is the same crumbs and not what we're entitled to under HS2 consequential.

Reply
Charles Coombes

As residents we would like to have our first and lady trains back permanently on the Cambrian Line. An hourly service is still just a dream!

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to John Cancel

Thanks, nice to see some sensible opinion on the matter. I see so much onesided and almost partisan nature to the debate, which never gives me confidence.i think I'm right in saying government has budgeted 50 billion. Of course it might go...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.