Tue, 28th July Cardiff 26°
Nation.Cymru wordmark
Advertisement

News

Council introduces 200% tax for second homes

By Mark Mansfield
Porthcawl. Photo Colin Burdett @Shutterstock.com

Martin Shipton

A local authority has defended its decision to charge the highest rate of second home premium tax in Wales - even though just 60 homes will be affected.

Responding to concerns that locals were being priced out of the housing market by outsiders buying second homes, the Welsh Government introduced legislation that allowed councils to charge higher rates of council tax on such properties.

From the start of the new financial year in April, Bridgend County Borough Council (BCBC) - whose area includes Porthcawl - will raise the premium tax rate to 200%.

For a typical council tax band C. one-bedroom apartment, that will trigger an annual bill of around £7,000.

A second home owner in the county borough who doesn’t wish to be named said: ā€œThe original consultation on second homes in February 2023 resulted in 53% of respondents not agreeing with the proposals for a 100% increase for all properties classified as second homes, rising to 200% in 2026.

ā€œThis led to further consultation and the BCBC cabinet then made the decision on the basis of an additional report in September 2023.

ā€œCouncils in Wales have the power to implement council tax premiums on second homes under the Housing (Wales) Act 2014.

ā€œThe guidance issued by Welsh Ministers states that the powers were designed as discretionary to allow local authorities to tailor their use to address local priorities and reflect the different patterns of housing availability and need across Wales. When exercising that discretion local authorities are asked to consider the numbers and percentages of long-term empty properties and/or second homes in the local area. The intention of the Act is to address areas where there are a large number of second homes lying empty for lengthy periods and preventing locals from having the opportunity to pursue/live in a property in their community.

ā€œThis of course applies to long term empty homes but BCBC has one of the lowest count of second homes in Wales, currently standing at around 60 properties. Therefore second homes in Bridgend have very little, if any, impact on housing stock or homelessness in the county.

ā€œThe cabinet minutes of the decision focus solely on financial gain, not the purpose of the act or the premium charge.

ā€œIt was mentioned in the cabinet meeting of September 2023 that there were concerns that second homes could increase if the Porthcawl regeneration proceeds. However, the Welsh Government allows BCBC to take account of the prevalence of second homes when considering local development plans.

ā€œThis gives BCBC a mechanism to regulate the number of future second homes via planning permission, therefore reducing the risk of high numbers of second homes from now on. This was not mentioned in the meeting in September 2023.

ā€œFurthermore BCBC intends to increase the charge from 100% (double) to 200%(triple) from 2026. Why so high? There doesn't seem to be any science or methodology behind this decision, which will make Bridgend the highest charging council in Wales despite having one of the lowest number of second homes.

ā€œEven Pembrokeshire County Council has deemed 200% untenable, and they have one of the highest numbers of second homes in Wales (3940). They reduced their rate to 150% and recently to 125% for 2026, as they saw 200% as too high.

ā€œBCBC leader John Spanswick has told me it’s a discretionary decision taken three years ago and he has no intention to propose a change. He was unable to give me any methodology and reason behind this hike.

ā€œSurely charging the highest tax in Wales with the fewest number of second homes is not in line with the sprit or intentions of the Housing (Wales) Act 2014.

ā€œI acknowledge I have a second home and am required to pay a premium, but it should not be 200%. This is way too high and not the going rate. I am trying to get BCBC to take it to full council to freeze it at the current rate of 100% in line with other Welsh local authorities for 2026 onwards.ā€

Support

A council spokesman said: ā€œThe Housing (Wales) Act 2014 enables councils in Wales to implement council tax premiums of up to 300 per cent on long-term empty properties and second homes, and to invest any additional money raised through these charges into supporting local housing needs.

ā€œIn setting the premium at 200 per centĀ as part of a staged increase, the council is exercising its rights under the terms of the Act in order to boost funds for local housing and homelessness services.

ā€œThe initiative forms part of a wider plan to address Bridgend County Borough’s local housing needs by bringing long-term empty properties back into residential use, and we have ensured that property owners have been kept fully informed throughout the entire process.

ā€œAs well as supporting the purchase of houses for multiple occupation which can be used to accommodate homeless people, itis encouragingĀ greater permanent residency, supportsĀ local sustainability, and helps to makeĀ local housing more accessible and affordable for our residents.ā€

Council Area Number of Second Homes Premium Council Tax Rate Gwynedd 4,758 150% Pembrokeshire 3,940 150% (200% in 2024, 125% from 2026) Cardiff 3,225 100% Isle of Anglesey 2,236 100% Ceredigion 1,788 150% Swansea 1,624 100% Conwy 1,384 150% Powys 1,376 75% Carmarthenshire 1,000 100% Neath Port Talbot 486 100% Vale of Glamorgan 449 100% Rhondda Cynon Taf 434 100% Denbighshire 422 150% Flintshire 269 100% Merthyr Tydfil 257 100% Caerphilly 244 100% Monmouthshire 184 100% Bridgend 60 100% (200% from 2026) Newport 12 100% Torfaen 8 0% Wrexham 0 50% Blaenau Gwent 0 0% Wales (total) 24,170 —

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News

17 comments

Richard Jenkins

Terrific! 25,000 empty homes in Cymru! Nuff said!

Reply
Clive hopper

These taxes should have been introduced years ago. There are plenty of empty unused homes and second homes that should house people permanently.

Reply
Alwyn

If you have a second home, you can easily transfer it to a company and avoid significant amounts of tax. It saves on income tax and you can count interest as a 'business expense.' Obviously, the downside is that it deprives the government of income to pay for public services. Now, it would be interesting before the senedd election to survey which politicians are doing this in Wales!

Reply
Larry

That doesn't avoid council tax or these surcharges. And there can only be income tax to avoid if the property is being rented out, and in that case it's not a second home but property business.

Reply
Alwyn

Yes - we have one MS in north wales (for sure) who is using this as a way to avoid c/t and income tax

Reply

In reply to Alwyn

Larry

So don't call it a second home because the impact on communities of a property that is kept empty most of the time just in case the owner fancies a change of scene is very different to a property business investment that's either rented to a local family (who'll pay the ctax) or is used to being regular flow of visitors into the area spending money in local businesses. Muddying these waters lets the most harmful hide behind the less harmful.

Reply

In reply to Larry

Alwyn

This MS has used this loophole to avoid tax. I’m against this and they should be called out for this

Reply

In reply to Alwyn

Larry

This article is about second homes not legal tax avoidance.

Reply
Larry

Will these extra revenues be used to fund more council homes?

Reply
hdavies15

The yield on this surcharge in BCBC will just about cover a few councillors' expenses! I was a bit surprised to see the headline as my gut reaction would be to conclude there aren't many 2nd homes in this authority. Buying a 2nd home in Porthcawl would be a very expensive deal. Even little boxes are over £300k and rising. Still, having wealthy people intervening with loot to spare would only heat the market further and we don't need that.

Reply
Larry

It only needs to cover the interest payments on loans to build them until the social rent starts flowing.

Reply
Cilmeri1282

Excellent. This will also discourage wealthy individuals from buying holiday houses in the area.

Reply
John Jones

And help the decline in tourism, money for local businesses and a general decline in living standards. Brilliant idea

Reply
Larry

Secondhomers aren't tourists, they're absentee residents propping up some other economy most of the time.

Reply
Pmb

Another excuse for councils to raid people’s pockets under the pretence they are concerned about rising house prices . If they think this will make housing more affordable for locals they are deluded , it’s simply a cynical excuse to raise and waste more money , easier than sorting themselves out .

Reply
Larry

Having their pockets raided is completely voluntary. Anyone unhappy with a sin tax on their extravagant lifestyle that's contributing to homelessness is free to rent their spare property to a local family and pay no council tax whatsoever.

Reply
Martelle Pearson

Since this has been introduced all it has done is impact local businesses. Chalets that were built purely as holiday homes that are not suitable to live in all year round are being used less and impacting on foot fall. Local pubs are now closing in the winter or doing shorter hours. If owners have to charge more to cover these bills less people will come. Madness

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Larry Cancel

So don't call it a second home because the impact on communities of a property that is kept empty most of the time just in case the owner fancies a change of scene is very different to a property business investment that's either rented to...

Comments are reviewed before they appear.