Thursday, 16th July 2026 Cardiff 20° · Partly cloudy
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Feature

Huw Edwards: The fall from grace of one of TV’s most recognisable faces

By Mark Mansfield
Huw Edwards. Picture by the BBC.

Huw Edwards was one of the most recognisable faces on TV before his glittering career came to an end amid a scandal that ended with him receiving a suspended prison sentence.

The 63-year-old was the BBC’s highest-paid newsreader and presented the News At Ten for decades before he pleaded guilty to making indecent images of children in late July.

Edwards was regarded as the best-known face of BBC News and was seen as a safe pair of hands to guide the country through major events including the late Queen’s death, which he announced to the nation in September 2022.

The disgraced newsreader has been making headlines this summer after he admitted to having 41 indecent images on WhatsApp, including seven of the most serious type.

Edwards was spared jail and the judge at Westminster Magistrates’ Court said it would not be “an exaggeration” to say his “long-earned reputation is in tatters.”

[mid-content-banner]

Sexually explicit photos

He had earned a reputation as a respected veteran broadcaster before he resigned from the corporation in April following a furore amid allegations, separate to the charges he later faced, about making payments to a young person for sexually explicit photos.

The newsreader was front and centre in live broadcasts of election coverage, the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012 and Platinum Jubilee in 2022, the wedding of the then Duke and Duchess of Cambridge in 2011, the wedding of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in 2018, and the funeral of the Duke of Edinburgh in 2021.

Edwards was also the BBC’s voice at Trooping the Colour and the Festival of Remembrance.

When the BBC was looking for someone to take over election coverage from the long-serving David Dimbleby in 2019, it was Edwards who was chosen.

Edwards was also the corporation’s highest-paid newsreader, with a pay bracket of £475,000 to £479,999 for the year 2023/24, before he resigned, according to the BBC’s latest annual report.

This last salary marked an increase from 2022/23, when he was paid between £435,000 and £439,999 for 180 days presenting on BBC One, as well as news specials.

In 2018, it was reported that he had agreed to take a pay cut following revelations over unequal pay for men and women at the BBC.

Edwards said in 2021 that he was considering his future presenting News At Ten as he approached his 60th birthday.

Cardiff University

The broadcaster, who attended Llanelli Grammar School and graduated in French from Cardiff University, was an honorary professor in the School of Journalism, Media and Culture at his old university before he resigned from both his honorary professor title and honorary fellowship following his guilty plea.

In June 2023, Edwards picked up the best live event honour at the Tric Awards for being among those to cover the state funeral of the late Queen, and in February he received the Broadcast Awards’ special recognition award.

In 2012 the BBC won a TV Bafta for Edwards’ coverage of Prince William and Kate Middleton’s wedding and the Welsh newsreader has also won the best on-screen presenter prize at the Bafta Cymru awards numerous times over the years.

Songs of Praise

Edwards was previously vice president of the National Churches Trust and has appeared on Songs Of Praise.

He has also made documentaries for the BBC including Wales: Who Do We Think We Are? and talked about his depression on S4C’s Huw Edwards Is 60.

In a documentary in 2021, Edwards revealed he has had bouts of depression over the last two decades which have left him “bedridden”.

“Like everyone that suffers with depression, you don’t get one bout of it. It comes and goes,” he said.

“For me, it started around 2002 I think. I went down fairly quickly and I couldn’t understand it.”

Speaking on a podcast hosted by Jane Garvey and Fi Glover, Fortunately… With Fi And Jane, he said he decided to share publicly that he has depression as he felt it was “complete hypocrisy” to support organisations such as the Shawmind Foundation or Mind without explaining why.

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

21 comments

Gareth Westacott

So, what was the sentence of the court? We're not told.

Reply
A.Redman

6 months suspended for 2 years.

Reply
Billy James

This is not justice... The guy who supplied him also had a 10 months suspended.. It makes you wonder who else from the elites are involved...

Reply
Bethan

The judge's reasoning was outrageous. Because he had daddy issues and didn't get to go to Oxford. Well if every predator who was raised in an abusive environment was spared prison time then it wouldn't even be worth calling it a crime. He's not special because of that. He's typical in fact and the part about him not being accepted by Oxford and having to settle for Cardiff. How out of touch is that judge? That's not a valid excuse to prey on children. People of Cardiff lock your doors at night because apparently Cardiff University is a psycho factory. O don't know if any other elites are involved (I wouldn't be in disbelief if they were) or if the judge was bought, but it's suspicious as all get out. What a crazy ruling. Very insulting to the victims and to the law abiding general public actually.

Reply
Jeff

The judges sentencing is here. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/EDWARDS-SENTENCE-REMARKS-FINAL.pdf

Reply

In reply to Jeff

Bethan

I've read it thanks.

Reply

In reply to Bethan

Jeff

It stinks. But the perp has the same treatment as others hence the sentencing notes, we only get upset at this because it's a person in the lime light. We don't see all the others that are also handed such sentences, the press are partly to blame here for under reporting (many have dedicated court reporters, it will get a mention but they are not big names so no massive front page multi day spreads). This is my takeaway. This points to the system is not looking after abused, they are forgotten. And that goes for any abuse, domestic, controlling, violence through to the other end of the scale.

Reply
Les Cargot

Straight out of the Farage Riots playbook. And no, before you accuse me of defending Huw Edward’s, I’m not,

Reply
Bethan

How's that? This is an appalling decision no matter what a person's political tilt is. An abuse of the legal system.

Reply

In reply to Bethan

Les Cargot

“It makes you wonder who else from the elites are involved…”,Billy James. “What aren’t we being told”, Nigel Farage. Same vein, same playbook. Try this for size, What aren’t we being told about Farage?

Reply
Adrian

What on earth are you on about? Multiple rioters went to jail: this peadophile got away with a suspended sentence.

Reply

In reply to Adrian

Les Cargot

Different crimes. Have I touched a nerve mentioning that international jetsetter and part time Clacton MP Farage.

Reply

In reply to Les Cargot

Adrian

Did I touch a verve by suggesting that peadophilia should be punished with a custodial sentence? Oh, and a question should have a question mark at the end. You’re welcome.

Reply

In reply to Adrian

Les Cargot

What’s a “verve” got to do with anything? Here’s the one I missed. “?” And learn how to spell “peadophilia” correctly. You’re welcome.

Reply
Alun

If you post something nasty on Facebook you serve jail time, if you pay for indecent images of seven year old children, it's a suspended sentence. What a crazy world we live in.

Reply
CapM

Wasn't the "something nasty on Facebook" incitement to burn people alive? That's the sort of thing that warrants time in prison. So too does Huw Edwards' crime.

Reply
Bethan

Thank you! Some non-binary logic in 2024. Just because a=wrong doesn't make b right. It's baffling that this situation is being used as ammunition from both sides of the political fence to try to prove points about whether or not there are grand conspiracies within the legal system or whether the far-right are brainwashing audiences in an anti-police agenda or whatever the heck else people have agendas and pre-conceived notions about. People need to centre themselves a bit and be objective. In this case, the legal system did it's due diligence up to the judge's decision. The police did their job in investigating and gathering evidence, the lawyers did their jobs in representing both sides, the judge seemingly did not do their job in using judgement within the confines of the law to determine appropriate sentencing. The judge by their own statements, used speculation, bias, and feels to sentence Edwards. There is no way the judge could know whether or not Edwards was remorseful but psychological and historical legal data would suggest that individuals with similar inclinations to Edwards are not capable of remorse and are likely to repeat offend; so the judgement there is highly debatable. Edwards personal history being an important factor is also questionable. Predators tend to have similar if not worse histories. Very sad but again non-binary thinking, just because someone has a sad past doesn't make them a victim of circumstance in the present. He's a grown man in a position of power and control over others. His psychological state is a questionable defence. In fact legally it wasn't a defence. He didn't plead insanity so it should have no bearing in this case. The judge apparently came to the determination based on 'aw shucks' logic that is quite unbelievable to me and so I this should be investigated. That doesn't mean I buy into the idea that the entire legal system is corrupt or biased towards certain demographics. Although money and power does get things done. There's no denying that.

Reply

In reply to Bethan

Adrian

Words and actions are not the same thing. The FB poster should have got a suspended sentence and this peado should have been jailed.

Reply

In reply to Adrian

CapM

"Words and actions are not the same thing. " However 'FIRE' is the last word someone facing a firing squad hears. Your logic suggests he's should not be overly perturbed.

Reply
Mawkernewek

Five years for participating in a zoom meeting (Roger Hallam) and a 6 month suspended sentence for Huw Edwards. Hard to argue that Huw got let off lightly.

Reply
Adrian

Don’t be so bloody silly. Hallam’s a dangerous nut case, and a repeat offender. He didn’t get five year for just ‘participating in a Zoom meeting’.

Reply

Leave a reply

Replying to Les Cargot Cancel

What’s a “verve” got to do with anything? Here’s the one I missed. “?” And learn how to spell “peadophilia” correctly. You’re welcome.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.