Wednesday, 15th July 2026 Cardiff 24° · Partly cloudy
NationCymru A news service by the people of Wales, for the people of Wales.

Opinion

The debate: #MeToo and the Welsh national movement

By NationCymru

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

59 comments

John Young

I usually, when reading posts here, see arguments from both sides and accept the logic of what's being said from the writers viewpoint even if I disagree with the writer. I haven't read the whole piece yet, only Dylan Llyr's part so far, but felt the need to comment immediately. His argument that 'What feminists actually want is quite simple, which is for men to stop harassing them' is laughable in it's simplicity. It suggests that it's only men who don't have a clear understanding of what is the 'boundary between what is acceptable and the inappropriate when interacting with a woman'. Is he really saying that some women, a minority, don't take the boundary ridiculously the other way when someone complains that some bloke put his hand on my knee thirty years ago and I want him hung, drawn and quartered for it. Those women are a minority as I say but it's also a fact that men who treat women wrongly are a minority also and the vast majority of us treat women with the respect they deserve.

Reply
Tellyesin

Dude. You need to get out more. Seriously.

Reply
JD

Aled's article on Golwg and now on here speak so much sense and represent the view of the majority. As a woman, I think #MeToo is nothing but digital hysteria and needs to stop. Da iawn Aled - there is absolutely nothing in your article above that people can reasonably disagree with.

Reply
jonesy

#metoo i am with you JD as a woman and a feminist, of course its bad to sexual harass - funny that the assembly has won a workplace award for LBGBT but seems to be a den of sexual pests and harassment depsite having loads of women in powerful positions there and a quite good gender balance, mind you it didn't stop me from being bullied by my women workers there, . I think most women want respect but we have had enough of this media nonsense, . and by the way those ladies in Hollywood are a bunch of hypcrites = Polanski raped underage girls but they don't seems to be too troubled by child abuse, the establishment isnt either.

Reply
Rob Bruce

"But let’s not forget that women have soft power at their disposal, i.e their femininity, their sexual allure and their attractiveness which can sometimes level the playing field somewhat." Haha! Those poor helpless men at the beck and call of their hormones, unable to resist the siren call of a fluttering eyelash. Are we talking about grown-ups here?

Reply
JD

Speaking as a woman, we do indeed know when to flutter our eyelashes and take advantage of situations in our own way. Generally speaking, we can be more devious, emotional and manipulative than men. I'm not trying to discredit genuine cases of sexual harrassment or rape but most of the time we know very well what we're doing.

Reply
Emyr

Maybe would have been nice to hear from some actual women in this debate, but hey. Strong editorial skills here, nation.cymru! ;)

Reply
NationCymru

I agree that this is a problem. Unfortunately, without the time or finances to commission articles we largely have to make do with what we're given. Unfortunately few female contributors send us material (perhaps the comments put them off!). We've published articles by female authors on the subject in the past: https://nation.cymru/2017/yes-wales-you-too/ https://nation.cymru/2017/allowing-bbc-radio-presenter-back-on-the-air-leaves-a-sour-taste-in-the-mouth/ Best, Ifan

Reply
JD

Weren't they written by your partner, Ifan? Hardly impartial.

Reply

In reply to JD

NationCymru

A woman complaining about a lack of articles by women on a site to which anyone can contribute voluntarily? If only she could do something about it, rather than complaining. - Ed

Reply

In reply to JD

Dafis

Is Ifan's partner any kind of inferior female, is she a lesser female because she is his partner ? is she incapable of independent thought ? or is that chip on your shoulder balanced by having another in your bag to stick on the other shoulder when the need arises ?

Reply

In reply to Dafis

Ifan Morgan Jones

Nation.Cymru is just a site produced voluntarily in my spare time - it's not the BBC. Of course many of the contributors are people who know me. JD or anyone else is free to contribute articles to this site or set up their own if they find it lacking. - Best, Ifan

Reply

In reply to Ifan Morgan Jones

JD

But not to comment on this site? Why have a comments section then? I doubt you'd be willing to receive and publish articles that disagree with feminism/Welsh language/independence.

Reply

In reply to JD

Nic

You have commented and no one has told you to not comment. People have disagreed with you (which you clearly don't like) but that's not the same as being told to not comment. Regarding your desire for articles that "disagree with feminism/Welsh language/independence", may I suggest you pop over to The Mail Online. I think you'll find what you're looking for there.

Reply

In reply to JD

NationCymru

"But not to comment on this site? Why have a comments section then?" You're commenting right now! "I doubt you’d be willing to receive and publish articles that disagree with feminism/Welsh language/independence" There's literally an article that argues that feminism has gone too far on this page. Look up /\ As I've said in the past, I'll publish anything a) interesting b) that makes a reasoned argument, c) not libellous and d) published under the author's real name. If it fits those criteria, it goes on the site. - Ed

Reply
Sarah Reynolds

“victimhood for status”? This kind of language betrays a shocking lack of empathy for the people who have had the courage to speak out about their trauma. “convenient scapegoats.” Scapegoats for whom? If we cannot hold men accountable for their own behaviour, whom should we be holding accountable? The very notion of ‘soft power’ is incredibly insulting. The idea that a woman should be content to demean herself by using her sexuality to achieve her goals demonstrates just how unlevel the playing field is. I am not a ‘female,’ I am a woman and I don’t want soft power, I want equality. I want to be treated with the same respect that you would treat a man.

Reply
JD

The thing is though, sis, is that us women aren't particularly nice to each other. That would be a start. But you can't say that for fear of betraying the sisterhood. Men and women have different currencies - physical and emotional and it's just human nature that we've learned to play to our strengths to get what we want. Ever heard of the phrase 'femme fatale'?

Reply
Sarah Reynolds

If you really believe that the only currency you have as a woman is ‘physical and emotional’ then that is a tragedy. I believe whole-heartedly in ‘playing to our strengths to get what we want’ but those strengths are our wit, intelligence and talent. We do not have to resort to 'fluttering our eyelashes'. The femme fatale is an out-dated caricature that belongs in the past.

Reply

In reply to Sarah Reynolds

JD

I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that both men and women have both masculine and feminine traits and those in their turn are both positive and negative. It's all part of the wonderful messy blur of life. #MeToo doesn't register with the majority of people who couldn't care less about Hollywood or social media. I also find this ridiculous notion of patriarchy so patronising. Take a look around you. Everything you see was built by men, from masons to architects and they did so to support their families. Historically anyway. Being a man hasn't been all that throughout history. Dying young on the battlefield or down a mine etc. Life has always been sh*t for men and women but in different ways. You could easily create a #MeToo for men who've been screwed over by cheating wives, women who've fleeced them for their money or got pregnant to ensure financial stability or have denied them access to their children after a divorce. But that hashtag will probably be shut down by Twitter. Women are by no means innocent we need to treat misogyny and misandry with equal contempt. No one wins otherwise.

Reply

In reply to JD

Sarah Reynolds

1. "#MeToo doesn’t register with the majority of people who couldn’t care less about Hollywood or social media." Where is your evidence for this? I suspect that when you say ‘#MeToo doesn’t register with the majority of people’ what you really mean is, it doesn’t register with you. You are entitled to your opinion but the fact that #MeToo has been used by over 1.7 million people suggests that a great many people disagree with you. 2. "I also find this ridiculous notion of patriarchy so patronising. Take a look around you. Everything you see was built by men, from masons to architects and they did so to support their families. Historically anyway." Patriarchy is not a notion, it is a fact. We live in a world where there are fewer women leading FTSE firms than men called John. Do you seriously believe that this is because women are just not up to the job? If history lacks female architects and stonemasons, it is not because women were incapable of doing such jobs, it is because they were excluded from them. While Isambard Kingdom Brunel was unveiling the Clifton Suspension Bridge, women were not allowed to own property, not allowed to vote, and not allowed to attend university. On top of all this, we had no reproductive rights. Motherhood was an inevitability, not a choice. To overcome all those obstacles and succeed, you’d have to have been Superwoman. Even when women did claw their way into history, we were written out of it. Just look at this list of female scientists you have never heard of: https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/13/130519-women-scientists-overlooked-dna-history-science/ 3. "Being a man hasn’t been all that throughout history. Dying young on the battlefield or down a mine etc. Life has always been sh*t for men and women but in different ways." On this we agree. Patriarchy enslaves men as much as it enslaves women. It tells us that talking about emotions and epressing vulnerability is ‘feminine’ and ‘weak’. It is no coincidence then that in the UK, suicide is the biggest killer of men under 45. 4. "You could easily create a #MeToo for men who’ve been screwed over by cheating wives, women who’ve fleeced them for their money or got pregnant to ensure financial stability or have denied them access to their children after a divorce. But that hashtag will probably be shut down by Twitter." Men are perfectly entitled to set up hashtags for those causes and good luck to them. However, that’s not what this discussion is about. 5. "Women are by no means innocent." To say that ‘women are by no means innocent’ is a meaningless generalisation and does not serve your argument. Some women are innocent. By bundling all women together in this crude statement, you insult the thousands of women who have been brave enough to come forward about rape and sexual assault. 6. “we need to treat misogyny and misandry with equal contempt” Yes, I agree. But where is this supposed misandry in the #MeToo campaign? I haven’t seen evidence of it. No one is suggesting that we should hate all men, only that a specific group of men should be held responsible for their actions. 7. “No one wins otherwise.” It’s not a question of winning and losing. Men and women don’t have to be pitted against one another. We can choose to work together to ensure that our culture and the structures within it allow us all to flourish equally.

Reply

In reply to Sarah Reynolds

Cynan

Has it ever occurred to feminists that some of the differences seen between men and women are actually due to the respective CHOICES they make? Voluntary ones. For instance, feminists have been talking about the gender 'pay gap' since at least the early 80's and it was found to be a myth then, just as it is now. The fact is, women and men CHOOSE different careers which are renumerated differently. That's it. There is no patriarchal conspiracy, just look up from your ideological narrative and look around you... there are women heads of state, senior executives, world leaders, etc. Most medics are now women, and it goes on. To follow your logic, womens dominance of Midwifery and Nursing must be due to the matriarchy then is it?

Reply

In reply to Cynan

Sarah Reynolds

1. “the gender pay gap is a myth” The gender pay gap is a complex issue but it is not a myth. The latest report by The Office for National Statistics found that - The gender pay gap for full-time workers is entirely in favour of men for all occupations - The occupations with the smallest gender pay gap are those which employ an equal number of men and women. - In total, women earn just 52% of what men do every year because not only do they earn less, they are more likely to sacrifice the opportunity to earn a wage for the sake of their family. 2. “women and men CHOOSE different careers which are remunerated differently,” It is not just that women and men are remunerated differently, they are remunerated unfairly. Those professions which are dominated by women are generally paid less than those roles traditionally occupied by men. Just compare for example the average wage of a truck driver with the average wage of a childcare worker. It could be argued that working with children requires greater expertise than driving a truck and yet the average wages of the traditionally female role is less than that of the male role. http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-3334946/Best-paid-jobs-2015-Compare-pay-UK-average-350-professions.html Child and early years officers £21,199 Large goods vehicle drivers £26,603 Another factor in the gender pay gap is childcare. Both men and women become parents but it is women whose pay suffers as a result of becoming a parent. The high cost of childcare is one factor but so is the societal expectation that a man should not take time out from his career to look after his children. This is seen as the woman’s role. Even if a man wanted to stay at home, it probably wouldn’t make financial sense for his family... because he is more likely to earn more money than his female partner. The problem is compounded when women want to re-enter the workplace and often end up having to work part-time in order to juggle childcare. All of this has a negative impact on women’s wages but a positive impact on men’s. Women are shouldering most of the responsibility of childcare while also working. 3. "women and men CHOOSE different careers / women’s dominance of Midwifery and Nursing must be due to the matriarchy then is it?" The choices we make are shaped by the society in which we live and the way we are brought up. If little girls are constantly having dolls thrust at them, they will learn that care-giving is something that they ‘ought’ to be doing. If boys are told that they should be building Lego instead of playing with dolls, then they will grow up to believe that caring for children is not something that they are good at or should be good at. We pass our own gender biases on to our children and that is why it takes such a long time to break down stereotypes. This is not my opinion, it has been scientifically demonstrated. Look at any of the scientific studies below: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00415/full http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/proginfo/2017/33/no-more-boys-and-girls http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6323/389.full https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=190924 4. "There is no patriarchal conspiracy" I am not suggesting that there is a conscious conspiracy, only that we, as a society continue to perpetuate some very old-fashioned values that are no longer fit for purpose. Only by educating ourselves and challenging our long held belief systems can we improve society for the next generation. 5. "there are women heads of state, senior executives, world leaders, etc. Most medics are now women, and it goes on." It is wonderful that there are women heads of state and senior executives but they are exceptional examples rather than a normal every day occurrence. If you look at the hard facts, only one third of MP’s are women, only 15% of executive roles in the UK are held by women and just seven FTSE 100 companies currently have women chief executives. We have a long way to go until we have equality. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/01/19/britains-successful-companies-have-women-senior-roles/ If you want some impartial information on the gender pay gap, it is freely available at the Office of National Statistics: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/articles/understandingthegenderpaygapintheuk/2018-01-17

Reply

In reply to Sarah Reynolds

Cynan

1. All you need to know is that the supposed gender pay gap does NOT standup to multivariate statistical analysis for reasons you mention yourself (e.g. women typically take time out of their career to have children). When factors such as this are controlled for, the pay gap vanishes. 2. Nice try ;) You actually make my point for me - that women CHOOSE careers which are paid less (and you have provided a nice example which demonstrates this). The point is, there is absolutely nothing stopping women becoming truck drivers but they choose not to. Also, surely it cannot escape your attention that you are, quite literally, comparing apples and pears. A truck driver and a childcare assistant is not the same job. Additionally, I would also disagree with your contention that childcare requires more skill. For a start, truck driving requires a special driving licence recognising that it is a relatively highly-skilled role, i.e. not everyone could do it. Maybe feminists should be demanding equal paternity leave for men? Like they have in Scandinavian countries. 3. & 4. I don't deny that biases in how children are raised may influence their later career choices but you can't keep moving the goalposts. Women and men choose differently, fact. Why they do that is a whole other issue. I just look around me and don't see this cruel, women-hating world that feminists see. It doesn't exist. Aside from some biological constraints (e.g. child-bearing age), which are literally impossible to eradicate, women are free to do whatever they want. In the West, anyway. I think your focus would be much better-served trying to liberate genuinely oppressed women around the world (e.g. in muslim-majority countries). 5. Again, it's all down to choices made. Nothing is preventing women from becoming an MP. Another quick point... I know it is literally how the hard-left operate, i.e. they must categorise people and identify an oppressor: women vs men, black vs white, etc, but just know that there is more within group variation than between group variation.

Reply

In reply to Cynan

Sarah Reynolds

1. “All you need to know is that the supposed gender pay gap does NOT stand up to multivariate statistical analysis” Are you claiming that you are better informed than The National Office of Statistics? Do you really believe that the finest statisticians in the world have failed to carry out multivariate statistical analysis? If so, where is your evidence? If you can provide a credible source to back up your claim then I would be happy to be read it. 2. “There is absolutely nothing stopping women becoming truck drivers but they choose not to.” There are plenty of factors stopping women becoming truck drivers: anti-social hours which are not conducive to family life, a testosterone-fuelled environment, and crucially, the societal expectation that this is not a job for a ‘lady.’A woman who decides to become a truck driver has to overcome all of these factors before she takes on the job. She is not on an equal footing with a man. 3. “it cannot escape your attention that you are, quite literally, comparing apples and pears.” The comparison is not literal at all, it is metaphorical. But to go with the metaphor of apples and pears, these fruits, though different, are equally valuable in the market place and should be priced accordingly. 4. “A truck driver and a childcare assistant is not the same job. Additionally, I would also disagree with your contention that childcare requires more skill. For a start, truck driving requires a special driving licence recognising that it is a relatively highly-skilled role, i.e. not everyone could do it.” Not everyone could work in childcare either and childcare workers also have to attain certain qualifications but all of this misses the point entirely. Regardless of the specific job, those fields which are dominated by women are undervalued and therefore underpaid. 5. “Maybe feminists should be demanding equal paternity leave for men? Like they have in Scandinavian countries.” Men should be entitled to equal paternity leave. If it is something that you feel passionate about then why don’t you start lobbying for it instead of asking feminists to do the job for you? 6. “I don’t deny that biases in how children are raised may influence their later career choices but you can’t keep moving the goalposts. Women and men choose differently, fact. Why they do that is a whole other issue.” Which goal posts are you refering to? The reason that women and men ‘choose’ differently is not a whole other issue; it is part and parcel of the very issue we are discussing. 7. “I just look around me and don’t see this cruel, women-hating world that feminists see.” Which feminists? In the course of this exchange, I haven’t used any of the emotive language you refer to. 8. “Another quick point… I know it is literally how the hard-left operate, i.e. they must categorise people and identify an oppressor: women vs men, black vs white, etc, but just know that there is more within group variation than between group variation.” Are you being witty here? Or have you genuinely missed the irony in this statement? First you make the sweeping generalisation that the ‘hard-left’ is operating a polarising agenda, then you point out that there is more within group variation than between group variation! Listen to your own argument and take your own advice! Not all feminists are ‘hard-left’ and not all feminists see the world as a ‘cruel, women-hating world’.We’re just people, like you, who want the world to be a better place for everyone.

Reply

In reply to Sarah Reynolds

Cynan

This is getting tedious now. 1. It is quite clear that you define the gender pay gap differently to the ONS. From the link you provided: "The gender pay gap is defined as the difference in median pay between men and women. The Office for National Statistics headline measure for the gender pay gap is calculated as the difference between median gross hourly earnings (excluding overtime) as a proportion of median gross hourly earnings (excluding overtime) for men. But crucially this measure does not take into account equal pay for equal work." Do you get it now? Do you see the inherent flaw in how its reported? As to my sources... just read any serious economist like Thomas Sowell. You will learn a lot, I know I did. 2. Your points are entirely speculation. By your own reasoning, men would face those exact barriers when trying to enter roles such as Nursing. So, men would be on an unequal footing to women. 3. Your childish flippancy aside, the market decides their value, not you. And the market says they are not equally valuable. 4. No it doesn't. You said that childcare is paid less because it is a traditional role for women and its "undervalued and therefore underpaid". I say that it's nothing to do with that but rather that the difference in renumeration is because one requires hard technical skills and the other does not. So the market deems that they are not "equally valuable" (as above). 5. Why on earth would I ask a feminist to do a job for me? What a strange thing to say. Anyway, the reason I said that was because you mentioned how childcaring disproportionately impacts upon women - so equal leave might help with that. 6. The goalposts referring to how you completely glossed-over choices made as adults and went straight for how kids are indoctrined from childhood. To my mind, they are different issues with different solutions. 7. If you are oblivious to those undertones in your arguments, that is not my problem. 8. There is no irony in that statement. You clearly missed my point, maybe read it again. And yes, the far-left absolutely does operate a polarising agenda. After all, they like nothing more than ignoring the individual and lumping extremely diverse people into their preordained categories - that was my point. P.s. I am yet to encounter a feminist who isn't far left.

Reply

In reply to Cynan

Sarah Reynolds

For some reason, I've had trouble posting a reply to your latest post. It's almost as if someone doesn't want me to be heard.... 1. This is getting tedious now. Really? I’ve enjoyed the debate. I think it’s important that people with opposite points of view are willing to discuss their views. Refusing to engage with one another is what leads to the great polarisation in society that we see currently. 2. It is quite clear that you define the gender pay gap differently to the ONS. From the link you provided: “The gender pay gap is defined as the difference in median pay between men and women. The Office for National Statistics headline measure for the gender pay gap is calculated as the difference between median gross hourly earnings (excluding overtime) as a proportion of median gross hourly earnings (excluding overtime) for men. But crucially this measure does not take into account equal pay for equal work.” On the contrary, my understanding of the pay gap is supported by the ONS. To quote the report: “Using the headline measure of gender pay gap, this article showed the gender pay gap for full-time workers is entirely in favour of men for all occupations.” “…with all other factors held constant, women would still earn less on average than men because fewer women work in the highest-paying occupations and in full-time jobs.” 3. By your own reasoning, men would face those exact barriers when trying to enter roles such as Nursing. So, men would be on an unequal footing to women. Yes they would face those exact barriers – that is why the current system is failing men as well as women. 4. “the market says they are not equally valuable.” And who controls that market? When men are in two thirds of top jobs, it is men who steer that market. 5. You said that childcare is paid less because it is a traditional role for women and its “undervalued and therefore underpaid”. I say that it’s nothing to do with that but rather that the difference in renumeration is because one requires hard technical skills and the other does not. So the market deems that they are not “equally valuable” (as above). Your comment proves my point. You – and the market – place a higher value on ‘technical skills’ than the multifarious skills involved in childcare: child psychology, health and nutrition, and an understanding of child development. 6. “Why on earth would I ask a feminist to do a job for me?” Strange or not, you said it. You quite literally asked feminists to do a job for you when you wrote:“feminists should be demanding equal paternity leave for men” However, I totally agree that men should be entitled to equal leave. 7. “The goalposts referring to how you completely glossed-over choices made as adults and went straight for how kids are indoctrinated from childhood. To my mind, they are different issues with different solutions.” The choices we make as adults are affected by the way we have been indoctrinated from childhood. They are not different issues, they are bound up together. 8. “There is no irony in that statement. You clearly missed my point, maybe read it again. And yes, the far-left absolutely does operate a polarising agenda. After all, they like nothing more than ignoring the individual and lumping extremely diverse people into their preordained categories – that was my point. P.s. I am yet to encounter a feminist who isn’t far left.” You’re doing it again! Can you really not see the irony in accusing the far left of “ignoring the individual and lumping extremely diverse people into their preordained categories” and then going on to say “I am yet to encounter a feminist who isn’t far left.” You are lumping an extremely diverse group of people together when you make the assumption that “all feminists are far left.” Theresa May identifies as a feminist! You are lumping us all together when you say that feminists see a “cruel, women-hating world”. Feminism is a broad church. If you got to know some feminists as individuals, perhaps you’d come to see that we aren’t terrible people. 9. As to my sources… just read any serious economist like Thomas Sowell. You will learn a lot, I know I did. A shame you didn’t learn this from him: "Stepping beyond your competence can be like stepping off a cliff. Too many people with brilliance and talent within some field do not realize how ignorant — or, worse yet, misinformed — they are when talking like philosopher-kings about other things." I’ve enjoyed chatting with you. OVER AND OUT!

Reply

In reply to Sarah Reynolds

Cynan

1. Haha, what a fatuous thing to say. Have I said that I don't want you to be heard? No I haven't, you said that. I agree that it's important to engage. Although the left has an increasing, and extremely worrying, habit of preventing these dicussions happening at all because they shout down anyone with an opinion they might disagree with. To your credit, you haven't done this. Although I still think your idealogy is preventing you from seeing the wood through the trees with regards to most of my points. 2. Again, you completely miss my point and obviously lack critical thought if you cannot see the huge limitations with the way the ONS data is reported. And you conviently missed the most important statement: "But crucially this measure does not take into account equal pay for equal work.” In any case, the quotes you provide, I have tried to address previously (again, I really don't think you are understanding any of my arguments). 3. I will just remind you to look into 2 things: 'Equality of outcome' and 'equality of opportunity'. 4. Iesu mawr! Maybe read Thomas Sowell's 'Basic Economics' too, you will definitely learn something after that statement. 5. Not it does not prove your point, not in the slightest. Hard technical skills are an important distinction. I'm sure truck driving also involves many other skills too. 6. I'm quickly learning that feminists are good at the slight of hand thing, Cathy Newman would be proud. No, I did not ask feminists to do anything. I said: "Maybe feminists should be demanding equal paternity leave for men? Like they have in Scandinavian countries." The context being that it might benefit WOMEN (not men), for reasons I have already stated and you conveniently missed/ignored. 7. I reiterate, to my mind they are issues that require different solutions and so should be considered separately. 8. Well, to be fair, one point (“ignoring the individual and lumping extremely diverse people into their preordained categories”) is literally the modus operandi of the post-modernist, neo-marxist left (thus, not an accusation) and the other point (“I am yet to encounter a feminist who isn’t far left.”) is a personal observation. They are two separate points. 9. Well, you have actually failed to refute the vast majority of my arguments so maybe take time to consider that quote for yourself. Here's my own clip from Thomas Sowell (from 1981) where the gender pay gap argument had already been explained back then: https://youtu.be/v_pQ7KXv0o0 Hwyl am y tro!

Reply

In reply to Sarah Reynolds

JD

Again and again, the gender gap has proven to be a myth as women and men make different life choices, even in the most egalitarian societies such as Norway and Sweden, men will gravitate towards higher paying roles and STEM subjects at school. Women still tend to go for more social roles like teachers and nurses when all options are presented to them from age 4 at school. Having said that, girls get better grades at school than boys, more women go to university than men and earn more than men when they leave. Any notion of gender pay gap arises when a woman decides to have children, but having children is a lifestyle choice and until men can get pregnant, nothing will change as I'm sorry to say, women can't have it all. We now have a generation of women who have been raised on American sitcoms like Friends and Sex and the City who think they can have a perfect career and a rich husband when it doesn't work like that. I know so many women in their thirties who have prioritised becoming an HR manager over starting a family and are shocked to reach 35 and realise that nobody wants them or there's no one left. They sit on their sofas swiping left on their iPhones thinking 'too short, too bald, too poor, too fat' etc. Women cannot blame men for their own life choices. As for the patriarchy, it is nothing but a reductionist, revisionist, retrospective fantasy created by bored women in universities in gender studies classes from the 1960s onwards. It may shock you to know that it wasn't only women who were denied the vote but also men who weren't of a certain class and even then under a certain age. You cannot rewrite history to suit your own views. And when you look at the worst and most dangerous jobs in society, they are all done by men 99% of the time. Sewer workers, refuse collectors, infantry, firemen, security guards, construction. If we want top FTSE people to be 50% women then the 50% figure should stretch all the way down the job ladder. And women who take 5 years out to have children should not be able to walk back into the workplace and start where they left off as that is deeply unfair to men and women who don't want children. As for #MeToo, 1.7 million people is nothing compared to the planet's population of 7 billion, with of the women living with GENUINE patriarchy in Islamic countries, but you feminists are conveniently silent on that one, aren't you?

Reply
Efnisien fab Euroswydd

Right under the title "Alt-right", appears this sentence: "there is a very misogynistic flavour to the anti-establishment, populist movement that has taken hold within Welsh nationalism recently." At whom, I wonder, is this double-blow aimed? It's disgusting, and backed up with absolutely nothing. It's just another attempt to smear, and it won't work. What a hatchet job. This is why, Ifan, both you and this site - the blog that Leanne never had - are fast losing all credibility.

Reply
JD

I agree - this site had so much potential but is now merely a poor translation of Golwg360/Gwynedd/Feminist angst. There hasn't been a decent article since before Christmas and I'm getting bored and readers are switching off.

Reply
Ifan Morgan Jones

It's interesting how the two of you have been posting under every article since October arguing that every article is the worst yet, and that the site is going to the dogs and our readership abandoning us. Given that neither have happened, and in fact the readership is higher than it's ever been, I wonder what the motivation could be? :D

Reply

In reply to Ifan Morgan Jones

Dafis

Ifan keep on producing, you are doing a good job under the circumstances. You and your contributors manage to stimulate a bit of debate although most of the comments indicate that many have deeply embedded opinions and are unlikely to be moved to change. That said, at least you bring out the oddballs and those of us who get quite fixated about the minutae while the big issues of the day are marching past us as though they are invisible and intangible - fine examples of distraction techniques. Wake up you Welsh bellybutton gazers, time is running out ( or at least mine is ! ). Shake off those invisible shackles first and then you can debate at your leisure the kind of society we should evolve here in our country. And remember evolution means that it will keep on changing not stop at your particular point of preference.

Reply

In reply to Ifan Morgan Jones

Efnisien fab Euroswydd

This is what I mean by losing credibility, Ifan. Firstly, you just lie. I've commented on very few articles; I've not argued once that the article I'm commenting on is worse than any previous one; and I've not cliamed the readership is 'abandoning' you. Losing credibility is not the same as losing readership.

Reply

In reply to Efnisien fab Euroswydd

Hedd Gwynfor

Beth am i ti gychwyn gwefan dy hun os ti'n anhapus? Llawer haws cwyno sbo a gwneud DIM!

Reply

In reply to Hedd Gwynfor

Efnisien fab Euroswydd

And how do you know I'm 'doing nothing'? Are you saying, Hedd, that my criticism is without merit? If so, why don't you address that?

Reply

In reply to Efnisien fab Euroswydd

Tellyesin

Are you being paid to do this - contrarian responses designed to imply that only you have a clear map or a Royal Road to perfection? Are you a Russian Spy? and JD? Are you being paid to sit opposite each other in an industrial unit in Deptford, giggling like lunatics and vying to see who can under deliver on the promise of real controversy? Nostrovia Tovarisch

Reply

In reply to Tellyesin

JD

What, so anyone who has a different opinion is a Russian troll? Grow up.

Reply

In reply to Ifan Morgan Jones

Abraham yn Dseina

Ifan, I support you. I think that what you've done with Nation.Cymru has been great, the fact that you have received criticism from both ends of the spectrum with this article suggests that you must be doing a good impartial job. And by the way, Nation.Cymru has been doing a great job for the Welsh national movement, and I feel privileged to have written articles for it. I may even have a new one up my sleave.

Reply
Coch-y-bonddu

Easy to see through your tactics seeking to undermine the value of this site. Keep up the good work Ifan and all the other contributors on here. Independence can't come quick enough as far as I'm concerned and when it does i am 100% certain we will make a success of it.

Reply

In reply to Coch-y-bonddu

Efnisien fab Euroswydd

This is symptomatic of the problem we face. What makes you think this is a 'tactic' of any kind? If you take issue with the point I made, address the point. Thus far, neither you, Hedd, nor Ifan have done so, but have rather tried to discredit me, which, ironically, was what my original point alluded to. So, instead of diverting away from my original point, why not address it? You can't defend the article by implying, as Hedd did, that only praise is allowed, or that I have some grand plan to undermine nation.cymru. Both positions are absurd but, alas, I am not too hopeful that any of you will see that.

Reply
henacynflin

I'd agree with Aled Gwyn Job that we need a proper discussion on this important matter. His original blog seemed reasonable and did not warrant the tirade that it engendered. Even the first of the two articles today have not managed to engage constructively with the issues; Dylan Llyr's piece can be cut down to name calling - if you dare to question our view then you are a misogynist and taking the gateway drug that leads to fascism. This is not helpful. At stake here are important issues of the mistreatment of women and our justice system, The #metoo is suggesting changes to our basic ideas of fairness and two of the foundations of our system of justice. Firstly it challenges the idea of "the presumption of innocence", substituting the presumption of guilt - If we are always to believe the accuser why go through all the inconvenience of a trail ? Secondly it undermines the principle that we all can expect "equal justice under law". To give different attitudes, on account of gender (or any other factor), to those involved in legal disputes means we are not "equal in the eyes of the law". These are not trivial matters but part of the base of a fair, free and civilised society. It is, I fear, because some people appreciate that they are tampering with these principles that they will not brook any debate and would prefer to respond with blustering, brow-beating name calling to try and silence any pesky critics who might try and counsel for caution in these ill thought out campaigns

Reply
Sam

I'm dismayed by the absurd comments on here that #metoo is some sort of plot. Harassment and assault of women are widespread, if you don't think that's true then you simply aren't listening to women. I'd love to see actual women write about this on here and hope they aren't put off by some of these deluded comments.

Reply
Simon

Topics like this can quickly become very polarized and even bitter. If you want to listen what a wide cross section of women discuss the issues raised by #metoo and 21st century feminism I'd suggest listening to this round-table of women discussing Ella Whelan's book What Women Want. There is not unanimous agreement, but these topics are explored in a thoughtful and thought-provoking manner. Here's the Wtwb link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak1zx3sdBCU

Reply
Neil McEvoy

The issue for me is about natural justice, due process and duty of care. We’ve had some concept of natural justice since Roman times but it seems there are too many cases were natural justice is being overridden, and too often by some internet mob. You have third sector organisations who give non-judgmental support only to women. That means these organisation will believe anything you tell them and support you in your accusations. That’s completely inconsistent with natural justice, where if they say someone is guilty of doing something it’s taken as a given. I’m concerned that non-judgmental support is leading to good fathers losing access to their children through malicious complaints, because no such support exists for men. Same goes for Safer Wales, whose Dyn project was recently the subject of a ruling by the Equality and Human Rights Commission. The Dyn project was told to stop discriminating against male victims of domestic violence by screening all male callers to their helpline as potential perpetrators, while not doing that for women callers. The police failing to release essential evidence in rape cases is another serious issue. We need to tackle discrimination, violence and abuse wherever we encounter it. Women have been on the receiving end more but that doesn’t mean we should shout down those who recognise there are areas where men need additional support and that women can be perpetrators too. We should be able to talk about these things without pitting gender against gender, however people define themselves, against each other. If we want real equality we need to recognise that men and women do terrible things to each other and offer support to all victims. We also need to hold power to account wherever we find it. Many of these third sector organisations are very powerful. They receive public money, they’re actively engaged in politics and legislation and so they can’t be beyond scrutiny for fear of any backlash, including being tarred as a misogynist.

Reply
Eos Pengwern

"We should be able to talk about these things without pitting gender against gender, however people define themselves, against each other. If we want real equality we need to recognise that men and women do terrible things to each other and offer support to all victims." Wise words. Unfortunately #MeToo is part of a wider tendency on the Left (I won't call it a plot, but it's certainly a mindset) to slice and dice society down into competing interest groups and then set them against each other. It's a form of 'divide and rule', and all too often it boils down to mere bullying.

Reply
Dafis

"divide and rule" - precisely. The ruling cliques have a good old laff while the little people scramble around chasing shadows.

Reply
Dylan Llyr (@dylanllyr)

We often make fun of those who disparage nationalism (referring to Welsh nationalism) because their lack of self-awareness leaves them blind to their own British nationalism. They think they're above nationalism, but they're not; they just don't recognise their own nationalism because it happens to conform to the status quo. The think they're simply normal, and that we are being odd. The same is true with identity politics. The truth is that all politics is identity politics. It's just that those for whom the status quo works just fine don't recognise their own politics as such. In fact, the biggest identity politics warriors of all are those white guys who keep going on and on about how much they hate identity politics.

Reply
Cynan

Well said, Aled! Absolutely spot on. Some people (e.g. feminists) seem to completely disregard the fact that some women take advantage of said power structures (whether in Hollywood or elsewhere) purely for their own personal gain, e.g. promotion. This happens everywhere in all walks of life and everyone knows it.

Reply
John Young

Correct. The fact is that human beings can be cruel, selfish, spiteful, vindictive, manipulative, violent etc etc. Those people can be women as well as men.

Reply
C.Davies

Oh god nothing worse than virtue signalling feminists or feminazis. Amazing how they hate Ring Brids or Grid Girls but have little to say about women dressing in hijab or burkha. Funny that...

Reply
Gwylon Phillips

Ifan: I applaud the sacrifices you must make to edit this website. `Diolch yn fawr o waelod calon. I am a retired schoolteacher. Throughout my career I regarded all my colleagues as equals and this issue was foreign to me until quite recently. I condemn all those who treat women or men in any disparaging way. It has no place in our society. Men and women are born equal and should remain so.

Reply
T

spot on DylanLlyr.

Reply
Anarchist and Welsh Nash

Dylan Llyr's piece sums up this socialist, right-on and morally superior approach which seems to have infected modern feminism as well. Two cheeks of the same ass in fact. This anarchist wants nothing to do with this type of socialist thought-control. It may amaze some, but I actually find more in common now with some elements of conservative thinking. At least they believe in individuals as free agents, and don't try to moralize and shame people to fit in with a top-down, 'we're always right' way of looking at life. Anarchist, Conservative, Welsh Nash. We live in crazy times......

Reply
Gwilym ab Ioan

Amazing how this 'non subject' attracts so much attention. Aled Gwyn Job's original comments appear to be well thought out, balanced and fair - without being discriminatory to either gender. A bit of balanced common sense (a rare attribute in this upside down and inside out Anglo American world we live in). Sorry to say, to the contrary, Dylan Llŷr's contribution appears to be a regurgitated flavour of the month drivel by a naive person who seems to believe and echo things he hears and reads from the mainstream (false) media. Wakey wakey Dylan, your perception of reality is - I believe - skewed. What you don't seem to realise is that all this is a rouse, and quite a successful 'divide and conquer' tactic to pitch the genders against one another - for reasons better known to those who work hard at controlling us from the shadows. Believe nothing, and question everything you are told by the propagandists is my advice to you. It is a perception deception of the grandest order. Take a leaf from Aled's book and brush up on your common sense.

Reply
Tellyesin

"The essential point I made was that modern feminism seems to have evolved into a narrow ideological way of experiencing and interpreting the world." The essential point you made was that the Mil and mainstream media outlets have described feminism as a narrow, ideological way of interpreting.......Surely that was what you meant. My daughter is a feminist. I am, so are my brothers and uncles and cousins. Mum was but is dead. My grandparents weren't. My aunties are and so are most of my daughters friends and parents. We know we're feminists because when asked the question "Do women get a systematic raw deal in this world and should we all do something about it?" We answer "yes they do, let's attempt a change" Doesn't seem to be going too far "the other way" or indeed even far enough. I see you arguing over which non-existent viewpoint is more important which has as much relevance as arguing over the meaning and relationships of the new stromtrooper designs in Star Wars and what they mean for a social order in a non-existent galaxy far, far away and a long time ago. Grow up

Reply
jonesy

Time to move on bois, i have been asking women of all ages and backgrounds who i meet in the business in west Wales during this week what do you think of #Metoo - - the majority thinks its has gone out of all proportion and many never heard of it, because they've got lives to live as independent women living in the real world . I would say its a fair reflection across ages/class/background . Arguments about transgender and metoo have become comedic fodder , and that's not because we are ignorant hambones, anti feminist, anti trans, anti this that and the other and hate wimmin/men/gays/vegans/godlfish , its just that most people have a modicum of commonsense and fairness... This business is making people into laughing stocks and diminishes people who really suffer. I think i have to give up following social media cos people have lost the plot and i would rather thht everybody was just tidy to eveyrbody else.

Reply

Leave a comment

Comments are reviewed before they appear.