Fri, 28th August Cardiff 18°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

End of Cardiff Parkway saga in sight close to a year after planning hearing

By Mark Mansfield
Cardiff Parkway View From The Platform Picture: Wilkinson Eyre

Ted Peskett, local democracy reporter

The end of a planning saga involving proposals for a new railway station and business park in Cardiff could soon be in sight nearly a year after a public hearing on the project.

Planning and Environment Decisions Wales (Pedw), the Welsh Government’s planning arm, held two planning hearings about the Cardiff Parkway development – one in July 2023 and another in January 2024.

Cardiff Council gave its endorsement to the project in 2022, but the Welsh Government stepped in to make a final call on it. This usually happens if a development is considered to be one of national significance.

[mid-content-banner]

Business park

The scheme proposes a four-platform railway station and a 90,000sqm business park on land south of St Mellons Business Park.

A Welsh Government spokesperson said consultation is ongoing with organisations and individuals about the development.

The spokesperson added views need to be provided by January 15 and a decision would be made following consideration of the representations received.

Councillors from across the political spectrum at Cardiff Council were unanimous in their calls for a swift conclusion to the Cardiff Parkway planning saga, with the Conservative and Labour groups passing a motion calling on the Welsh Government to make a decision by January 30.

This is when the local authority will next meet for its full council meeting.

We asked the Welsh Government at the beginning of December if it would make a decision by this date, but it could only confirm a decision was expected to be made “at the earliest opportunity”.

[taboola-banner]

First Minster

A spokesperson said: “This is a decision which will be taken by the First Minister. As with all planning decisions, they need to be considered fully using the very latest evidence and information and so providing timeframes is unwise.

“But as the Economy, Energy and Planning Cabinet Secretary has demonstrated, this Welsh Government has been proactive in accelerating the decision making process… and so you can expect a decision to be made at the earliest opportunity.”

First Minister Eluned Morgan confirmed at First Minister’s Questions in October that she would make the final decision on Cardiff Parkway.

Despite the uncertainty hanging over the development, it has been mentioned in plans for a number of other transport projects.

Plans for the first phase of Cardiff Crossrail, which will see a new tram line developed between Cardiff Central Station and Cardiff Bay, moved forward in November, after the Welsh Government committed to providing match-funding for the project.

Transport for Wales (TfW) is working on Cardiff Crossrail alongside Cardiff Council.

A consultation page on TfW’s website states Cardiff Crossrail will eventually run from the northwest of the city to the east, connecting with Cardiff Parkway.

'Bus corridors'

As part of a separate project to enhance bus routes across Cardiff, the city council has put forward six proposed ‘bus corridors’ in a consultation which will run until January 27.

One of these routes is titled “city centre to Newport Road, Cardiff Parkway and Newport”.

When Cardiff Parkway was discussed at the two Pedw hearings, campaigners expressed major concerns about the impact developing on the land south of St Mellons Business Park could have on biodiversity.

The land includes part of the Rumney and Peterstone site of special scientific interest (SSSI).

Speaking at the second planning hearing, co-chair of Friends of the Gwent Levels, Dr Diana Callaghan, questioned the need for office space in the proposed location for Cardiff Parkway.

A member of Cardiff Civic Society who was present at the same meeting, Julia Barrell, welcomed the idea of having a railway station in east Cardiff but added: “I think it would be very hard to argue that the business park is wholly exceptional… it definitely doesn’t need to be built on a SSSI.”

Cardiff Parkway Developments Ltd has proposed compensation land in a bid to offset the loss of habitats on site if its proposed scheme goes ahead.

Those in favour of the scheme point to the jobs it could bring to the area and the potential for economic growth in east Cardiff.

Cardiff Council Labour ward councillor for Trowbridge, Cllr Chris Lay, called it a disgrace that the station had not been developed yet.

At a Cardiff Council meeting on November 28, 2024, he said: “I don’t know why but we are being let down by Welsh Government at the moment… it is not right and it is not fair.

“We deserve to have that network of the railway. We also deserve to have the businesses in our ward.”

Rolls-Royce is one of the businesses which has so far shown an interest in the site as a potential location for one of its hubs.

Another ward member for Trowbridge, Cllr Michael Michael, called the case for Cardiff Parkway “overwhelming”. He added: “It should have been done 20 years ago. I welcome the First Minister’s decision that she is going to take the decision. I hope it is the right decision.”

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

24 comments

Amir

The latest consultation is on whether or not the railway station is built first. The Railway station was always expected to come first. The fact there is a possibility the station will not come first is because the developer cannot pay for the station. The business park was the perk for building the station. The business park is not viable without the railway station.

Reply
Barnaby

Which consultation? Post the link here.

Reply
Amir

Read the fifth and sixth paragraph in this news article. It was sent via email from [email protected].

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

Nothing to support "whether or not the railway station is built first".

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/iREnfCViKtSZkbJV/ https://www.facebook.com/share/p/7HaLrVhYSh5grwp9/ You can read the comments and the letter of the consultation in the second link.

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

Fakebook?

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

I have uploaded screenshots of the consultation letter on the Facebook posts. I cannot upload anything in this comments section. https://planningcasework.service.gov.wales/case You want to download the letter the dated 4/12/2024.

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

https://planningcasework.service.gov.wales/ CAS-02298-X2Q2Q2

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

Got there in the end. And what's wrong with that? Making it a requirement of planning consent doesn't mean it wasn't going to happen in that order. It sounds like a smart move to me as long as they aren't impacted by Network Rail delays for example.

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

How is it a smart move?

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

Because it means the station will be available for locals to use sooner rather than later. It also rules out the unlikely possibility of the whole development going to one tenant that doesn't need a rail link and negotiates a discount based on it not being built. Tesla, for example, who'd probably want everyone coming to work in a Tesla.

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

The station was clearly meant to be built in the initial phase of the development. "The initial phase would include the construction of the new station and associated facilities" 17 Dec 2021 Planning Statement. Page 9. Section 4.1.6 The station would have been available earlier. In the last hearing, the developer told us the funding was in place for the complete development. Clearly not. And that is why we have this new consultation. https://nation.cymru/news/opponents-pour-cold-water-on-claim-that-gething-backed-project-could-create-5000-jobs/ https://nation.cymru/news/gething-backed-scheme-would-fatally-undermine-welsh-governments-planning-policy/

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

"meant to be built" You're not distinguishing between what the developer wants to do, and what they're obligated to do.

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

“meant to be built” was my take. The other bit in quotations was from the document. They are obligated to provide the station first. With all this confusion, there needs to another hearing to clarify what has changed: developer's lack of funds. If so, the planning needs to be shelved until the funds are in place. Then the first minister can make her decision.

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

Obligated how? And let's not forget that the initial phase could take years. There's a huge difference in building the station at the start or end of this phase.

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

Jo Stevens MP has clearly stated to me the business park is not viable without the railway station.

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

Clearly that's true for almost every scenario except the unlikely one I presented.

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

That is a massive business park without a railway station for an unlikely scenario.

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

So there shouldn't be any problem accepting the proposed restriction.

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

With so much uncertainty, planning needs to call another hearing.

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

How does that help, unless there's someone who can predict the future. Who's to say, for example, that World President Elon Musk won't snap this up to build a new European HQ for SpaceX and Tesla, just to help his new Reform friends win Wales in 2026 as a springboard to Westminster in 2029. No hearing could foresee such an outcome.

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

The hearing will make clear the funding available for the development. This was a private funded project for a railway station to be provided first. The "prize" for providing the station was the developer could build muliptle massive 15 storey office towers on SSSI land: the gwent levels. If the funds are not available for the railway station, that's a significant change and so yes, another hearing is needed. So far only Rolls Royce have said they are interested. There is no need to wait for another 20 years with a ghost business park waiting for Elon Musk to help a bunch of people that have directed their hatred towards people of Indian descent like me and Rishi Sunak. https://nation.cymru/news/jobs-boost-hopes-for-ghost-business-park/ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c10l5qd8p60o

Reply

In reply to Amir

Barnaby

I'm no fan of that lot but that doesn't stop my scenario from happening. There's no suggestion that anything has actually changed in this letter you've picked up on beyond the new FM apparently wanting more commitment on the availability of the railway station. It's smart to link it to the initial occupation of the business park rather than leaving it to commercial priorities.

Reply

In reply to Barnaby

Amir

I don't see how it is smart to build massive 'ghost' office towers on green spaces which may remain empty or get converted to residential buildings. https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/huge-cardiff-bay-office-block-29651962 https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/welsh-secretary-jo-stevens-rail-30509890 If office buildings are needed for Elon Musk, then build on a brownfield site Llanwern former steelworks.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Amir Cancel

The hearing will make clear the funding available for the development. This was a private funded project for a railway station to be provided first. The "prize" for providing the station was the developer could build muliptle massive 15...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.